Back to Journals » Diabetes, Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity: Targets and Therapy » Volume 12

Teneligliptin and “Thorough QTc study”: thorough enough?

Authors Ghosal S 

Received 24 June 2019

Accepted for publication 24 June 2019

Published 15 July 2019 Volume 2019:12 Pages 1141—1142

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/DMSO.S220562

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Juei-Tang Cheng



Samit Ghosal

Department of Endocrinology, Nightingale Hospital, Kolkata, India

I read with interest the “Thorough QTc study” with teneligliptin by Erande et al.1 It came as a surprise to me that the basic structure required to conduct such a trial as per the ICH E14 recommendations for the industry was not followed.2 The recommended design to conduct such a trial was not universally followed (Table1).

View the original paper by Erande and colleagues

Dear editor

I read with interest the “Thorough QTc study” with teneligliptin by Erande et al1. It came as a surprise to me that the basic structure required to conduct such a trial as per the ICH E14 recommendations for the industry was not followed.2 The recommended design to conduct such a trial was not universally followed (Table1).

Table 1 Requirements for a thorough QT/QTc study2

The original thorough QT/QTc study was conducted by the recommending authority (PMDA) in Japan using a dose range of 40 mg (therapeutic dose) and 160 mg (experimental dose) for teneligliptin compared to moxifloxacin 400 mg (active control dose).3 The upper limit of 90% CI was more than 10 ms for the 160 mg dose in both sexes. More than 10 ms CI was also documented in females with the 40 mg dose, prompting the Japanese authorities to include this adverse event as a warning.

In view of the above-mentioned deficiency in the study design as well as reporting strategy, the data analyzed in the Erande et al, study can be considered as an effect of teneligliptin on QT interval and not a thorough QTc study.

I would be obliged if the following issues were adequately clarified with your involvement.

Disclosure

The author has no conflicts of interest to declare in this communication.

References

1. Erande S, Sarwardekar S, Desai B. QT/QTc safety and efficacy evaluation of teneligliptin in Indian type 2 diabetes mellitus patients: the “thorough QT/QTc” study (Q-SET study). Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2019;12:961–967. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S202458

2. Guidance for Industry. E14 clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for non-antiarrhythmic drugs. [Online] Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/71372/download. Accessed 22, 2019.

3. Report on the deliberation result; 2012. [Online] Available from: https://www.pmda.go.jp/files/000153594.pdf. Accessed June 22, 2019.

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.