Impact of Intraoperative Fluid Management on Electrolyte and Acid-Base Variables During Posterior Spinal Fusion in Adolescents
Received 15 May 2020
Accepted for publication 30 June 2020
Published 27 July 2020 Volume 2020:12 Pages 69—74
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Clark Hung
Meagan King,1,2 David Martin,1,3 Renata Miketic,1,3 Allan Beebe,4 Walter Samora,4 Jan Klamar,4 Dmitry Tumin,5 Joseph D Tobias1,3
1Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA; 2Department of Anesthesiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA; 3Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH, USA; 4Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Nationwide Children’s Hospital and the Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA; 5Department of Pediatrics, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
Correspondence: Joseph D Tobias
Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA
Introduction: Various isotonic fluids may be used to maintain intravascular homeostasis during major surgical procedures. Variations in the electrolyte and buffer concentrations between these solutions may result in differential changes in electrolyte and acid-base status during fluid resuscitation. This study evaluates these changes during posterior spinal fusion in adolescents.
Methods: Patients were randomized to receive lactated Ringers (LR), normal saline (NS) or Normosol-R® (NR) during posterior spinal fusion (N=19, 20, and 20, respectively). The specific fluid was used for maintenance fluids as well as fluid replacement of deficits, third space losses, and blood loss.
Results: Patients who received NS had a greater base deficit (NS: − 2.0 ± 2.2 vs NR − 0.6 ± 1.8, p=0.031 or LR: − 0.2 ± 1.7, p=0.007) and were more likely to have a ≥ 2 point change in the base deficit (60% with NS compared to 30% with NR and 47% with LR). Patients receiving NS also had a lower pH (NS: 7.37 ± 0.03 vs NR: 7.39 ± 0.04, p=0.013) and a greater change in pH (NS: − 0.03 ± 0.04 vs NR: 0.01 ± 0.06).
Conclusion: The use of NS for intraoperative resuscitation during posterior spinal fusion in adolescents resulted in a greater base deficit and a lower pH than the use of LR or NR. Although these changes had limited clinical significance in our patient population, future studies are indicated to further investigate the potential clinical impact of these changes.
Keywords: posterior spinal fusion, intravenous fluids, normal saline, dilutional acidosis
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]