Back to Browse Journals » Clinical Epidemiology » Volume 2

Measuring nutritional risk in hospitals

Authors Henrik H Rasmussen, Mette Holst, Jens Kondrup

Published 2 September 2010 Volume 2010:2 Pages 209—216


Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 6

Henrik H Rasmussen1,2, Mette Holst3, Jens Kondrup4

1Centre for Nutrition and Bowel Disease, Department of Medical Gastroenterology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; 2Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 3Centre for Nutrition and Bowel Disease, Aarhus University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; 4Department of Human Nutrition, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Clinical Nutrition Unit, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

Abstract: About 20%–50% of patients in hospitals are undernourished. The number varies depending on the screening tool amended and clinical setting. A large number of these patients are undernourished when admitted to the hospital, and in most of these patients, undernutrition develops further during hospital stay. The nutrition course of the patient starts by nutritional screening and is linked to the prescription of a nutrition plan and monitoring. The purpose of nutritional screening is to predict the probability of a better or worse outcome due to nutritional factors and whether nutritional treatment is likely to influence this. Most screening tools address four basic questions: recent weight loss, recent food intake, current body mass index, and disease severity. Some screening tools, moreover, include other measurements for predicting the risk of malnutrition. The usefulness of screening methods recommended is based on the aspects of predictive validity, content validity, reliability, and practicability. Various tools are recommended depending on the setting, ie, in the community, in the hospital, and among elderly in institutions. The Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS) 2002 seems to be the best validated screening tool, in terms of predictive validity ie, the clinical outcome improves when patients identified to be at risk are treated. For adult patients in hospital, thus, the NRS 2002 is recommended.

Keywords: nutritional risk screening, undernutrition, clinical outcome, hospital

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML] 


Readers of this article also read:

Posttraumatic stress symptoms, dissociation, and alexithymia in an Italian sample of flood victims

Craparo G, Gori A, Mazzola E, Petruccelli I, Pellerone M, Rotondo G

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2014, 10:2281-2284

Published Date: 28 November 2014

Neurophysiological correlates of response inhibition predict relapse in detoxified alcoholic patients: some preliminary evidence from event-related potentials

Petit G, Cimochowska A, Kornreich C, Hanak C, Verbanck P, Campanella S

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2014, 10:1025-1037

Published Date: 9 June 2014

Warfarin-induced calciphylaxis: a case report and review of literature

Saifan C, Saad M, El-Charabaty E, El-Sayegh S

International Journal of General Medicine 2013, 6:665-669

Published Date: 9 August 2013

Letter to the editor

Zühlke LJ, Engel ME

Clinical Epidemiology 2011, 3:171-173

Published Date: 18 May 2011

Thermosensitive Pluronic® hydrogel: prolonged injectable formulation for drug abuse

Katayoun Derakhshandeh, Mahtab Fashi, Seyedalireza Seifoleslami

Drug Design, Development and Therapy 2010, 4:255-262

Published Date: 20 September 2010

The use of PEGylated liposomes in the development of drug delivery applications for the treatment of hemophilia

Rivka Yatuv, Micah Robinson, Inbal Dayan-Tarshish, et al

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2010, 5:581-591

Published Date: 6 August 2010

Hepatitis C virus infection and risk of cancer: a population-based cohort study

Lars Haukali Omland, Dora Körmendiné Farkas, Peter Jepsen, et al

Clinical Epidemiology 2010, 2:179-186

Published Date: 24 June 2010