Back to Journals » Advances in Medical Education and Practice » Volume 11

Best Practices in Peer Assessment: Training Tomorrow’s Physicians to Obtain and Provide Quality Feedback [Response to Letter]

Authors Lerchenfeldt S , Taylor TAH 

Received 31 October 2020

Accepted for publication 31 October 2020

Published 12 November 2020 Volume 2020:11 Pages 851—852

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S289790



Sarah Lerchenfeldt, Tracey AH Taylor

Department of Foundational Medical Studies, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA

Correspondence: Tracey AH Taylor
Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, O’Dowd Hall, Room 475, 586 Pioneer Drive, Rochester, MI 48309, USA
Tel +1 248 370 3901
Fax +1 248 370 3630
Email [email protected]

We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the letter from I. Hussain, M. Ameen, and H. Singh entitled “Final year medical students’ perspective on the use of peer assessments in the training of future doctors to obtain and provide quality feedback”. We sincerely thank the authors for their feedback on our article “Best Practices in Peer Assessment: Training Tomorrow’s Physicians to Obtain and Provide Quality Feedback”1. The feedback is especially helpful coming from students in their last year of medical training.

 

View the original paper by Lerchenfeldt and Taylor

 

This is in response to the Letter to the Editor

Dear editor

We appreciate the opportunity to respond to the letter from I. Hussain, M. Ameen, and H. Singh entitled “Final year medical students’ perspective on the use of peer assessments in the training of future doctors to obtain and provide quality feedback”. We sincerely thank the authors for their feedback on our article “Best Practices in Peer Assessment: Training Tomorrow’s Physicians to Obtain and Provide Quality Feedback”1. The feedback is especially helpful coming from students in their last year of medical training.

We agree with the students that many of the suggestions and tips offered in our paper are difficult to implement and require dedication on the part of students, faculty, and medical school administration alike. However, we feel that it is important that students take the time to learn these skills and that this learning should be a part of the regular curriculum, even with the realization that medical curricula are indeed time-constrained. While we acknowledge that it is not easy, our hope is that students who are in a medical school program are professional and will take accountability for their own actions, including their own learning. Peer assessment is an important learning experience, and while faculty can help guide/teach - just like anything, in the end for it to be truly effective and meaningful, it is up to the students to make the most out of their experience and make an honest effort. This includes being honest with their peers since they will all be transferring these important skills to their careers as future medical professionals.

We agree that education and reinforcement of peer feedback in the curriculum should not come at the expense of clinical education, and that student perspectives should indeed be actively sought out during the planning process. Lastly, these are not “one size fits all” suggestions. All medical school curricula are slightly different and offer different advantages to different student educational goals, however the inclusion of peer feedback into the curriculum during various points in a student’s medical education will be beneficial and better prepare students for when they enter their careers in interdisciplinary patient care. We again thank the medical students for their valuable feedback and wish them nothing but the best in their medical professions.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this communication.

Reference

1. Lerchenfeldt S, Taylor TAH. Best practices in peer assessment: training tomorrow’s physicians to obtain and provide quality feedback. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020;11:571–578. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S250761

Creative Commons License © 2020 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.