Back to Journals » International Journal of Women's Health » Volume 15

Study on the Efficacy of “Information Platform + Self-Care Model” on the Health Status of Discharged Patients Following Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery

Authors Tian T, Guan MJ, Liu LJ, Su XQ, Wang H, He L

Received 6 April 2023

Accepted for publication 11 July 2023

Published 25 July 2023 Volume 2023:15 Pages 1185—1195

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S416134

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Elie Al-Chaer



Tian Tian,1,* Mei-Jun Guan,1,* Li-Juan Liu,1 Xiao-Qiu Su,1 Hui Wang,2 Li He1

1Department of Gynecology, Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, People’s Republic of China; 2Department of Gynecological Day Surgery, Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, 611731, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Li He, Department of Gynecology, Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, No. 1617 of Riyue Anenue, Qingyang District, Chengdu, 611731, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 13881782966, Email [email protected]

Objective: To discuss the impact of the “information platform + self-care model” on the health status of discharged patients following vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES).
Methods: Patients underwent vNOTES at a tertiary specialized women’s and children’s hospital in Chengdu. They were randomly assigned to one of two groups—the intervention group (29 patients) and the control group (29 patients). The control group received standard education after discharge, while the intervention group received guidance based on an “information platform + self-care model” on discharge; a questionnaire survey was conducted for both groups one month after discharge.
Results: The quality of life score in the intervention group was higher than that in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05); the scores of the intervention group on dimensions such as vitality, general health perceptions, physical role functioning, social role functioning, emotional role functioning, and mental health, except for physical functioning (Z =  0.034, P =  0.973) and bodily pain (Z =  1.470, P =  0.141), were higher than those in the control group one month after discharge, and the difference was statistically significant (P <  0.05). There was no patient (0) in the intervention group who had an unscheduled visit/admission, and there was 1 patient (3.6%) in the control group who had unscheduled visit/admission; there were no statistical differences between the two groups in the number of patients who had an unscheduled visit/admission 1 month after discharge (P =  0.491).
Conclusion: The application of the “information platform + self-care model” can, to a certain extent, improve the health status of patients following vNOTES after discharge, and it can also reduce unscheduled visits/admissions, but more research with a larger sample size is required.

Keywords: gynecology, health status, information platform, self-care, trans-vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, vNOTES

Background

Vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) refers to a surgical technique in which the target tissue in the abdominal cavity is accessed surgically through the vagina, the natural orifice of the human body,1 an excellent location for gynecological surgery. Due to gynecologists familiarity in vaginal and endoscopic procedures, vNOTES has been rapidly adopted for use in both routine2,3 and complex gynecological procedures.4–6 The advantages of the technology are gradually being reported.7,8 However, as an emerging technique, although it can provide shorter surgery duration, lower postoperative pain scores, shorter hospital stays and better cosmetic outcomes in different types of gynecological surgery,9–12 vNOTES is still in the initial exploratory stage,13 and the limitations of surgical instruments and the lack of experience and mature surgical techniques increase the surgical risks,14 which may lead to postoperative complications.15 With vNOTES incision in the posterior fornix, patients are concerned that the wound may be painful, the incision infection may be difficult to detect, and even affect sexual life and fertility after surgery, which aggravates the psychological burden of patients.16 All of these factors contribute to poor patient prognosis and readmission.17 As a result, health education and guidance prior to discharge are vital to maintain the health status of discharged patients. A review of literature revealed that the current care of patients undergoing vNOTES is focused primarily on the perioperative period,16 with few studies on the health outcomes of patients in preliminary rehabilitation at home and within their community after discharge. Thus, at this stage, it is critical to focus on guidance and education, as well as establish a follow-up mechanism for early prevention and treatment and strengthen self-care capacity of patients.

Modern consumers value convenience and simplicity when acquiring information and making purchases. Information from the internet is accessible to many individuals via their mobile phones. Thus, using the WeChat public platform, the nursing staff of the hospital can on the one hand, provide health education and guidance with precise expertise to improve work efficiency, and on the other hand, provide continuous care services for discharged patients by releasing disease and health care knowledge to encourage them to strengthen health management.18 According to the “Orem self-care theory”, each person is responsible for their own health-related self-care behavior, and necessary care intervention is only to assist them in improving their self-care capacity in order to enhance their health and quality of life.19,20 Consequently, in this study, we developed a “WeChat public platform + self-care model” for the management and intervention of patients after discharge following vNOTES, and to investigate the application effect of the model on the health status of such patients, using network and information technology as the carrier and health education as the core, combining modern information means with the self-care theory.

