Long Non-Coding RNA LINC00662 Regulated Proliferation and Migration by Targeting miR-34a-5p/LMAN2L Axis in Glioma

Introduction

Glioma is considered as the most lethal primary brain tumor, accounting for 80% of all central nervous system malignant tumors.¹ Despite great efforts have dedicated to the therapeutic strategies for glioma over the past years, including surgery, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rate of glioma patients remains dismal.² Thus, elucidating the molecular mechanisms underlying glioma and identifying effective biomarkers are essential to developing effective treatment modalities for this deadly malignancy.

The long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are new-founded members which occupy a large portion of the non-coding RNA family.³ They are a class of transcripts with a length of more than 200 nucleotides, with rare protein-coding capacity.⁴ Accumulating evidence has confirmed that lncRNAs function as ceRNAs to regulate the expression of microRNAs (miRNAs), and further affect the target proteins.⁵ On the other hand, lncRNAs play a significant role in the regulation of cell proliferation, metastasis and EMT of various cancers.⁶ Specifically, LINC00662, which is located at the human chromosome 19q11,⁷ was originally identified as an oncogene in lung cancer.⁸ Subsequent studies suggested that LINC00662 was upregulated and promoted tumor progression in other malignancies, including gastric,⁹ oral,¹⁰ prostate,¹¹ liver and colorectal cancer.^12,13 The involvement of LINC00662 in glioma has not yet been documented, inspiring us to investigate its biological functions and the underlying mechanism.

In the current study, we analyzed that LINC00662 exacerbated glioma malignant phenotypes and predicted glioma patient survival outcomes. Xenograft mouse models were established to assess the tumor-promoting role of LINC00662 in vivo. Mechanistically, LINC00662 functioned as a ceRNA that upregulated LMAN2L by sponging miR-34a-5p, and their effects on glioma progression were also investigated.

Materials and Methods

Data Acquisition and Bioinformatics Analysis

The expression levels and survival risk of LINC00662, miR-34a-5p and predicted target genes (ARID4B, ATMIN, DAAM1, DCAF7, ELL2, FOXP1, GLCE, LMAN2L, METAP1, TMEM109, VAMP2 and VCL) were analyzed using gene expression profiling interactive analysis (GEPIA),¹⁴ TCGA or Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas (CGGA) database. The correlation expression between LINC00662, miR-34a-5p and predicted target genes were evaluated by The Encyclopedia of RNA Interactomes (ENCORI).¹⁵ ENCORI, Targetscan, miRDB and mirDIP were applied to predict the potential binding sites between LINC00662, miR-34a-5p and LMAN2L.^16–18

Cell Culture

The human high-grade glioma cell lines, U87, U251, U343 and normal astrocyte cell line HEB were kindly gifts from Dr. Chen or purchased from Beijing winter song Boye Biotechnology (Beijing, China). A known problematic cell line U87 was authenticated by STR profile. The above-mentioned cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Corning, NY, USA) containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (HyClone, Logan, UT, USA) in a humidified environment at 37°C with 5% CO₂. TT150630 and TT150714 were cultivated as previously described.¹⁹ All cell lines were confirmed to be negative for mycoplasma.

RNA Interference

Short-hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) against LINC00662 and LMAN2L were cloned in FUGW-H1 (H1) lentiviral plasmid as previously described and H1 was used as control.²⁰ The lentivirus package was performed according to Hu’s protocol.²¹ miR-34a-5p inhibitor, mimics and their control miR-NC were obtained from GenePharm (Shanghai, China). For transfection, Lipofectamine 3000 (Invitrogen Life Technologies, Shanghai, China) was used according to the manufacturer’s guide. The RNA interference sequences are listed in Table 1.

Table 1 RNA Interference Sequences

RNA Isolation and qRT-PCR Analysis

The total RNA was extracted from the cell lines using TRIzol reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA, USA). qRT‐PCR was carried out in a Bio‐Rad CFX384 system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and SYBR Green (CWBIO, Beijing, China) was utilized to evaluate the expression of LINC00662, LMAN2L and another eight predicted target genes. TaqMan MicroRNA Reverse Transcription kit and TaqMan Universal Master Mix II (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) were used to detect the expression levels of miR‐34a‐5p. Relative gene expression was figured out by 2-ΔΔCt method and normalized to GAPDH or U6. The primer sequences are provided in Table 2.

