Back to Journals » International Journal of Nanomedicine » Volume 21

Nanozyme-Mediated Joint Homeostasis Restoration: Emerging Strategies for Arthritis Therapy

Authors Han S, Wang D ORCID logo, Pak HU ORCID logo, Tsering P, Yin B, Li H

Received 30 March 2026

Accepted for publication 26 June 2026

Published 14 July 2026 Volume 2026:21 612956

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S612956

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Eng San Thian



Shun Han,1,2,* Daqing Wang,1,2,* Hyon-U Pak,1,2 Pema Tsering,3 Baosheng Yin,1 Hongjing Li1

1Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, 116011, People’s Republic of China; 2Division of Biotechnology, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, Liaoning, 116023, People’s Republic of China; 3High Altitude Medical Research Institute, Nagqu City People’s Hospital, Nagqu, Xizang, 852000, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Hongjing Li, Department of Joint Surgery and Sports Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, 116011, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]

Abstract: Severe oxidative stress and inflammatory cascades drive the pathological progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), and gouty arthritis (GA). Conventional pharmacotherapies and natural enzyme interventions are frequently constrained by factors such as systemic toxicity and poor intra-articular bioavailability. In contrast, nanozymes have garnered researcher’s attention by virtue of their superior physicochemical stability, cost-effectiveness, and tunable reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging capacities. They exhibit unique advantages in the field of arthritis therapy, featuring single-atom catalysts, efficient multi-enzyme catalytic activities, and significantly prolonged synovial retention half-lives. To bridge critical gaps in the existing review literature, this review focuses on nanozyme-mediated therapeutics for the three most common types of arthritis, systematically summarizing the latest advancements in this domain. First, the review elucidates the pathomechanisms of RA, OA, and GA to establish a therapeutic rationale. Subsequently, the article traces the evolution of nanozyme engineering designs for specific disease applications. Finally, critical barriers to clinical translation are analyzed, including long-term biosafety, pharmacokinetics, and industrial standardization. This review elucidates the therapeutic functions of nanozymes across distinct pathological microenvironments, establishing a clinical demand-driven classification framework. By mapping material-inherent catalytic properties directly to specific clinical requisites, this article provides actionable insights to bridge the translational gap between fundamental biomaterials research and clinical practice.

Keywords: nanozymes, arthritis, oxidative stress, reactive oxygen species, immunomodulation

Introduction

Rapid advancements in nanomedicine have introduced novel strategies to overcome traditional biomedical limitations.1 Nanozymes—nanomaterials with intrinsic enzyme-like catalytic activity—have emerged as a significant therapeutic focus, integrating nanoscale physicochemical properties with high catalytic efficiency.2,3 Compared to natural enzymes, nanozymes circumvent conformational instability, high production costs, and complex functionalization, offering superior structural stability, industrial scalability, and tunable catalytic activity.4 Crucially, by mimicking antioxidant enzymes like superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT), peroxidase (POD), and glutathione peroxidase (GPx), nanozymes effectively remodel pathological microenvironments via reactive oxygen/nitrogen species (ROS/RNS)5 scavenging and immune homeostasis regulation.6,7 This microenvironmental modulation directly addresses the oxidative stress and inflammatory cascades central to the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), osteoarthritis (OA), and gouty arthritis (GA).8–10 Consequently, the introduction of nanozyme technology into arthritis therapeutics offers new possibilities for advancing therapeutic approaches.11,12

Exacerbated by aging populations and shifting lifestyles, the rising global incidence of RA, OA, and GA constitutes a major public health burden.13,14 Current clinical management primarily relies on pharmacotherapies, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), glucocorticoids (GCs), disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), and targeted biologics such as tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) inhibitors.15,16 These interventions effectively manage symptoms: NSAIDs and GCs rapidly suppress acute inflammation,17 whereas biologics significantly slow disease progression.18 However, current clinical treatments still face significant limitations. Long-term systemic NSAID and GC use induces adverse effects, including gastrointestinal ulcers, cardiovascular risks, and osteoporosis.17 Widespread application of targeted biologics is restricted by high costs, immunogenicity, and secondary infection risks.18 Furthermore, these therapies primarily provide symptomatic relief or single-pathway blockade rather than reversing the damaged joint microenvironment. Similarly, the complexity of the intra-articular environment is one of the major factors contributing to the poor bioavailability and suboptimal targeting efficacy of conventional small-molecule drugs in clinical applications.19,20 To address these challenges, nanozymes offer a compelling alternative, providing multi-target microenvironment remodeling, sustained antioxidant catalysis, and programmable targeted delivery.

However, a profound translational gap separates laboratory nanocatalysis from clinical joint disease modification, whereas existing reviews predominantly adopt a chemistry-oriented classification based on material synthesis methodologies, focusing on aspects such as catalytic mechanisms, activity regulation, and fields of development and application.4,6 In contrast, this review advocates for a return to a function-first paradigm in nanozyme development. We systematically summarize and discuss the various strategies for alleviating the pathological microenvironment of arthritis over the past five years (Scheme 1). By correlating atomic-level active site engineering of nanozymes with the distinct pathophysiological features of RA, OA and GA, we propose a framework with a unique perspective from translational medicine. Following this, We detail nanozyme design strategies, focusing on therapeutic applications and mechanisms for joint microenvironment remodeling. Finally, we assess translational obstacles, with a particular focus on long-term biosafety and in vivo metabolism, and outline future research directions. We hope this review serves as a robust theoretical framework, inspiring innovative approaches for the design of safer, smarter, and more efficient nanomedicines for arthritis management.

An infographic on nanozyme applications for RA, OA and GA, highlighting therapy limitations and future challenges.

Scheme 1 Nanozyme-base strategies for arthritis treatment.

Pathological Characteristics and Conventional Therapy

Core Pathological Mechanisms

Joint inflammation results from multifactorial disruptions to tissue homeostasis, driving progressive degeneration. Despite differing etiologies, RA, OA, and GA share five pathological hallmarks: oxidative stress, cytokine dysregulation, immune cell imbalance, synovial hyperplasia, and cartilage degeneration (Figure 1).

Arthritis: stress, macrophage imbalance, pannus, synovial growth, cytokines, cartilage loss.

Figure 1 Common pathological features of arthritis.

Oxidative Stress and ROS Accumulation

While physiological ROS are essential signaling molecules for cellular homeostasis, the articular microenvironment disrupts this balance via a vicious hypoxia-inflammation cycle. Hypoxia-induced ROS generation and hypoxia-inducible factor 1 subunit α (HIF-1α) upregulation overwhelm endogenous antioxidants (eg, SOD, CAT), precipitating profound oxidative stress.21 Consequently, excessive ROS inflict direct macromolecular oxidative damage and act as second messengers to activate the nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) pathway, driving a pro-inflammatory/pro-oxidative feedback loop.22 Despite varying origins, ROS-mediated pathological consequences converge across arthritis subtypes. In RA, immune cell respiratory bursts and sustained ROS release by fibroblast-like synoviocytes (FLS) synergistically amplify TNF-α expression.23,24 Mechanical overload and aging induce mitochondrial ROS accumulation, activating the HIF-α/Matrix Metalloproteinase(MMP) 13 axis to drive chondrocyte catabolism and joint degradation.25,26 Furthermore, in GA, ROS generated during immune cell phagocytosis of urate crystals serve as the essential trigger for NLRP3 inflammasome activation, fundamentally driving crystal-induced acute joint inflammation.27,28

Uncontrolled Release of Pro-Inflammatory Cytokines

In arthritis, dysregulated pro-inflammatory cytokines orchestrate molecular networks driving progressive joint destruction.29 Elevated synovial expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-17 synergistically promotes immune infiltration, angiogenesis, and extensive matrix degradation, fundamentally destabilizing the articular environment.30,31 Distinct cytokine profiles dictate disease-specific manifestations: RA features a TNF-α and IL-6-dominated “cytokine storm” directly driving pannus formation;32 OA presents as DAMP-induced low-grade chronic inflammation, suppressing cartilage synthesis and sensitizing pain pathways; whereas GA relies on an IL-1β-centric cascade to trigger acute inflammation.33,34 Despite these divergent modalities, all arthritic forms ultimately perpetuate irreversible joint destruction by establishing self-sustaining inflammatory microenvironments that chronically elevate pro-inflammatory signaling and abrogate tissue repair mechanisms.35

Macrophage Polarization Imbalance

Macrophage phenotypic plasticity fundamentally regulates joint inflammation, and the polarization disequilibrium between M1 (pro-inflammatory) and M2 (anti-inflammatory) phenotypes underpins arthritis chronicity and tissue repair failure.36 Driven by the sustained activation of pathways such as Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4)/Myeloid differentiation factor (MyD88)/NF-κB, M1 macrophages release copious pro-inflammatory mediators and propagate bone destruction,37 whereas the reparative functions of the M2 phenotype are concurrently suppressed.38 Targeting these signaling cascades is thus necessary to reverse pathogenic macrophage polarization. While M1-driven inflammation consistently fuels joint pathology, specific manifestations vary: in RA, M1 macrophages primarily drive persistent bone erosion;39 in OA, M1-secreted factors induce osteophyte formation;40 and in GA, “frustrated phagocytosis” of urate crystals forms chronic granulomas (tophi).41 Therefore, targeted macrophage repolarization represents a pivotal strategy for chronic arthritis management.

Synovial Hyperplasia and Pannus Formation

Synovial hyperplasia and invasive pannus formation link articular inflammation to structural destruction. Chronic inflammation confers tumor-like anti-apoptotic and invasive phenotypes upon FLS. Alongside hypoxia-induced neovascularization, these transformed cells form a protease-rich “synovium-vascular” axis that actively degrades cartilage and bone.42,43 While driven by this common axis, disease-specific manifestations vary: RA is characterized by highly invasive pannus; OA presents with synovitis and fibrosis secondary to cartilage loss; and chronic GA features granulomatous synovitis surrounding tophi, causing distinct “punched-out” bone defects.44,45

Chondrocyte Apoptosis and ECM Degradation

Chondrocyte apoptosis and extracellular matrix (ECM) degradation constitute the terminal pathway of irreversible joint dysfunction.26 Driven by the pro-inflammatory microenvironment, significantly upregulated proteases, specifically MMP-1/13 and ADAMTS-4/5, catalyze the irreversible hydrolysis of type II collagen and aggrecan, making their inhibition critical for preserving articular structural integrity.29,46 While distinct pathologies trigger chondrocyte death via unique mechanisms: mitochondrial-mediated senescence and apoptosis in OA;47,48 Fas/FasL death receptor activation in RA;49,50 and MSU crystal-induced, NLRP3/IL-1β-driven MMP release in GA,51 they universally converge on these destructive ECM-degrading programs. Targeting this shared convergence point consequently offers profound broad-spectrum therapeutic potential. Because pro-inflammatory cytokine-driven chondrocyte death and ECM degradation remain the universal drivers of structural damage, specifically inhibiting terminal enzymes like MMP-13 and ADAMTS-5 can effectively arrest progressive joint destruction across arthritic conditions.

Developments and Challenges of Current Therapies

Current clinical paradigms for RA, OA, and GA primarily rely on the stepwise administration of GCs, NSAIDs, DMARDs, and biological agents.52 However, the necessity for high-dose systemic administration to overcome low intra-articular bioavailability inevitably precipitates systemic toxicity while failing to effectively neutralize the localized reactive oxygen species sustaining chronic inflammation. Prolonged glucocorticoid exposure induces metabolic disturbances and accelerates cartilage degradation, whereas NSAIDs carry concurrent gastrointestinal and cardiovascular risks alongside disruptions to chondrocyte metabolism.53,54 The therapeutic efficacy of conventional DMARDs is frequently constrained by hepatotoxicity and gastrointestinal intolerance.55 Despite biologics improving RA outcomes, nearly 40% of patients develop secondary resistance due to anti-drug antibodies, and the clinical utility of convenient oral JAK inhibitors (eg, tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib) remains restricted by elevated risks of thrombosis and malignancy.56,57 Disease-specific challenges further undermine therapeutic efficacy beyond systemic toxicity: standard regimens for refractory RA struggle to address central sensitization and synovial fibrosis;58 OA treatment is relegated to palliative management or joint replacement absent approved disease-modifying agents;59 and gout management is complicated by poor patient adherence to urate-lowering therapies alongside allergic reactions triggered by highly immunogenic drugs.60,61 Collectively, existing standard therapies prove inadequate in dismantling the central hypoxia-ROS-inflammation axis within the articular microenvironment, rendering them incapable of arresting the vicious cycle of joint destruction.

Multidimensional explorations at the research frontier attempt to circumvent these clinical bottlenecks, although such emerging strategies present distinct translational barriers. At the molecular intervention level, small-molecule antioxidants and natural polyphenols, including resveratrol, curcumin and quercetin, function by scavenging free radicals or activating the Nrf2 pathway. Specifically, resveratrol upregulates SOD to suppress NF-κB activation, while quercetin mitigates chondrocyte endoplasmic reticulum stress via the SIRT1/AMPK axis.62 However, poor aqueous solubility, weak chemical stability, and marginal intra-articular bioavailability severely compromise their in vivo therapeutic efficacy relative to in vitro performance.63 Exogenous natural antioxidant enzymes (SOD, CAT, GPx), theoretically represent highly efficient and specific interventions, yet they remain susceptible to rapid lymphatic clearance and proteolytic inactivation driven by the mildly acidic microenvironment and elevated MMP concentrations within the inflamed joint cavity.64 While specific biologics and small-molecule inhibitors achieve precise blockade of inflammatory signaling but frequently elicit resistance through compensatory pathway activation, concurrently increasing the risk of systemic immunosuppression during long-term administration.65 Advanced genetic tools like CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing offers precise transcriptional silencing of pro-inflammatory genes. Nevertheless, off-target effects and Cas9 protein immunogenicity remain primary obstacles to clinical translation.66,67 Within biologics and regenerative medicine, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) and their exosomes exhibit unique advantages in inducing M2 macrophage polarization and promoting cartilage regeneration, yet localized oxidative stress and acidic conditions drastically restrict the survival and functional durability of transplanted cells.68 Similarly, recently highlighted 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) inhibitors, which promote endogenous cartilage regeneration by protecting PGE2, demonstrate encouraging outcomes in animal models. But their human safety profiles, articular targeting efficiency, and impact on systemic immunity require robust clinical validation.69 Beyond joint disorders, nanomaterial platforms have been actively investigated in related musculoskeletal conditions, such as lubricious nanofibers for tendon adhesion prevention and gradient scaffolds for tendon-bone interface regeneration.70,71 Finally, advanced tissue engineering and delivery technologies, including 3D-printed bioscaffolds, long-acting microparticle release systems, and in situ cross-linked hydrogels, prolong intra-articular drug retention and modulate release kinetics, yet these approaches necessitate deeper evaluation regarding their adaptability to individual anatomical variations, the long-term biocompatibility of degradation products, and scalable manufacturing.72

However, despite continuous advances in therapeutic modalities, the multi-layered barrier system arising from the inherent physiological and biomechanical architecture of the intra-articular microenvironment fundamentally limits the efficacy of these interventions.73 Locally administered small molecules and biologics exhibit transient intra-articular half-lives, driven by rapid lymphatic drainage and clearance through the highly vascularized synovium.74 In weight-bearing joints such as the knee, physiological biomechanical loading accelerates this clearance via a hydrodynamic pumping mechanism. Alterations in the non-Newtonian viscosity of synovial fluid exacerbate this therapeutic loss, while the high viscosity of healthy fluid naturally limits drug diffusion, arthritic inflammation triggers the enzymatic degradation of hyaluronic acid.75,76 This depolymerization converts the fluid into a low-viscosity state, dismantling its physical buffering capacity and accelerating convective wash-out. Systemic administration offers little recourse, as the restrictive blood-joint barrier necessitates supra-therapeutic dosing that frequently induces systemic toxicity. Retaining a therapeutic agent within the joint space does not guarantee efficacy, given that the dense, avascular, and negatively charged extracellular matrix of articular cartilage presents significant steric and electrostatic resistance to deep chondrocyte penetration.77 This structural barrier is compounded by a hostile inflammatory microenvironment characterized by severe hypoxia, localized acidosis, and robust reactive oxygen species generation, which rapidly denature unshielded molecules. These limitations are further modified by anatomical scale. Small extremity joints present strict volumetric constraints that trigger acute intra-articular pressure spikes upon injection, whereas the lower temperature of the first metatarsophalangeal joint accelerates monosodium urate crystallization, forming physical obstructions to drug delivery.73

Consequently, overcoming these multifaceted barriers necessitates a shift from conventional unshielded monotherapies toward advanced, microenvironment-responsive delivery systems. Multifunctional nanozymes represent a pivotal innovation. By integrating multi-enzyme catalytic homeostasis restoration with targeted cargo delivery, they effectively circumvent physiological barriers to achieve sustained, disease-modifying outcomes.