Methods

Study Design and Participants

This study was a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted on patients following vNOTES, who were admitted to the department of gynecology of a tertiary specialized women’s and children’s hospital in Chengdu from May 2022 to July 2022.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Patients who underwent vNOTES for a routine gynecological procedure and were not transferred to other surgical procedures or had the surgery stopped for other reasons.
  2. Patients in stable conditions after surgery and eligible for discharge.
  3. Patients aged ≥ 18 years.
  4. Patients who themselves or their family members have basic Chinese literacy and use WeChat.
  5. Patients who volunteered for the study and gave full informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Patients suffering from severe mental or cognitive disorders who were unable to participate in the study.
  2. Patients with severe visual and hearing impairment or diagnosed with other systemic malignancies.

Rejection Criteria

  1. Patients dropping out of the study for any reason.
  2. Patients with missing data ≥ 20%.
  3. Patients who did not complete the 4-week follow-up period.

Calculation of Sample Size

We used the sample size calculation formula ; the significant level α was set to 0.05, and the power of test 1-β was set to 0.9, µ0.05 =1.6449, µ0.10=1.2816; according to the findings of Wang,21 δ = 6.7, σ2 = 61.9. The sample size for each group was 24. Given the loss to follow-up, we increased the sample size by 20% to 58, with 29 patients in the intervention group and the control group each.

Grouping and Intervention

Randomization Scheme and Blinding

Patients in this study were grouped by simple randomization. Researchers used the random number table to generate random numbers, which were then sealed in sequence in opaque numbered envelopes. With 29 numbers in each group, even numbers represented the control group, and odd numbers represented the intervention group. The intervention group received guidance based on the “WeChat public platform + self-care model”, while the control group received routine care intervention. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two groups.

Treatment in the Control Group

Before discharge, the control group received routine discharge instructions.

  1. Initial guidance: Following the doctor’s pre-discharge advice, the responsible nurse distributed paper discharge documents to patients on the day of discharge, and educated patients through both written and oral forms about discharge procedures, instructions for activities of daily life after discharge, disease observation and symptom management, medication and treatment compliance, complication identification, and access to continuous services.
  2. Follow-up guidance: The nursing staff kept in touch with patients for four weeks after discharge, and patients could seek advice by telephone/via WeChat from the team of specialist nursing staff, and the latter appropriately increased the number of follow-ups and gave guidance accordingly.

Treatment in the Intervention Group

The intervention scheme was implemented by the team’s unified trained specialist nursing staff (including education specialist, follow-up specialist, and maintenance specialist). Patients were guided based on the “WeChat public platform + self-care model” scheme both before discharge and for four weeks after discharge.

Establishment of “Information Platform + Self-Care Model”

  • 1. A standardized self-care model for patients following vNOTES was investigated during the post-discharge transition period, with the goal of developing key guidance content for online vNOTES management.
  • vNOTES is a novel surgical procedure. At this time, there is no consensus on the self-care model for patients undergoing vNOTES during the post-discharge transition period, as there is no established system and no relevant guidelines and literature. The core guidance content of the “WeChat public platform + self-care model” was gradually established in this study following an evidence-based method, a review of relevant literature, and expert consultation.

  • 2. An information platform was created, and patient follow-up information files were established.
  • The WeChat official account “Home of Minimally Invasive and Non-invasive Physicians” was used to establish a vNOTES information platform. The WeChat public platform was used for health knowledge education, symptom guidance, postoperative self-care skills training, complication observation and prevention guidance, push notification of re-examination information and follow-up time, consultation and feedback, sharing of the latest information, intermittent article and knowledge sharing on epidemic prevention and control. The management of patients during the post-discharge transition period was implemented on time by virtue of the internet. Patients who underwent vNOTES and their family members were included in the platform, and relevant personnel were in charge of answering patient questions, providing remote guidance, and advising patients on treatment or additional medical attention based on their condition. At the same time, the team’s follow-up specialists initially established a follow-up information database for patients undergoing vNOTES, and data was regularly updated and maintained to ensure the authenticity and accuracy.

