Back to Journals » Clinical Pharmacology: Advances and Applications » Volume 12

Is Bodyweight-Based Dosing Truly Better Than Flat Dosing for Panitumumab? [Response to Letter]

Authors Liao MZ, Kast J, Berkhout M, Prenen H, Dutta S, Upreti VV 

Received 31 October 2020

Accepted for publication 31 October 2020

Published 9 December 2020 Volume 2020:12 Pages 189—190

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/CPAA.S289793



Michael Z Liao,1 Johannes Kast,1 Marloes Berkhout,2 Hans Prenen,3 Sandeep Dutta,4 Vijay V Upreti1

1Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA; 2Amgen B.V., Breda, the Netherlands; 3Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium; 4Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA, USA

Correspondence: Vijay V Upreti
Clinical Pharmacology, Modeling & Simulation, Amgen, 1120 Veterans Boulevard, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
Email [email protected]

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the letter by Dr. Hendrikx and colleagues.


We wish to thank Dr. Hendrikx and colleagues for their interest in our recent publication by Liao et al1 and their comments about the optimal dosing regimen for panitumumab.


The body weight-based dosing, 6 mg/kg once every two-week (Q2W) regimen, for panitumumab as an optimal dosing regimen is fully supported by clinical study data and pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations.2

 

View the original paper by Liao and colleagues

 

This is in response to the Letter to the Editor

Dear editor

Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the letter by Dr. Hendrikx and colleagues.

We wish to thank Dr. Hendrikx and colleagues for their interest in our recent publication by Liao et al1 and their comments about the optimal dosing regimen for panitumumab.

The body weight-based dosing, 6 mg/kg once every two-week (Q2W) regimen, for panitumumab as an optimal dosing regimen is fully supported by clinical study data and pharmacokinetic modeling and simulations.2

Based on our analysis of 352 patients from 3 studies, body weight impacted panitumumab exposure. Observed Cmax and Cmin increased with increasing body weight after administration of panitumumab 6 mg/kg. In addition, a population pharmacokinetic model of panitumumab developed based on 1200 patients and 14 clinical studies identified body weight as a significant covariate for the greatest contribution of interpatient variability.3 Consistent with observed data, model-based simulation demonstrated that the weight-based dose (6 mg/kg) led to substantially lower variability in panitumumab exposure across the range of body weights than fixed dosing (480 mg), supporting that a body weight–based approach leads to lower variability in drug exposure across patients. Importantly, the scientific justification of 6 mg/kg Q2W regimen for panitumumab was accepted and approved by global regulatory agencies in the USA, European Union, Japan, and over 70 countries in total.

The body weight-based dosing of 6 mg/kg Q2W regimen for panitumumab was based on thorough pharmacokinetic analysis aimed to reduce interpatient variability in drug exposure with the goal to optimize dosing and improve patient efficacy and safety, as recommended by the FDA.4 Fixed doses of panitumumab are not FDA approved and suboptimal dosing may impede efficacy and safety. It is now well understood that not all monoclonal antibody (mAb)-based therapies should be administered as flat dose regimen, nor should all be dosed based on body size as previously thought. Some mAb demonstrate clinically relevant impact of body size on exposure whereas others do not. The dosing rationale of mAb should therefore always be data-driven and based on the totality of the scientific evidence.

Disclosure

Michael Z. Liao, Johannes Kast, Sandeep Dutta and Vijay V. Upreti are employees of and stockholders in Amgen. Marloes Berkhout is an employee of Amgen B.V. and has restricted shares in Amgen. Hans Prenen has received honoraria and/or travel grants from Amgen, Bayer, Ipsen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Terumo, and Vifor pharma. The authors report no other potential conflicts for this communication.

References

1. Liao MZ, Berkhout M, Prenen H, Dutta S, Upreti VV. Dose regimen rationale for panitumumab in cancer patients: to be based on body weight or not. Clin Pharmacol. 2020;12:109–114. PMID: 32801947; PMCID: PMC7406372. doi:10.2147/CPAA.S262949

2. Vectibix® (panitumumab). Full Prescribing Information. Thousand Oaks, CA: Amgen Inc; 2017.

3. Ma P, Yang BB, Wang YM, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of panitumumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Pharmacol. 2009;49(10):1142–1156. doi:10.1177/0091270009344989

4. Zhao L, Ren TH, Wang DD. Clinical pharmacology considerations in biologics development. Acta Pharmacol Sin. 2012;33(11):1339–1347. doi:10.1038/aps.2012.51

Creative Commons License © 2020 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.