Table 2 qRT-PCR Primer Sequences

Cell Proliferation and Colony Formation Assay

The Celltiter-Glo kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) was used to detect cell viability and the luminescence intensity was evaluated by the TECAN Infinite 2000 plate reader (TECAN, Maennedorf, Zürich, Switzerland). To conduct colony formation assay, 1,000 cells/well were cultured in triplicates in 6-well plates and incubated at 37°C. Ten days later, the cells were fixed with methanol and stained with 0.5% crystal violet (Sangon Biotech).

Wound Healing

4×10⁵ cells/well were seeded into 6-well plates and incubated for 24 hrs. Wounds were created by scratching the cell layer with a pipette tip. Then, the cells were cultured in the DMEM containing 2% FBS for another 24 hrs. Next, images were captured using a microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany).

BrdU Incorporation Assay

20 μM BrdU was applied to label cells for 15 minutes at 37°C. Next, cells were fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 10 minutes, followed by denaturation with 2N HCl for 1hr and then neutralized with 20 mM Na₂CO₃ for another 1 hr. Subsequently, we blocked the cells with 5% bovine serum albumin and incubated the cells with anti-BrdU (Abcam) primary antibody overnight. DAPI (Sigma) was added during secondary antibody incubation. The signal was visualized using LSM880 confocal microscope (Zeiss).

Western Blot

The cell lysate preparation, membrane transfer and band visualization were performed using standard procedures. Primary antibodies (1:1000) used in our study listed as below: N-Cadherin (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), Vimentin (Thermo Fisher Scientific), LMAN2L (Novus Biologicals, CO, USA) and GAPDH (abm, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China). The uncropped images of membranes used for our study were provided in Figure S1.

In vivo Experiments

All in vivo research was conducted strictly following the protocol of Care and Use of Laboratory Animals and approved by the Committee on the Ethics of Animal Experiments of Beijing Tiantan Hospital. 10⁶ U87 cells stably expressing H1 or shLINC00662-1 were subcutaneously injected into the four-week-old female BALB/C nude mice (Beijing Vital River Laboratory Animal Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Tumor growth rates were monitored at the indicated time. The tumor volume was calculated according to the formula: volume = 0.5 × length × width². After four weeks, the mice were euthanized by CO₂ and the tumors were weighed and fixed by 4% PFA.

For HE and immunohistochemistry staining, serial sections at 5 μm thickness were prepared and deparaffinized according to standard protocol. Next, the sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (Sangon Biotech) in accordance with manufacturer’s guideline. Other slides were incubated with anti-Ki67 primary antibody (1:1000, Invitrogen) overnight at 4°C. Subsequently, sections were visualized using DAB and co-stained with hematoxylin (Sangon Biotech), mounted with neutral gum and captured by the microscope (Zeiss).

Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay

The wild type (WT) and mutant (MU) miR-34a-5p binding sites to LINC00662 sequence or LMAN2L 3′-UTR were separately cloned to pmirGLO (Promega) vectors to obtain LINC00662-WT/MU and LMAN2L-WT/MU vectors. The miR-34a-5p mimics, miR-NC were co-transfected into U87 and U251 cells with above luciferase vectors for 48 hours and finally examined using the Dual-Luciferase Assay System (Promega).

RNA Immunoprecipitation (RIP)

RIP assay was performed using a Magna RIP RNA-Binding Protein Immunoprecipitation Kit (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany) in accordance with the manufacturer’s protocol. Briefly, the cell extract was prepared and incubated with magnetic beads precoated with the Ago2-antibody or with the control IgG (Millipore). The precipitated complex was tested by qRT-PCR.

