Back to Journals » Risk Management and Healthcare Policy » Volume 15

Suicide and Suicide Attempts Among Patients Attending Primary Health Care Facilities in Uganda: A Medical Records Review

Authors Kaggwa MM , Rukundo GZ , Wakida EK , Maling S, Sserumaga BM, Atim LM, Obua C 

Received 13 January 2022

Accepted for publication 7 April 2022

Published 19 April 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 703—711

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S358187

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Jongwha Chang



Mark Mohan Kaggwa,1,2 Godfrey Zari Rukundo,1,2 Edith K Wakida,2– 4 Samuel Maling,1 Baker Makaya Sserumaga,1,2 Letizia Maria Atim,1,2 Celestino Obua5

1Department of Psychiatry, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda; 2African Centre for Suicide Prevention and Research, Mbarara, Uganda; 3Office of Research Administration, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda; 4Department of Medical Education, California University of Science and Medicine, San Barnardino, CA, United States of America; 5Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda

Correspondence: Mark Mohan Kaggwa, Email [email protected]

Background: Suicide is one of the leading causes of death globally, accounting for about 800,000 deaths annually. The suicide burden drastically increased since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic. In Uganda, no known study has determined the suicide rate since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Objective: To determine the suicide mortality rate and describe the characteristics of victims of suicide attempts from January to December 2020 in south western Uganda.
Methods: This study was based on the health management information systems (HMIS) of patients’ registered data for the year 2020 at 15 selected primary health care facilities in four districts in south-western Uganda. We used a data extraction tool to capture demographic and clinical characteristics of the individuals who had attempted or completed suicide. We estimated yearly incidence rates of fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts, and used chi-square and t-test to determine the statistical difference between suicide attempt outcomes.
Results: A total of 130 non-fatal suicide attempts and 26 suicides were identified. Majority were male 69.87% (n = 109/156) and the mean age was 27.16 (SD = 14.71) years. The overall incidence of suicide attempts was about 60 attempts per 100,000 people, while that of completed suicide was about three deaths per 100,000 people. The suicide attempts increased following the first month of COVID-19 lockdown in the country (March 2020) and most individuals attempted suicide by poisoning (n = 144).
Conclusion: Suicide is a common occurrence in primary health care settings of Uganda and there has been a rapid increase in suicide attempts since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. With suicide by poisoning being common, there is need for proactive interventions, such as the control of pesticides and herbicides, to prevent suicide among members of this community, especially during pandemic conditions.

Keywords: suicide, non-fatal suicide attempt, suicide attempt, primary health care, COVID-19, pandemic, Uganda

Introduction

Suicide is one of the leading causes of death globally, with 1 in every 100 deaths due to suicide.1 For each fatal suicide, there are many more persons with serious suicidal ideations and non-fatal suicide attempts.2 Suicide rates are reported to have increased during the COVID-19 pandemic in most parts of the globe.3–7 However, some countries like Canada reported a decline from 10.82 per 100,000 pre-pandemic to 7.34 per 100,000 during the pandemic.8 Approximately 44% of people with suicidal ideations have contacted their health care providers in the month before their suicide attempt, and most leave the health care facilities without proper assessment and management.9 This scenario is attributed to poor mental health services in primary healthcare facilities especially in low-income settings such as Uganda.10 For example, in terms of human resource, compared with global averages of 3.96 psychiatrists per 100,000 people,11 Uganda had less than 50 psychiatrists to serve over 44 million people during the COVID-19 pandemic; a number too low to serve the overwhelming mental health burden in the country.

