Back to Journals » Infection and Drug Resistance » Volume 15

Identification and Genetic Characterization of Blastocystis Species in Patients from Makkah, Saudi Arabia

Authors Wakid MH , Aldahhasi WT, Alsulami MN, El-Kady AM , Elshabrawy HA

Received 1 November 2021

Accepted for publication 12 January 2022

Published 17 February 2022 Volume 2022:15 Pages 491—501

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IDR.S347220

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. Héctor Mora-Montes



Majed H Wakid,1,2 Waad T Aldahhasi,3 Muslimah N Alsulami,3 Asmaa M El-Kady,4 Hatem A Elshabrawy5

1Department of Medical Laboratory Technology, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia; 2Special Infectious Agents Unit, King Fahd Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, 21589, Saudi Arabia; 3Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Jeddah, Jeddah, 21493, Saudi Arabia; 4Department of Medical Parasitology, Faculty of Medicine, South Valley University, Qena, 83523, Egypt; 5Department of Molecular and Cellular Biology, College of Osteopathic Medicine, Sam Houston State University, Conroe, TX, 77304, USA

Correspondence: Asmaa M El-Kady; Hatem A Elshabrawy, Email [email protected]; [email protected]

Background: Blastocystis species (sp.) are gastrointestinal protozoan parasites with high prevalence rates worldwide. Blastocystis sp. show extensive genetic diversity with 17 different subtypes (STs) described to date. A few studies have investigated the prevalence and STs of Blastocystis sp. in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Therefore, we aimed in this study to identify and characterize subtypes of Blastocystis sp. in the City of Makkah, Saudi Arabia.
Methods: Stool samples were collected from 140 patients who presented to King Abdulaziz Hospital, Hera General Hospital and Modern Medical Center in Saudi Arabia. Different microscopic examination methods of patients’ stools and molecular analyses (using primers targeting SSU rRNA gene) were performed to identify and characterize STs of Blastocystis sp.
Results: Our microscopic examination of stool samples showed that 96/140 patients (68.6%) had Blastocystis sp. infection. Clinical examination of infected patients revealed that 81 patients were symptomatic, whereas 15 were asymptomatic. Next, we isolated DNA from Blastocystis sp.-positive stool samples followed by PCR amplification of small-subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene and sequence analysis. Our sequence analysis showed that subtype 3 (ST3) was the most prevalent (53.13%) followed by subtype 1 (ST1) (45.83%), whereas subtype 2 (ST2) was the least prevalent (1.04%). Moreover, our results showed that all three STs resulted in more symptomatic than asymptomatic cases. Finally, we identified novel haplotypes which comprised of 8 ST3, 6 ST1, and one ST2 haplotypes.
Conclusion: Our identification of several haplotypes in patients’ stools confirms the genetic diversity of Blastocystis sp. and may explain the reported low host specificity and differential pathogenicity of Blastocystis sp. We believe that additional molecular epidemiological and genomic studies are needed to understand the prevalence and pathogenicity of different subtypes in humans and animal hosts.

Keywords: Blastocystis sp., genotyping, subtype, haplotype, ST1, ST2, ST3, Saudi Arabia

Background

Blastocystis species (sp.) are intestinal protozoan parasites that have several forms in lifecycle including vacuolar, granular, amoeboid, and cyst forms. Human to human transmission is common, through the fecal-oral route, which explains significantly higher rates of infection among food and animal handlers1,2.

According to previous reports, developing countries have higher prevalence rates (55–70%) of Blastocystis sp. compared to developed countries (10–15%). This could be attributed to higher standards of hygiene, lesser contact with animals and lower consumption rates of contaminated food and drink in developed countries.3,4 Recent studies have suggested that Blastocystis sp. exist as part of gut microbiota in healthy individuals (asymptomatic) and in patients presenting with gastrointestinal disease (symptomatic). However, the pathogenicity of the parasite, factors and mechanisms that trigger the progression to disease remain poorly understood.5,6 Symptomatic patients may present with nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms such as abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea. However, irritable bowel syndrome and urticaria sensitization were also reported.7,8 Several genomic, in vitro, and in vivo studies have identified multiple virulence factors of Blastocystis sp. and demonstrated the parasite’s pathological effects on the intestine.6,9

