Back to Journals » Patient Related Outcome Measures » Volume 10

Measuring improvement in health-status with the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ)

Authors Morley D , Dummett S, Kelly L, Jenkinson C 

Received 18 December 2018

Accepted for publication 6 February 2019

Published 17 May 2019 Volume 2019:10 Pages 153—156

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PROM.S198619

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Robert Howland



David Morley, Sarah Dummett, Laura Kelly, Crispin Jenkinson

Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7LF, UK

Background: The Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ) is a recently validated 23-item generic patient reported outcome measure that is theoretically grounded in the World Health Organisation International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF), as well as fully FDA compliant. The measure comprises three domains, Routine Activities (14 items), Emotional Well-Being (5 items) and Social Engagement (4 items), and has been shown to be both valid and reliable. The aim of this study was to make a preliminary assessment of the sensitivity to the change of the Ox-PAQ.
Methods: Three hundred and seventy three people with either chronic pulmonary obstructive disease, motor neurone disease, multiple sclerosis or Parkinson’s disease completed the Ox-PAQ electronically on two occasions, six months apart. Participants completed an additional four questions during the second administration of the Ox-PAQ in order to assess any relevant changes since baseline. For each of the three Ox-PAQ domains, the minimally important difference (MID) and effect size (ES) was calculated from those participants indicating small, but meaningful positive improvement.
Results: Two hundred and ninety respondents were entered into the final analysis, 77.74% of the original sample. For those indicating “slight improvement” in Routine Activities (n=19), an MID of 7.51 and an ES of 0.32 was calculated. For Emotional Well-Being (n=26), the MID was 10.77 and the ES 0.44. For Social Engagement (n=16), the MID was 5.47 and the ES 0.28.
Conclusion: Data presented provides MID improvement and effect sizes for Ox-PAQ domains that will act as preliminary guidance for those powering clinical trials assessing activity and participation. Future research with larger samples will provide further sensitivity to change data for the Ox-PAQ.

Keywords: sensitivity to change, effect size, minimally important difference, activity, participation

Background

The Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ) is a 23-item patient reported outcome measure (PROM) specifically designed for generic use in clinical trials and interventions where the primary focus is on the improvement and/or maintenance of participation and activity. The measure is theoretically grounded in the World Health Organisation International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF),1 and its development2 was fully compliant with current best practice guidelines such as those provided by the United States Food & Drug Administration (FDA).3 The Ox-PAQ comprises three domains, Routine Activities (14 items), Emotional Well-Being (5 items) and Social Engagement (4 items), and psychometric analyses indicate that it is both valid and reliable.4

An important attribute of any given PROM is sensitivity to change, ie, the ability to detect meaningful changes in health status over time.5,6 Given that the purpose of many clinical trials and interventions is to measure improvement in a given condition, this short report aims to provide preliminary evidence of the ability to detect positive change through administration of the Ox-PAQ. Specifically, analyses aim to determine the minimally important difference (MID) and effect size (ES) for each of the three Ox-PAQ domains from those participants indicating small, but meaningful, positive improvement.

Methods

Ethical approval for the study was granted by the Medical Sciences Inter Divisional Research Ethics Committee of the University of Oxford (ref: R44281/RE001).

Participants

Three hundred and seventy three people with a diagnosis of either chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, motor neurone disease, multiple sclerosis or Parkinson’s disease were recruited via their respective support organizations in the United Kingdom; the British Lung Foundation, Motor Neurone Disease Association, Multiple Sclerosis Society and Parkinson’s UK. Written informed consent was obtained electronically from all participants included in the study.

Materials

An e-based version of the Ox-PAQ was administered via Qualtrics survey software.7 As outlined in the Introduction, the measure comprises three domain; Routine Activities, Emotional Well-Being and Social Engagement. Higher scores indicate greater problems with the relevant domain. Following migration from its paper-based equivalent, the e-based Ox-PAQ has been shown to be both usable and acceptable to respondents.8

Procedure

In response to advertisements placed by their relevant support organizations, participants contacted a member of the research team via email and were subsequently forwarded a unique link to the survey.

The Ox-PAQ was administered to participants on two occasions, six months apart (Time 1 and Time 2). At Time 2, four transition items9 were included, one for each of the three Ox-PAQ domains and one as an indicator of overall health. Participants were asked to indicate their degree of change using one of five response options; “much better”, “slightly better”, “the same”, “slightly worse”, “much worse”. Demographic data were captured prior to completion of the Ox-PAQ.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics Version 22.10 Means and standard deviations (SDs) were calculated for relevant demographic variables. Mean change scores were calculated for each domain of the Ox-PAQ in order to establish minimally important differences (MIDs).11 Effect sizes were subsequently calculated as the difference between mean domain scores at Time 1 and Time 2, divided by the standard deviation of domain scores at Time 1.12,13

Results

Participants who completed the Ox-PAQ at both Time 1 and Time 2 and with no missing data for at least one Ox-PAQ domain were entered into the final analysis, equating to two hundred and ninety respondents (77.74% of the original sample). The sample consisted of 122 males (42.1%) and 168 females (57.9%). The mean age was 61.87 years (SD 10.82) and mean age at diagnosis 53.03 years (SD 13.53). For those indicating “slight improvement” in Routine Activities (n=19) an MID of 7.51 and an ES of 0.32 was calculated. For Emotional Well-Being (n=26), the MID was 10.77 and the ES 0.44. For Social Engagement (n=16), the MID was 5.47 and the ES 0.28. Further details can be viewed in Table 1.