In Uganda, the mental health services are offered at different levels of health facilities starting with health centres II to IV, then general hospitals, regional referral hospitals (tertiary health facility), and at the national referral hospitals.12,13 The expertise and knowledge about mental illness such as suicide assessment and management are better at higher facility levels, beginning at health centre IV.12 Mental health professionals work from health centres (psychiatric nurses), general hospital (psychiatry nurses and psychiatric clinical officers), and then specialist psychiatrists and other mental health professionals at regional and national referral hospitals.13 The health workers at the lower primary health facilities (II to III) are believed to have lower levels of knowledge, poor attitude, and higher levels of stigma about suicide. In addition, individuals with suicidality have poor health seeking behaviors since suicide is considered illegal in Uganda.14,15 Individuals who attempt suicide (a criminal offence) are sentenced for six months, an action carried out to keep the victim safe and give them time to change their mindset about suicide.16,17 However, no mental illness or psychological treatment is given in jail to these individuals.16,18 According to the Penal Code Act of Uganda, suicide is still considered as a criminal act. The illegality of suicide forces many to aim at completed suicide instead of being considered criminals after a failed suicide attempt.14,15 The methods used for completing suicide in Uganda include: hanging, drug overdose, burning, ingestion of poisons, jumping from a height, drowning, among others.14,15,19

In Uganda, the suicide rate declined from 15.91 per 100,000 population in the year 2000 to 4.6 per 100,000 people in 2018.20,21 This decline may be associated with improvement in the country’s mental health care services over the years. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the mental health burden and suicide cases increased across the globe.6,7,22,23 Therefore, in this study we describe the burden of suicide during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic in south-western Uganda. A country where the mental health units were used as COVID-19 treatment centres. The findings of this study may give policy makers and mental health practitioners some insight into what may be expected as the pandemic progresses, for better preparation and interventions. With the country having no known suicide database, we performed a retrospective review of the health management information system (HMIS) registers to describe suicide occurrence during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

Study Design and Area

This was an observational retrospective medical records review of patient information (both inpatients and outpatients) collected between January and December 2020, at 15 rural-based public health facilities (five HC III, nine HC IV, and a hospital) in four randomly selected districts (Mbarara, Rwampara, Ntungamo, and Isingiro) in south-western Uganda. The primary source of data was the Ministry of Health paper-based Health Management Information System (HMIS) registers for patient chartings, that captures the patient identification number, name, address, age, anthropometric measurements, gender, next of kin, substances of addiction used, physical symptoms, investigations, diagnosis, and treatments given.

Eligibility Criteria

We only included registered patient cases of fatal or non-fatal suicide attempts across age groups. Records of all patients who were reported to have accidentally ingested poison were excluded.

Data Collection Procedure

We identified the HMIS register for the year 2020 for each health facility. Three individuals on the research team (LMA, MMK, and BMS) checked and traced all the cases to be included, independently. In case of any inconsistency, it was discussed in the presence of the content expert GZR. MMK entered the data in a pretested web-based, researcher developed Google Form. The entered data included level of health facility, month of the event, age, gender, district of origin, physical illness present, mental illness diagnosis, history of substance use, type of substance used/abused, and the method used to attempt or die by suicide. We also collected the total number of patients who attended the various facilities in 2020 from the district biostatisticians.

Ethical Considerations

The study complied with the ethical guidelines of the Declarations of Helsinki. Mbarara University Research Ethics committee reviewed and approved the study (MUREC 21/12-20). A waiver of informed consent was granted since we collected retrospective data and majority of the individuals could not be traced. Permission to conduct the records reviews in the HCs was obtained from the respective District Health Officers and the facility heads. No participant identifiers were included at data entry and analysis.

Data Analysis

The Microsoft Excel sheet of the data entered in the Google Form was downloaded and checked for completeness and errors by GZR. Data were analyzed using STATA version 16.0. Categorical variables were presented with frequencies and percentages. However, age was presented in terms of mean and standard deviation. The Gaussian assumption was used to assess for normality based on the Shapiro–Wilks test and histograms. Chi-square and Student’s t-test were used to determine the statistical difference between non-fatal and fatal suicide attempts. Yearly incidence rates were calculated as per district and health centre level. A p-value <0.05 was set to be statistically significant.