Statistics

Data were analyzed with GraphPad Prism 7 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) and were presented as mean ± standard deviation (SD). All the experiments were repeated three times at least. For the Western blot, representative images from three biological replicates were shown and the bands were analyzed with Image J and normalized to the loading controls. Kaplan–Meier method and Log rank test were carried out for survival analysis. The association of the expression of miR-34a-5p with LINC00662 and LMAN2L was analyzed by Pearson’s correlation. The comparison between the two groups was analyzed using a non-paired Student’s t-test. One-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test was used to test differences among multiple groups. P-value <0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results

Upregulated LINC00662 Indicated Unsatisfactory Prognosis in Glioma

To determine the expression of LINC00662 and the relative prognosis in glioma, we used the data retrieved from the TCGA and CGGA platform. The results showed an increased expression trend of LINC00662 in glioma tissues compared with normal tissues (Figure 1A). Next, glioma patients were classified into high and low expression groups according to the median expression of LINC00662. Kaplan-Meier curve indicated that high LINC00662 expression displayed remarkably shorter overall survival in glioma patients (Figure 1B and C). Additionally, the expression level of LINC00662 in glioma cells was higher than normal astrocyte (Figure 1D). Both U87 and U251 cells were selected for further experiments due to their high LINC00662 expression levels.

Figure 1 Highly expressed LINC00662 that was involved in glioma was identified by bioinformatics prediction. (A) Relative expression of LINC00324 in normal tissue (black bar) and low-grade glioma (red bar). (B and C) Kaplan-Meier method was used to analyze the survival rate of glioma patients in both CGGA (B) and TCGA (C) database. (D) qRT-PCR results of the relative LINC00662 expression level in HEB, U87, U251, U343, TT150630 and TT150714 cells.

Suppression of LINC00662 Inhibited Glioma Cell Proliferation Both in vitro and in vivo

To evaluate the function of LINC00662 in glioma, we stably knocked down the expression of LINC00662 by three shRNA (shLINC00662-1, shLINC00662-2, shLINC00662-3) in U87 and U251 cells. As a result, shLINC00662-1 and shLINC00662-3 exhibited the most evident silencing effects and were selected for the subsequent experiments (Figure 2A). Celltiter-Glo assay indicated that LINC00662 knockdown markedly inhibited the proliferative capabilities of U87 and U251 cells (Figure 2B). The colony formation and BrdU incorporation assays were utilized to further confirm the inhibitory effects of LINC00662 knockdown on glioma cell proliferation (Figure 2C and D).

Figure 2 Silenced LINC00662 restrained glioma cell proliferation. (A) The expression of LINC00662 was knocked down using three shRNAs in U87 and U251 cells. (B) Celltiter-Glo assays were performed to evaluate the cell proliferation in LINC00662-silenced U87 (left) and U251 (right) cells. (C) Colony formation assays showed the clone numbers in glioma cells with LINC00662 knockdown. (D) BrdU incorporation assays were performed to assess the proliferative ability of U87 and U251 cells with LINC00662 knockdown. Scale bar = 50 μm. (E–G) The effect of shLINC00662 on the tumor volume (E and F) and weight (G) was observed through xenograft model. (H) HE and IHC assays showed the decreased positive immunostaining cells of Ki-67 after LINC00662 was inhibited. Scale bar = 200 μm.

Since shLINC00662-1 showed better anti-tumor effects in vitro, it was chosen for the in vivo experiments. LINC00662-depleted U87 cells were injected into the BALB/C immunodeficient mice. We found that the tumor volumes of the LINC00662 knockdown group were remarkably smaller than that of the H1 group after 21 days (Figure 2E). Meanwhile, the tumor weights displayed a similar result (Figure 2F and G). To further validate the inhibitory effects, IHC assay was used to assess the proliferation in the xenografts. Consequently, Ki-67 was significantly reduced in the LINC00662 knockdown group compared with the NC group (Figure 2H). Collectively, silenced LINC00662 suppressed glioma proliferation both in vitro and in vivo.

Silencing of LINC00662 Inhibited Cell Migration and EMT Pathway of Glioma

Since the previous study reported that LINC00662 regulated CRC metastasis,13 we wondered if LINC00662 displayed a similar function in glioma. Transwell assay showed that the decreased cell migration capacity following suppression of LINC00662 expression (Figure 3A). Similarly, the wound healing rate of LINC00662-silenced cells was significantly slower compared with that of control H1-treated glioma cells (Figure 3B). EMT is an important process to increase tumor cell migration capability.²² In support of EMT, two mesenchymal markers, N-cadherin and Vimentin were detected by Western blot. As a result, both were downregulated after LINC00662 knockdown in glioma cells (Figure 3C). Taken together, silencing LINC00662 suppressed migration ability and EMT pathway in glioma.