By 2013, Blastocystis sp. have been classified into 17 subtypes (STs) (ST1-17) in birds and mammals (including humans) based on extensive genetic variations in small-subunit ribosomal RNA (SSU rRNA) gene sequence.10 Eleven additional STs (ST18-28) have been described in literature since then; however, four of these STs (ST18-20, and ST22) are still being validated.11 These different STs are believed to result in differential symptoms and distribution among animal hosts and humans.12 Ten STs have been isolated from human stools (ST1-9 and ST12) and more than 90% of all human cases have been associated with ST1-4.13,14 However, only eight subtypes (ST10-17) were isolated from animal hosts.12,15–17 A study has shown that Blastocystis sp. ST3, isolated primarily from symptomatic patients, produces proteases that play a major role in host protein degradation and immune evasion.4,18

Several molecular methods have been used to identify Blastocystis sp. subtypes that are isolated from humans and animals. These methods include random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) using four different arbitrary polymerase chain reaction (PCR) primers, and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) followed by PCR to detect SSU rRNA gene variations.19,20 To date, a few studies investigated the prevalence and subtypes of B. hominis in Saudi Arabia. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify Blastocystis sp. subtypes and their prevalence in stool samples of patients living in City of Makkah, Saudi Arabia.

Methods

Study Population and Sample Collection

The present study involved 140 patients who presented, in 2017–2018, to King Abdulaziz Hospital, Hera General Hospital, and Modern Medical Center in the City of Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Some of the participants were complaining of GIT symptoms such as diarrhea or abdominal pain, while others were asymptomatic. Stool samples were collected from each patient in a clean container and divided into 2 parts. The first part was examined microscopically for the presence of Blastocystis sp. using direct mount (saline and iodine) and concentration technique; as previously described.21 The second part was stored at −20°C for further molecular analysis.

PCR Amplification and Sequencing

Stool samples that tested positive for Blastocystis sp. were subjected to molecular analysis. DNA was extracted from stool samples using QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (QIAGEN) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The specific primers, forward primer Blast 505–532 (5′ GGA GGT AGT GAC AAT AAATC 3′) and reverse primer Blast 998–1017 (5′ TGC TTT CGC ACT TGT TCATC 3′),22 were used to amplify the SSU rRNA gene using AccuPower® PCR PreMix (Bioneer). The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 4 min then 35 cycles of {denaturation at 95°C for 30 seconds, annealing at 54°C for 30 seconds, extension at 72°C for 30 seconds}, and a final extension step at 72°C for 5 minutes. Next, PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on 1.5% agarose gels and visualized by UV following ethidium bromide staining. Positive Blastocystis sp. samples generated PCR products of 500bp. For characterization of Blastocystis sp. genetic variations, all PCR products as well as positive and negative controls were sent to Macrogen company in South Korea for sequencing (https://dna.macrogen.com/).

Sequence Analysis

The DNA sequences of PCR products generated from Blastocystis sp.-positive samples were analyzed. The BLASTN software was used to compare the SSU rRNA sequences obtained with those in GenBank. MEGA X software was used to build a phylogenetic tree using the neighbor-joining method and the Kimura 2-parameter model.23 The bootstrap method with 1000 replicates was used to determine the support of monophyletic communities. All sequences were aligned by MUSCLE software and phylogenetic analysis was performed using MEGA X the maximum likelihood (ML), and Neighbor Joining (NJ) method. The maximum parsimony (MP) methods with 1000 bootstrap replicates were then used to construct the phylogenetic tree. The evolutionary history was concluded using the NJ method.24 The Maximum Composite Likelihood method was used to calculate the evolutionary distances25 and are in the units of the number of base substitutions per site. The analysis included 46 nucleotide sequences and any equivocal position was deleted for each sequence pair (pairwise deletion option). There was a total of 48,775 positions in the final dataset. MEGA X software was used for evolutionary analyses.23

Statistical Analysis

All collected data were entered into the SPSS program (version 22) and chi-square test was used to analyze categorical variables. P-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Microscopic Examination of Patients’ Stools Identified 96 Blastocystis sp.-Infected Patients with Significantly Higher Number of Symptomatic Than Asymptomatic Patients

The present study included 140 patients aging between 7 and 80 years (mean ± SD = 35.5±12.4) of which 105 (75%) were males (Table 1). Microscopic examination of stool samples of all patients showed that 96 patients (96/140; 68.6%) were infected with Blastocystis sp. Our results showed that there was a significantly higher percentage of males infected with Blastocystis sp. (N=77/105; 73.3%) compared to females (N=19/35; 54.3%) (Table 1; p<0.05). Interestingly, age group 21–40 years (yrs) had the highest percentage of infected patients (70/94; 74.5%) compared to age group <20 yrs (1/4; 25%), age group 41–60 yrs (23/37; 62.2%), and age group >60 yrs (2/5; 40%), Table 1. However, the differences were not statistically significant (p=0.3).