Results

We extracted a total of 156 records, 130 of which were non-fatal suicide attempts, and 26 were cases of suicide. The majority of the records were for males, 69.87% (n = 109/156). The mean age was 27.16 (standard deviation = 14.71) years, range of 8 to 98 years, and there was no statistical difference between ages of the males and females (ie, 27.93% vs. 25.37%, t = −0.99, p = 0.325). Among these individuals, only 7/156 (5.15%) had a diagnosis of mental illness (ie, three with depression and four with schizophrenia). Twenty-two individuals (16.18%, 22/156) used substances of addiction (ie, two for tobacco alone, nine for alcohol alone, and 11 for both). A total of five individuals had a diagnosis of a physical illness: three had HIV; two had hypertension. The mean age of individuals who died by suicide was statistically less than that of non-fatal suicide attempts (t = 2.50, p-value = 0.013). More females died by suicide compared to males (29.79% vs. 11.01%, X2 = 8.34, p-value = 0.004). For details, see Table 1.

Table 1 Relationship Between Study Variables and Suicide Outcome

Annual Suicide Attempt and Suicide Incidence

We found that the overall suicide attempt incidence rate in south western Uganda was about 73 suicide attempts per 100,000 people. The overall incidence of non-fatal suicide attempts among individuals were about 60 attempts per 100,000 people, while that of fatal suicide attempts were about three deaths per 100,000. Suicidal attempt incidence was highest in Ntungamo district at 72.31 suicide attempts per 100,000 people. Mbarara district and HC IVs had the highest suicide mortality rate with suicide incidence rates of 85.35 and 17.44 per 100,000 people, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2 Shows the Yearly Suicide Incidences as per District and Level of Health Facility

Trends of Monthly Suicide Behaviors/Activities

As shown in Figure 1, suicide attempts increased in 2020, especially after March 2020. Suicide activities among males consistently remained higher than females, especially after April. The highest incidences of suicide were in May, June, and August. However, there was a sharp decline in suicide attempts in July. There was a statistical difference between fatal and non-fatal suicide attempts across the various months (X2 = 29.15, p-value = 0.002). Fatal and non-fatal suicide had almost similar trends from January to July. However, fewer suicide attempts resulted in death from July till the end of the year.

Figure 1 Trends of suicide activities/behaviours during the year of 2020 in south western Uganda (n = 156).

Suicide Methods Used

Almost all the individuals (n = 144/156, 92.3%) used ingestion of poisons/drug overdose to attempt or die by suicide. One individual used both cutting and poisoning. Only one individual used drowning, and the remaining (n = 11) records did not clearly show the method used.

Discussion

This study analyzed the suicide attempt incidence during the year 2020 before, during and after the first lockdown following COVID-19 pandemic. The findings show a rise in the incidence of suicide attempts following the COVID-19 total country lockdown with higher suicide mortality in the most developed/urban district of the explored areas. The lockdown and its associated loneliness and increased levels of depression led to isolation of people disrupting all the culturally known stress relievers such as religious fellowship, communal alcohol drinking, in person studying, traveling, and diversion to work/employment stress.24–28 These put many individuals at risk of suicide as reported by other studies, especially due to the high level of violence use to enforce the lockdown policies.29,30 The increase in suicide in our study due to the lockdown was similar a study in Japan where the monthly suicide rate increased by 16% during the second lockdown.31 However, many studies showed an initial reduction in the number of suicide cases following the lock down, contrary to our findings.8,29,31,32 This reported difference in the trend of suicide would best be explained by the “pulling‐together effect” observed in times of national tragedies, due to people getting used to the lockdown-imposed changes.29 In our study, the suicide activities remained high but fewer individuals had fatal suicide attempts.