Engineering Design of Nanozymes in Arthritis Therapy

Nanozymes: From Inorganic Nanoparticles to Single-Atom Catalysts

The development of nanozymes originated from the seminal discovery of intrinsic peroxidase-like activity in ferromagnetic nanoparticles.78 These materials were later formally defined by Wei and Wang as nanomaterials that strictly adhere to Michaelis-Menten kinetics.79 However, the clinical application of first-generation inorganic nanozymes, such as CeO2, was often limited by catalytic heterogeneity and low atomic utilization (Figure 2a).80 To overcome these constraints, researchers began focusing on structural diversification to enhance both biocompatibility and multifunctionality. Second-generation nanozymes employ diverse structural designs to meet the complex requirements of the articular environment.81 For instance, carbon-based nanomaterials like carbon dots utilize π-conjugated electronic systems to enable integrated photothermal theranostics (Figure 2b).82 Simultaneously, Metal-Organic Frameworks (MOFzymes) provide high porosity to optimize substrate diffusion within viscous synovial fluid (Figure 2c).52 These MOFs function as “molecular cages” that facilitate synergistic drug delivery for arthritis management. Single-Atom Nanozymes (SAzymes) represent the current peak of catalytic efficiency in this field. This superior performance arises from the dispersion of catalytic metal centers to the atomic limit, which achieves nearly 100% atom economy.83 Furthermore, SAzymes are engineered with precise M-Nx coordination environments, such as Fe-N4 centers, to mimic the structures of natural metalloenzymes (Figure 2d–f).84–86 By replicating the geometric and electronic features of heme, these materials offer highly specific catalytic activity. Recent advancements in dual-atom engineering have further optimized the catalytic potential of these platforms. For example, Cu-Mn synergy is used to modulate the d-band center of active sites, which significantly lowers the activation energy for ROS scavenging.87 This evolutionary trajectory reflects a fundamental paradigm shift from discovering catalytic activity to customizing it for specific needs. Recognized by IUPAC as a top emerging technology, these rationally designed atomic sites now provide a robust material foundation for precision arthritis therapy.

An infographic showing the evolution of nanozymes from inorganic nanoparticles to SAzymes.

Figure 2 (a) Top view (left) and side view (right) of the CeO2 structural model. Atomistic-level catalytic mechanisms for the CAT-mimicking reactions of nanoceria. Adapted with permission.80 Copyright 2019, Royal Society of Chemistry (b) Synthesis of Se-CQDs with green fluorescence by the hydrothermal treatment of selenocystine. Adapted with permission.82 Copyright 2017, John Wiley and Sons (c) Typical biosafe MOFs include MIL-100(Fe)-NH2, MIL-101(Fe), ZIF-8(Zn) and UiO-66(Zr). Fe, Zr and Zn polyhedra are in Orange or red, blue, and pink, respectively. Adapted with permission.52 Copyright 2025, John Wiley and Sons (d) CoN4. Adapted with permission.84 Copyright 2018, Elsevier; (e) Structure of different SACs: FeN4.85 Adapted with permission. Copyright 2017, Wiley-VCH; (f) AuN4. Adapted with permission.86 Copyright 2019, Wiley-VCH.

Enzyme-Mimetic Catalytic Mechanisms

Nanozyme therapeutic efficacy arises from recapitulating endogenous antioxidant defenses through precise material engineering.(Figure 3).5 SOD-mimics utilize reversible metal redox cycles, such as Ce3⁺/Ce4⁺ valence switching in ceria nanoparticles, to catalyze the dismutation of superoxide anion radical (O2•−).88 At the atomic scale, electronic modulation determines this efficiency. Specifically, Fe-Cu dual-atom configurations enhance activity by upshifting the d-band center, thereby optimizing O2•− adsorption kinetics. Consequently, these electronic adjustments lower protonation energy barriers and facilitate the efficient removal of reactive species.89

Diagram of nanozyme activities: POD-like, GPx-like, SOD-like, CAT-like and other activities.

Figure 3 Schematic representation of the main enzyme-like activities of nanozymes. Reproduced with permission.5 Copyright 2025, American Chemical Society.

SOD activity constitutes the primary antioxidant defense, yet exclusive reliance on it triggers hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) accumulation. Excess H2O2 risks conversion into cytotoxic •OH via the Fenton reaction.90 Incorporating CAT-like activity is therefore essential for a comprehensive therapeutic strategy.6 Nanozymes like MnO2 or Prussian Blue decompose H2O2 while evolving O2 to alleviate synovial hypoxia. The POD-like activity exerts a synergistic effect by utilizing endogenous reducing substrates present in the microenvironment, such as glutathione (GSH), ascorbic acid, and even thiol groups of certain proteins, to catalyze the decomposition of H2O2 into water and oxidized substrates. This in situ reoxygenation downregulates the HIF-1α pathway and suppresses metabolic inflammation.91 Se-based GPx mimics further mitigate oxidative damage by detoxifying organic peroxides. Surface selenium centers undergo reversible redox cycling between selenol (-SeH) and selenenic acid (-SeOH). Using endogenous GSH as an electron donor, these mimics reduce toxic peroxides to benign alcohols. Consequently, this catalytic process arrests lipid peroxidation and prevents chondrocyte ferroptosis.92

Advanced “cascade defense systems” address multifaceted oxidative stress through two strategic approaches. First, heterostructures or all-in-one atomic frameworks integrate multi-enzyme activities to ensure the instantaneous conversion of intermediates into H2O and O2. Second, metabolic cascades, such as NIR-responsive SAzymes, modulate mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes. This dual strategy scavenges existing ROS while effectively inhibiting de novo generation.93

Design for Joint Environments

Engineering Strategies for Articular Nanozyme Delivery

The superior physicochemical stability of nanozymes provides the fundamental basis for their therapeutic efficacy within the intra-articular cavity. Unlike natural enzymes that are susceptible to proteolytic degradation, nanozymes maintain catalytic integrity even amidst local biochemical stressors.94 To maximize intra‑articular retention, researchers have exploited size‑exclusion effects and bioadhesive interactions to achieve passive targeting. For instance, hydrogel encapsulation serves as a robust depot system that enables sustained release of nanozymes while concurrently imposing physical barriers against lymphatic drainage.95 Similarly, micron‑sized aggregation or microsphere encapsulation leverages the size‑dependent clearance threshold of synovial tissue. Particles exceeding approximately 500 nm exhibit significantly prolonged retention compared to smaller counterparts, owing to reduced lymphatic uptake.96

Beyond passive strategies, active recognition and targeting emerge when nanozyme surfaces are functionalized with ligands designed to specifically bind overexpressed receptors or characteristic components within the inflamed joint. Hyaluronic acid modification confers CD44-targeting capabilities to nanozymes, facilitating preferential accumulation in activated synovial fibroblasts and macrophages.97,98 Folic acid functionalization exploits the elevated expression of folate receptor β (FRβ) on activated macrophages in RA and OA.99,100 RGD peptide modifications directly target the upregulated integrin αvβ3 on angiogenic endothelium and synovial fibroblasts.101 Meanwhile, advances in cell membrane coating technology endow nanozymes with both active targeting capability and innate immune evasion as well as proteolytic protection. PEGylation and biomimetic coatings (eg, macrophage or platelet membranes) construct a protective barrier around the catalytic core, thereby maximizing circulation persistence and intra-articular retention.35,102–104

The dense synovial lining and the avascular, negatively charged cartilaginous matrix present formidable biological barriers to deep nanozyme penetration. To address these challenges, researchers have explored size‑reduction strategies (eg, sub‑50 nm nanozymes) to facilitate traversal through synovial fenestrations,105,106 while employing cationic surface modifications to enhance electrostatic binding to the negatively charged cartilage extracellular matrix.107 In addition, conjugating cartilage-targeting peptides like WYRGRL to the nanozyme surface endows these therapeutics with a specific affinity for structural cartilage components.108 This targeted approach enables enhanced accumulation within avascular cartilaginous zones that remain difficult to access via conventional drug delivery modalities.

Intelligent Stimulus-Responsive Design

The acidic nature of the arthritic microenvironment is characterized by synovial pH values of approximately 6.5 and intralysosomal pH below 5.2.109 Utilizing this acidic gradient, pH-sensitive nanozymes can be constructed to achieve site-specific drug release and catalytic activity activation at the lesion site, enabling precise remodeling of the articular microenvironment. A representative example is the Ce‑MOF@CaCO3 (Ce‑Ca) platform, which orchestrates a pH-responsive cascade: the CaCO3 shell dissolves at pH 5.5, simultaneously neutralizing local acidity and releasing Ca2⁺ ions to promote subchondral bone repair; subsequently, the exposed Ce‑MOF core exerts SOD/CAT-mimetic activities, eliminates extracellular ATP to inhibit M1 macrophage pyroptosis, and generates adenosine to drive M2 repolarization.110 Complementing this design, the Se/LDH@PEG‑M system exploits joint acidosis to trigger degradation and release Mg2⁺, Se, and Mito-TEMPO, thereby restoring mitochondrial respiratory activity and correcting glycolytic reprogramming through GPx-mimetic catalysis.111 Taking multi-stage response kinetics a step further, the PCM@MnO2 system employs pH-dependent dissociation of its polydopamine (PDA) shell at pH 6.5 to enable targeted cellular binding, whereas subsequent lysosomal core degradation at pH 5.2 triggers both methotrexate burst release and MnO2-catalyzed in situ oxygenation, collectively reversing the pro-inflammatory macrophage phenotype (Figure 4).109

PCM@MnO2 nanoparticles: pH-driven methotrexate release and macrophage shifts in arthritis treatment.

Figure 4 Schematic Diagram of the pH-Responsive PCM@MnO2 System. (A): Application of PCM@MnO2 NPs in RA treatment and related mechanisms. Under RA acidic conditions, PDA was degraded from PCM@MnO2 NPs to scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS). CM@MnO2 NPs were internalized by macrophages through interaction between CS and CD44. Under intracellular conditions of low pH, CM@MnO2 NPs disintegrated to release MnO2 and MTX, which could produce O2 and inhibit inflammatory factors, respectively. PCM@MnO2 NPs effectively treated RA by improving the oxidative stress microenvironment. (B): In vitro release of MTX from PCM@MnO2 NPs at different pHs. (C): PCM@MnO2 NPs induced M1-to-M2 polarization (iNOS (yellow)↓; CD206 (red)↑).109 Copyright 2025, Springer Nature.

Beyond pH responsiveness, pathologically elevated ROS levels serve as equally sensitive switches for on-demand drug release.112 The thioacetal-linked CP‑GA‑PKP nanosystem undergoes ROS-specific cleavage, shedding its polyethylene glycol (PEG) shield to expose an adhesive PDA core for enhanced intra-articular retention. Concurrently, the released gallic acid synergizes with the exposed Ce-MOF-Pt dual catalytic centers to execute SOD- and CAT-like activities, effectively scavenging superoxide radicals and hydrogen peroxide.113 In acute GA, macrophage membrane-coated HMPB‑Pt@MM nanozymes achieve homologous targeting to inflamed joints, scavenging ROS/•OH and mimicking urate oxidase to convert insoluble uric acid into allantoin, thereby eliminating crystals and alleviating hypoxia.114

Hypoxia represents a critical pathological hallmark of both RA and OA.115 Synovial hyperplasia, coupled with inflammatory cell infiltration, drives a precipitous decline in intra-articular oxygen tension (to as low as 2–4%), which in turn stabilizes HIF‑1α and upregulates VEGF, thereby promoting pannus formation and cartilage erosion.116 The Au@CeO2 Nano heterojunction leverages the Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance (LSPR) effect of its gold core under NIR irradiation to generate local hyperthermia, accelerating CAT-mimetic O2 evolution from its ceria shell and suppressing HIF‑1α/VEGF.117 Similarly, Macrophage microvesicle-modified amorphous MnO2 (MMV‑MnO2@DSP) targets deep inflammatory cartilage and synoviocytes, converting H2O2 to dissolved O2 to reverse glycolytic reprogramming and modulate subchondral bone.109

Beyond pH and ROS, overexpressed MMPs serve as specific enzymatic switches: TGMS-modified lipid nanomicelles enable instantaneous drug burst release exclusively during high-MMP disease flares while remaining stable during remission to prevent systemic leakage.118,119 Consequently, Intelligent, stimuli-responsive designs further enhance the precision of nanozyme therapy, which is particularly advantageous for reducing systemic side effects and improving in vivo biosafety.

Nonetheless, current research on smart responsive nanozymes for arthritis remains constrained by significant limitations. Contemporary designs indiscriminately apply “ROS scavenging” strategy. Physiological ROS, serving as essential second messengers for intracellular signaling and redox homeostasis, cannot be exhaustively depleted without risking microenvironmental disruption. Nevertheless, systematic quantification of in vivo catalytic thresholds remains largely absent. Furthermore, the M1/M2 macrophage repolarization observed in cell cultures or rodent models may prove overly reductionist when extrapolated to the highly heterogeneous and temporally dynamic human arthritic joint. These models inadequately address the multidimensionality of the synovial immune microenvironment, the continuum of macrophage activation states, and the complex pathological feedback circuits that sustain chronic inflammation.