Table 1 Gender and Age Group of Blastocystis sp.-Infected and Uninfected Patients

Physical examination of Blastocystis sp.-infected patients concluded that a significantly higher number were symptomatic (diarrhea) than asymptomatic (81 vs 15; p< 0.05).

Sequence Analysis of PCR Products Amplified from DNA of Blastocystis sp., Isolated from Stools of Infected Patients, Showed Prevalence of Blastocystis sp. Subtype 3 (ST3)

Our PCR on the DNA extracted from the 96 Blastocystis sp.-positive stool samples generated PCR products of the right size (500 bp) from all samples, which confirmed Blastocystis sp. infection.

Next, we sequenced PCR products to identify the genetic subtype of Blastocystis sp. in each sample. The obtained sequences were analyzed using BLAST software and aligned with Blastocystis sp. sequences deposited in the gene bank. Sequence analysis showed that ST3 existed in significantly higher percentage of stool samples compared to ST1 (53.13% vs 45.83%). ST2 was detected in only 1.04% of samples (p<0.05).

Our results showed that 100% of ST2-infected patients were symptomatic followed by ST1 (88.6%), and ST3 (80.4%).

Novel Blastocystis sp. Haplotypes Were Identified in Subtypes with Inter- and Intra-Subtype Genetic Variations

Median joining network analysis, of sequences of PCR products, demonstrated genetic variations between the different subtypes, and identified intra-subtype genetic variations within ST1 and ST3 (Figure 1). The median joining network analysis identified 15 haplotypes; H1-15, in Blastocystis sp. subtypes. ST3 comprised 8 haplotypes, ST1 comprised 6 haplotypes, whereas ST2 comprised only one haplotype.

Figure 1 Median joining network sequence analysis of SSU rRNA gene-PCR products demonstrated different haplotypes (H1-15) within Blastocystis sp. subtypes. Maximum parsimony (MP) analysis was used as the optional post-processing calculation using Network 4.6.1.3 software. Each haplotype represents a distinct subtype. The haplotypes are numbered from H1 to H15.

Further sequence analysis of PCR products revealed inter-subtype genetic variations with genetic differentiation values ranging from a minimum of JC = 0.0991, between ST1 and ST2 subtypes, to higher values between ST1 and ST3 (JC = 0.248) (Table 2). Moreover, high intra-subtype genetic variations were found between ST1 sequences (JC = 0.0834) followed by ST3 (JC = 0.0356) (Table 2).

Table 2 Inter- and Intra-Subtype Genetic Variations Characterize Blastocystis sp. Subtypes/Haplotypes

Higher Genetic Variations Were Detected Between ST1 Haplotypes Compared to ST3 Haplotypes

Next, we performed an overall analysis of sequences of SSU rRNA gene PCR products, obtained from all Blastocystis sp.-positive stool samples. We identified 113 sites that were polymorphic and 91 sites that were parsimony informative, which led to the distinction of 15 haplotypes. The total number of non-InDel and InDel sites were 431 and 25, respectively. The 91 parsimony informative sites included 59 sites that had two variants, 24 sites that had three variants, and 8 sites with four variants. The average number of nucleotide differences was 52.076. We found that the haplotype and nucleotide diversity were 1.000 and 0.12083, respectively.

Consistent with the data shown in Table 2, the analysis of haplotypes of each subtype confirmed that ST1 has higher genetic variations than ST3, with higher nucleotide diversity, higher numbers of polymorphic sites and higher number of nucleotide differences (Table 3). All subtypes showed negative neutrality tests (Tajima’s test and Fu’s Fs) which means that DNA sequence is evolving naturally and not under directional selection.

Table 3 Genetic Variability of Blastocystis sp. Haplotypes

Next, we constructed the phylogenetic tree and included all our identified haplotypes. We determined the relation of the identified haplotypes to other Blastocystis sp. isolates (Figure 2). We used thirty reference sequences of Blastocystis sp. subtypes ST1-ST17 (Table 4) and Proteromonas lacertae (U37108) as an outgroup sequence.

