Medical students’ assessment preferences at King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia
Tarek Tawfik Amin1, Feroze Kaliyadan2, Nouria Saab Al-Muhaidib3
1Community Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Cairo, Egypt; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Dermatology Section; 3Vice Dean for Female Students, College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia
Objective: To assess the preferred methods for assessment among medical students at both preclinical and clinical stages of medical education and the possible correlates that promote these preferences.
Subjects and methods: All medical students from the third year onwards were surveyed. A self-administered anonymous questionnaire was designed to gather information on the preferred assessment method for course achievement. The preferred methods were also evaluated in relation to cognitive functions. Preference for specific exam format, in the form of multiple choices, short essay questions, or both, and the stated reasons for that preference, was also included in the questionnaire.
Results: Out of 310 questionnaires distributed, 238 were returned. Written tests, projects, portfolios, and take home exams were the preferred modes for assessing students’achievements in a course; oral tests including a viva voce were the least preferred type of assessment. Questions that tested the domains of ‘understanding’ and ‘application’ were the most preferred type while those entailing ‘analysis’ were the least preferred. Multiple choice question format was the most preferred type of question (68.7%) at both pre- and clinical stages.
Conclusion: Students’ assessments at the College of Medicine, King Faisal University, Saudi Arabia, do not use the full range of cognitive domains. The emphasis on higher domains for medical students’ assessment incorporating critical thinking should increase as the students’ progress through their medical courses.
Keywords: medical students, assessment, exams, multiple choices, essay
This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. Permissions beyond the scope of the License are administered by Dove Medical Press Limited. Information on how to request permission may be found at: http://www.dovepress.com/permissions.php
Readers of this article also read:
Published Date: 3 July 2014
Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS
Published Date: 15 November 2012
Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS
Published Date: 27 July 2012
Fujiwara T, Nishimura M, Honda R, Nishiyama T, Nomoto M, Kobayashi N, Ikeda M
Published Date: 26 July 2011
Particle size reduction to the nanometer range: a promising approach to improve buccal absorption of poorly water-soluble drugs
Rao S, Song Y, Peddie F, Evans AM
Published Date: 20 June 2011
High-fidelity simulation in the nonmedical domain: practices and potential transferable competencies for the medical field
Carron PN, Trueb L, Yersin B
Published Date: 20 May 2011
Sayeeda Rahman, Md Anwarul Azim Majumder, Sami F Shaban, et al
Published Date: 7 March 2011
Silvia Riva, Marco Monti, Alessandro Antonietti
Published Date: 16 February 2011
Station-based deconstructed training model for teaching procedural skills to medical students: a quasi-experimental study
Seyyed M Razavi, Mojgan Karbakhsh, Mahdi Panah Khahi, et al
Published Date: 30 September 2010
PowerPoint or chalk and talk: Perceptions of medical students versus dental students in a medical college in India
Vikas Seth, Prerna Upadhyaya, Mushtaq Ahmad, et al.
Published Date: 30 August 2010