Our study findings, show that fatalities from suicide was common among the younger individuals, a finding similar to other studies where the youth and younger individuals were more hit by effects of the pandemic including suicide.7,33 Contrary to previous studies, our study showed that females completed suicide more than males who had more non-fatal suicide attempts.15 Despite mental illness and comorbid medical illness being a known risk factor for suicide. We did not have enough data to make any substantial conclusion about this known risk factor. However, common risk factors for suicide such as depression, burnout, stress, and severe behavioural addictions such as gambling, internet use disorders, should be screened for among patients visiting health facilities by health workers.19,34–37

We found that many of the individuals used poisoning as a means of attempting/completing suicide, which may be attributed to the fact that individuals who use poisoning require medical intervention due to the severe traumatic physical symptoms attempters experience which prompts them being taken to hospital.38 In addition, compared to methods like hanging or drowning, individuals who attempt with poisoning, depending on the poison may take longer to die. This predominant method used by attempters in our study was different from other studies which use other data sources, for instances with media report data, hanging has been the most reported method used by attempters, since hanging attracts more media attention.15,19 In south-western Uganda poisoning is a common method of attempted suicide as many people may have access to pesticides and herbicides, since farming is the predominant activity in the region. The people in the region know that these medications kill when ingested, hence their predominant use to attempt suicide.14 Completed suicide rates were more in the least rural district (Mbarara), a finding consistent with findings by previous researchers.39 Our findings differ from those in many developed countries such as US, Canada, among others, where suicide rates are higher among rural dwellers.40,41 The number of non-fatal suicide attempts increased with the level of health facility that is, higher in hospitals than health centre IV or III, however, fewer individuals died by suicide from the hospitals, possibly due to the better emergency services offered by the hospitals compared to the lower health facilities.

Implications and Future Direction

The information provided in this paper can be used by mental health providers and advocates to sensitize the community about suicide and its dangers. In addition, the information can be a basis for increasing health workers knowledge about suicide especially during pandemic periods. The finding that more suicide attempts were fatal in lower health facilities, health workers should be trained in emergency care for attempters and encouraged to use accurate brief suicide risk assessment tools to screen for suicidal behaviors that are based on reliable theories such as the tripartite affect-behavior-cognition theory, the suicidal barometer model, classical test theory, and item response theory.42 Innovative methods should be used to screen and manage suicide among the patients for example, the use of online psychological intervention to reduce suicide. Interventions that have been popular during the COVID-19 pandemic for both suicide and depression as reported by several researchers.43 The most evidence-based online psychological intervention/treatment modality is internet cognitive behaviour therapy, which is cost effective and can be used to manage other psychiatry related symptoms such as insomnia, anxiety, among others.43–45

Due to the nature of suicide behaviors and its association to the biopsychosocial spiritual and economic factors, we propose future researchers to use Online Photovoice (OPV) qualitative methods in understanding suicidal behaviors in south-western Uganda, as used in other studies.46–48 OPV is an effective innovative qualitative research method that gives opportunities to the participants to express their own experience with as little manipulation as possible if at all, compared to traditional quantitative methods. Also, OPV increases group and organizational synergy especially in experimental studies.

Future researchers and policy makers should also advocate for the decriminalization of suicide in Uganda because many individuals with suicidal behaviors shy away from health facilities due to fear of receiving punishment for their suicidal behaviors. Systems should also be put in place to assess and manage victims already jailed due to attempted suicide. This can be done through regular visits to prisons by psychiatrists and other mental health professionals.

Limitations

This study encountered some limitations such as the fact that we were extracting information from the HMIS registers, we may have failed to obtain some relevant information from the registers. Secondly, mental illness is not regularly captured in the HMIS registers, thus information bias could not be ruled out. Lastly, being rural and less economically developed, the community may have difficulty accessing the health facilities in the region due to poor transportation system, extreme poverty, among other reasons.49 Many individuals who attempt suicide in the villages may not reach the facilities and this information may have been missed in our data collection. Thus, the findings may not be a true representative of suicide rates and behaviors of the region.