Table 4 GenBank References for the Blastocystis sp. Subtypes Used to Construct the Phylogenetic Tree

Figure 2 Phylogenetic relationship of Blastocystis sp. haplotypes identified in the current study to other Blastocystis sp. isolates, based on SSU rRNA gene sequences. The reference GenBank sequence accession numbers of all isolates are shown, including our haplotypes accession numbers in bold. Proteromonas lacertae served as the outgroup sequence. *Indicates the haplotypes identified in the current study.

Discussion

Blastocystis sp. infections are prevalent in both developing and developed countries. Multiple studies have described several gastrointestinal manifestations following Blastocystis sp. infections.26 However, several studies have shown that only a few subtypes of Blastocystis sp. are associated with diseases in humans, whereas other subtypes cause asymptomatic infections.

In the present study, we aimed to identify and characterize Blastocystis sp. subtypes in 140 patients who attended King Abdulaziz Hospital, Hera General Hospital and Modern Medical Center in City of Makkah, Saudi Arabia. We detected Blastocystis sp. infection in 68.6% (96/140) patients who presented with gastrointestinal symptoms (symptomatic) or remained asymptomatic. Other studies from different countries have shown variable prevalence rates of 0.54% in Iran,27 2.5% in Japan,28 3.3% in Singapore,29 19% in Lebanon,17 22.1% in Libya,30 33.3% in Egypt,31 40.7% in the Philippines,32 and 46.9% in Venezuela.33 This could be attributed to variations in sanitation standards in different countries. Our small number of patients could be the reason for the higher prevalence rates of Blastocystis sp. in our study compared to other studies.

We report higher prevalence rate of Blastocystis sp. in males compared to females, which is consistent with the findings of previous studies in Iran, Libya and Turkey.34–36 The higher prevalence rate of Blastocystis sp. in males compared to females may be attributed to their more frequent outdoor activities. There are several contradictory studies regarding Blastocystis sp. pathogenicity.37 In the present study, we report that the number of symptomatic Blastocystis sp. -infected patients were significantly higher than the number of asymptomatic patients (81 symptomatic patients vs 15 asymptomatic).

Nine subtypes of Blastocystis sp. (ST1 to ST9) were isolated from human stools38 of which ST1, ST2, ST3, ST4, and ST5 were the most common. It has been shown that ST4 is the prevalent subtype in European countries, while ST1, ST2, ST3, and ST5 are the common subtypes in other countries all over the world.39 However, there is still debate about the relationship between Blastocystis sp. subtypes and clinical symptoms.40–42

Our molecular analysis, of patients’ stool samples, showed that ST3 was detected in significantly higher percentage of samples than ST1 (53.13% vs 45.83%). We identified ST2 in only one sample. This finding indicates that ST3 is the predominant subtype of Blastocystis sp. in our patients. Predominance of ST3, in our study, is consistent with a previous report43 which characterized Blastocystis sp. subtypes in symptomatic (diarrhea) and asymptomatic patients in City of Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Moreover, ST3 was found to be the prevalent subtype (41–92%) in a comparative study between Japan, Bangladesh, Pakistan and Germany,28 whereas the prevalence rates in other studies were reported at 78%, 75.9%, 54.5%, 53.5% and 33.3% in Singapore, Turkey, Egypt, France and Lebanon, respectively.17,29,36,44,45

We additionally showed that a significantly higher percentage of ST3-infected patients were symptomatic than asymptomatic (80.4% vs 19.6%). This finding is in agreement with findings of another study where most ST3 patients showed gastrointestinal symptoms.5 Tan et al also showed similar results and reported that all symptomatic patients in his study were ST3-infected.46 Symptoms other than gastrointestinal manifestations were also reported in Blastocystis sp. ST3-infected patients. A patient infected with ST3 presented with acute urticaria and gastrointestinal symptoms.47 We also showed that most ST1-infected patients (88.6%) were symptomatic which is in agreement with other studies which reported the ability of ST1 to cause symptomatic infections.28,48 This indicates that Blastocystis sp. STs, that were identified in our study, tend to cause symptomatic than asymptomatic infections.