Table 1 Mean Ox-PAQ domain scores at Time 1 and Time 2 for respondents who indicated they were “slightly better” with subsequent minimally important differences and effect sizes

Discussion

This short report provides a preliminary assessment of MID improvement in Ox-PAQ domain scores, alongside effect size calculations for each domain. The MID is regarded as the smallest change that respondents perceive as important,11 and the MIDs reported here should be sought in studies incorporating the Ox-PAQ to evaluate changes over time in activity and participation.

Traditionally, effect sizes of 0.2, 0.5 and 0.8 have been regarded as indicating small, medium and large degrees of change, respectively.14 However, these values are generally regarded as a guide, and ideally effect size interpretation should be based on analyses of the measurement properties of any given questionnaire. Consequently, the analyses presented here suggest effect sizes for the Ox-PAQ domains fall between 0.28 and 0.44, indicating small to medium degrees of change that are subjectively meaningful to respondents completing the Ox-PAQ.

It is acknowledged that the sample sizes for the reported analyses are small, although it is noteworthy that many similar studies include small numbers who reflect sensitivity to change in their analyses.1517 Additional research with larger samples will provide more precise MIDs and effect sizes for the Ox-PAQ. Further research is also planned to determine what constitutes a minimally important negative change.

Conclusion

Data presented provide MID improvement and effect sizes for Ox-PAQ domains that will act as preliminary guidance for those powering clinical trials which assess activity and participation. Future research with larger samples will provide further sensitivity to change data for the Ox-PAQ.

Acknowledgments

Funding was made available by the European Brain Council and Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd. We would like to acknowledge the following organizations for their support in recruiting participants for this study: the British Lung Foundation, MND Association, MS Society and Parkinson’s UK. Finally, we wish to thank the hundreds of participants who so readily gave their time to take part in the study.

Disclosure

This research was presented at ISPOR Europe 2018 held in Barcelona, Spain, 10–14 November, 2018, as a poster with interim findings. The abstract was published in Value in Health, Volume 21, Supplement 3, S327. All authors are developers of the Ox-PAQ and will receive royalties from its use in commercial contexts. All authors have also undertaken consultancy work for Oxford University Innovation Ltd which holds the license for the Ox-PAQ. The authors report no other conflicts of interest in this work.

References

1. World Health Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organisation; 2001.

2. Kelly L, Jenkinson C, Dummett S, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Morley D. Development of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire: constructing an item pool. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2015;6:145–155. doi:10.2147/PROM.S82121

3. Food & Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Sciences. Guidance to Industry. Patient Reported Outcome Measures. Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labelling Claims. Silver Spring (MD): Food and Drug Administration; 2009.

4. Morley D, Dummett S, Kelly L, Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Jenkinson C. Validation of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire. Patient Relat Outcome Meas. 2016;7:73–80. doi:10.2147/PROM.S102732

5. Roach KE. Measurement of health outcomes: reliability, validity and responsiveness. J Prosthet Orthot. 2006;18:P8–P12. doi:10.1097/00008526-200601001-00003

6. Fitzpatrick R, Ziebland S, Jenkinson C, Mowat A, Mowat A. Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures. Qual Saf Health Care. 1992;1:89–93. doi:10.1136/qshc.1.2.89

7. Qualtrics. Copyright Year: 2017. Provo (UT); 2005.

8. Kelly L, Dummett S, Dawson J, et al. Pretesting an e-based version of the Oxford Participation and Activities Questionnaire (Ox-PAQ). Value Health. 2016;19:A485. doi:10.1016/j.jval.2016.09.804

9. Morley D, Jenkinson C, Lloyd H. Transition questions or items. In: Michalos AC, editor. Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Dordrecht (Netherlands): Springer; 2014:6720–6721.

10. IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp; 2013.

11. Johnston BC, Ebrahim S, Carrasco-Labra A, et al. Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol. BMJ Open. 2015;5(10):e007953. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007953

12. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum; 1988.

13. Kazis L, Anderson J, Meenan R. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care. 1989;27(S3):S178–S189. doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015

14. Sullivan GM, Feinn R. Using effect size-or why the P-value is not enough. J Grad Med Educ. 2012;4(3):279–282. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-12-00156.1

15. Tu X-J, Hwang W-J, Hsu S-P, Ma H-I. Responsiveness of the short-form health survey and the Parkinson’s disease questionnaire in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):75. doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0642-8

16. Bharmal M, Fofana F, Barbosa CD, et al. Psychometric properties of the FACT-M questionnaire in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):247. doi:10.1186/s12955-017-0815-5

17. Axelsson E, Lindsäter E, Ljótsson B, Andersson E, Hedman-Lagerlöf E. The 12-item self-report World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 administered via the internet to individuals with anxiety and stress disorders: a psychometric investigation based on data from two clinical trials. JMIR Ment Health. 2017;4(4):e58. doi:10.2196/mental.8086

Creative Commons License © 2019 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.