Back to Journals » Drug Design, Development and Therapy » Volume 17

Thoughtful Discussion on Article “Antimicrobial Peptide Cec4 Eradicates Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in vitro and in vivo” [Letter]

Authors Hidayat S , Isnawati R, Panjaitan NSD 

Received 3 April 2023

Accepted for publication 12 May 2023

Published 15 May 2023 Volume 2023:17 Pages 1433—1434

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S415574

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Anastasios Lymperopoulos



Syarif Hidayat, Rina Isnawati, Novaria Sari Dewi Panjaitan

Center for Biomedical Research, Research Organization for Health, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Cibinong Science Center, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia

Correspondence: Novaria Sari Dewi Panjaitan, Center for Biomedical Research, Research Organization for Health, National Research and Innovation Agency (BRIN), Cibinong Science Center, Jl. Raya Bogor No. 490, Cibinong – Bogor Km. 46, Cibinong, West Java, Indonesia, Email [email protected]


View the original paper by Dr Peng and colleagues


Dear editor

The works performed by Peng et al were much appreciated, as the effects of Cec4 on bacterial membrane permeability, membrane potential, and the production of bacterial reactive oxygen species were well-explored.1 Based on the previous study, 41 amino acids-antimicrobial peptide Cec4 had been reported to be effective against the in vitro growth of A. baumannii ATCC19606 reference strain with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 4 µg/mL which even quantitatively inhibits 50% formation of bacterial biofilm formed by A. baumannii ATCC19606 and carbapenem resistant A. baumannii clinical isolates.2 The results reported in their recently published study were obviously promising. Furthermore, results regarding the A. baumannii bacterial load in C. elegans showed that the bacterial count in the nematodes was significantly lower compared under the treatment with Cec4 compared to the control group. This data showed the effectiveness of Cec4 antimicrobial peptides. However, after reading and reviewing this study in detail, a few suggestions for improving future studies in the field are provided here.

The control used in the experimental work designed to unravel the bactericidal effects of peptide Cec4 exerted through its binding ability to the bacterial cell membrane was not clearly explained. If the control used was the buffer system of the experiment, we advise that additional positive and negative controls be included in any future study.3 In addition, since a growing body of evidence suggests that potential antimicrobial peptides not only directly kill pathogens, but may also modulate and even bridge innate and adaptive immune responses,4,5 detailed information regarding immune response and essential survival protein levels of the cells under antimicrobial peptide treatment are highly suggested to be revealed together with the in vitro toxicity assay. Regardless, the works performed by the authors were appreciated since the detailed mechanisms of Cec4 antimicrobial activity started to be unraveled by proving that bacterial cell membrane was disrupted by Cec4 peptide and a higher level of ROS production in A. baumannii ATCC19606. A suggestion of exploring the specific protein or site targeted by the Cec4 peptide could be considered in future studies in this field.

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge Peng et al, as the authors of the discussed study for their great works. The authors also would like to convey gratitude and acknowledge Dr. Sunarno and all researchers in the Center for Biomedical Research BRIN for the support.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising, or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Disclosure

All authors stated that there is no conflict of interest related to the work, authors, and affiliation of the discussed study.

References

1. Peng J, Wang Y, Wu Z, et al. Antimicrobial peptide Cec4 eradicates multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in vitro and in vivo. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2023;17:977–992. doi:10.2147/DDDT.S405579

2. Liu W, Wu Z, Mao C, et al. Antimicrobial peptide Cec4 eradicates the bacteria of clinical carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii biofilm. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1–13. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.01532

3. Matsuzaki K. Control of cell selectivity of antimicrobial peptides. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1788(8):1687–1692. doi:10.1016/j.bbamem.2008.09.013

4. Huan Y, Kong Q, Mou H, Yi H. Antimicrobial peptides: classification, design, application and research progress in multiple fields. Front Microbiol. 2020;11:1–21. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.582779

5. Blancas-Luciano BE, Zamora-Chimal J, da Silva-de Rosenzweig PG, Ramos-Mares M, Fernández-Presas AM. Macrophages immunomodulation induced by Porphyromonas gingivalis and oral antimicrobial peptides. Odontology. 2023. doi:10.1007/s10266-023-00798-w

Creative Commons License © 2023 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.