Our sequence analysis, of PCR products obtained from all samples, identified three parsimony informative sites and three mutations (not parsimony informative) across the entire obtained sequences, resulting in the identification of 15 Blastocystis sp. haplotypes. (8 different ST3 haplotypes, 6 ST1 haplotypes, and one ST2 haplotype). The sequence analysis of ST1 and ST3 samples revealed high genetic variations. This high level of genetic variability in ST1 and ST3 appears to support t’s low host specificity.49 Despite our findings, we believe that large-scale molecular epidemiological studies, both in humans and in animals, will be useful to further understand the transmission of Blastocystis sp. Moreover, immunological and pathogenicity studies should be performed for better understanding of the Blastocystis sp. pathogenicity and immune responses in humans.

Several studies have isolated ST1 and ST3 from a variety of species including monkeys, goats, pigs, dogs, and non-human primates. As a result, it has been proposed that these subtypes are zoonotic subtypes, capable of infecting humans at varying rates.48,50–52 A study analyzed both the nuclear SSU rRNA and the MLST of the mitochondrion-like organelle genome and discovered significant intra-subtype genetic variation in ST3. The fact that ST3 has high intra-subtype variation means that this subtype may have co-evolved with human hosts over a long time.53

Conclusions

A few studies investigated the prevalence and subtypes of Blastocystis sp. STs in patients from Saudi Arabia. Our study showed that 81/96 Blastocystis sp.-infected patients from Saudi Arabia were symptomatic, whereas stool analysis identified 15 genetically distinct haplotypes that are distributed in three STs (8 ST3, 6 ST1, and 1 ST2). We believe that future genomic analysis could shed light on potential coevolutionary aspects, which could help researchers better understand Blastocystis sp. Biology, interaction with the host, and pathogenicity. Furthermore, proteomic studies of the various subtypes of Blastocystis sp. could enhance our understanding of the parasite’s pathogenic mechanisms.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the ethics and research committee, Faculty of Applied Medical Sciences, King Abdulaziz University (Protocol number: FAMS-ERC2017-12). An informed consent was obtained from each patient involved in this study. The Saudi Ministry of Health, Saudi Arabia cooperated in this study.

Data Sharing Statement

All genetic sequences are available at [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/]. GenBank accession numbers are: MZ396562, MZ396563, MZ396564, MZ396565, MZ396566, MZ396567, MZ396568, MZ396569, MZ396570, MZ396571, MZ396572, MZ396573, MZ396574, MZ396575, MZ396576.

Disclosure

The authors declare no competing interests in this work.

References

1. Wakid M, Azhar E, Zafar T. Intestinal parasitic infection among food handlers in the holy city of Makkah During Hajj season1428 Hegira (2007G). J King Abdulaziz Univ Sci. 2009;16(1):39–52. doi:10.4197/med.16-1.4

2. Aldahhasi W, Toulah F, Wakid M. Evaluation of common microscopic techniques for detection of Blastocystis hominis. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2020;50(1):33–40. doi:10.21608/jesp.2020.88748

3. Belkhair J, Karrati I, Tarmidi M, El Mezouari M, Moutaj R. Blastocystis hominis microbiota: study of 13255 patients and review of the literature. J Microbiol Exp. 2021;9(2):29–32. doi:10.15406/jmen.2021.09.00319

4. Palasuwan A, Palasuwan D, Mahittikorn A, Chiabchalard R, Combes V, Popruk S. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis in communities along the Chao Phraya River, Thailand. Korean J Parasitol. 2016;54(4):455–460. doi:10.3347/kjp.2016.54.4.455

5. Khademvatan S, Masjedizadeh R, Yousefi-Razin E, et al. PCR-based molecular characterization of Blastocystis hominis subtypes in southwest of Iran. J Infect Public Health. 2018;11(1):43–47. doi:10.1016/j.jiph.2017.03.009

6. Ajjampur SSR, Tan KSW. Pathogenic mechanisms in Blastocystis spp. - Interpreting results from in vitro and in vivo studies. Parasitol Int. 2016;65(6Pt B):772–779. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2016.05.007

7. Kantardjiev V, Galev A, Broshtilova V. Urticaria associated with amoeboid forms of Blastocystis spp. Asian J Res Infect Dis. 2019;2(3):1–4. doi:10.9734/ajrid/2019/v2i330105

8. Lepczyńska M, Dzika E, Kubiak K, Korycińska J. The role of Blastocystis sp. as an etiology of irritable bowel syndrome. Polish Ann Med. 2016;23:57–60. doi:10.1016/j.poamed.2015.04.001

