Back to Journals » Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials » Volume 6

Pediatric clinical trials: a US perspective

Authors Oelstrom M, Hoover-Regan M

Received 7 July 2014

Accepted for publication 12 August 2014

Published 26 November 2014 Volume 2014:6 Pages 127—138


Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Greg Martin

Matthew J Oelstrom,1 Margo L Hoover-Regan2

1Children’s Hospital of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA; 2Division of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, The University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA

Background: Since the scientific revolution, systematic child-subject experimentation has evolved, with regard not only to scientific methodology but also to appreciation of the vulnerability of pediatric subjects. Permission-assent or informed consent policies serve to protect pediatric subjects. Unfortunately, child-subject and parent-surrogate understanding of research is not satisfactory.
Methods: The PubMed, Essential Evidence Plus, and CINAHL Plus databases were searched for literature on informed consent, permission, and assent in pediatric clinical trials. Articles with an emphasis on the parents' and subjects' understanding of clinical trials were selected for review and summary.
Results: Seventy unique articles satisfied the search criteria. Each article was reviewed thoroughly for information about the informed consent process, parent (and, in some cases, child-subject) understanding of the nature of specific pediatric clinical trials, and procedures used or proposed to improve understanding of clinical research by subjects and/or their parents.
Conclusion: Many parent-surrogates and child-subjects do not adequately understand clinical research. Parents and children often fail to understand randomization, especially as it relates to the principle of clinical equipoise. Children have additional difficulty with the nature of placebos and with right to withdraw from research at any time. Future research should prospectively evaluate interventions such as "staged consent," public education, medical trainee education, and alternative information-delivery methods, which are not yet known to consistently affect understanding.

Keywords: informed consent, permission-assent, subject understanding

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]


Readers of this article also read:

Emerging and future therapies for hemophilia

Carr ME, Tortella BJ

Journal of Blood Medicine 2015, 6:245-255

Published Date: 3 September 2015

A new recombinant factor VIII: from genetics to clinical use

Santagostino E

Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2014, 8:2507-2515

Published Date: 12 December 2014

Green synthesis of water-soluble nontoxic polymeric nanocomposites containing silver nanoparticles

Prozorova GF, Pozdnyakov AS, Kuznetsova NP, Korzhova SA, Emel’yanov AI, Ermakova TG, Fadeeva TV, Sosedova LM

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1883-1889

Published Date: 16 April 2014

Methacrylic-based nanogels for the pH-sensitive delivery of 5-Fluorouracil in the colon

Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5769-5779

Published Date: 15 November 2012

Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy

Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088

Published Date: 27 July 2012

Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection

Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711

Published Date: 14 July 2010