Applications of Nanozymes in Arthritis Therapy

Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

The RA microenvironment is characterized by a self-sustaining cascade of persistent inflammatory infiltration, hypoxia, and excessive reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation that drives bone and cartilage destruction.120 Traditional anti-rheumatic therapies have proven effective in clinical practice, yet they rarely disrupt this vicious feedback loop. Nanozymes, with their superior stability and responsive multi-enzyme mimetic activities, enables targeted microenvironmental remodeling and precision joint theranostics. In the context of RA, they primarily serve as immunomodulators and hypoxia relievers, counteracting autoimmune-driven synovial hyperplasia and T-cell dysregulation through ROS scavenging, HIF-1α suppression, and NETs degradation. This section systematically reviews recent advances in nanozyme-mediated RA therapy across four dimensions: redox homeostasis restoration, immunomodulation, tissue repair, and multifunctional synergistic treatment (Table 1).

Table 1 Nanozyme Therapy for Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)

Remodeling the Oxidative Microenvironment

Targeting the core pathological hallmarks of rheumatoid arthritis, the design strategy for nanozymes has evolved into a synergistic system that integrates both ROS scavenging and in situ oxygen generation. By mimicking the catalytic cascade reactions of natural antioxidant enzymes, these nanozymes achieve systematic depletion of excessive ROS, thereby effectively suppressing the cascade activation of key inflammatory signaling pathways—such as NF-κB, MAPK, NLRP3/caspase-1, cGAS-STING, and JAK/STAT—and ultimately reshaping the homeostasis of the articular immune microenvironment. Specifically, Kim et al developed MFC-MSNs utilizing manganese ferrite to decompose H2O2 via the Fenton reaction within H2O2-rich environments, generating O2 to alleviate tissue hypoxia while incorporating ceria to scavenge hydroxyl radicals (•OH), thereby achieving synergistic ROS elimination and oxygenation (Figure 5).121 This strategy was subsequently extended to hydrogel scaffolds like MnCoO and MXene to effectively alleviate hypoxia.125,144 These materials significantly enhance the survival and differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). Furthermore, integrating Mn3O4 with polydopamine (PDA) or thermosensitive liposomes enables a synergy of photothermal therapy (PTT), chemotherapy, and ROS scavenging.143 Consequently, these multi-modal platforms provide comprehensive microenvironmental regulation.22,145

Scientific schematic and graphs depict MFC-MSNs mechanism in rheumatoid arthritis therapy.

Figure 5 (A): Therapeutic mechanisms of MFC-MSNs in RA treatment. MFC-MSNs synergistically scavenge ROS and generate O2; Promotes macrophage repolarization; Capable of loading methotrexate. (B): Synergistic ROS scavenging and O2 generation by MFC-MSNs compared with MFMSNs and C-MSNs. (i) H2O2 degradation curves in the presence of MF-MSNs, C-MSNs, and MFC-MSNs at pH 7.4 (n = 3). Estimated H2O2 degradation of MFC-MSNs was obtained by adding the degraded H2O2 concentrations of MF-MSNs and C-MSNs. (ii) O2 generation curves in 1 M H2O2 solution in the presence of NPs under physiological conditions (n = 3). (iii) SOD activity of MF-MSNs, C-MSNs, and MFC-MSNs (n = 3). (iv) Time-dependent hydroxyl radical generation of MF-MSNs, C-MSNs, and MFC-MSNs in the presence of H2O2 (n = 3). Reproduced with permission.121 Copyright 2026, ACS Nano.

Cerium-based nanozymes serve as classical antioxidants, exhibiting dual SOD- and CAT-like activities via the Ce3⁺/Ce4⁺ redox couple. For example, Zhou et al98 integrated cerium oxide with ROS-responsive micelles to facilitate gated drug release and inhibit inflammatory signaling, specifically by suppressing IκB degradation and p65 nuclear translocation, thereby blocking the NF-κB pathway. To accommodate the specific intestinal environment, Wang et al139 modulated the valence state of Au/CeOX via gold deposition to design a nanozyme with an “OXD-SOD-POD” cascade that selectively suppresses CAT activity, thereby scavenging ROS while avoiding oxygen generation to preserve anaerobic intestinal conditions.

Beyond cerium, noble metal nanozymes offer superior broad-spectrum antioxidant performance. For instance, PtTe heterostructures (HPT)97 and CeO2-Pt Janus nanoplatforms129 utilize high-density Pt active sites for enhanced ROS scavenging. Furthermore, integrating multiple noble metal, such as the PtPdCo trimetallic nanozyme developed by Zhang et al, can simultaneously achieve SOD, CAT, POD, and AAO activities, thus significantly broadening the catalytic spectrum.142

To maximize this catalytic efficiency, recent studies have transitioned toward single-atom catalysis. Incorporating atomically dispersed active sites, such as in copper single-atom-loaded graphene quantum dots or Pd single-atom-modified selenium nanomotors, significantly lowers reaction energy barriers and accelerates electron transfer.131,133 Consequently, single-atom engineering provides a robust strategy for drastically improving nanozyme performance.

Similarly, iron-based materials like ferrihydrite nanoparticles have been optimized for targeted ROS conversion.106 While traditional iron nanozymes rely on basic nanocatalytic mechanisms, recent advancements focus on elevating biosafety alongside efficiency. By mimicking natural protein folding, Yang et al designed a biomimetic peptide single-chain artificial enzyme. Ultimately, this structural innovation achieves high SOD/POD-like activity while maintaining extremely low iron loading (<5%).140

Remodeling the Immune Microenvironment

Restoring synovial immune homeostasis, primarily by repolarizing macrophages from the pro-inflammatory M1 to the anti-inflammatory M2 phenotype, is a central therapeutic objective in RA management. Nanozymes facilitate this phenotypic reprogramming through ROS scavenging, metabolic modulation, and synergistic pharmacological interactions. By mitigating oxidative stress and hypoxia, nanozymes effectively inhibit pro-inflammatory signaling pathways—including NF-κB, MAPK, and JAK-STAT—thereby fostering M2 polarization.103,121,126,127,142

To advance this immune reprogramming, researchers have developed multifunctional nanoplatforms that target both innate and adaptive immunity. For example, the ceria-mesenchymal stem cell nanovesicle hybrid system (Ce-MSCNVs) engineered by Koo et al promoted M2 polarization and induced regulatory T cell (Treg) differentiation to restore immune equilibrium.128 Similarly, ROS-responsive micelles developed by Zhou et al98 synergistically suppressed TLR4 signaling by co-delivering rhein and cerium ions, which concurrently inhibited p65 phosphorylation and IκBα degradation to block NF-κB activation, downregulate IL-1β and TNF-α transcription, and subsequently suppress JAK2/STAT1 phosphorylation. To ensure long-term efficacy, Zhang et al142 incorporated chloroquine into their system to inhibit ferroptosis in M2 macrophages during transition, effectively preserving the stability of the anti-inflammatory phenotype.

Beyond phenotypic modulation, directly scavenging or sequestering pathogenic factors within the microenvironment serves as a crucial complementary strategy. For instance, Jin et al134 designed a biomimetic nanogel integrating ceria nanozymes with DNase I to simultaneously scavenge ROS and degrade Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs). Moreover, macrophage membrane-coated nanoparticles have proven highly effective as broad-spectrum “decoys” to neutralize pro-inflammatory cytokines and mediators.103,104 To further guide these interventions, Niu et al137 developed electrochemical sensors for the high-sensitivity detection of autoantibodies (eg, Anti-MCV), enabling crucial early-stage therapeutic timing. Ultimately, coupling early immune detection with targeted environmental neutralization comprehensively arrests the inflammatory cascade.

Tissue Repair and Regeneration

To address the irreversible osteochondral destruction in RA, nanozyme applications have expanded into regenerative tissue engineering. Functionalized hydrogel scaffolds, for example, are now engineered to recapitulate specific articular anatomies. Hu et al developed a LiMn2O4 nanozyme-loaded bilayer hydrogel that biomimetically simulates the cartilage and subchondral layers, thereby promoting the synergistic regeneration of both tissues.146 Integrating functional mitochondria with Prussian blue nanozymes within a DNA hydrogel facilitates efficient tissue repair by restoring cellular energy metabolism.138 Furthermore, a copper single-atom nanozyme hydrogel combines anti-inflammatory effects with a specialized lubricating network. This design effectively mitigates friction-induced mechanical damage and ensures robust long-term adhesion (Figure 6).133

A diagram showing synthesis and application of DAGQD@Cu@KGN SAN hydrogel for RA therapy in three parts.

Figure 6 (A) Synthesis of DAGQD@Cu SAN and DAGQD@Cu@KGN SAN. (B) Synthesis of DAGQD@Cu@KGN-SO3−/DA-HA hydrogel. (C) DAGQD@Cu@KGN-SO3−/DA-HA hydrogel for RA therapy. (I) Hydrogel self-cures in situ within the joint cavity; (II, III) DAGQD@Cu@KGN-SO3−/DA-HA hydrogel displays lubrication and adhesion properties; (IV) Regulation of inflammatory microenvironment facilitated by SAN with remarkable ROS-scavenging capabilities; (V) KGN released from the hydrogel promotes the recruitment of BMSCs and induces their differentiation into chondrocytes, facilitating the repair of cartilage damaged by RA. Reproduced with permission.133 Copyright 2025, Springer Nature.

Parallel to hydrogel development, advances in implant surface engineering and cell-based therapies have further enhanced osteochondral regeneration. For instance, applying a MnFe2O4 coating to titanium substrates successfully induces immunomodulatory osseointegration.130 This process is driven by the reprogramming of macrophage mitochondrial metabolism from glycolysis to oxidative phosphorylation. Additionally, augmenting mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) with nanozymes provides crucial antioxidant protection.124 This intracellular modification enhances MSC survival, fosters M2 polarization, and accelerates subsequent cartilage repair. Beyond localized joint interventions, current research also explores systemic modulation via the “microbiota-gut-joint axis.” Adopting this macroscopic perspective, researchers have developed orally administered, valence-tunable Au/CeO2 nanozymes.139 These unique agents scavenge intestinal ROS while actively suppressing oxygen generation to preserve strict anaerobic homeostasis. By subsequently modulating short-chain fatty acid metabolism, this mechanism achieves remote, systemic therapeutic efficacy against RA.

Multi-Functional Platform

Nanozymes are increasingly serving as pivotal hubs for integrating physical modalities, pharmacotherapy, and diagnostic imaging. In physical field-assisted therapies, for example, coupling PTT with nanozymes effectively mitigates heat-induced oxidative stress. Materials such as Pt-Te, Pd, carbon-based nanostructures, and Mn3O4 leverage their photothermal conversion capabilities to generate localized hyperthermia under near-infrared (NIR) irradiation. This process thermally ablates inflammatory macrophages while synergistically accelerating enzymatic ROS scavenging.22,97,103,143 Similarly, combining sonodynamic therapy (SDT) with sonosensitizer-conjugated rhodium nanozymes couples ultrasound-triggered ROS generation with self-oxygenation, utilizing human serum albumin for active targeting.122 Therefore, integrating external physical stimuli with intrinsic nanozyme catalysis achieves mutually reinforcing therapeutic outcomes.

To complement these physical therapies, nanozymes also facilitate the seamless convergence of chemotherapy and catalytic therapy. This versatility is largely due to their intrinsic porous or hollow architectures, which render them superior drug delivery vehicles. Therapeutic agents, such as methotrexate,22,121,143 dexamethasone,127 rapamycin136 and iguratimod,103,141 are frequently encapsulated and released via engineered pH- or ROS-responsive mechanisms. Beyond traditional small molecules, these carriers also enable combined gene-chemotherapy; for instance, complexing HIF-1α siRNA with calcium phosphate transcriptionally blocks hypoxia signaling.123 Nanozymes provide highly adaptable platforms for precise, stimulus-triggered multimodal treatments.

Beyond therapeutic delivery, integrating diagnostic and imaging capabilities enables the real-time monitoring of treatment efficacy. Theranostic nanozyme platforms routinely incorporate advanced techniques such as NIR-II fluorescence,129 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),105 and photoacoustic imaging.121 Moreover, nanozyme-based sensors allow for the ultrasensitive detection of RA biomarkers like anti-MCV137 and therapeutics such as D-penicillamine132 aiding in both early diagnosis and therapeutic monitoring.

Osteoarthritis (OA)

The pathophysiology of OA is multifaceted. It is characterized by an intricate interplay of oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, chondrocyte metabolic dysregulation, and ECM degradation. While natural antioxidant enzymes (eg, SOD, CAT) offer theoretical regulatory potential, their clinical utility is frequently compromised by inherent instability within the harsh pathological microenvironment. Conversely, nanozymes possess stability and tunable multi-enzyme mimetic capabilities, encompassing SOD-, CAT-, and GPx-like activities. For OA, these properties frame nanozymes as chondroprotective agents that focus on mitochondrial quality control, Nrf2 activation, and cartilage matrix preservation to counteract the degenerative and senescence-associated pathology. Therefore, nanozymes have transcended the role of passive ROS. They have evolved into active disease-modifying agents capable of precisely remodeling organelle function and the immune microenvironment (Table 2).

Table 2 Nanozyme Therapy for Osteoarthritis (OA)

Redox Homeostasis Remodeling

Excessive ROS accumulation drives chondrocyte senescence, apoptosis, and ECM degradation in OA. Consequently, engineering nanozymes that mimic natural antioxidants constitutes a primary therapeutic strategy. Metal oxide nanozymes, such as Mn3O4, exhibit robust, broad-spectrum catalytic properties, specifically dual SOD- and CAT-like activities, that significantly attenuate intracellular ROS. Thus, these metal-based systems effectively preserve cartilage integrity.152,156,172 To mitigate the inherent cytotoxicity of bare metal oxides, surface coatings have been employed to minimize cytotoxicity while retaining high catalytic efficiency, such as PDA coating on Cr2O3 and Mn3O4.171,172 Structural design serves as a crucial strategy to further amplify the catalytic efficiency of nanozymes. Defect-rich hollow RuO2 nanospheres (d-RuO2) leverage their amorphous and hollow architecture to maximize active site exposure, surpassing crystalline equivalents.174 Beyond macroscopic architectures, engineering at the atomic level provides additional enhancements. Specifically, synergistic dual-atom Fe-Fe sites directly amplify ROS clearance capacity (Figure 7).179 Similarly, cobalt single-atom-doped platinum nanozymes (Pt/Co-SA-NSG) exhibit augmented SOD/CAT-mimetic activities.154

Fe-NCs synthesis and ROS scavenging in OA: enzymatic cascades and cellular impacts illustrated.