9. Wu Z, Mirza H, Tan KSW. Intra-subtype variation in enteroadhesion accounts for differences in epithelial barrier disruption and is associated with metronidazole resistance in Blastocystis subtype-7. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8(5):e2885. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0002885

10. Stensvold CR, Lebbad M, Hansen A, et al. Differentiation of Blastocystis and parasitic archamoebids encountered in untreated wastewater samples by amplicon-based next-generation sequencing. Parasite Epidemiol Control. 2020;9:e00131. doi:10.1016/j.parepi.2019.e00131

11. Hublin JSY, Maloney JG, Santin M. Blastocystis in domesticated and wild mammals and birds. Res Vet Sci. 2021;135:260–282. doi:10.1016/j.rvsc.2020.09.031

12. Alfellani MA, Taner-Mulla D, Jacob AS, et al. Genetic diversity of Blastocystis in livestock and zoo animals. Protist. 2013;164(4):497–509. doi:10.1016/j.protis.2013.05.003

13. Stensvold CR, Tan KSW, Clark CG. Blastocystis. Trends Parasitol. 2020;36(3):315–316. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2019.12.008

14. Stensvold CR, Clark CG. Molecular identification and subtype analysis of Blastocystis. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2016;43(1):20A- 2.

15. Zhu W, Tao W, Gong B, et al. First report of Blastocystis infections in cattle in China. Vet Parasitol. 2017;246:38–42. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2017.09.001

16. Roberts T, Stark D, Harkness J, Ellis J. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates identified in a Sydney population and pathogenic potential of Blastocystis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32(3):335–343. doi:10.1007/s10096-012-1746-z

17. El Safadi D, Meloni D, Poirier P, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis in Lebanon and correlation between subtype 1 and gastrointestinal symptoms. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88(6):1203–1206. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.12-0777

18. Abdel-Hameed DM, Hassanin OM. Proteaese activity of Blastocystis hominis subtype3 in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. Parasitol Res. 2011;109(2):321–327. doi:10.1007/s00436-011-2259-x

19. Motazedian H, Ghasemi H, Sadjjadi SM. Genomic diversity of Blastocystis hominis from patients in southern Iran. Ann Trop Med Parasitol. 2008;102(1):85–88. doi:10.1179/136485908X252197

20. Sardarian K, Hajilooi M, Maghsood A, Moghimbeigi A, Alikhani M. A study of the genetic variability of Blastocystis hominis isolates in Hamadan, west of Iran. 2012.

21. Manser MM, Saez ACS, Chiodini PL. Faecal parasitology: concentration methodology needs to be better standardised. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(4):e0004579. doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0004579

22. Böhm-Gloning B, Knobloch J, Walderich B. Five subgroups of Blastocystis hominis from symptomatic and asymptomatic patients revealed by restriction site analysis of PCR-amplified 16S-like rDNA. Trop Med Int Health. 1997;2(8):771–778. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3156.1997.d01-383.x

23. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol. 2018;35(6):1547–1549. doi:10.1093/molbev/msy096

24. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4(4):406–425. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454

25. Tamura K, Nei M, Kumar S. Prospects for inferring very large phylogenies by using the neighbor-joining method. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101(30):11030–11035. doi:10.1073/pnas.0404206101

26. Duda A, Kosik-Bogacka D, Lanocha-Arendarczyk N, Kołodziejczyk L, Lanocha A. The prevalence of Blastocystis hominis and other protozoan parasites in soldiers returning from peacekeeping missions. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;92(4):805–806. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.14-0344

27. Riabi TR, Haghighi A, Mirjalali H, et al. Study of prevalence, distribution and clinical significance of Blastocystis isolated from two medical centers in Iran. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2017;10:S102–S107. doi:10.22037/ghfbb.v0i0.1292

28. Yoshikawa H, Wu Z, Kimata I, et al. Polymerase chain reaction-based genotype classification among human Blastocystis hominis populations isolated from different countries. Parasitol Res. 2004;92(1):22–29. doi:10.1007/s00436-003-0995-2

29. Wong KHS, Ng GC, Lin RTP, Yoshikawa H, Taylor MB, Tan KSW. Predominance of subtype 3 among Blastocystis isolates from a major hospital in Singapore. Parasitol Res. 2008;102(4):663–670. doi:10.1007/s00436-007-0808-0

30. Abdulsalam AM, Ithoi I, Al-Mekhlafi HM, Al-Mekhlafi AM, Ahmed A, Surin J. Subtype distribution of Blastocystis isolates in Sebha, Libya. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e84372. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0084372

31. Rayan HZE, Ismail OA, El Gayar EK. Prevalence and clinical features of Dientamoeba fragilis infections in patients suspected to have intestinal parasitic infection. J Egypt Soc Parasitol. 2007;37(2):599–608.