  • 3. Specific guidance method in the “information platform + self-care model”
  • The “information platform + self-care model” is patient-oriented and based on the WeChat public account—“Home of Minimally Invasive and Non-invasive Physicians”. It includes discharge education, guidance on health knowledge, training on home-based self-care skills, complication observation, symptom guidance, consultation and feedback, and other aspects. Details are as follows:

    1. Initial guidance: Following the doctor’s pre-discharge advice, the team’s education specialist nurses explained each module to patients and family members through the WeChat public account “Home of Minimally Invasive and Non-invasive Physicians” after surgery, and guided them on the use of these modules, in order to strengthen the guidance on matters and related knowledge during the post-discharge transition period of patients. They also educated and evaluated patients’ mastery of post-discharge knowledge and use of the WeChat platform on the day of discharge, including the seven core intervention contents of the WeChat public platform (Table 1).
    2. Follow-up guidance: Specialist education nurses transferred all information of discharged patients to specialist follow-up nurses who were in charge of tracking the follow-up details of patients during the post-discharge transition period, contacting and interacting with patients through the WeChat public platform and telephone to regularly learn about the status of patients during the post-discharge transition period, answer questions and motivate patients periodically, and remind and guide patients to read health education content and operation videos; additionally, they appropriately increased the number of telephone follow-ups after consulting the patients and tracked the effect.
    3. When patients were discharged, the family members of patients who did not use WeChat were given the above intervention guidance, as well as a paper health guidance manual and oral education.

    Table 1 Core Intervention Content and Guidance Methods of “Information Platform + Self-Care Model”

    Measurement Index

    In this study, the primary outcome index was quality of life after discharge; and the secondary outcome index was unscheduled visit/admission after discharge.

    Research methods

    1. General data questionnaire: primarily consists of social-demographic data and disease related data.
    2. Questionnaire on quality of life one month after discharge: primarily includes psychological and mental health content.

    Quality of life after discharge: The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) was used to capture the health status; SF-36 was developed by RAND (USA) to collect data on the general quality of life of patients.22,23 It is a universal scale with 36 items in 8 dimensions. The scale is widely used and has good reliability and validity.24,25 In this study, the Chinese scale developed by Sichuan University was used; the Cronbach’s α coefficient of the scale was 0.917, while those of four dimensions were 0.747–0.894.

    Data Collection Method

    The participants provided full informed consent and voluntarily participated in the study, and the data were collected independently by the researcher using unified instructions. One month after discharge, data collection was completed on site/via WeChat/by telephone. The entire process lasted approximately 10–15 minutes, and 58 questionnaires were eventually distributed. One patient in the intervention group and 2 patients in the control group were lost to follow-up during the study, leading to a 5.2% drop-out rate. There were a total of 55 returned questionnaires, and all were valid.

    Statistical Methods

    The SPSS22.0 version was used for statistical analysis. Quantitative data are expressed as medians and quartile intervals; grouped data are expressed as frequency, constituent ratios, and other indicators; comparisons were made between the two groups in general data or quality of life or unscheduled visit/admission: the quantitative data were compared using independent sample t-test or nonparametric test; the grouped data were compared using a chi-squared test.

    Research Ethics

    This controlled trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital (No.2021–76), and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register website (www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100044134).

    Results

    Comparison of General Data Between the Intervention Group and the Control Group

    The results revealed that there were no statistical differences in general data between the two groups (P > 0.05), and the data were comparable (Table 2).

    Table 2 General Data of Patients

    Comparison of Quality of Life One Month After Discharge Between the Intervention Group and the Control Group

    The results revealed statistical differences between the two groups (P < 0.05) in the SF-36 total score as well as the scores for each dimension, with the exception of physical functioning (Z = 0.034, P = 0.973) and bodily pain (Z = 1.470, P = 0.141). The score of the intervention group was higher than that of the control group (Table 3).