Figure 3 LINC00662 regulated glioma cell migration and influenced the EMT pathway. (A) Transwell assays were conducted to examine the effects of LINC00662 knockdown on glioma cell migration. Scale bar = 500 μm. (B) The wound-healing assay was performed to determine the migration of U87 and U251 cells. Scale bar = 200 μm. (C) Protein levels of EMT markers in U87 and U251 cells transfected with the lentivirus suppressing LINC00662 expression or a control sequence were assessed by Western blot. GAPDH was used as control for normalization.

LINC00662 Acted as a ceRNA on miR-34a-5p in Glioma

Numerous studies suggest that lncRNAs could act as ceRNA that interfere with the function of miRNAs.²³ Online analysis ENCORI and DIANA were used to predict that miR-34a-5p was the potential target of LINC00662 (Figure 4A), which was reported in prostate cancer.¹¹ According to Pearson’s correlation coefficient analysis, the expression level of miR-34a-5p was negatively associated with LINC00662 expression in glioma tissues (Figure 4B). Then, we further analyzed the CGGA database to explore its effect on survival. The result indicated that the expression of miR-34a-5p was positively correlated with overall survival, consistent with the ceRNA hypothesis (Figure 4C). Next, we performed the dual-luciferase reporter assay to further validate the binding site. The results revealed that the transfection of miR-34a-5p mimics contributed to the significant decrease of luciferase activity of LINC00662-WT reporter, while the luciferase activity of LINC00662-MU reporter had no significant fluctuation in any group (Figure 4D). In addition, RIP assay indicated that LINC00662 was remarkably enriched by Ago2 antibody in U87 and U251 cells transfected with miR-34a-5p mimics in comparison with IgG group (Figure 4E). Moreover, qRT-PCR assay demonstrated that LINC00662 knockdown strikingly increased miR-34a-5p expression in U87 and U251 cells (Figure 4F). These data revealed that miR-34a-5p was a direct target of LINC00662 in glioma.

Figure 4 LINC00662 functioned as a microRNA sponge to combine with miR-34a-5p. (A) Construction of LINC00662-WT and LINC00662-MU luciferase reporter vectors based on the predicted binding site of miR-34a-5p on LINC00662 (Capital letter and red square highlighted the predicted binding site). (B) The correlation between the expression of miR-34a-5p and LINC00662 in glioma tissues was determined using the ENCORI platform. (C) Kaplan-Meier survival curves showing the effect of miR-34a-5p on overall survival by the CGGA database. (D) Luciferase assay of miR-34a-5p overexpression glioma cells transfected with pmirGLO 3′-UTR reporter of LINC00662. (E) The enrichments of LINC00662 and miR-34a-5p in the beads conjugated with the Ago2 antibody were determined by performing RIP assays. (F) The expression of miR-34a-5p was determined by qRT-PCR in shLINC00662-transfected U87 and U251 cells.

miR-34a-5p Exerted Anti-Tumor Effects on the Growth and Migration of Glioma Cells in vitro

Despite several studies have explored that miR-34a-5p could suppress tumorigenesis and progression of glioma,^24–26 it is necessary to confirm the biological function of miR-34a-5p on the malignancy of glioma in our study. U87 and U251 cells were transfected with either miR-34a-5p mimics or miR-NC. Then, a series of gain-of-function experiments were conducted. Celltiter-Glo assay and flow cytometric analysis demonstrated that the ectopic miR-34a-5p expression markedly inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis of U87 and U251 cells (Figure S2A and B). In addition, Transwell migration assay was performed to evaluate the motility of glioma cells after either miR-34a-5p or miR-NC transfection. The number of migratory miR-34a-5p-overexpressing U87 and U251 cells was much lower than those of the cells transfected with miR-NC (Figure S2C). Thus, miR-34a-5p functioned as an oncogene during glioma progression, in agreement with the previous studies.^24,25