Figure 7 (A): Schematic synthesis and mechanism illustration of Fe2-NCs, which perform as SOD, CAT, and GSH-Px to sequentially scavenge ROS and GSH for mitigating OA. (B): Bioinspired catalytic defense mechanism: Nanozyme-mediated sequential ROS scavenging mimicking SOD, CAT, OXD, and GPx enzymatic cascades. Reproduced with permission.179 Copyright 2025, Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Due to their structural tunability, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as prominent scaffolds for antioxidant nanozymes. Copper-based MOFs, for example, have been engineered as safe nanozymes offering comprehensive antioxidant protection (SOD/CAT/•OH scavenging) devoid of pro-oxidant side effects.165 Prussian blue (PB) analogues constitute another major class, with both ultrasmall (3.5 nm) PB nanozymes161 and hollow manganese-PB variants149 exhibiting exceptional ROS scavenging and hypoxia-mitigating capabilities. Furthermore, integrating PB into self-hydrogen-releasing platforms achieves synergistic oxidative stress alleviation via concurrent H2 therapy and enzymatic catalysis.176 To further enhance biocompatibility and targeting specificity, diverse surface modification strategies have been adopted. For instance, lubricin-inspired PAF nanozymes (PAMPS-grafted amino-fullerene)158 and Pluronic F127-coated Prussian blue150 have successfully improved material stability and cellular uptake. Moreover, stimuli-responsive systems have also been developed, such as a ceria-based “mitochondria inspector” that enables the on-demand, ROS-triggered release of SOD/CAT-mimetic CeNPs for precise oxidative stress intervention.167

Immune Microenvironment Remodeling

OA is increasingly recognized not merely as a degenerative wear disorder but as a complex inflammatory pathology. Within this context, nanozymes remodel the joint immune microenvironment primarily by directing macrophage polarization, shifting the phenotype from pro-inflammatory M1 to anti-inflammatory M2 states. Extensive evidence corroborates that nanozymes modulate this plasticity via ROS scavenging, which subsequently suppresses key inflammatory cascades including NF-κB, MAPK, and JNK. For example, ultrasmall Prussian blue nanozymes,161 hollow Prussian blue analogs,149 and PdZn/CoSA-NC nanozymes164 effectively induce this transition, decreasing pro-inflammatory markers (eg, iNOS, TNF-α) while elevating anti-inflammatory mediators (eg, Arg-1, IL-10). Mechanistically, PdZn/CoSA-NC nanozymes also inhibit M1 activation through purine metabolism modulation.164

Integrating nanozymes with bioactive molecules establishes a dual-action paradigm that couples antioxidative capacity with targeted immunomodulation. For instance, CeO2 nanozyme-mediated self-assembly of rhein hydrogels synergistically suppresses the IL-6/JAK2/STAT1 axis.170 Similarly, Xu et al177 developed a Zinc–Loureirin B (Zn-LB) coordination nanozyme enhanced both drug bioavailability and immunomodulatory efficacy. Additionally, Yang et al178 engineered a biomimetic nanoplatform incorporating anti-inflammatory peptide (KAFAK) and macrophage-synoviocyte hybrid membrane coating, achieving dual-targeted therapy against synovitis and cartilage degradation.

At the molecular level, rationally designed nanozymes exert anti-inflammatory efficacy by intercepting specific signaling cascades. Key examples include the targeted blockade of JNK phosphorylation and NF-κB signaling,150 alongside the dual inhibition of the ROS-NF-κB and MAPK pathways.157 Additionally, hollow Prussian blue nanozymes mitigate inflammation and apoptosis via Rac1/NF-κB axis suppression.147 Ultimately, these precise molecular interventions profoundly ameliorate the osteoarthritic inflammatory microenvironment.

From Mitochondrial Repair to Tissue Repair

Recent advances in OA pathophysiology highlight subcellular targeting as the next frontier in nanozyme therapeutics. Because mitochondrial dysfunction initiates chondrocyte senescence and apoptosis, conjugating targeting moieties, such as triphenylphosphine (TPP), enables precise organelle localization. For example, Mn3O4/UIO-TPP nanozymes effectively scavenge mitochondrial ROS. This targeted intervention restores membrane potential and preserves mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) integrity.156 Intervening in pathological mitochondrial cascades represents a vital homeostatic strategy. To combat respiratory chain impairment, the HTM-N@Gel NAD+/O2 co-delivery system restores mitochondrial bioenergetics by synchronously replenishing electron donors and acceptors (Figure 8).175 Furthermore, active intervention in pathological mitochondrial pathways represents an emerging trend. Notably, the “Mitocelle” Prussian blue nanozyme developed by Lim et al173 mitigates ROS generation at its source by competitively inhibiting the NOX4-p22phox interaction.

Three-part OA schematic: nanozyme synthesis, HA hydrogel microcarriers, intra-articular mechanism.

Figure 8 Design of the cartilage-mitochondria cascade-targeting composite hydrogel and its therapeutic mechanism for OA. (a) Synthesis of mitochondrialtargeting functionalized MnO2-based nanozymes. (b) Fabrication of cartilage-targeting interpenetrating network hydrogel microcarriers. (c) Minimally invasive intra-articular injection of the composite hydrogel, where the positively charged hydrogel surface facilitates cartilage adhesion, followed by the in situ release of mitochondrial-targeting functionalized MnO2-based nanozymes. This process mitigates oxidative stress-induced chondrocyte senescence, thereby inhibiting OA progression. Reproduced with permission.175 Copyright 2025, Elsevier.

The elimination of dysfunctional mitochondria via mitophagy is critical for maintaining chondrocyte homeostasis. Microsphere system assembling ceria nanozymes with metformin has been shown to activate autophagy for this purpose.167 Similarly, NIR-triggered MOF nanozymes153 and hydrogen-releasing nanozymes176 have demonstrated efficacy in preserving mitochondrial function, promoting mitophagy, and retarding chondrocyte senescence. Beyond senescence mitigation, nanozymes are employed to inhibit other cell death modalities. For example, a platinum nanozyme-loaded silk fibroin/oxidized pullulan hydrogel (Pt@SF/oxPL) effectively suppressed chondrocyte ferroptosis by scavenging ROS and lipid peroxides.159 Additionally, a biomimetic membrane-camouflaged nanozyme (CM@HPBPT) was found to attenuate inflammation-induced chondrocyte injury by intercepting the cGAS-STING pathway mediated by cytosolic mtDNA leakage.168

Multifunctional Synergistic Therapy

To overcome the intrinsic limitations of monotherapies, researchers have developed synergistic platforms integrating nanozymes with modalities like PTT, gene interference, and drug delivery, which markedly amplifies targeted therapeutic outcomes. NIR-responsive nanozymes facilitate the synergistic coupling of PTT with enzymatic catalysis. For instance, a NIR-triggered, tea polyphenol (TP)- modified metal-organic framework (TP-Au@PCN) facilitates concurrent photocatalytic ROS scavenging and photothermally controlled drug release.153 Similarly, Pt/Co single-atom nanozymes exhibit augmented enzymatic activity and photothermal conversion under NIR-II irradiation.154 Additionally, zwitterionic nanozymes mimicking both antioxidant enzymes and hyaluronan synthase (HAS) utilize mild photothermal stimulation to upregulate heat shock protein 70 (HSP70), thereby fostering cartilage regeneration.155

Nanozymes frequently function as versatile vehicles for therapeutic cargo. Combining MOF-encapsulated iridium oxide (IrO2) nanozymes with antisense oligonucleotides (ASO) enables simultaneous ROS scavenging and miR-181a silencing to actively modulate chondrocyte metabolism.163 Parallelly, Kartogenin-loaded nanozymes utilize precise pH-responsive release kinetics to drive the chondrogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.160 Moreover, hydrogel systems incorporating platelet-rich plasma (PRP) leverage the synergy between PRP-derived growth factors and the antioxidative capacity of selenium nanozymes to achieve comprehensive “inside-out” and “outside-in” tissue repair.70,148,169

Achieving prolonged intra-articular retention and on-demand drug release necessitates the development of intelligent hydrogel matrices. These materials are characterized by injectability, self-healing properties, and environmental responsiveness such as pH, ROS, or temperature. Prominent examples include Schiff base-crosslinked hyaluronic acid hydrogels,162,166 silk fibroin/oxidized pullulan scaffolds,159 and mitochondria-targeting NAD+/O2 co-delivery interpenetrating networks.175 Furthermore, pH- and ROS-responsive hydrogels developed by Zhou et al148 and Wang et al162 respectively, have demonstrated significantly enhanced therapeutic efficacy and sustained retention.

In summary, nanozymes significantly ameliorate OA pathology through multifaceted mechanisms, encompassing ROS scavenging, immune polarization modulation, inflammatory pathway suppression, and the promotion of cartilage matrix synthesis. Preclinical studies consistently evidence improvements in histology, cytokine profiles, and locomotor function, alongside favorable biocompatibility and safety profiles. Looking forward, the integration of organ-on-a-chip models with rigorous clinical translational research positions nanozymes as a promising avenue for developing DMOADs.

Gouty Arthritis (GA)

GA pathogenesis fundamentally originates from MSU crystal deposition and the consequent sterile inflammation. While biological urate oxidase exhibits potent uricolytic activity, its clinical translation is significantly impeded by intrinsic immunogenicity and the oxidative injury provoked by its catalytic byproduct, hydrogen peroxide (H2O2).5 The advent of nanozymes represents a paradigm shift addressing these challenges. For GA, nanozymes are positioned as rapid ROS scavengers and purine metabolic regulators, with particular emphasis on NLRP3 inflammasome inhibition and uric acid metabolism modulation to terminate the MSU crystal-triggered acute inflammatory burst. Current design philosophies have transcended simple mono-enzyme mimicry, evolving into intelligent theranostic systems that orchestrate “self-cascading” catalysis, atomic-level active site engineering, and immune microenvironment reprogramming (Table 3).

Table 3 Nanozyme Therapy for Gouty Arthritis(GA)

Re-Establishing Redox Homeostasis

To circumvent the “ROS dilemma”, in which natural uricase generates hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and thereby exacerbating inflammation, researchers have increasingly focused on designing bi- or multi-functional nanozymes. These integrated platforms possess intrinsic urate oxidase (UOX) alongside CAT/SOD activities, enabling simultaneous uric acid clearance and ROS elimination. For example, optimizing a Pt/CeO2 nanozyme at a 1:5 molar ratio utilizes Pt for UOX mimicry while leveraging CeO2 oxygen vacancies for potent CAT activity. Consequently, this synergistic design achieves the instantaneous scavenging of degradation-induced H2O2.181

Furthermore, catalytic efficiency can be amplified through precise nanostructural and morphological engineering. Xi et al synthesized ultrathin PdPt3 and PdIr3 cubic hollow nanocages (HNCs). This distinct topology maximizes active site exposure and optimizes electronic structures via alloying, thereby driving an efficient ROS scavenging cycle (Figure 9).188 Additionally, Ye et al elucidated the size-dependence of catalytic activity, identifying that 46 nm two-dimensional Pd@Ir nanosheets exhibit the lowest activation energy for uric acid degradation (35.9 kJ/mol). Crucially, these nanosheets facilitate O2 regeneration via a self-cascading reaction mechanism, effectively mitigating the hypoxic microenvironment.190

16 sub-images: nanoparticle micrographs, elemental maps, line graphs on white background.

Figure 9 TEM images of (A) core/shell Pd/Pt, (B) core/shell Pd/Ir nanocubes, and (C) PdPt3 and (D) PdIr3 HNCs. HR-TEM images of (E) Pd/Pt, (F) Pd/Ir nanocubes, and (G) PdPt3 and (H) PdIr3 HNCs. EDS-elemental mappings of (I) Pd/Pt, (J) Pd/Ir nanocubes, and (K) PdPt3 and (L) PdIr3 HNCs. EDS-line scans of (M) Pd/Pt, (N) Pd/Ir nanocubes, and (O) PdPt3 and (P) PdIr3 HNCs. Reproduced with permission.188 Copyright 2024, American Chemical Society.

Dissolution of Monosodium Urate Crystals

Beyond systemic uric acid clearance, directly modulating MSU crystal nucleation serves as a pivotal objective in comprehensive gout management. To this end, Liu et al constructed a biomimetic architecture mirroring natural enzyme pockets.183 By utilizing arginine-rich peptides (protamine) to direct the growth of rhodium nanoclusters (RhNCs) on reduced graphene oxide (rGO) surfaces. This design endowed the material with exceptional substrate affinity (Km approaching that of natural enzymes) and robust physiological stability, effectively prolonging the induction period for urate crystallization. Earlier investigations by the same group corroborated that arginine peptide-guided Pt nanoclusters (ARP-PtNC) mimic the multi-enzyme cascade functions of peroxisomes, thereby suppressing the formation of needle-like crystals.183,184

Advancing to atomic precision, the direct dissolution of mature crystals constitutes a distinct and highly effective physicochemical intervention. Lin et al developed a Mn-N-C single-atom nanozyme (P–Mn–N–C) by precisely modulating the Mn4+/Mn2+ redox equilibrium and the nitrogen coordination sphere.182 This nanomaterial not only exhibits triple enzyme-mimetic activity but also directly adsorbs and erode pre-existing MSU crystals via surface charge interactions. Ultimately, this atomic-level engineering provides a robust therapeutic alternative that fundamentally diverges from conventional pharmacological treatments.

Biomimetic Targeting and Immune Microenvironment Remodeling

As insights into gouty arthritis (GA) pathogenesis deepen, therapeutic paradigms have transitioned from isolated metabolic regulation to holistic immune microenvironment remodeling. To achieve precise lesion targeting while evading immune clearance, biomimetic cell membrane camouflage technologies have been widely adopted.192 By employing a Trojan horse” strategy, macrophage or erythrocyte membranes endows nanozymes with prolonged circulation half-lives and intrinsic inflammatory tropism. Specifically, macrophage membrane-cloaked Prussian blue/platinum nanozymes (HMPB-Pt@MM) exploit surface receptors (eg, LFA-1) to selectively accumulate inflamed sites.114 This system suppresses gout recurrence by concurrently metabolizing uric acid and driving M1-to-M2 macrophage repolarization.

To further elevate functional integration, Chen191 and Xu189 developed sophisticated fusion membrane systems such as erythrocyte-macrophage hybrid membranes. These intelligent platforms not only serve as vehicles for uricase and anti-inflammatory agents (eg, methotrexate, resveratrol) but also integrate photothermal agents (SPIONs) or photothermal nanozymes. The resulting synergistic interplay between thermal effects and pharmacotherapy blocks the NF-κB pathway, potently inducing the M1-to-M2 transition. At the molecular level, folate-modified liposomes (FALNZs) selectively target folate receptor β-overexpressing M1 macrophages to arrest inflammatory cascades via intracellular ROS clearance.185 Parallelly, biomimetic nanoparticles (BIM NPs) utilizing a MnO2 shell scavenge ROS while releasing indomethacin.186 These dual-action mechanisms comprehensively resolve inflammation by preventing neutrophil infiltration and promoting reverse migration.

The application of nanozymes in GA therapy is currently transcending traditional formulation limits, extending into implantable biomedical devices. Researchers have integrated Pt-CeO2 nanozymes into 3D-printed meniscus scaffolds featuring gradient porosity.187 This biomimetic device provides mechanical support while adaptively regulating catalytic activity in response to local uric acid levels. This innovation marks a critical paradigm shift, transitioning nanozyme therapeutics from acute pharmacological interventions to structure-function integrated tissue engineering for chronic disease management.

