Back to Journals » International Journal of General Medicine » Volume 11

Received care compared to ADP-guided care of patients admitted to hospital with chest pain of possible cardiac origin

Authors Perera M, Aggarwal L, Scott IA, Logan B

Received 25 February 2018

Accepted for publication 22 May 2018

Published 3 September 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 345—351

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S166570

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser


Michael Perera,1 Leena Aggarwal,1 Ian A Scott,2,3 Bentley Logan1

1Medical Assessment and Planning Unit, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLS, Australia; 2Department of Internal Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLS, Australia; 3School of Clinical Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLS, Australia

Purpose: To assess the extent to which accelerated diagnostic protocols (ADPs), compared to traditional care, identify patients presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with chest pain who are at low cardiac risk and eligible for early ED discharge.
Patients and methods: Retrospective study of 290 patients admitted to hospital for further evaluation of chest pain following negative ED workup (no acute ischemic electrocardiogram [ECG] changes or elevation of initial serum troponin assay). Demographic data, serial ECG and troponin results, Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score, cardiac investigations, and outcomes (confirmed acute coronary syndrome [ACS] at discharge and major adverse cardiac events [MACEs]) over 6 months of follow-up were analyzed. A validated ADP (ADAPT-ADP) was retrospectively applied to the cohort, and processes and outcomes of ADP-guided care were compared with those of care actually received.
Results: Patients had mean (±SD) TIMI score of 1.8 (±1.7); six (2.0%) patients were diagnosed with ACS at discharge. At 6 months, one patient (0.3%) re-presented with ACS and two (0.6%) died of non-coronary causes. The ADAPT-ADP defined 97 (33.4%) patients as being at low risk and eligible for early ED discharge, but who instead incurred mean hospital stay of 1.5 days, with 40.2% in telemetry beds, and 21.6% subject to non-invasive testing with only one positive result for coronary artery disease. None had a discharge diagnosis of ACS or developed MACE at 6 months.
Conclusion: Compared to traditional care, application of the ADAPT-ADP would have allowed one-third of chest pain patients with initially negative investigations in ED to have been safely discharged from ED.

Keywords: chest pain, accelerated diagnostic protocol, investigation, coronary outcomes

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]