Thrombocytopenia and bleeding in myelosuppressed transfusion-dependent patients: a simulation study exploring underlying mechanisms
Received 24 August 2017
Accepted for publication 11 January 2018
Published 11 April 2018 Volume 2018:10 Pages 401—411
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Professor Henrik Toft Sørensen
Rutger A Middelburg,1,2 Jean-Louis H Kerkhoffs,1,3 Johanna G van der Bom1,2
1Center for Clinical Transfusion Research, Sanquin Research, Leiden, the Netherlands; 2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; 3Department of Hematology, Hagaziekenhuis, Den Haag, the Netherlands
Background: Hematology–oncology patients often become severely thrombocytopenic and receive prophylactic platelet transfusions when their platelet count drops below 10×109 platelets/L. This so-called “platelet count trigger” of 10×109 platelets/L is recommended because currently available evidence suggests this is the critical concentration at which bleeding risk starts to increase. Yet, exposure time and lag time may have biased the results of studies on the association between platelet counts and bleeding risks.
Methods: We performed simulation studies to examine possible effects of exposure time and lag time on the findings of both randomized trials and observational data.
Results: Exposure time and lag time reduced or even reversed the association between the risk of clinically relevant bleeding and platelet counts. The frequency of platelet count measurements influenced the observed bleeding risk at a given platelet count trigger. A transfusion trigger of 10×109 platelets/L resulted in a severely distorted association, which closely resembled the association reported in the literature. At triggers of 0, 5, 10, and 20×109 platelets/L the observed percentages of patients experiencing bleeding were 18, 19, 19, and 18%. A trigger of 30×109 platelets/L showed an observed bleeding risk of 16% and triggers of 40 and 50×109 platelets/L both resulted in observed bleeding risks of 13%.
Conclusion: The results from our simulation study show how minimal exposure times and lag times may have influenced the results from previous studies on platelet counts, transfusion strategies, and bleeding risk and caution against the generally recommended universal trigger of 10×109 platelets/L.
Keywords: platelet transfusions, platelet counts, bleeding, simulation study, lag time, exposure time
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]