Back to Journals » Journal of Pain Research » Volume 13

Properties of Thermal Analgesia in a Human Chronic Low Back Pain Model

Authors Chabal C, Dunbar PJ, Painter I, Young D, Chabal DC

Received 7 May 2020

Accepted for publication 10 July 2020

Published 13 August 2020 Volume 2020:13 Pages 2083—2092

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S260967

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Robert B. Raffa


Video abstract of "Properties of thermal analgesia in a human chronic low back pain model" [ID 260967].

Views: 69

Charles Chabal,1 Peter J Dunbar,1 Ian Painter,2 Douglas Young,3 Darah C Chabal4

1Soovu Labs Inc., Seattle, WA, USA; 2Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA; 3Northern California Research, Sacramento, CA, USA; 4Biology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Correspondence: Charles Chabal
Soovu Labs Inc., Seattle, WA, USA
Tel +1 206-579-4910
Email Chuck@Soovu.com

Purpose: For years, heat has been used for comfort and analgesia is recommended as a first-line therapy in many clinical guidelines. Yet, there are questions that remain about the actual effectiveness of heat for a condition as common as chronic low back pain, and factors such as time of onset, optimal temperature, and duration of effect.
Materials and Methods: A randomized double-blinded controlled trial was designed to compare the analgesic response to heat delivered via pulses at 45°C (experimental group, N=49) to steady heat at 37°C (control group, N=51) in subjects with longstanding low back pain. Treatment lasted 30 minutes with follow-up out to four hours. The hypothesis was that the experimental group would experience a higher degree of analgesia compared to the control group. Time of onset and duration of effect were also measured.
Results: Both groups were similar in average duration of pain (10.3 years). The primary outcome measure was pain reduction at 30 minutes after the end of treatment, using a 10-points numeric pain scale. Reduction in pain was greater for the experimental group than the control group (difference in mean reduction = 0.72, 95% CI 0.15– 1.29, p = 0.014). Statistically significant differences in pain levels were observed from the first measure at 5 minutes of treatment through 120 minutes after completion of treatment. Reduction in pain associated movement was greater in the active heat group than the placebo group (p = 0.04).
Conclusion: High-level pulsed heat (45°C) produced significantly more analgesia as compared to steady heat at 37°C at the primary end point and for an additional 2 hours after treatment. The onset of analgesia was rapid, < 5 minutes of treatment. The results of this trial provide insight into the mechanisms and properties of thermal analgesia that are not well understood in a chronic low back pain model.

Keywords: thermal analgesia, heat, chronic low back pain

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]