Back to Journals » Advances in Medical Education and Practice » Volume 8

Changing opinions about research by Saudi medical students

Authors D’Ottavio AE 

Received 9 August 2017

Accepted for publication 26 August 2017

Published 13 October 2017 Volume 2017:8 Pages 709—710

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S148706

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Editor who approved publication: Dr Md Anwarul Azim Majumder



Alberto Enrique D’Ottavio

 

Rosario Faculty of Medical Sciences, National Rosario University, Rosario, Argentina

 

After analyzing the appealing communication, “Changing opinions about research by Saudi medical students,” authored by  Ahmad Abulaban et al,1 I would like to offer some complementary data on that issue rooted in the 25 years experience carried out in our medical school and related to an extracurricular and voluntary program of scientific formation in medical sciences for undergraduates. In this regard, previous considerations and results2,3 are updated and summarized.

View the original paper by Abulaban and colleagues.

Dear editor

After analyzing the appealing communication, “Changing opinions about research by Saudi medical students,” authored by Ahmad Abulaban et al,1 I would like to offer some complementary data on that issue rooted in the 25 years experience carried out in our medical school and related to an extracurricular and voluntary program of scientific formation in medical sciences for undergraduates. In this regard, previous considerations and results2,3 are updated and summarized. During that time period, 614 undergraduate students (400 women and 214 men) were admitted to that program as initiation fellows, 471 of them also fulfilling the subsequent advanced phase. Consequently, 76% of the students completed the biennial challenge. Three quarters of the research projects accepted and assessed during the 25-year period focused on biological aspects while the remaining ones were centered in educational and psycho-social features. While a total predominance of medical students was evidenced until 2004, nursing and speech therapy students increased from 2005 onward. Between 1991 and 2016, the quantitative achievements of the program were as follows: participation in 1957 communications in scientific meetings and collaboration in 267 and 200 papers published in national and international journals, respectively. Similarly, indirect contributions to 55 PhD theses were recorded. Qualitatively, the main competences acquired after carrying out both the stages were, as formerly reported, satisfactory literature search, critical reading of scientific papers, planning of research activities, feasibility, quality and pertinence of the projects, training with different procedures, data registration as well as proper wording of progress and final reports, abstracts, short communications, and full-length papers, among others.2 Moreover, a poll systematically applied after finishing both the stages revealed 95% of positive results related to the acquired competences and the resulting outcomes. The simultaneous creation and development of the Scientific Association of Medical Students strengthened its advantages and generated a fruitful interaction between this institution and the program under consideration. To sum up, research training in undergraduates becomes an advisable practice for their future professional and quotidian life.

Disclosure

The author reports no conflicts of interest in this communication.

References

1.

Abulaban A, Alharbi A, BinDajam O, et al. Changing opinions about research by Saudi medical students. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017;2017(8):571–575.

2.

Montenegro SM, Tarrés MC, D’Ottavio AE. Entrenamiento científico en el grado de ciencias médicas; descripción, análisis y crítica de una experiencia innovadora en Argentina. Rev Arg Educ Med. 2007;1(1):17–22.

3.

Gayol MC, Montenegro SM, Tarrés MC, D’Ottavio AE. Competencias investigativas. Su desarrollo en carreras del Área de la Salud. Revista Uni-Pluri/Versidad. 2008;8(2):47–52.

Dove Medical Press encourages responsible, free and frank academic debate. The content of the Advances in Medical Education and Practice ‘letters to the editor’ section does not necessarily represent the views of Dove Medical Press, its officers, agents, employees, related entities or the Advances in Medical Education and Practice editors. While all reasonable steps have been taken to confirm the content of each letter, Dove Medical Press accepts no liability in respect of the content of any letter, nor is it responsible for the content and accuracy of any letter to the editor.

Creative Commons License © 2017 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.