    Table 3 Comparison of Quality of Life Scores One Month After Discharge Between the Intervention Group and the Control Group

    Discussion

    The Impact of “Information Platform + Self-Care Model” on the Quality of Life of Patients Following vNOTES

    The findings of this study revealed that the intervention group scored higher on dimensions such as physical role functioning, general health perceptions, vitality, social role functioning, emotional role functioning, and mental health than the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no statistical differences in physical functioning (Z = 0.034, P = 0.973) and bodily pain (Z = 1.470, P = 0.141). The following are the specific reasons: in general health education, patients undergoing vNOTES are only informed of conventional and experiential contents in written and oral forms, and some specific conditions of patients such as age, education, learning time, and learning ability are not taken into account, due to which the education is ineffective. In this study, using the public platform as a carrier, education was provided with the focus on patients through graphics, texts, and videos, and the content could guide patients on self-observation and self-care after discharge, thus realizing an ideal self-care model. Educated using this online model, patients could screen and comprehensively interpret the knowledge they needed at any time and from any location, which could not only save resources, but also improve the learning efficacy of patients. By allowing patients to consult and by providing one-on-one consulting and answering services to patients for various problems, this method upended the conventional model of discharge education, allowing for the early detection and treatment of abnormal problems and better postoperative health guidance for patients. Simply put, switching from the standard mode of discharge education to one based on the “WeChat public platform + self-care model” can speed up a patient’s return to their pre-surgery health and social functioning, allowing them to return to their normal lives sooner while also allowing for the early detection and treatment of complications to protect them and enhance their quality of life. Education for nurses that is more efficient and effective leads to better output.

    The results also indicated that there were no statistical differences in physical functioning and bodily pain (P > 0.05). The reason for this is that vNOTES is a minimally invasive surgery that causes little damage to the patient’s body, and patients who have no surgical incision on the body surface experience less pain and are thus less affected with respect to their physiological function. This is consistent with the findings of Xie,26 and Chen et al.27 Therefore, changes in the health education model have little impact on the two dimensions. A larger sample size may be used for further verification.

    The Impact of “Information Platform + Self-Care Model” on the Number of Unscheduled Visits/Admissions of Patients Following vNOTES One Month After Discharge

    There was only 1 patient in the control group who had an unscheduled visit/admission (3.6%) compared to none in the intervention group (0), and there were no statistical differences between the two groups in the number of patients with unscheduled visits/admissions 1 month after discharge (P = 0.491). Due to the small trauma, short duration, and low complication rate of vNOTES, fewer patients required revisit/readmission.28 However, given the smaller sample size and shorter follow-up time in this study, a larger sample size and prolonged follow-up time may be used for future discussion.

    Summary

    The “information platform + self-care model” combines modern information and minimally invasive surgery with the ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery) principle and can help improve the self-care awareness of patients following vNOTES. It provides systemic and individual nursing support to patients, enabling them to master the knowledge about the disease and improve their quality of life after surgery. This study provides empirical evidence for further establishing a mobile health education and post-discharge management scheme for patients following vNOTES.

    Data Sharing Statement

    All data generated or analysed during this study are included in this article. Further enquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

    Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

    The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as was revised in 2013). This controlled trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Chengdu Women’s and Children’s Central Hospital (No.2021-76), and registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register website (www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100044134). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants.

    Acknowledgments

    We are particularly grateful to all the people who have given us help on our article.

    Funding

    This study was funded by the Chengdu Municipal Health Commission (No.2021075).

    Disclosure

    The authors declare that they have no competing interests in this work.

    References

    1. Li CB, Hua KQ. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (vNOTES) in gynecologic surgeries: a systematic review. Asian J Surg. 2020;43(1):44–51. doi:10.1016/j.asjsur.2019.07.014

    2. Yang YS, Kim SY, Hur MH, Oh KY. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted versus single-port laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: a case-matched study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2014;21(4):624–631. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2014.01.005

    3. Liu J, Bardawil E, Lin Q, et al. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery tubal reanastomosis: a novel route for tubal surgery. Fertil Steril. 2018;110(1):182. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.02.139

    4. Tantitamit T, Lee CL. Application of sentinel lymph node technique to transvaginal natural orifices transluminal endoscopic surgery in endometrial cancer. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2019;26(5):949–953. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2018.10.001

    5. Chen YH, Wang DB, Tian Y, Wu SD. Pure NOTES transvaginal appendectomy with gasless laparoscopy. J Surg Res. 2014;186(1):179–183. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2013.08.026

    6. Ozceltik G, Hortu I, Itil IM, Yeniel AO. Impact of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery on hysterectomy practice. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022;51(1):102241. doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102241

    7. Ozceltik G, Simsek D, Hortu I, Yeniel AO, Itil IM. Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2022;48(3):843–849. doi:10.1111/jog.15165

    8. Ozceltik G, Hortu I, Itil IM, Yeniel AO. Vaginal approach versus laparoscopy for hysterectomy in transgender men. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2022;51(2):102286. doi:10.1016/j.jogoh.2021.102286