32. Baldo ET, Belizario VY, De Leon WU, Kong HH, Chung D-I. Infection status of intestinal parasites in children living in residential institutions in Metro Manila, the Philippines. Korean J Parasitol. 2004;42(2):67–70. doi:10.3347/kjp.2004.42.2.67

33. Velásquez V, Caldera R, Wong W, et al. [Blastocystosis: a high prevalence of cases found in patients from Health Center of Soledad, Anzoategui State, Venezuela]. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop. 2005;38(4):356–357. Portuguese. doi:10.1590/s0037-86822005000400017

34. Al-Fellani MA, Khan AH, Al-Gazoui RM, Zaid MK, Al-Ferjani MA. Prevalence and clinical features of Blastocystis hominis infection among patients in Sebha, Libya. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2007;7(1):35–40.

35. Khoshnood S, Rafiei A, Saki J, Alizadeh K. Prevalence and genotype characterization of Blastocystis hominis among the Baghmalek people in southwestern Iran in 2013–2014. Jundishapur J Microbiol. 2015;8(10):4–8. doi:10.5812/jjm.23930

36. Ozyurt M, Kurt O, Mølbak K, Nielsen HV, Haznedaroglu T, Stensvold CR. Molecular epidemiology of Blastocystis infections in Turkey. Parasitol Int. 2008;57(3):300–306. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2008.01.004

37. Roberts T, Stark D, Harkness J, Ellis J. Update on the pathogenic potential and treatment options for Blastocystis sp. Gut Pathog. 2014;6:17. doi:10.1186/1757-4749-6-17

38. Rene BA, Stensvold CR, Badsberg JH, Nielsen HV. Subtype analysis of Blastocystis isolates from Blastocystis cyst excreting patients. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2009;80(4):588–592. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2009.80.588

39. Alfellani MA, Stensvold CR, Vidal-Lapiedra A, Onuoha ESU, Fagbenro-Beyioku AF, Clark CG. Variable geographic distribution of Blastocystis subtypes and its potential implications. Acta Trop. 2013;126(1):11–18. doi:10.1016/j.actatropica.2012.12.011

40. Rezaei Riabi T, Mirjalali H, Haghighi A, et al. Genetic diversity analysis of Blastocystis subtypes from both symptomatic and asymptomatic subjects using a barcoding region from the 18S rRNA gene. Infect Genet Evol. 2018;61:119–126. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2018.03.026

41. Moosavi A, Haghighi A, Mojarad EN, et al. Genetic variability of Blastocystis sp. isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in Iran. Parasitol Res. 2012;111(6):2311–2315. doi:10.1007/s00436-012-3085-5

42. Alinaghizade A, Mirjalali H, Mohebali M, Stensvold CR, Rezaeian M. Inter- and intra-subtype variation of Blastocystis subtypes isolated from diarrheic and non-diarrheic patients in Iran. Infect Genet Evol. 2017;50:77–82. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2017.02.016

43. Mohamed RT, El-Bali MA, Mohamed AA, et al. Subtyping of Blastocystis sp. isolated from symptomatic and asymptomatic individuals in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Parasit Vectors. 2017;10(1):1–7. doi:10.1186/s13071-017-2114-8

44. Souppart L, Sanciu G, Cian A, et al. Molecular epidemiology of human Blastocystis isolates in France. Parasitol Res. 2009;105(2):413–421. doi:10.1007/s00436-009-1398-9

45. Hussein EM, Hussein AM, Eida MM, Atwa MM. Pathophysiological variability of different genotypes of human Blastocystis hominis Egyptian isolates in experimentally infected rats. Parasitol Res. 2008;102(5):853–860. doi:10.1007/s00436-007-0833-z

46. Tan TC, Suresh KG, Smith HV. Phenotypic and genotypic characterisation of Blastocystis hominis isolates implicates subtype 3 as a subtype with pathogenic potential. Parasitol Res. 2008;104(1):85–93. doi:10.1007/s00436-008-1163-5