Conclusions

Suicide is a common occurrence in primary health care settings of south-western Uganda and there has been a rapid increase in suicide attempts since the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. With suicide by poisoning being common in southwestern Uganda, there is need for proactive interventions to prevent suicide among community members, especially during pandemic conditions.

Data Sharing Statement

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Ethical Approval and Consent of Participants

The study complied with the ethical guidelines of the Declarations of Helsinki. Mbarara University Research Ethics committee (MUREC) reviewed and approved the study (MUREC 21/12-20). A waiver of informed consent was granted by MUREC since we collected retrospective data and majority of the individuals could not be traced. Permission to conduct the records reviews in the HCs was obtained from the respective District Health Officers and the facility heads. No participant identifiers were included at data entry and analysis.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support from the district health officers for the permission to conduct the study in their districts.

Funding

This study was funded by the Fogarty International Centre, the Office of the Director of the National Institutes of Health, the National Institute of Mental Health, and the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke under Award Number D43 TW010128 (PI: Celestino Obua). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest for this work.

References

1. One in 100 deaths is by suicide - WHO guidance to help the world reach the target of reducing suicide rate by 1/3 by 2030. Available from: https://www.who.int/news/item/17-06-2021-one-in-100-deaths-is-by-suicide. Accessed April 8, 2020.

2. Piscopo KD. Suicidality and death by suicide among middle-aged adults in the United States. Edited by Rockville. Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration: The CBHSQ Report; 2017. Available from: https://www.samhsa.gov/data/sites/default/files/report_3370/ShortReport-3370.html. Accessed April 8, 2020.

3. Acharya B, Subedi K, Acharya P, Ghimire S. Association between COVID-19 pandemic and the suicide rates in Nepal. PLoS One. 2022;17(1):e0262958. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0262958

4. Koda M, Harada N, Eguchi A, Nomura S, Ishida Y. Reasons for suicide during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(1):e2145870–e2145870. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45870

5. Lee Y, Lui LMW, Brietzke E, et al. Comparing mortality from covid-19 to mortality due to overdose: a micromort analysis. J Affect Disord. 2022;296:514–521. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.059

6. Mamun MA. Suicide and suicidal behaviors in the context of COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: a systematic review. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:695–704. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S315760

7. Mamun MA, Al Mamun F, Hosen I, et al. Suicidality in Bangladeshi young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic: the role of behavioral factors, COVID-19 risk and fear, and mental health problems. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:4051–4061. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S330282

8. McIntyre RS, Lui LM, Rosenblat JD, et al. Suicide reduction in Canada during the COVID-19 pandemic: lessons informing national prevention strategies for suicide reduction. J R Soc Med. 2021;114(10):473–479. doi:10.1177/01410768211043186

9. Stene-Larsen K, Reneflot A. Contact with primary and mental health care prior to suicide: a systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2017. Scand J Public Health. 2019;47(1):9–17. doi:10.1177/1403494817746274

10. Bruckner TA, Scheffler RM, Shen G, et al. The mental health workforce gap in low- and middle-income countries: a needs-based approach. Bull World Health Organ. 2011;89(3):184–194. doi:10.2471/BLT.10.082784

11. Rathod S, Pinninti N, Irfan M, et al. Mental health service provision in low- and middle-income countries. Health Serv Insights. 2017;10:1178632917694350. doi:10.1177/1178632917694350

12. Kaggwa MM, Nkola R, Najjuka SM, Bongomin F, Ashaba S, Mamun MA. Extrapyramidal side effects in a patient with alcohol withdrawal symptoms: a reflection of quality of the mental health care system. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2021;14:2789–2795. doi:10.2147/RMHP.S314451

13. Ndyanabangi S, Funk M, Ssebunnya J, et al. WHO profile on mental health in development (WHO proMIND). Republic of Uganda. WHO proMIND. Republic of Uganda: World Health Organisation; 2012. Available from: http://www.who.int/mental_health/policy/country/uganda_country_summary_2012.pdf. Accessed April 8, 2020.

