Sleep problems in internationally adopted children: a pilot study

Dear editor

Approximately 25% of children experience a sleep problem.¹ Medical conditions and social and emotional stress can impact developing sleep patterns. Internationally adopted children could therefore be at risk. Although many adoptive parents report a sleep problem in their children,^2–5 these studies have not focused on sleep specifically or used validated sleep questionnaires. To the best of our knowledge, two studies in adopted children used validated sleep questionnaires. However, the first study only investigated sleep in maltreated children with behavioral difficulties,⁶ and the second study mainly investigated the role of marital distress on the development of sleep disorders in children unrelated to genetic factors.² Therefore, this study aimed to investigate sleep disorders in internationally adopted children.

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Antwerp University Hospital, and all participants provided written informed consent. Parents of adopted children (under 12 years) were approached through several adoption agencies and the “Institute of Tropical Medicine.” All adopted children arrived in Belgium <6 months ago. Parents of the control group were approached through well-child clinics and day care centers. All completed the Pediatric Sleep Questionnaire, Brouillette obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) Score, International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) Questionnaire, Restless Legs Syndrome Questionnaire, Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and a sleep diary for one week.

Twenty seven adopted children (16 boys), average age of 2.9 years, were included in the adoption group (response rate of 23%). Ninety-three children (52 boys) with an average age of 3.3 years made up the nonadoption group. Both groups were comparable for age, gender, parents’ level of education, and family composition. The age of the parents was higher in the adoption group. Overall, adopted children showed a significantly higher prevalence of any disorder of initiating and/or maintaining sleep (DIMS) (67% vs 40%; P=0.01), defined as a sleep latency of more than 30 minutes on average or more than one hour on ≥1 night during the week, restless sleep, and frequent nocturnal awakenings. About 44% of the adopted children were categorized as having possible restless legs syndrome (RLS), defined as having a frequent urge to move the legs, compared to 12% of children in the control group (P<0.001). No significant differences were found for parasomnia, nocturnal enuresis, or snoring.

In logistic regression, adoption was related to DIMS (odds ratio =3.46; P=0.02), controlling for age (odds ratio =0.53; P<0.001) and asthma (P=0.3).

Adoption is a major life-changing event demanding a lot of adjustment and exerting a possible amount of stress. Our study found that adoption was an independent risk factor for DIMS adjusting for possible confounders. Not surprisingly, younger children also had a higher risk of DIMS. Another significant finding was a higher prevalence of “possible RLS.” RLS can be very difficult for parents to evaluate. Lower ferritin levels could be an explanation for this higher prevalence, although this was not assessed in our study. The main limitations of this pilot study are the fact that no information was collected on maltreatment preceding adoption and the low response rate in both groups, possibly leading to a selection bias where parents from a child with a sleep disorder could be more likely to participate. This could also be the case for the control group where a high prevalence of DISM was noted as well. Nevertheless, both groups were comparable, and the higher prevalence of DISM and possible RLS support a future prospective study investigating the influence of adoption on sleep in children.

Author contribution

SV and MW designed the study; ES, NS, MW, and SV collected and analyzed data; ES, NS, and SV wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors contributed toward data analysis, drafting and critically revising the paper and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this communication.

References