Challenges and Future Research

In light of the substantial evidence presented above, it is clear that researchers have accomplished a series of landmark advances in both the design and mechanistic elucidation of nanozymes, substantiating the clinical translational potential of inorganic nanozymes. Across the distinct pathological landscapes of RA, OA, and GA, recent therapeutic breakthroughs share a common paradigm encompassing multi-enzyme cascade catalysis, microenvironmental reprogramming, and hybrid biomaterial integration (Supplementary Table 1).193 These platforms are engineered with multi-mimetic activities, specifically emulating superoxide SOD, CAT, and urate oxidase, to enable sequential reactive oxygen species (ROS) scavenging and crystal dissolution while suppressing pro-oxidant Fenton side reactions.194,195 This catalytic relay modulates local immunometabolism, shifts the polarization of M1 macrophages and activated neutrophils toward anti-inflammatory M2 phenotypes, and subsequently dampens the inflammatory cascade.98 To navigate the physical constraints of dense cartilage extracellular matrices and rapid synovial lymphatic clearance, these inorganic nanocatalysts are incorporated into responsive delivery vectors, such as membrane-camouflaged biomimetic vesicles, ROS-responsive polymeric micelles, and injectable hydrogel scaffolds.88,114,161 This integration extends intra-articular retention and facilitates chondrocyte targeting, combining localized nanocatalysis with controlled drug release and osteochondral tissue regeneration.196

However, translating these laboratory successes into clinical realities is hampered by a dynamic physiological reality: the joint cavity acts as an active biological barrier that counteracts external therapeutic interventions through interconnected oxidative, immune, and proliferative signals. While the inherent multi-enzyme mimetic activity of nanozymes provides a clear biochemical advantage over single-target agents, their systemic or intra-articular deployment raises pressing questions regarding structural integrity, biocompatibility, target specificity, and batch-to-batch consistency. A closer examination of these issues suggests that the current enthusiasm for nanozyme therapy may need to be tempered by a more rigorous assessment of what can realistically be achieved. Consequently, in the following discussion, we shift focus from what has been accomplished to what remains unresolved, offering a critical perspective on the barriers that lie ahead.

Long-Term Biosafety

Biosafety remains the principal impediment to the clinical translation of nanozymes.197 Unlike conventional small-molecule therapeutics, these platforms frequently incorporate transition metals such as Mn, Pt, Ce, Au, and Pd. Despite this, their long-term in vivo metabolic trajectories and immune interactions remain incompletely elucidated. Surface engineering, specifically PEGylation and biomimetic cell membrane camouflaging, effectively attenuates acute immunogenicity. However, these modifications do not resolve fundamental clearance issues. Evidence indicates that certain metal-based nanozymes (eg, ceria, Prussian blue analogs) may sequester in the liver, spleen, or kidneys for extended periods.35,98,105,121,128,151 Compounding this issue, current literature predominantly relies on short-term rodent efficacy models spanning merely 2 to 8 weeks.35,122,129,134,163,166,173,180 This distinct lack of comprehensive toxicological profiling obscures our understanding of chronic metal burdens. Specifically, it is entirely unknown whether this prolonged retention precipitates organ fibrosis, chronic inflammation, or secondary oxidative injury via Fenton-mediated hydroxyl radical generation.

Beyond systemic risks, localized nanoparticle aggregation within the articular space can paradoxically exacerbate joint pathology. Large aggregates frequently trigger “frustrated phagocytosis,” a process where synovial macrophages fail to internalize the material and consequently release pro-inflammatory cytokines. This specific mechanism closely mimics the pathogenicity of monosodium urate crystals in gout.5 Consequently, the development of biodegradable or ultrasmall, renally clearable nanozymes, coupled with the establishment of a rigorous, full-lifecycle safety evaluation framework, encompassing reproductive and genotoxicity, is a prerequisite for clinical translation.

Catalytic and Delivery Challenges in Joint Nanozyme Therapy

Considerable efforts have been made to address nanozyme catalytic instability in the articular microenvironment, including surface engineering to enhance delivery and stimulus-responsive systems tailored to arthritic pathophysiological cues. Despite these advances, critical deficiencies remain. The formation of a protein corona upon synovial fluid exposure physically occludes active sites and compromises catalytic efficiency, while PEGylation and membrane-camouflaging strategies—though partially effective—often introduce new complexities such as reduced activity or accelerated clearance.198 Furthermore, the intrinsic pH-dependence of most nanozymes creates a fundamental disconnect: optimal activity frequently occurs in acidic lysosomal compartments (pH 4.0–5.5),199 yet therapeutic efficacy in OA or RA requires sustained SOD/CAT-mimetic function within the weakly acidic inflammatory milieu (pH 6.5–6.8).147,159 Compounding these catalytic challenges, intra-articular delivery confronts the paradox of prolonged retention versus deep cartilage penetration. The dense synovial lymphatic network clears free nanoparticles within hours,200 while bulky hydrogel depots, though improving retention, fail to traverse the negatively charged cartilage ECM, restricting nanozymes to superficial surfaces and limiting efficacy against deep zone degeneration.125,133,134,138,144,146,148,159,168,169,201–203 Although ultrasmall particles or charge-reversal mechanisms enhance ECM permeability, they simultaneously sacrifice retention time.204 Overcoming these barriers requires three concurrent efforts: (1) the engineering of pH-insensitive broad-spectrum nanozymes through multi-metal alloying, heterojunction construction, or defect engineering; (2) the establishment of physiologically relevant activity detection systems that replicate the protein-rich and shear-stress conditions of synovial fluid; and (3) the development of multi-stage delivery systems, such as exosome-based carriers or MMP-responsive particles, that reconcile sustained retention with deep tissue penetration.

Clinical Translation and Production Standardization

Translating nanozyme synthesis from the bench to industrial scales introduces formidable Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls (CMC) challenges. Unlike well-defined small molecules or biologics, nanozyme catalytic efficacy depends intrinsically on complex physicochemical properties. These structural determinants encompass crystal lattice integrity, surface defect density, coordination environments, and particle size distribution. During scale-up, even minor deviations in macro-reaction parameters (eg, temperature, agitation rate) can induce profound batch-to-batch variations in catalytic performance.205 Establishing reproducible, industrial-grade synthetic methodologies is therefore a fundamental prerequisite for guaranteeing therapeutic consistency. Parallel to manufacturing hurdles, a profound standardization and regulatory gap impede clinical progress. The field currently lacks a unified metric or standardized unit for defining nanozymatic activity. Disparate substrates and assay conditions across laboratories confound cross-study comparability and preclude the development of precise clinical dosing regimens. Moreover, existing regulatory frameworks provide no specific guidelines for inorganic, enzyme-mimetic nanomaterials. Defining their regulatory classification demands urgent consensus between regulatory agencies and researchers, whether as drugs, medical devices, or combination products. To successfully cross the threshold into clinical trials, implementing standardized activity assays and rigorous quality control protocols remains strictly imperative.

Future Research Directions

To overcome the translational barriers outlined above, future arthritis-targeted nanozyme research must strategically advance along several interconnected frontiers. First, the vast material parameter space makes traditional trial-and-error development inefficient. Artificial intelligence, particularly machine learning trained on catalytic databases, can establish quantitative structure-activity relationships that link material properties to target enzyme-like activities, enabling rapid and cost-effective predictions of catalytic performance prior to experimental synthesis. Combining density functional theory calculations with machine learning algorithms further enables the prediction of intermediate adsorption energies on various metal oxide surfaces, offering mechanistic insights into catalytic selectivity and turnover rates.

Second, SAzymes, featuring isolated metal atoms atomically dispersed on solid supports, represent a paradigm shift toward precision catalysis, offering maximized atomic utilization and well-defined M-Nx coordination structures that facilitate precise activity regulation. Emerging evidence indicates that tuning the coordination geometry of M-Nx sites can differentially regulate catalytic selectivity, which provides the advantage of mild and controllable ROS regulation, while their atomically dispersed nature concurrently facilitates renal clearance.89

Third, the complex, multifactorial pathology of arthritis necessitates multi-enzyme mimetic nanozymes that integrate two or more catalytic activities (eg, SOD + CAT, SOD + GPx, POD + UOD, or the complete quartet) within a single nanoplatform. Core-shell architectures and MOF-based frameworks enable spatial organization of sequential catalysis. Biomimetic camouflage represents another critical developmental direction. By integrating diverse cell membrane coatings, researchers can exploit endogenous receptor-ligand interactions to precisely target the inflamed synovium while concurrently optimizing biocompatibility. Furthermore, the therapeutic paradigm must evolve from isolated antioxidative interventions toward holistic microenvironmental reprogramming by integrating ROS scavenging with targeted delivery of pharmacological or genetic payloads to suppress core inflammatory cascades, notably NF-κB, NLRP3, and JAK-STAT.

Fourth, the heterogeneity of arthritis calls for personalized strategies stratified by synovial fluid cytokine profiles, autoantibody status, and ROS composition. Finally, clinical translation demands a clear roadmap addressing GMP-compliant manufacturing processes, regulatory classification, and the establishment of appropriate clinical trial endpoints. Addressing these unresolved issues will chart the course for future therapeutic applications.

Conclusion

While conventional pharmacotherapies offer rapid symptomatic relief, their capacity to reverse the self-sustaining inflammatory and oxidative microenvironments within arthritic joints remains inherently limited by poor local bioavailability and multifactorial pathogenesis. Nanozymes have demonstrated substantial preclinical efficacy in modulating this pathological niche, driven by their intrinsic enzyme-mimicking activities and programmable physicochemical properties. Their robust capacity to scavenge excessive reactive oxygen and nitrogen species while concurrently remodeling local immunometabolic profiles mechanistically distinguishes them from conventional single-target interventions. Despite these promising preclinical outcomes, current evidence predominantly derives from acute or early-stage animal models that fail to accurately replicate the chronic, multifactorial nature of human arthritis. The long-term intra-articular fate of inorganic nanozymes, encompassing degradation kinetics, metabolic clearance pathways, and potential off-target accumulation, remains inadequately elucidated. Intra-articular injection currently represents the most feasible near-term clinical route, yet issues of joint retention and immunological tolerance to repeated administrations must be addressed. Advancing this field requires focused attention on three critical research priorities. Systematic and prolonged biosafety evaluations in clinically relevant animal models, particularly utilizing immunocompetent, aged, or comorbid subjects, must precede any clinical translation. Mechanistic investigation of synovial clearance and cartilage penetration. And developing active targeting strategies is critical for establishing sufficient therapeutic concentrations within the avascular zones of articular cartilage. Nanozymes offer a conceptually distinct and mechanistically feasible complement to existing arthritis therapeutics, exhibiting the potential to address unmet needs. Realizing this theoretical potential demands rigorous validation through comprehensive in vivo profiling and meticulously designed translational studies. The ultimate clinical realization of nanozyme strategies hinges not merely on their catalytic efficacy, but fundamentally on their safety, biocompatibility, and deliverability—the primary foci of ongoing and future research endeavors.

Abbreviations

ADAMTS, A disintegrin and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin motifs; ADAs, Anti-drug antibodies; Anti-MCV, Anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin; ASO, Antisense oligonucleotides; BMSCs, Bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells; CAT, Catalase; CMC, Chemistry, Manufacturing, and Controls; DAMPs, Damage-associated molecular patterns; DMARDs, Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs; DMOADs, Disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs; ECM, Extracellular matrix; FLS, Fibroblast-like synoviocytes; GA, Gouty arthritis; GCs, Glucocorticoids; GM-CSF, Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor; GPx, Glutathione peroxidase; GSH, glutathione; HAS, Hyaluronan synthase; HIF-1α, Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 subunit α; H2O2, Hydrogen peroxide; IL, Interleukin; IrO2, Iridium oxide; JAK, Janus Kinase; MMP-13, Matrix metalloproteinase 13; MOFs, Metal-organic frameworks; MSU, Monosodium urate; mtDNA, Mitochondrial DNA; MTX, Methotrexate; MyD88, Myeloid differentiation factor; NETs, Neutrophil extracellular traps; NF-κB, Nuclear factor-Κb; NIR, Near-infrared; NSAIDs, Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs; OA, Osteoarthritis; OXD, Oxidase; O2•−, Superoxide anion radical; PB, Prussian blue; FRβ, folate receptor β; PDA, Polydopamine; PEG, Polyethylene glycol; LSPR, Localized Surface Plasmon Resonance; POD, Peroxidase; PRP, Platelet-rich plasma; PTT, Photothermal therapy; RA, Rheumatoid arthritis; RhNCs, Rhodium nanoclusters; RNS, Reactive nitrogen species; ROS, Reactive oxygen species; SACs, Single-atom catalysts; SAzymes, Single-atom nanozymes; SDT, Sonodynamic therapy; SOD, Superoxide dismutase; TLR4, Toll-like receptor 4; TNF-α, Tumor necrosis factor-α; TP, Tea polyphenol; TPP, Triphenylphosphine; •OH, Hydroxyl radicals.

Acknowledgments

We sincerely thank all the participants.