    9. Karakaş S, Kaya C, Yildiz Ş, et al. Comparison of vNOTES technique with conventional laparoscopy in gynecological emergency cases. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022;31(5):803–809. doi:10.1080/13645706.2021.2025111

    10. Kaya C, Yıldız Ş, Alay İ, et al. Comparison of surgical outcomes of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and vNOTES hysterectomy for undescended-enlarged uteri. J Invest Surg. 2022;35(4):918–923. doi:10.1080/08941939.2021.1958111

    11. Yassa M, Kaya C, Kalafat E, et al. The comparison of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and conventional laparoscopy in opportunistic bilateral salpingectomy for permanent female sterilization. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2022;29(2):257–264.e1. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2021.08.009

    12. Kaya C, Alay I, Cengiz H, et al. Conventional laparoscopy or vaginally assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery for adnexal pathologies: a paired sample cross-sectional study. J Invest Surg. 2021;34(11):1185–1190. doi:10.1080/08941939.2020.1789246

    13. Kaya C, Alay İ, Ekin M, Yaşar L. Hysterectomy by vaginal-assisted natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery: initial experience with twelve cases. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2018;19(1):34–38. doi:10.4274/jtgga.2017.0075

    14. Tavano I, Housmans S, Bosteels J, Baekelandt J. Pregnancy outcome after vaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, a first retrospective observational cohort study. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2021;86(5):432–437. doi:10.1159/000517834

    15. Housmans S, Noori N, Kapurubandara S, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis on hysterectomy by Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (vNOTES) compared to laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications. J Clin Med. 2020;9(12):3959. doi:10.3390/jcm9123959

    16. Tolcher MC, Kalogera E, Hopkins MR, Weaver AL, Bingener J, Dowdy SC. Safety of culdotomy as a surgical approach: implications for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery. JSLS. 2012;16(3):413–420. doi:10.4293/108680812X13462882735854

    17. Nelson G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Kalogera E, et al. Guidelines for perioperative care in gynecologic/oncology: enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society recommendations-2019 update. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019;29(4):651–668. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2019-000356

    18. Yang HL, Luan XR, Zhao LL, Wang JW, Chen YY. Design and application of health education apps based on WeChat for self-management among patients. Iran J Public Health. 2022;51(5):1020–1029. doi:10.18502/ijph.v51i5.9417

    19. Younas A. A foundational analysis of Dorothea orem’s self-care theory and evaluation of its significance for nursing practice and research. Creat Nurs. 2017;23(1):13–23. doi:10.1891/1078-4535.23.1.13

    20. Wong CL, Ip WY, Choi KC, Lam LW. Examining self-care behaviors and their associated factors among adolescent girls with dysmenorrhea: an application of orem’s self-care deficit nursing theory. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2015;47(3):219–227. doi:10.1111/jnu.12134

    21. Wang ZQ, Xie YH. The effect of the expert patient program on patients after natural orifice specimen extraction. Mod Nurse. 2020;27(03):121–124. doi:10.19792/j.cnki.1006-6411.2020.08.051

    22. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30(6):473–483. doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002

    23. McHorney CA, Ware JE, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31(3):247–263. doi:10.1097/00005650-199303000-00006

    24. Zeng YC, Ching SS, Loke AY. Quality of life in cervical cancer survivors: a review of the literature and directions for future research. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011;38(2):E107–E117. doi:10.1188/11.ONF.E107-E117

    25. Jiang MM, Li L. Psychological tests of the SF-36 scales in hemodialysis patients. Chin J Behav Med Brain Sci. 2003;2023(01):31–33.

    26. Xie DL, Zhang LY, Mao YF, et al. Application of transvaginal single-orifice laparoscope in 24 surgeries of gynecological benign diseases. Anhui Med Pharma J. 2022;26(3):560–563. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-6469.2022.03.033

    27. Chen SJ, Qi XR, Wang YW, et al. Clinical analysis of ovarian cystectomy by means of access.transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and laparoscopy. Chin J Laparosc Surg. 2019;12(2):86–91. doi:10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-6899.2019.02.006

    28. Zhang Q, Zhang L, Zha L, et al. Application of transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in tubal pregnancy. Chin J Family Plan Gynecotokol. 2019;11(8):33–36. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1674-4020.2019.08.09

    Creative Commons License © 2023 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.