14. Kaggwa MM, Nuwamanya S, Ashaba S, Rukundo GZ, Harms S. An adolescent’s use of veterinary medicines: a case report exploring addiction. J Psychoactive Drugs. 2021;53(4):339–344. doi:10.1080/02791072.2021.1873466

15. Kaggwa MM, Muwanguzi M, Nduhuura E, et al. Suicide among Ugandan university students: evidence from media reports for 2010–2020. BJPsych Int. 2021;18(3):63–67. doi:10.1192/bji.2021.13

16. Jail time for suicide. Available from: https://www.newvision.co.ug/news/1330902/jail-suicide. Accessed April 8, 2020.

17. Lubaale EC. The crime of attempted suicide in Uganda: the need for reforms to the law. J Law Soc Dev. 2017;4(1):1–19. doi:10.25159/2520-9515/385

18. Hjelmeland H, Kinyanda E, Knizek BL. Mental health workers’ views on the criminalization of suicidal behaviour in Uganda. Med Sci Law. 2012;52(3):148–151. doi:10.1258/msl.2012.011107

19. Kaggwa MM, Mamun MA, Najjuka SM, et al. Gambling-related suicide in East African Community countries: evidence from press media reports. BMC Public Health. 2022;22(1):158. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-12306-2

20. Suicide rate estimates, crude estimates by country. Available from: https://apps.who.int/gho/data/node.main.MHSUICIDE. Accessed April 8, 2020.

21. Uganda Suicide Rate 2000–2021. Available from: https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/UGA/uganda/suicide-rate. Accessed April 8, 2020

22. Kahil K, Cheaito MA, El Hayek R, et al. Suicide during COVID-19 and other major international respiratory outbreaks: a systematic review. Asian J Psychiatr. 2021;56:102509. doi:10.1016/j.ajp.2020.102509

23. John A, Eyles E, Webb RT, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-harm and suicidal behaviour: update of living systematic review. F1000Research. 2020;9:1097. doi:10.12688/f1000research.25522.1

24. Hwang T-J, Rabheru K, Peisah C, Reichman W, Ikeda M. Loneliness and social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Psychogeriatr. 2020;32(10):1217–1220. doi:10.1017/S1041610220000988

25. Giebel C, Ivan B, Ddumba I. COVID-19 public health restrictions and older adults’ well-being in uganda: psychological impacts and coping mechanisms. Clin Gerontol. 2021:1–9. doi:10.1080/07317115.2021.1910394

26. Najjuka S, Checkwech GM, Olum R, Ashaba S, Kaggwa MM. Depression, anxiety, and stress among Ugandan university students during the COVID-19 lockdown: an Online survey. Afr Health Sci. 2021;21(4):1533–1543. doi:10.4314/ahs.v21i4.6

27. Al Mamun F, Hosen I, Misti JM, Kaggwa MM, Mamun MA. Mental disorders of Bangladeshi students during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:645–654. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S315961

28. Xiong J, Lipsitz O, Nasri F, et al. Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: a systematic review. J Affect Disord. 2020;277:55–64. doi:10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.001

29. Olié E, Nogue E, Picot M, Courtet P. Hospitalizations for suicide attempt during the first COVID-19 lockdown in France. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2021;143(6):535–536. doi:10.1111/acps.13296

30. Katana E, Amodan BO, Bulage L, et al. Violence and discrimination among Ugandan residents during the COVID-19 lockdown. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):467. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10532-2

31. Tanaka T, Okamoto S. Increase in suicide following an initial decline during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5(2):229–238. doi:10.1038/s41562-020-01042-z

32. Carr MJ, Steeg S, Webb RT, et al. Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary care-recorded mental illness and self-harm episodes in the UK: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Public Health. 2021;6(2):e124–e135. doi:10.1016/s2468-2667(20)30288-7