Disclosure

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R, Farokhzad OC. Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17(1):20–40. doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.108

2. Liang M, Yan X. Nanozymes: from new concepts, mechanisms, and standards to applications. Acc Chem Res. 2019;52(8):2190–2200. doi:10.1021/acs.accounts.9b00140

3. Wu J, Wang X, Wang Q, et al. Nanomaterials with enzyme-like characteristics (nanozymes): next-generation artificial enzymes (II). Chem Soc Rev. 2019;48(4):1004–1076. doi:10.1039/c8cs00457a

4. Jiang D, Ni D, Rosenkrans ZT, Huang P, Yan X, Cai W. Nanozyme: new horizons for responsive biomedical applications. Chem Soc Rev. 2019;48(14):3683–3704. doi:10.1039/C8CS00718G

5. Huang S, Yang P, Yuan Y, et al. Nanozyme-Based Therapy in Gout. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025;17(28):39863–39879. doi:10.1021/acsami.5c07644

6. Huang Y, Ren J, Qu X. Nanozymes: classification, catalytic mechanisms, activity regulation, and applications. Chem Rev. 2019;119(6):4357–4412. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00672

7. Zhang R, Yan X, Fan K. Nanozymes Inspired by Natural Enzymes. Acc Mater Res. 2021;2(7):534–547. doi:10.1021/accountsmr.1c00074

8. Burmester GR, Pope JE. Novel treatment strategies in rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2017;389(10086):2338–2348. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31491-5

9. McInnes IB, Schett G. Pathogenetic insights from the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Lancet. 2017;389(10086):2328–2337. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31472-1

10. Sies H, Jones DP. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020;21(7):363–383. doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3

11. He L, Huang G, Liu H, Sang C, Liu X, Chen T. Highly bioactive zeolitic imidazolate framework-8-capped nanotherapeutics for efficient reversal of reperfusion-induced injury in ischemic stroke. Sci Adv. 2020;6(12):eaay9751. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aay9751

12. Zhang S, Hu B, Liu W, et al. Articular cartilage regeneration: the role of endogenous mesenchymal stem/progenitor cell recruitment and migration. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2020;50(2):198–208. doi:10.1016/j.semarthrit.2019.11.001

13. Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the global burden of disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. Lancet. 2021;396(10267):2006–2017. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32340-0

14. Long H, Liu Q, Yin H, et al. Prevalence Trends of Site-Specific Osteoarthritis From 1990 to 2019: findings From the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2022;74(7):1172–1183. doi:10.1002/art.42089

15. Latourte A, Bardin T, Richette P. Prophylaxis for acute gout flares after initiation of urate-lowering therapy. Rheumatology. 2014;53(11):1920–1926. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keu157

16. Smolen JS, Landewé RBM, Bergstra SA, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(1):3–18. doi:10.1136/ard-2022-223356

17. Conaghan PG, Peloso PM, Everett SV, et al. Inadequate pain relief and large functional loss among patients with knee osteoarthritis: evidence from a prospective multinational longitudinal study of osteoarthritis real-world therapies. Rheumatology. 2015;54(2):270–277. doi:10.1093/rheumatology/keu332

18. Strand V, Balsa A, Al-Saleh J, et al. Immunogenicity of biologics in chronic inflammatory diseases: a systematic review. BioDrugs. 2017;31(4):299–316. doi:10.1007/s40259-017-0231-8

19. Fearon U, Canavan M, Biniecka M, Veale DJ. Hypoxia, mitochondrial dysfunction and synovial invasiveness in rheumatoid arthritis. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2016;12(7):385–397. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2016.69

20. Quiñonez-Flores CM, González-Chávez SA, Del Río Nájera D, Pacheco-Tena C. Oxidative stress relevance in the pathogenesis of the rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:6097417. doi:10.1155/2016/6097417

21. Dou Y, Li C, Li L, Guo J, Zhang J. Bioresponsive drug delivery systems for the treatment of inflammatory diseases. J Control Release. 2020;327:641–666. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.09.008

22. Fu X, Song Y, Feng X, et al. Synergistic chemotherapy/PTT/oxygen enrichment by multifunctional liposomal polydopamine nanoparticles for rheumatoid arthritis treatment. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2024;19(1):100885. doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2024.100885

23. Mittal M, Siddiqui MR, Tran K, Reddy SP, Malik AB. Reactive Oxygen Species in Inflammation and Tissue Injury. Antioxid. Redox Signaling. 2014;20(7):1126–1167. doi:10.1089/ars.2012.5149

24. Nelson KK, Melendez JA. Mitochondrial redox control of matrix metalloproteinases. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004;37(6):768–784. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.06.008

25. Chen S, Li Q, Shi H, Li F, Duan Y, Guo Q. New insights into the role of mitochondrial dynamics in oxidative stress-induced diseases. Biomed Pharmacother. 2024;178:117084. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117084

26. Lee YT, Mohd Yunus MH, Yazid MD, Ugusman A. Unraveling the path to osteoarthritis management: targeting chondrocyte apoptosis for therapeutic intervention. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024;12:1347126. doi:10.3389/fcell.2024.1347126

27. Busso N, So A. Mechanisms of inflammation in gout. Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(2):206. doi:10.1186/ar2952

28. Sil P, Wicklum H, Surell C, Rada B. Macrophage-derived IL-1β enhances monosodium urate crystal-triggered NET formation. Inflamm Res. 2017;66(3):227–237. doi:10.1007/s00011-016-1008-0

29. Zhang Y, Liu L, Wang T, et al. Reactive oxygen species-responsive polymeric prodrug nanoparticles for selective and effective treatment of inflammatory diseases. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2023;12(29):2301394. doi:10.1002/adhm.202301394

30. Fetter T, de Graaf DM, Claus I, Wenzel J. Aberrant inflammasome activation as a driving force of human autoimmune skin disease. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1190388. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1190388

31. Xue C, Yao Q, Gu X, et al. Evolving cognition of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway: autoimmune disorders and cancer. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8:204. doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01468-7

32. Skrzypkowska M, Stasiak M, Sakowska J, et al. Cytokines and chemokines multiplex analysis in patients with low disease activity rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatol Int. 2022;42(4):609–619. doi:10.1007/s00296-022-05103-6

33. Li S, Cao P, Chen T, Ding C. Latest insights in disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs development. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2023;15:1759720X231169839. doi:10.1177/1759720X231169839

34. Meehan RT, Regan EA, Hoffman ED, et al. Synovial fluid cytokines, chemokines and mmp levels in osteoarthritis patients with knee pain display a profile similar to many rheumatoid arthritis patients. J Clin Med. 2021;10(21):5027. doi:10.3390/jcm10215027

35. Lin Y, Yi O, Hu M, et al. Multifunctional nanoparticles of sinomenine hydrochloride for treat-to-target therapy of rheumatoid arthritis via modulation of proinflammatory cytokines. J Control Release. 2022;348:42–56. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.05.016

36. Wang J, Xu S, Chen B, Qin Y. Advances in cell therapy for orthopedic diseases: bridging immune modulation and regeneration. Front Immunol. 2025;16:1567640. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1567640

37. Kurowska-Stolarska M, Alivernini S. Synovial tissue macrophages: friend or foe? RMD Open. 2017;3(2):e000527. doi:10.1136/rmdopen-2017-000527

38. Locati M, Curtale G, Mantovani AD. Mechanisms and significance of macrophage plasticity. Annu Rev Pathol. 2020;15:123–147. doi:10.1146/annurev-pathmechdis-012418-012718

39. Miao Y, Wu S, Gong Z, et al. SPARCL1 promotes chondrocytes extracellular matrix degradation and inflammation in osteoarthritis via TNF/NF-κB pathway. J Orthop Translat. 2024;46:116–128. doi:10.1016/j.jot.2024.02.009

40. Wu L, Cao X, Shen B. Development of a macrophage polarization-modulating therapeutic agent for osteoarthritis treatment. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025;20:279. doi:10.1186/s13018-025-05679-2

41. Kiefer D, Erkenberg J, Braun J. Similarities and differences between gouty arthritis and rheumatoid arthritisan interesting case with a short look into the literature. Explor Musculoskeletal Dis. 2023;1(1):11–19. doi:10.37349/emd.2023.00003

42. Macfarlane FR, Chaplain MA, Eftimie R. Modelling rheumatoid arthritis: a hybrid modelling framework to describe pannus formation in a small joint. bioRxiv. 2021. doi:10.1101/2021.09.02.458714

43. Nygaard G, Firestein GS. Restoring synovial homeostasis in rheumatoid arthritis by targeting fibroblast-like synoviocytes. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2020;16(6):316–333. doi:10.1038/s41584-020-0413-5

44. Dönmez S, Pamuk ÖN. Chronic Tophaceous Gout. J Rheumatol. 2014;41(3):554–555. doi:10.3899/jrheum.130688

45. wei XS, kun LY, rong ZY, yu JZ. Musculoskeletal ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of gouty arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Pak J Med Sci. 2020;36(5):977–981. doi:10.12669/pjms.36.5.2716

46. Tu Z, Zhong Y, Hu H, et al. Design of therapeutic biomaterials to control inflammation. Nat Rev Mater. 2022;7(7):557–574. doi:10.1038/s41578-022-00426-z

47. Bean MB, Favero M, Ramonda R, Scanzello CR. Erosive hand osteoarthritis: recent advances and future treatments. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2024;26(4):103–111. doi:10.1007/s11926-023-01130-9

48. Hwang HS, Kim HA, Hwang HS, Kim HA. Chondrocyte apoptosis in the pathogenesis of osteoarthritis. Int J Mol Sci. 2015;16(11):26035–26054. doi:10.3390/ijms161125943

49. Firestein GS, McInnes IB. Immunopathogenesis of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Immunity. 2017;46(2):183–196. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2017.02.006

50. Kachler K, Andreev D, Thapa S, et al. Acod1-mediated inhibition of aerobic glycolysis suppresses osteoclast differentiation and attenuates bone erosion in arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2024;83(12):e224774. doi:10.1136/ard-2023-224774

51. Dalbeth N, Gosling AL, Gaffo A, Abhishek AG. The Lancet. 2021;397(10287):1843–1855. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00569-9

52. Zhao H, Serre C, Steunou N. Metal-organic frameworks for the therapy of inflammatory diseases. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2025;14(26):2404334. doi:10.1002/adhm.202404334

53. Roelofs AJ, De Bari C. Osteoarthritis year in review 2023: biology. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2024;32(2):148–158. doi:10.1016/j.joca.2023.11.002

54. Wirth T, Lafforgue P, Pham T. NSAID: current limits to prescription. Joint Bone Spine. 2024;91(4):105685. doi:10.1016/j.jbspin.2023.105685

55. Oh JM, Choi SJ, Kim ST, Choy JH. Cellular uptake mechanism of an inorganic nanovehicle and its drug conjugates:  enhanced efficacy due to clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Bioconjugate Chem. 2006;17(6):1411–1417. doi:10.1021/bc0601323

56. Law ST, Taylor PC. Role of biological agents in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Pharmacol Res. 2019;150:104497. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104497

57. Favalli EG, Maioli G, Caporali R. Biologics or Janus Kinase inhibitors in rheumatoid arthritis patients who are insufficient responders to conventional anti-rheumatic drugs. Drugs. 2024;84(8):877–894. doi:10.1007/s40265-024-02059-8

58. Kerschbaumer A, Sepriano A, Bergstra SA, et al. Efficacy of synthetic and biological DMARDs: a systematic literature review informing the 2022 update of the EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2023;82(1):95–106. doi:10.1136/ard-2022-223365

59. Brandt MD, Malone JB, Kean TJ. Advances and challenges in the pursuit of disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs: a review of 2010-2024 clinical trials. Biomedicines. 2025;13(2):355. doi:10.3390/biomedicines13020355

60. Shi C, Zhou Z, Chi X, et al. Recent advances in gout drugs. Eur J Med Chem. 2023;245(Pt 1):114890. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114890

61. Feng YZ, Cheng H, Xiong GQ, et al. Uricase-expressing engineered macrophages alleviate murine hyperuricemia. Biomedicines. 2024;12(11):2602. doi:10.3390/biomedicines12112602

62. Wu J, Li H, Hu F, Luo P. Stevioside attenuates osteoarthritis via regulating Nrf2/HO-1/NF-κB pathway. J Orthop Translat. 2023;38:190–202. doi:10.1016/j.jot.2022.05.005

63. Li S, Shi Y, Zhang S, et al. Corynoline Alleviates Osteoarthritis Development via the Nrf2/NF-κB Pathway. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2022;2022(1):2188145. doi:10.1155/2022/2188145

64. Jomova K, Alomar SY, Alwasel SH, Nepovimova E, Kuca K, Valko M. Several lines of antioxidant defense against oxidative stress: antioxidant enzymes, nanomaterials with multiple enzyme-mimicking activities, and low-molecular-weight antioxidants. Arch Toxicol. 2024;98(5):1323–1367. doi:10.1007/s00204-024-03696-4

65. Kim J, Kong JS, Lee S, et al. Angiogenic cytokines can reflect the synovitis severity and treatment response to biologics in rheumatoid arthritis. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52(5):843–853. doi:10.1038/s12276-020-0443-8

66. Jasinski D, Haque F, Binzel DW, Guo P. Advancement of the Emerging Field of RNA Nanotechnology. ACS Nano. 2017;11(2):1142–1164. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b05737

67. Zhao L, Huang J, Fan Y, et al. Exploration of CRISPR/Cas9-based gene editing as therapy for osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(5):676–682. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2018-214724

68. Zubair M, Abouelnazar FA, Iqbal MA, et al. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes as a plausible immunomodulatory therapeutic tool for inflammatory diseases. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025;13:1563427. doi:10.3389/fcell.2025.1563427

69. Zhang Y, Desai A, Yang SY, et al. Inhibition of the Prostaglandin Degrading Enzyme 15-PGDH Potentiates Tissue Regeneration. Science. 2015;348(6240):aaa2340. doi:10.1126/science.aaa2340

70. Cao X, Li J, Zhai W, Zhou B, Lin H, Wang Y. Inhibiting friction-induced exogenous adhesion via robust lubricative core–shell nanofibers for high-quality tendon repair. Biomacromolecules. 2025;26(2):1350–1361. doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.4c01729

71. Wang L, Sun L, Qiu Z, et al. Gradient hydroxyapatite nanoparticles with spatial distribution facilitate the healing of tendon-to-bone interface. Int J Bioprinting. 2025;11(1):501–516. doi:10.36922/ijb.6181

72. Tan G, Xu J, Yu Q, et al. Photo-Crosslinkable Hydrogels for 3D Bioprinting in the Repair of Osteochondral Defects: a Review of Present Applications and Future Perspectives. Micromachines. 2022;13(7):1038. doi:10.3390/mi13071038

73. Xia Y, Zhou Y, Liang B, et al. Drug delivery systems targeting the knee microenvironment: a prospective strategy for knee osteoarthritis treatment. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025;19:10909–10935. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S564907

74. Bajpayee AG, Grodzinsky AJ. Cartilage-targeting drug delivery: can electrostatic interactions help? Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2017;13(3):183–193. doi:10.1038/nrrheum.2016.210

75. Babu A, Channaveera C, Gupta A, Mittal MK, Johnson DS. Clinical and radiological efficacy of single-dose intra-articular high-molecular-weight hyaluronic acid in knee osteoarthritis. J Family Med Prim Care. 2023;12(8):1692–1696. doi:10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_486_23

76. Amirsaadat S, Amirazad H, Hashemihesar R, Zarghami N. An update on the effect of intra-articular intervention strategies using nanomaterials in osteoarthritis: possible clinical application. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1128856

77. Zhang C, He T, Vedadghavami A, Bajpayee AG. Avidin-biotin technology to synthesize multi-arm nano-construct for drug delivery. MethodsX. 2020;7:100882. doi:10.1016/j.mex.2020.100882

78. Gao L, Zhuang J, Nie L, et al. Intrinsic peroxidase-like activity of ferromagnetic nanoparticles. Nature Nanotech. 2007;2(9):577–583. doi:10.1038/nnano.2007.260

79. Wei H, Wang E. Nanomaterials with enzyme-like characteristics (nanozymes): next-generation artificial enzymes. Chem Soc Rev. 2013;42(14):6060–6093. doi:10.1039/c3cs35486e

80. Wang Z, Shen X, Gao X, Zhao Y. Simultaneous enzyme mimicking and chemical reduction mechanisms for nanoceria as a bio-antioxidant: a catalytic model bridging computations and experiments for nanozymes. Nanoscale. 2019;11(28):13289–13299. doi:10.1039/C9NR03473K

81. Li F, Li S, Guo X, et al. Chiral carbon dots mimicking topoisomerase i to mediate the topological rearrangement of supercoiled dna enantioselectively. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(27):11087–11092. doi:10.1002/anie.202002904

82. Li F, Li T, Sun C, Xia J, Jiao Y, Xu H. Selenium-doped carbon quantum dots for free-radical scavenging. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56(33):9910–9914. doi:10.1002/anie.201705989