LMAN2L, a Direct Target of miR-34a-5p, Was Crucial for the Function of LINC00662

To investigate the target of miR-34a-5p regulated by LINC00662, we conducted bioinformatics analysis using four different algorithms, including ENCORI, TargetScan, miRDB and mirDIP (Table S1). From the Venn results, 12 potential miR-34a-5p target genes were identified (ARID4B, ATMIN, DAAM1, DCAF7, ELL2, FOXP1, GLCE, LMAN2L, METAP1, TMEM109, VAMP2, VCL) (Figure 5A). Among them, the expression levels of ARID4B, ATMIN, DCAF7, LMAN2L and METAP1 were negatively correlated with miR-34a-5p expression (Figures 5B and S3A). Furthermore, DCAF7 and LMAN2L were found to be upregulated in glioma tissues (Figures 5C and S3B). Meanwhile, DAAM1, VCL, TMEM109, GLCE and LMAN2L expression levels were correlated conversely with overall survival (Figures 5D and S3C). Then, expression analysis yielded that only LMAN2L was downregulated in U87 cells upon miR-34a-5p overexpression (Figure 5E). According to the bioinformatic analysis and qRT-PCR result, we supposed that LMAN2L is a direct target of miR-34a-5p. Next, we conducted the dual-luciferase assay to verify the predicted interaction between LMAN2L and miR-34a-5p (Figure 5F). Upregulation of miR-34a-5p markedly decreased the luciferase activity of plasmid LMAN2L-WT, which contains the wild-type miR-34a-5p binding site; however, the luciferase activity of the reporter plasmid containing the mutant binding site (LMAN2L-MU) showed no obvious change in U87 and U251 cells (Figure 5G). In addition, the expression of LMAN2L was downregulated with shLINC00662-1 alone and reversed by co-transfection with shLINC00662-1 and miR-34a-5p inhibitor (Figure 5H). Therefore, LMAN2L is a direct target of miR-34a-5p in glioma cells.

Figure 5 LMAN2L was a direct target gene of miR-34a-5p. (A) Venn diagram showed twelve putative miR-34a-5p target genes predicted by four different algorithms (ENCORI, TargetScan, miRDB and mirDIP). (B) Pearson’s correlation between the expression of miR-34a-5p and LINC00662 in glioma tissues. (C) LMAN2L was upregulated in glioma tissues assessed by the TCGA database. (D) High LMAN2L expression was negatively correlated with the overall survival of glioma determined by CGGA (up) and TCGA (down) database. (E) qRT-PCR analysis revealed that LMAN2L was downregulated in miR-34a-5p-overexpressed U87 glioma cells. (F) Putative binding sequence of miR-34a-5p in the 3′-UTR of LMAN2L (Capital letter and red square highlighted the predicted binding site). (G) Dual-luciferase reporter assay revealed that miR-34a-5p could bind to the 3′-UTR of LMAN2L. (H) The protein level of LMAN2L was detected by Western blot.

To verify the ceRNA network between LINC00662, miR-34a-5p and LMAN2L in glioma, we firstly manipulated LMAN2L expression using specifically targeting shRNAs. The knockdown efficiencies were evaluated by qRT-PCR and Western blot (Figure 6A and B). Next, Celltiter-Glo assay demonstrated that miR-34a-5p inhibitor could increase the growth of shLINC00662 glioma cells, which was reversed by LMAN2L knockdown (Figure 6C). Similarly, the anti-migratory effect and mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) induced by LINC00662 knockdown were rescued by miR-34a-5p inhibitor, while suppression of LMAN2L could reverse these effects (Figure 6D and E). Collectively, these data disclosed that LMAN2L and miR-34a-5p involved in LINC00662-mediated cell proliferation, migration and MET pathway.

Figure 6 LMAN2L rescued the proliferation, migration and EMT pathway inhibited by the LINC00662/miR-34a-5p axis. (A and B) The efficiency of LMAN2L knockdown was evaluated by qRT-PCR (A) and Western blot (B). shLMAN2L-1 was chosen for our further experiment due to its best efficiency. (C–E) The Celltiter-Glo (C), Transwell (D) and Western blot (E) assays were conducted to evaluate the proliferation, migration and EMT pathway of U87 and U251 cells treated as indicated. Scale bar = 500 μm.

