Optimal Laparoscopic Management and Oncological Outcomes of Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors in Duodenum: Pancreaticoduodenectomy or Pancreas-Sparing Duodenectomy?
Authors Lu C, Jin W, Mou Y, Shao H, Wu X, Li S, Xu B, Wang Y, Zhu Q, Xia T, Zhou Y
Received 27 March 2020
Accepted for publication 29 May 2020
Published 19 June 2020 Volume 2020:12 Pages 4725—4734
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Eileen O'Reilly
Chao Lu,1– 3 Weiwei Jin,1,2 Yiping Mou,1,2 Hongliang Shao,4 Xiaosan Wu,4 Shaodong Li,5 Biwu Xu,4 Yuanyu Wang,1,2 Qicong Zhu,1,2 Tao Xia,1,2 Yucheng Zhou1– 3
1Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 2Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China; 3School of Medicine, Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, People’s Republic of China; 4School of Medicine, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, Anhui Province, People’s Republic of China; 5School of Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Yucheng Zhou; Yiping Mou
Department of Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China
Email firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
Background: Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) of the duodenum are rarely reported and optimal minimally invasive management has not been well proposed. Pancreaticoduodenectomy and different types of pancreas-sparing duodenectomy can be chosen; however, which to choose and its corresponding clinical outcomes and oncological concerns remain controversial.
Patients and Methods: Patients diagnosed with GIST of duodenum underwent laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (L-PD) or pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (L-PSD) in Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital were enrolled. All prospectively maintained data were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were grouped into the L-PD group or the L-PSD group, and the clinical outcomes and oncological outcomes were analyzed.
Results: Between June 2013 and March 2019, a total of 22 patients (11 males/11 females) underwent surgical management, including 13 L-PDs and 9 L-PSDs. The average age was 58.2± 9.5 year-old (median 60.5 year-old). The most common presentations were GI bleeding (54.5%) and abdominal discomfort (27.2%), and the dominant lesion located in the second portion of duodenum (59.1%). Compared with L-PD group, L-PSD group showed much shorter operation time (364.2± 58.7min vs. 230.0± 12.3min, P< 0.001), less blood loss (176.9± 85.7mL vs. 61.1± 18.2min, P< 0.001), faster recovery to off-bed (2.6± 1.3d vs. 1.1± 0.3d, P=0.003), anus flatus (4.5± 1.0d vs. 2.4± 0.5d, P< 0.001) and liquid intake (4.9± 1.3d vs. 2.3± 0.5d, P< 0.001). Lymph node retrieval was much less in L-PSD, but no lymph node metastasis was observed in any patients. L-PSD had much Lower morbidity of both minor (Grade I/II) and major (III/IV/V) complications than that of L-PD (11.1% vs. 61.6%, P=0.02), resulting in shorter hospital stays (10.9± 3.8d vs. 20.6± 11.1d, P=0.021) and less total cost (76,972.4± 11,614.8yuan vs 125,628.7± 46,356.8yuan, P=0.006). The median follow-up was 42 months (range from 12 to 82months) without loss. Only 1 L-PD patient suffered hepatic metastasis 36months after surgery, and given sunitinib to stabilize the disease, none of the rest observed recurrence or metastasis.
Conclusion: For GIST located opposite the major papilla, L-PSD showed comparable safety and oncological benefits when compared to L-PD, with shorter operation time, less blood loss and much faster recovery time, resulting in much less total cost. L-PSD should be applied in selected patients with experienced hands.
Keywords: GIST, duodenum, pancreaticoduodenectomy, pancreas-sparing duodenectomy
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]