83. Guo Z, Hong J, Song N, Liang M. Single-atom nanozymes: from precisely engineering to extensive applications. Acc Mater Res. 2024;5(3):347–357. doi:10.1021/accountsmr.3c00250

84. Yang L, Shi L, Wang D, Lv Y, Cao D. Single-atom cobalt electrocatalysts for foldable solid-state Zn-air battery. Nano Energy. 2018;50:691–698. doi:10.1016/j.nanoen.2018.06.023

85. Chen Y, Ji S, Wang Y, et al. Isolated single iron atoms anchored on n-doped porous carbon as an efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2017;56(24):6937–6941. doi:10.1002/anie.201702473

86. Lin R, Albani D, Fako E, et al. Design of single gold atoms on nitrogen-doped carbon for molecular recognition in alkyne semi-hydrogenation. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2019;58(2):504–509. doi:10.1002/anie.201805820

87. Jiao L, Yan H, Wu Y, et al. When nanozymes meet single-atom catalysis. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(7):2565–2576. doi:10.1002/anie.201905645

88. Zhang J, Wang C, Wu X, Shen Q, Du Y. Nanozyme-based therapeutic strategies for rheumatoid arthritis. J Control Release. 2025;377:716–734. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.11.072

89. Liu L, Zhang S, Li G, et al. D-band center coordination modulated enzyme-like activity in Fe-Cu dual-metal single-atom nanozymes. Nano Res. 2024;17(7):5872–5883. doi:10.1007/s12274-024-6561-0

90. Nie Y, Li D, Peng Y, et al. Metal organic framework coated MnO2 nanosheets delivering doxorubicin and self-activated DNAzyme for chemo-gene combinatorial treatment of cancer. Int J Pharm. 2020;585:119513. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2020.119513

91. He Q, Zhang L. Nanozyme-driven remodeling of the immune microenvironment: from catalytic therapy to precise immune regulation. Nanoscale. 2025;17(45):25947–25963. doi:10.1039/D5NR03420E

92. Liang S, Tian X, Wang C. Nanozymes in the treatment of diseases caused by excessive reactive oxygen specie. J Inflamm Res. 2022;15:6307–6328. doi:10.2147/JIR.S383239

93. Xiang J, Yang X, Tan M, et al. NIR-enhanced Pt single atom/g-C3N4 nanozymes as SOD/CAT mimics to rescue ATP energy crisis by regulating oxidative phosphorylation pathway for delaying osteoarthritis progression. Bioact Mater. 2024;36:1–13. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.02.018

94. Singh N, Savanur MA, Srivastava S, D’Silva P, Mugesh G. A redox modulatory mn3 o4 nanozyme with multi-enzyme activity provides efficient cytoprotection to human cells in a parkinson’s disease model. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2017;56(45):14267–14271. doi:10.1002/anie.201708573

95. Li H, Liu Z, Zhang P, Zhang D. The recent research progress in the application of the nanozyme-hydrogel composite system for drug delivery. Drug Deliv. 2024;31(1):2417986. doi:10.1080/10717544.2024.2417986

96. Yuan F, dong QL, Cui L, Goldring SR, Wang D. Development of macromolecular prodrug for rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2012;64(12):1205–1219. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2012.03.006

97. Ma MW, He KL, Li CQ, et al. Multifunctional platinum-tellurium nanorods modified with hyaluronic acid remove reactive oxygen species to improve the photothermal treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Chem Eng J. 2023;475:146450. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.146450

98. Zhou F, Li M, Chen M, et al. Redox homeostasis strategy for inflammatory macrophage reprogramming in rheumatoid arthritis based on ceria oxide nanozyme-complexed biopolymeric micelles. ACS Nano. 2023;17(5):4358–4372. doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c09127

99. Huang L, Yao Y, Ruan Z, et al. Baicalin nanodelivery system based on functionalized metal-organic framework for targeted therapy of osteoarthritis by modulating macrophage polarization. J Nanobiotechnology. 2024;22:221. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-02494-5

100. Deng Y, Li B, Zheng H, et al. Multifunctional Prussian blue nanoparticles loading with Xuetongsu for efficient rheumatoid arthritis therapy through targeting inflammatory macrophages and osteoclasts. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2025;20(3):101037. doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2025.101037

101. Ma L, Zheng X, Lin R, et al. Knee osteoarthritis therapy: recent advances in intra-articular drug delivery systems. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2022;16:1311–1347. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S357386

102. Mancipe Castro LM, Sequeira A, García AJ, Guldberg RE. Articular cartilage- and synoviocyte-binding poly(ethylene glycol) nanocomposite microgels as intra-articular drug delivery vehicles for the treatment of osteoarthritis. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2020;6(9):5084–5095. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.0c00960

103. Li Y, Cong L, Zhang W, et al. Macrophage Membrane-Coated Carbon Nanozymes for Targeted Drug Delivery and NIR-Responsive Synergistic Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2025:03316. doi:10.1002/adhm.202503316.

104. Zhou Z, Mukundan N, Zhang JA, et al. Macrophage-mimicking cellular nanoparticles scavenge proinflammatory cytokines in specimens of patients with inflammatory disorders. Adv Sci. 2024;11(31):2401423. doi:10.1002/advs.202401423

105. Zhang L, Qin Z, Sun H, et al. Nanoenzyme engineered neutrophil-derived exosomes attenuate joint injury in advanced rheumatoid arthritis via regulating inflammatory environment. Bioact Mater. 2022;18:1–14. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.02.017

106. Yang B, Shi J. Ferrihydrite nanoparticles alleviate rheumatoid arthritis by nanocatalytic antioxidation and oxygenation. Nano Lett. 2023;23(17):8355–8362. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c02743

107. Brown SB, Wang L, Jungels RR, Sharma B. Effects of cartilage-targeting moieties on nanoparticle biodistribution in healthy and osteoarthritic joints. Acta Biomater. 2020;101:469–483. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2019.10.003

108. Ren K, Ke X, Chen Z, et al. Zwitterionic polymer modified xanthan gum with collagen II-binding capability for lubrication improvement and ROS scavenging. Carbohydr Polym. 2021;274:118672. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118672

109. Jia J, Liu M, Yang H, et al. Manganese dioxide-based ph-responsive multifunctional nanoparticles deliver methotrexate for targeted rheumatoid arthritis treatment. Biomater Res. 2025;29:0187. doi:10.34133/bmr.0187

110. Wen R, Qiu H, Dong P, et al. pH-responsive nano immunomodulator for rheumatoid arthritis therapy via macrophages pyroptosis inhibiting and reprograming. Bioact Mater. 2026;64:799–816. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2026.03.031

111. Fang X, Zhao H, Ke W, et al. Mitochondrial-targeted ROS scavenger delivery using selenium-doped layered double hydroxide nanocomposites for enhanced osteoarthritis therapy via inflammation suppression and macrophage metabolism reprogramming. Adv Compos Hybrid Mater. 2026;9. doi:10.1007/s42114-026-01655-4

112. Liu H, Li T, Zhao S, et al. A Comprehensive Review of Metal-Based Nanozymes for ROS Scavenging and Therapeutic Applications in Osteoarthritis. ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2026;12(4):1991–2016. doi:10.1021/acsbiomaterials.5c02068

113. Zhou F, Gao S, Xiong T, et al. A ROS-responsive nanozyme delivering gallic acid synergistically ameliorates chronic rhinosinusitis via epithelial barrier restoration and Syk/NF-κB inhibition. Int J Pharm X. 2026;11:100540. doi:10.1016/j.ijpx.2026.100540

114. Wang R, Liu T, Li X, et al. Biomimetic integrated nanozyme for flare and recurrence of gouty arthritis. Asian J Pharm Sci. 2024;19(3):100913. doi:10.1016/j.ajps.2024.100913

115. han ZQ, Zhai Y, hang WY, Pan Z. The role of hypoxic microenvironment in rheumatoid arthritis. Front Immunol. 2025;16. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2025.1633406

116. Wang Y, Chen Z, Huang W, Liu M, Zhao R, Deng X. Oxygen-releasing biomaterials for osteoarthritis: advances in managing the hypoxic joint microenvironment. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025;13:1704327. doi:10.3389/fcell.2025.1704327

117. Wang S, Chen R, Yu Q, et al. Near-infrared plasmon-boosted heat/oxygen enrichment for reversing rheumatoid arthritis with metal/semiconductor composites. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(41):45796–45806. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c13261

118. Liu XH, Ding JY, Zhu ZH, et al. Recent advances in enzyme-related biomaterials for arthritis treatment. Front Chem. 2022;10:988051. doi:10.3389/fchem.2022.988051

119. Wei Z, Zhu M, Wang S, et al. High drug-loaded supramolecular microgels enabled by controlled in-droplet self-assembly for adaptive treatment of inflammatory arthritis. Bioact Mater. 2025;57:231–246. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2025.11.013

120. Wu D, Li Y, Xu R. Can pyroptosis be a new target in rheumatoid arthritis treatment? Front Immunol. 2023;14:1155606. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1155606

121. Kim J, Kim HY, Song SY, et al. Synergistic oxygen generation and reactive oxygen species scavenging by manganese ferrite/ceria co-decorated nanoparticles for rheumatoid arthritis treatment. ACS Nano. 2019;13(3):3206–3217. doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b08785

122. Li W, Song Y, Liang X, et al. Mutual-reinforcing sonodynamic therapy against Rheumatoid Arthritis based on sparfloxacin sonosensitizer doped concave-cubic rhodium nanozyme. Biomaterials. 2021;276:121063. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2021.121063

123. Liu X, Guo R, Huo S, et al. CaP-based anti-inflammatory HIF-1α siRNA-encapsulating nanoparticle for rheumatoid arthritis therapy. J Control Release. 2022;343:314–325. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.01.029

124. Lu Y, Ding C. Pos0412 enhancing survival and therapeutic effect of mesenchymal stem cells in rat model of rheumatoid arthritis via nanomodification. Ann Rheumatic Dis. 2022;81:462. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.927

125. Zhao Y, Song S, Wang D, et al. Nanozyme-reinforced hydrogel as a H2O2-driven oxygenerator for enhancing prosthetic interface osseointegration in rheumatoid arthritis therapy. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):6758. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34481-5

126. Hua P, Liang R, Tu Y, Yin Y, Law MK, Chen M. Reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide scavenging nanoparticles alleviating rheumatoid arthritis through adjusting the seeds and growing soils. Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. 2023;13(12):5016–5029. doi:10.1016/j.apsb.2023.07.021

127. Jia M, Ren W, Liu Y, et al. Messenger nanozyme for reprogramming the microenvironment of rheumatoid arthritis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(1):338–353. doi:10.1021/acsami.2c16458

128. Koo S, Sohn HS, Kim TH, et al. Ceria-vesicle nanohybrid therapeutic for modulation of innate and adaptive immunity in a collagen-induced arthritis model. Nat Nanotechnol. 2023;18(12):1502–1514. doi:10.1038/s41565-023-01523-y

129. Liu Y, Chen L, Chen Z, et al. Multifunctional Janus nanoplatform for efficiently synergistic theranostics of rheumatoid arthritis. ACS Nano. 2023;17(9):8167–8182. doi:10.1021/acsnano.2c11777

130. Chen S, Liu X, Zhang W, et al. Nanozyme coating-mediated mitochondrial metabolic reprogramming of macrophages for immunomodulatory osseointegration in rheumatoid arthritis case. ACS Nano. 2025;19(28):26127–26146. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c07535

131. Chen X, Yang Y, Chen J, et al. Dual-driven selenium Janus single-atom nanomotors for autonomous regulating mitochondrial oxygen imbalance to catalytic therapy of rheumatoid arthritis. Redox Biol. 2025;81:103574. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2025.103574

132. Goda MN, Alqarni LS, Ibrahim H, Ali AMBH, El-Wekil MM. Dual-mode colorimetric and fluorometric detection of D-penicillamine via inhibition of peroxidase-mimetic activity of bimetallic N-doped carbon dots Spectrochimica Acta, Part A. Mol Biomol Spectroscopy. 2025;343:126605. doi:10.1016/j.saa.2025.126605

133. He H, Zhang Q, Zhang Y, et al. Injectable bioadhesive and lubricating hydrogel with polyphenol mediated single atom nanozyme for rheumatoid arthritis therapy. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):2768. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-58059-z

134. Jin Y, Yang N, Chen S, et al. Bioinspired catalytic nanogel as an inflammatory cascade-targeted therapeutic for rheumatoid arthritis. J Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23(1):623. doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03642-1

135. Li R, Zhang Y, Ma M, Li H, He Q. Bone-targeted carbon dots nanogels achieve precision antioxidant therapy for rheumatoid arthritis by activating the endogenous antioxidant system. J Mater Chem B. 2025;13(36):11274–11283. doi:10.1039/D5TB01469G

136. Ma H, Li X, Feng X, Li Y, Liu D, Han L. Mesoporous silica-based nanomotors loaded with rapamycin for synergistic treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. ACS Nano. 2025;19(25):22914–22930. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c01763

137. Niu Y, Wang Y, Cao H, et al. Core-shell Co-COF@MOF nanozyme-based dual-catalytic electrochemical immunosensor for ultrasensitive detection of Anti-MCV in early rheumatoid arthritis. Electrochim Acta. 2025;539:147100. doi:10.1016/j.electacta.2025.147100

138. Wang F, Han Y, Zhou Q, et al. Polymer-modified DNA hydrogels for living mitochondria and nanozyme delivery in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Bioact Mater. 2025;47:448–459. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.12.027

139. Wang G, Zhang X, Zhu B, et al. Structure-tailoring cerium nanozymes with self-cascade ros scavenging catalysis modulate the microbiota-gut-joint axis for rheumatoid arthritis therapy. Adv Sci. 2025:e12281. doi:10.1002/advs.202512281.

