Study of nasal exhaled nitric oxide levels in diagnosis of allergic rhinitis in subjects with and without asthma
Authors Duong-Quy S, Vu-Minh T, Hua-Huy T, Tang-Thi-Thao T, Le-Quang K, Tran-Thanh D, Doan-Thi-Quynh N, Le-Dong NN, Craig TJ, Dinh-Xuan AT
Received 30 November 2016
Accepted for publication 3 February 2017
Published 22 March 2017 Volume 2017:10 Pages 75—82
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Amy Norman
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Luis Garcia-Marcos
Sy Duong-Quy,1–3 Thuc Vu-Minh,4 Thong Hua-Huy,1 Tram Tang-Thi-Thao,3 Khiet Le-Quang,3 Dinh Tran-Thanh,3 Nhu Doan-Thi-Quynh,3 Nhat-Nam Le-Dong,5 Timothy J Craig,2 Anh-Tuan Dinh-Xuan1
1Department of Respiratory Physiology, Cochin Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France; 2Department of Medicine, Penn State University, Hershey, PA, USA; 3Bio-Medical Research Center, Lam Dong Medical College, Dalat, 4Department of Immuno-Allergology, ENT National Institute, Hanoi, Vietnam; 5Department of Pulmonology, St Elisabeth Hospital, Namur, Belgium
Background: The measure of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in the airways is a useful tool to guide the diagnosis and titration of inhaled corticosteroids in patients with asthma. However, its role in diagnosis of allergic rhinitis (AR), especially in subjects with asthma, is not well established.
Objective: To study the cutoff of nasal FENO in the diagnosis of subjects with AR and AR-asthma compared to age-matched subjects without AR or asthma and its correlations with the clinical and functional characteristics.
Methods: The study was cross sectional and descriptive. Subjects were grouped into control subjects, AR, and AR-asthma, based on the inclusion criteria. Exhaled NO (nasal FENO, bronchial FENO, and alveolar concentration of NO) was measured by multiple flow electroluminescence device.
Results: Six hundred twenty-eight subjects were included: 217 control subjects (children: n=98, 10±4 years; adults: n=119, 50±16 years), 168 subjects with AR (children: n=54, 10±3 years; adults: n=114, 49±15 years), and 243 subjects with AR-asthma (children: n=115, 10±3 years; adults: n=128, 51±14 years). Nasal peak inspiratory flow and peak expiratory flow were lower in subjects with AR and AR-asthma than in control subjects (P<0.01 and P<0.01; and P<0.05 and P<0.01, respectively). Nasal FENO levels were significantly higher in subjects with AR and AR-asthma than in control subjects (1614±629 and 1686±614 ppb vs 582±161 ppb; P<0.001 and P<0.001, respectively). In subjects with AR non-asthma, the cutoffs of nasal FENO for those diagnosed with AR were 775 ppb in children, 799 ppb in adults, and 799 in the general population (sensitivity: 92.68%, 92.63%, and 92.65%, respectively; specificity: 91.67%, 95.00%, and 96.87%, respectively). In subjects with AR-asthma, the cutoffs of nasal FENO were higher, especially in asthma children (1458 ppb; sensitivity: 72.97% and specificity: 95.83%).
Conclusion: Nasal FENO measurement is a useful technique for the diagnosis of AR in subjects with and without asthma.
Keywords: nitric oxide, NO, FENO, nasal FENO, allergic rhinitis, asthma
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]
Other article by this author:
Study of the correlations between fractional exhaled nitric oxide in exhaled breath and atopic status, blood eosinophils, FCER2 mutation, and asthma control in Vietnamese children
Nguyen-Thi-Bich H, Duong-Thi-Ly H, Thom VT, Pham-Thi-Hong N, Dinh LD, Le-Thi-Minh H, Craig TJ, Duong-Quy S
Published Date: 14 September 2016