33. Walsh C. Young adults hardest hit by loneliness during pandemic. The Harvard Gazette February 17, 2021; 2021.

34. Jahan I, Hosen I, Al Mamun F, Kaggwa MM, Griffiths MD, Mamun MA. How has the COVID-19 pandemic impacted internet use behaviors and facilitated problematic internet use? A Bangladeshi study. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2021;14:1127–1138. doi:10.2147/PRBM.S323570

35. Kajjimu J, Kaggwa MM, Bongomin F. Burnout and associated factors among medical students in a public university in Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021;12:63–75. doi:10.2147/AMEP.S287928

36. Kaggwa MM, Kajjimu J, Sserunkuma J, et al. Prevalence of burnout among university students in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2021;16(8):e0256402. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0256402

37. Wang C, Chudzicka-Czupała A, Tee ML, et al. A chain mediation model on COVID-19 symptoms and mental health outcomes in Americans, Asians and Europeans. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):6481. doi:10.1038/s41598-021-85943-7

38. Corkeron M. Emergency management of poisoning. In: Haddad and Winchester’s Clinical Management of Poisoning and Drug Overdose. 2007:13–61.

39. Isometsä E, Heikkinen M, Henriksson M, Marttunen M, Aro H, Lönnqvist J. Differences between urban and rural suicides. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1997;95(4):297–305. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1997.tb09635.x

40. Reccord C, Power N, Hatfield K, et al. Rural-urban differences in suicide mortality: an observational study in newfoundland and labrador, Canada: différences de la mortalité par suicide en milieu rural-urbain: une Étude observationnelle à terre-Neuve et labrador, Canada. Can J Psychiatry. 2021;66(10):918–928. doi:10.1177/0706743721990315

41. Suicide in rural areas. Available from: https://www.ruralhealthinfo.org/toolkits/suicide/1/rural#:~:text=The%20suicide%20rate%20is%20nearly,100%2C000%20people%20in%20urban%20areas. Accessed April 8, 2020

42. Harris KM, Syu JJ, Lello OD, Chew YL, Willcox CH, Ho RH. The ABC’s of suicide risk assessment: applying a tripartite approach to individual evaluations. PLoS One. 2015;10(6):e0127442. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127442

43. Ho CS, Chee CY, Ho RC. Mental health strategies to combat the psychological impact of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) beyond paranoia and panic. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2020;49(3):155–160. doi:10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.202043

44. Zhang MW, Ho RC. Moodle: the cost effective solution for internet cognitive behavioral therapy (I-CBT) interventions. Technol Health Care. 2017;25(1):163–165. doi:10.3233/thc-161261

45. Soh HL, Ho RC, Ho CS, Tam WW. Efficacy of digital cognitive behavioural therapy for insomnia: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Sleep Med. 2020;75:315–325. doi:10.1016/j.sleep.2020.08.020

46. Tümkaya S, Kayiran BK, Tanhan A, Arslan Ü. Using Online Photovoice (OPV) to understand youths’ perceptions of distance education during COVID-19. Int J Educ Literacy Stud. 2021;9(4):45–60.

47. Tanhan A. Utilizing online photovoice (OPV) methodology to address biopsychosocial spiritual economic issues and wellbeing during COVID-19: adapting OPV to Turkish. Turk Stud. 2020;15(4):1029–1086. doi:10.7827/TurkishStudies.44451

48. Doyumgaç I, Tanhan A, Kiymaz MS. Understanding the most important facilitators and barriers for online education during COVID-19 through online photovoice methodology. Int J High Educ. 2021;10(1):166–190. doi:10.5430/ijhe.v10n1p166

49. Malande OO, Munube D, Afaayo RN, et al. Barriers to effective uptake and provision of immunization in a rural district in Uganda. PLoS One. 2019;14(2):e0212270. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0212270

Creative Commons License © 2022 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.