140. Yang Y, Wang H, Hong S, et al. Polypeptide Single-Chain Nanoparticle Derived Artificial Enzyme. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2025;14(27):e02053. doi:10.1002/adhm.202502053

141. Yu W, Wu X, Li M, et al. A multifunctional enzyme cascade catalytic nanoplatform for effective synergistic therapy of rheumatoid arthritis. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;35(35):2423054. doi:10.1002/adfm.202423054

142. Zhang L, Wu G, Yao J, Wang D, Gao F, Qian Z. Hyaluronic acid-modified PtPdCo-CQ nanocatalyst with triple enzyme-like activities regulates macrophage polarization and autophagy levels for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Biol Macromol. 2025;309:143143. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.143143

143. Zhang X, Wang Z, Bai Y, et al. Therapeutic Effect of a Near-Infrared Responsive MTX-Mn3O4@PDA Nano-Delivery System on Rheumatoid Arthritis. Adv Ther. 2025;8(2):2400345. doi:10.1002/adtp.202400345

144. Zhao Y, Li Z, Chen X, et al. MXenzyme-reinforced hydrogel enhances stem cell therapy through multidimensional regulation in rheumatoid arthritis management. Biomaterials. 2026;325:123560. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2025.123560

145. Hao X, Jiang B, Wu J, et al. Nanomaterials for bone metastasis. J Control Release. 2024;373:640–651. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.07.067

146. Hu C, Huang R, Xia J, et al. A nanozyme-functionalized bilayer hydrogel scaffold for modulating the inflammatory microenvironment to promote osteochondral regeneration. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):445. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-02723-x

147. Hou W, Ye C, Chen M, et al. Excavating bioactivities of nanozyme to remodel microenvironment for protecting chondrocytes and delaying osteoarthritis. Bioact Mater. 2021;6(8):2439–2451. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.016

148. Zhou T, Ran J, Xu P, et al. A hyaluronic acid/platelet-rich plasma hydrogel containing MnO2 nanozymes efficiently alleviates osteoarthritis in vivo. Carbohydr Polym. 2022;292:119667. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119667

149. Xiong H, Zhao Y, Xu Q, et al. Biodegradable hollow-structured nanozymes modulate phenotypic polarization of macrophages and relieve hypoxia for treatment of osteoarthritis. Small. 2022;18(32):2203240. doi:10.1002/smll.202203240

150. Cho C, Oh H, Lee JS, et al. Prussian blue nanozymes coated with Pluronic attenuate inflammatory osteoarthritis by blocking c-Jun N-terminal kinase phosphorylation. Biomaterials. 2023;297:122131. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122131

151. Hu H, Huang X, Dai Y, et al. Organic metal matrix Mil-88a nano-enzyme for joint repair in the osteoarthritis mouse model. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023:11. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1164942.

152. Wang W, Duan J, Ma W, et al. Trimanganese tetroxide nanozyme protects cartilage against degeneration by reducing oxidative stress in osteoarthritis. Adv Sci. 2023;10(17):2205859. doi:10.1002/advs.202205859

153. Xu S, Lin Y, Zhao X, et al. NIR triggered photocatalytic and photothermal bifunctional MOF nanozyme using for improving osteoarthritis microenvironment by repairing injured chondrocytes of mitochondria. Chem Eng J. 2023;468:143826. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.143826

154. Yang X, Xiang J, Su W, et al. Modulating Pt nanozyme by using isolated cobalt atoms to enhance catalytic activity for alleviating osteoarthritis. Nano Today. 2023;49:101809. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2023.101809

155. Yu P, Li Y, Sun H, et al. Mimicking antioxidases and hyaluronan synthase: a zwitterionic nanozyme for photothermal therapy of osteoarthritis. Adv Mater. 2023;35(44):2303299. doi:10.1002/adma.202303299

156. Zhang S, Cai J, Yao Y, Huang L, Zheng L, Zhao J. Mitochondrial-targeting Mn3O4/UIO-TPP nanozyme scavenge ROS to restore mitochondrial function for osteoarthritis therapy. Regen Biomater. 2023;10:rbad078. doi:10.1093/rb/rbad078

157. Zhang Z, Yuan L, Liu Y, et al. Integrated Cascade Nanozyme Remodels Chondrocyte Inflammatory Microenvironment in Temporomandibular Joint Osteoarthritis via Inhibiting ROS-NF-κB and MAPK Pathways. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2023;12(10):2203195. doi:10.1002/adhm.202203195

158. Du C, Chen Z, Liu S, et al. Lubricin-inspired nanozymes reconstruct cartilage lubrication system with an “in-out” strategy. Small Methods. 2024;8(10):2400757. doi:10.1002/smtd.202400757

159. Feng J, Deng X, Hao P, et al. Intra-articular injection of platinum nanozyme-loaded silk fibroin/pullulan hydrogels relieves osteoarthritis through ROS scavenging and ferroptosis suppression. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;280:135863. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135863

160. Guo J, Li C, Lin J, et al. Chemically programmed nanozyme with microenvironment remodeling for combinatorial treatment of osteoarthritis. Chem Eng J. 2024;485:149897. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2024.149897

161. Qin Z, Li X, Wang P, et al. Ultrasmall prussian blue nanozyme attenuates osteoarthritis by scavenging reactive oxygen species and regulating macrophage phenotype. Nano Lett. 2024;24(37):11697–11705. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c03314

162. Wang H, Li Z, Liu J, et al. Nanozyme-enhanced injectable hyaluronic acid-based hydrogel for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;282:136819. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.136819

163. Wu S, Nan F, Zhang K, et al. A novel metal-organic framework encapsulated iridium oxide nanozyme enhanced antisense oligonucleotide combo for osteoarthritis synergistic therapy. Aggregate. 2024;5(6):e635. doi:10.1002/agt2.635

164. Yang X, Tan M, Guo J, et al. PdZn/CoSA-NC Nanozymes with Highly Efficient SOD/CAT Activities for Treatment of Osteoarthritis via Regulating Immune Microenvironment. Adv Funct Mater. 2024;34(41):2401963. doi:10.1002/adfm.202401963

165. Yu B, Sun W, Lin J, et al. Using Cu-based metal–organic framework as a comprehensive and powerful antioxidant nanozyme for efficient osteoarthritis treatment. Adv Sci. 2024;11(13):2307798. doi:10.1002/advs.202307798

166. Zhang D, Zhang Y, Yue X, et al. Bioinspired nanozyme-reinforced hydrogels with free radical scavenging capability for treating temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis. Mater Des. 2024;244:113125. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2024.113125

167. Chen L, Yang J, Cai Z, et al. Cerium dioxide nanoparticles-based inspector enhances mitochondrial quality control to maintain chondrocyte homeostasis in osteoarthritis therapy. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2025;14(10):2405069. doi:10.1002/adhm.202405069

168. Fan Y, Niu Z, Yin L, et al. Membrane biomimetic nanoenzyme-incorporated hybrid glycyrrhizic acid hydrogel for precise mitochondrial ROS scavenging for osteoarthritis treatment. Mater Today Bio. 2025;32:101778. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101778

169. Gao W, Li S, Miao Y, et al. Selenium nanozyme-crosslinked composite hydrogel for promoting cartilage regeneration in osteoarthritis via an integrated ‘outside-in’ and ‘inside-out’ strategy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;693:137612. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2025.137612

170. Jiang J, Song C, Hou X, et al. Nanozyme-driven self-assembled rhein gels for osteoarthritis therapy: alleviating chondrocyte inflammation by reprogramming macrophages. Mater Today Bio. 2025;34:102161. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102161

171. Li C, Chen G, Yan X, Hu B, Zhang X, Song J. Multifunctional Nanozyme PDA-Cr2O3 for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis. IJN. 2025;20:10369–10387. doi:10.2147/IJN.S538289

172. Li Y, Chen Q, Han D, et al. Mn3O4@PDA nanozyme with high-efficiency enzyme-like activity and good biocompatibility reduce oxidative stress and inflammation to alleviate osteoarthritis. Surf Interfaces. 2025;74:107659. doi:10.1016/j.surfin.2025.107659

173. Lim MJ, Oh H, Jeon J, et al. An intra articular injectable Mitocelle recovers dysfunctional mitochondria in cellular organelle disorders. Bioact Mater. 2025;43:305–318. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2024.09.021

174. Lv J, Muhammad F, Wang Z, et al. Defective RuO2 Nanospheres Attenuate Osteoarthritis Progression via Suppressing the ROS/NLRP3/Caspase-1 Signaling Pathway. ACS Nano. 2025;19(25):23080–23095. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c04011

175. Shen X, Hu J, Wang C, et al. Mitochondria-targeted NAD+/O2 co-delivery interpenetrating network hydrogel for respiratory chain restoration and osteoarthritis therapy. J Control Release. 2025;385:113975. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.113975

176. Wang Q, Zhang M, Jiang W, et al. Spontaneous hydrogen-releasing nanoenzyme alleviates osteoarthritis via oxidative stress reduction and mitochondrial dysfunction reversal. J Nanobiotechnology. 2025;23:662. doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03716-0

177. Xu Z, Yu H, Hu Z, et al. A Zinc–loureirin b coordination nanozyme for oxidative and inflammatory microenvironment remodeling in osteoarthritis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2025;17(36):50203–50216. doi:10.1021/acsami.5c07574

178. Yang C, Liao X, Wang Y, et al. Biomimetic nanoplatform integrating ceo2 nanozymes and anti-inflammatory peptides for osteoarthritis therapy. Small. 2025;21(32):2502677. doi:10.1002/smll.202502677

179. Ying T, Wang Q, Li D, et al. Constructing dual-atomic fe─fe sites nanozyme for targeted osteoarthritis therapy through mitigating oxidative stress and cartilage degeneration. Adv Sci. 2026:e08073. doi:10.1002/advs.202508073

180. Zhao Y, Duan W, Zhu B, et al. Nanozyme-engineered hyaluronic acid adhesives loading platelet-rich plasma for multilayered osteoarthritis treatment with pain-relief effect. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;35(17):2418660. doi:10.1002/adfm.202418660

181. Lin A, Sun Z, Xu X, et al. Self-cascade uricase/catalase mimics alleviate acute gout. Nano Lett. 2022;22(1):508–516. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04454

182. Lin Y, Zhu Z, Xu Z, et al. Triple-Enzyme Mimetic Manganese Nanozyme with Redox-Adaptive Catalysis for Synergistic MSU Degradation and Inflammation Resolution in Acute Gout. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2025;14(24):2502180. doi:10.1002/adhm.202502180

183. Liu Y, Li N, Su K, Du J, Guo R. Arginine-Rich Peptide–Rhodium Nanocluster@Reduced Graphene Oxide Composite as a Highly Selective and Active Uricase-like Nanozyme for the Degradation of Uric Acid and Inhibition of Urate Crystal. Inorg Chem. 2024;63(29):13602–13612. doi:10.1021/acs.inorgchem.4c01801

184. Liu Y, Qin Y, Zhang Q, Zou W, Jin L, Guo R. Arginine-rich peptide/platinum hybrid colloid nanoparticle cluster: a single nanozyme mimicking multi-enzymatic cascade systems in peroxisome. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2021;600:37–48. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2021.05.025

185. Mohapatra A, Mohanty A, Sathiyamoorthy P, et al. Targeted treatment of gouty arthritis by biomineralized metallic nanozyme-mediated oxidative stress-mitigating nanotherapy. J Mater Chem B. 2023;11(32):7684–7695. doi:10.1039/D3TB00669G

186. Mohapatra A, Rajendrakumar SK, Chandrasekaran G, et al. Biomineralized nanoscavenger abrogates proinflammatory macrophage polarization and induces neutrophil clearance through reverse migration during gouty arthritis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2023;15(3):3812–3825. doi:10.1021/acsami.2c19684

187. Shuai C, Hu S, Wang K, et al. Bionic menisci with integrated material–structure–functionality for gouty arthritis. Colloids Surf. B. 2025;252:114672. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2025.114672

188. Xi Z, Xie J, Hu J, et al. Polyvinylpyrrolidone-coated cubic hollow nanocages of pdpt3 and pdir3 as highly efficient self-cascade uricase/peroxidase mimics. Nano Lett. 2024;24(11):3432–3440. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00071

189. Xu J, Wu M, Yang J, et al. Multimodal smart systems reprogramme macrophages and remove urate to treat gouty arthritis. Nat Nanotechnol. 2024;19(10):1544–1557. doi:10.1038/s41565-024-01715-0

190. Ye Z, Wang Y, Zhang G, Hu X, Wang J, Chen X. Exploration of uricase-like activity in Pd@Ir nanosheets and their application in relieving acute gout using self-cascade reaction. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;678:380–392. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2024.09.140

191. Chen R, Yang J, Wu M, et al. M2 macrophage hybrid membrane-camouflaged targeted biomimetic nanosomes to reprogram inflammatory microenvironment for enhanced enzyme-thermo-immunotherapy. Adv Mater. 2023;35(39):2304123. doi:10.1002/adma.202304123

192. Fang RH, Gao W, Zhang L. Targeting drugs to tumours using cell membrane-coated nanoparticles. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2023;20(1):33–48. doi:10.1038/s41571-022-00699-x

193. Gong X, Wang H, Yan A, et al. Monometal-doped nanozymes ameliorate rheumatoid arthritis by regulating neutrophil ferroptosis via the MDM2–P53–SLC7A11 pathway. Mater Today Bio. 2025;35:102613. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102613

194. Li Z, Wu B, Li W, et al. Unlocking an Efficient SOD-to-CAT Catalytic Relay in a MOF Nanozyme via Dopamine-Driven Interfacial Nanoreconstruction for Osteoarthritis Therapy. Adv Mater. 2026;38(19):e72747. doi:10.1002/adma.72747

195. He Y, Tan J, Tan J, et al. Cascade nanozyme-catalyzed tophi dissolution and ros scavenging for anti-inflammatory therapy in gouty arthritis. Small. 2026:e74140. doi:10.1002/smll.74140.

196. Zhou Y, Yan H, Meng F, et al. Therapeutic nanozymes in rheumatoid arthritis treatment through disease stage-oriented strategies. IJN. 2026;21:1–38. doi:10.2147/IJN.S574600

197. Tagaras N, Song H, Sahar S, Tong W, Mao Z, Buerki-Thurnherr T. Safety landscape of therapeutic nanozymes and future research directions. Adv Sci. 2024;11(46):2407816. doi:10.1002/advs.202407816

198. Cong Y, Qiao R, Wang X, et al. Protein corona-mediated inhibition of nanozyme activity: impact of protein shape. J Am Chem Soc. 2024;146(15):10478–10488. doi:10.1021/jacs.3c14046

199. Maddheshiya S, Nara S. Recent trends in composite nanozymes and their pro-oxidative role in therapeutics. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.880214

200. Aldrich JL, Panicker A, Robert Ovalle J, et al. Drug delivery strategies and nanozyme technologies to overcome limitations for targeting oxidative stress in osteoarthritis. Pharmaceuticals. 2023;16(7). doi:10.3390/ph16071044

201. Cao H, Li W, Zhang H, et al. Bio-nanoparticles loaded with synovial-derived exosomes ameliorate osteoarthritis progression by modifying the oxidative microenvironment. J Nanobiotechnology. 2024;22(1):271. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-02538-w

202. Feng S, Peng X, Wei X, et al. Ligand-dependent activity engineering of Cu-MOFs based on biomimetic strategies for nanozyme-decorated smart hydrogels for therapy of inflammatory bone defects. J Mater Chem B. 2025;13(39):12448–12468. doi:10.1039/D5TB01686J

203. Li Y, Fu R, Duan Z, Zhu C, Fan D. Construction of multifunctional hydrogel based on the tannic acid-metal coating decorated MoS2 dual nanozyme for bacteria-infected wound healing. Bioact Mater. 2022;9:461–474. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.07.023

204. Gao X, Zhang J, Gong Y, Yan L. The biomedical applications of nanozymes in orthopaedics based on regulating reactive oxygen species. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):569. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-02844-3

205. Jiang B, Duan D, Gao L, et al. Standardized assays for determining the catalytic activity and kinetics of peroxidase-like nanozymes. Nat Protoc. 2018;13(7):1506–1520. doi:10.1038/s41596-018-0001-1

Creative Commons License © 2026 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.