47. Katsarou-Katsari A, Vassalos CM, Tzanetou K, Spanakos G, Papadopoulou C, Vakalis N. Acute urticaria associated with amoeboid forms of Blastocystis sp. subtype 3. Acta Derm Venereol. 2008;88(1):80–81. doi:10.2340/00015555-0338

48. Yan Y, Su S, Ye J, et al. Blastocystis sp. subtype 5: a possibly zoonotic genotype. Parasitol Res. 2007;101(6):1527–1532. doi:10.1007/s00436-007-0672-y

49. Alfellani MA, Jacob AS, Perea NO, et al. Diversity and distribution of Blastocystis sp. subtypes in non-human primates. Parasitology. 2013;140(8):966–971. doi:10.1017/S0031182013000255

50. Lee IL, Tan TC, Tan PC, et al. Predominance of Blastocystis sp. subtype 4 in rural communities, Nepal. Parasitol Res. 2012;110(4):1553–1562. doi:10.1007/s00436-011-2665-0

51. Stensvold CR, Lewis HC, Hammerum AM, et al. Blastocystis: unravelling potential risk factors and clinical significance of a common but neglected parasite. Epidemiol Infect. 2009;137(11):1655–1663. doi:10.1017/S0950268809002672

52. Noël C, Dufernez F, Gerbod D, et al. Molecular phylogenies of Blastocystis isolates from different hosts: implications for genetic diversity, identification of species, and zoonosis. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(1):348–355. doi:10.1128/JCM.43.1.348-355.2005

53. Scanlan PD, Stensvold CR. Blastocystis: getting to grips with our guileful guest. Trends Parasitol. 2013;29(11):523–529. doi:10.1016/j.pt.2013.08.006

54. Pintong A, Sunyanusin S, Prasertbun R, et al. Blastocystis subtype 5: predominant subtype on pig farms, Thailand. Parasitol Int. 2018;67(6):824–828. doi:10.1016/j.parint.2018.08.009

55. Arisue N, Hashimoto T, Yoshikawa H. Sequence heterogeneity of the small subunit ribosomal RNA genes among blastocystis isolates. Parasitology. 2003;126(Pt 1):1–9. doi:10.1017/s0031182002002640

56. Rivera WL. Phylogenetic analysis of Blastocystis isolates from animal and human hosts in the Philippines. Vet Parasitol. 2008;156(3):178–182. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2008.06.001

57. Thathaisong U, Siripattanapipong S, Mungthin M, et al. Identification of Blastocystis subtype 1 variants in the home for girls, Bangkok, Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2013;88(2):352–358. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2012.12-0237

58. Leelayoova S, Siripattanapipong S, Thathaisong U, et al. Drinking water: a possible source of blastocystis spp. subtype 1 infection in schoolchildren of a rural community in central Thailand. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2008;79(3):401–406. doi:10.4269/ajtmh.2008.79.401

59. Abe N. Molecular and phylogenetic analysis of Blastocystis isolates from various hosts. Vet Parasitol. 2004;120(3):235–242. doi:10.1016/j.vetpar.2004.01.003

60. Noël C, Peyronnet C, Gerbod D, et al. Phylogenetic analysis of Blastocystis isolates from different hosts based on the comparison of small-subunit rRNA gene sequences. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2003;126(1):119–123. doi:10.1016/S0166-6851(02)00246-3

61. Villegas-Gómez I, Martínez-Hernández F, Urrea-Quezada A, et al. Comparison of the genetic variability of Blastocystis subtypes between human carriers from two contrasting climatic regions of México. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;44:334–340. doi:10.1016/j.meegid.2016.07.036

62. Stensvold CR, Traub RJ, von Samson-himmelstjerna G, Jespersgaard C, Nielsen HV, Thompson RCA. Blastocystis: subtyping isolates using pyrosequencing technology. Exp Parasitol. 2007;116(2):111–119. doi:10.1016/j.exppara.2006.12.002

63. Bart A, Wentink-Bonnema EMS, Gilis H, et al. Diagnosis and subtype analysis of Blastocystis sp. in 442 patients in a hospital setting in the Netherlands. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13(1):2–7. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-13-389

64. Sharifi Y, Abbasi F, Shahabi S, Zaraei A, Mikaeili F, Sarkari B. Comparative genotyping of Blastocystis infecting cattle and human in the south of Iran. Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2020;72:101529. doi:10.1016/j.cimid.2020.101529

Creative Commons License © 2022 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.