Back to Journals » Journal of Pain Research » Volume 10

Pain management, prescription opioid mortality, and the CDC: is the devil in the data?

Authors Schatman ME, Ziegler SJ

Received 5 October 2017

Accepted for publication 5 October 2017

Published 20 October 2017 Volume 2017:10 Pages 2489—2495

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S153322

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Michael E Schatman,1,2 Stephen J Ziegler3

1Research and Network Development, Boston Pain Care, Waltham, MA, 2Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, 3Department of Public Policy, Purdue University, Fort Wayne, IN, USA

Transparency, freedom from bias, and accountability are, in principle, hallmarks of taxpayer-funded institutions. Unfortunately, it seems that at least one institution, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), continues to struggle with all three.
What began with a prescribing guideline created in secrecy has now evolved to the use of statistical data and public statements that fail to capture not only the complexity of the problem but also the distinction between licit and illicit opioids and their relationship to the alarming increase in unintentional overdose. This is unfortunately consistent with Mark Twain’s assertion that “There are lies, there are damn lies, and then there are statistics.”1


Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF] 

 

Other articles by this author:

A glimmer of hope in American pain medicine?

Schatman ME

Journal of Pain Research 2016, 9:509-513

Published Date: 13 July 2016

Does a research group increase impact on the scientific community or general public discussion? Alternative metric-based evaluation

De Gregori M, Scotti V, De Silvestri A, Curti M, Fanelli G, Allegri M, Schatman ME

Journal of Pain Research 2016, 9:391-395

Published Date: 11 June 2016

The MEDD myth: the impact of pseudoscience on pain research and prescribing-guideline development

Fudin J, Pratt Cleary J, Schatman ME

Journal of Pain Research 2016, 9:153-156

Published Date: 23 March 2016

The American chronic pain crisis and the media: about time to get it right?

Schatman ME

Journal of Pain Research 2015, 8:885-887

Published Date: 17 December 2015

The damage done by the war on opioids: the pendulum has swung too far

Atkinson TJ, Schatman ME, Fudin J

Journal of Pain Research 2014, 7:265-268

Published Date: 12 May 2014

A practical and ethical solution to the opioid scheduling conundrum

Schatman ME, Darnall BD

Journal of Pain Research 2014, 7:1-3

Published Date: 6 December 2013