Discussion

With the high occurrence and aggressive behavior, glioma has become a major reason for intracranial tumor relevant death.¹ It is urgent and important to investigate the biological mechanism of glioma and find new therapeutic targets to prevent tumor cell growth and migration. Convincing evidence indicated that lncRNAs have been established as crucial regulators of glioma.²⁷ Especially, LINC00662 is considered as an oncogene in several other tumors.²⁸ We wondered whether LINC00662 played a similar role in glioma progression. In our study, we analyzed TCGA and CGGA databases to revealed that high LINC00662 expression level was correlated with unfavorable survival outcomes of glioma patients. By loss-of-function experiments, we demonstrated that suppression of LINC00662 inhibited the proliferation, mobility capacity and EMT pathway of glioma cells in vitro. The xenograft mouse model was a common method to evaluate the gene function in vivo. Consequently, xenograft and immunohistochemistry were adopted to verify the tumor-promoting role of LINC00662 in vivo.

It is well accepted that lncRNAs exert their regulatory functions by sequestration of miRNAs.²⁹ Based on online databases, miR-34a-5p was predicted as a potential target of LINC00662 in glioma. Interestingly, miR-34a-5p was elucidated to be a direct target of LINC00662 in prostate cancer,¹¹ as well as acting as a tumor suppressor in numerous cancers.³⁰ We supposed LINC00662 and miR-34a-5p exerted a similar interaction in glioma. Next, correlation analysis between miR-34a-5p and LINC00662, together with the survival benefit of miR-34a-5p upregulation, gave us the confidence to further explore the ceRNA hypothesis. Then, the binding between LINC00662 and miR-34a-5p in glioma was verified using dual-luciferase reporter and RIP assay. Subsequently, functional experiments indicated that LINC00662 sponged miR-34-5p to promote glioma malignant phenotype, in agreement with the previous study.²⁴

To investigate the target gene of the LINC00662/miR-34a-5p axis in glioma, we combined four bioinformatics algorithms (Targetscan, ENCORI, miRDB and mirDIP), TCGA and CGGA databases and found that LMAN2L was the downstream effector of the LINC00662/miR-34a-5p pathway. The lectins contain a diverse class of proteins, which are able to bind carbohydrates with considerable specificity. The selectin, a family member of lectin, has been confirmed to control lymphocyte homing and leukocyte trafficking to sites of inflammation.^31,32 The galectins regulate cell–substratum interactions,³³ contribute to the tumor-promoting microenvironment and lead to tumor cell metastasis.³⁴ In addition, Cheng et al indicated LINC00662 regulated Claudin 8 (CLDN8) and Interleukin 22 (IL-22) co-expression to promote colon cancer metastasis,³⁵ inferring that both LINC00662 and lectin family participated in neuroinflammation and tumor-promoting microenvironment.

LMAN2L, a transmembrane protein located at the endoplasmic reticulum, plays a crucial role in quality control of glycoproteins.³⁶ LMAN2L gene mutation results in neurodevelopmental disorder, including intellectual disability and bipolar disorder.^37,38 It is well documented that glycoproteins contribute to epithelial cell growth and malignant transformation.^39,40 Therefore, we speculated that LMAN2L might contribute to glioma progression. However, to our best knowledge, there is no published study to investigate the relationship between LMAN2L and tumor malignancy, motivating us to explore the biological function of LMAN2L in glioma. As shown in Figure 7, LMAN2L was a direct target of miR-34a-5p regulated by LINC00662 evidenced by bioinformatic analysis and dual-luciferase reporter assay. Moreover, rescue experiments suggested that the interaction between the LINC00662/miR-34a-5p axis and LMAN2L is implicated in the progression of glioma and EMT pathway.

Figure 7 Schematic of the LINC00662/miR-34a-5p/LMAN2L/EMT regulatory network in glioma cells.

Conclusion

In summary, our study indicated that suppression of LINC00662 attenuated cell proliferation and migration through activating miR-34a-5p to regulate the expression of LMAN2L and inhibiting EMT signaling pathway. These results may provide a novel perspective on the targeted therapy of glioma.