Histopathological Diagnosis of Cervical Biopsies: Reduction of Sampling Errors with the Evaluation of a Third Histologic Level
Received 28 July 2019
Accepted for publication 9 April 2020
Published 26 June 2020 Volume 2020:12 Pages 5099—5104
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Eileen O'Reilly
Edgar Villegas-Hinojosa,1 Yolanda Terán-Figueroa,1 Veronica Gallegos-García,1 Dario Gaytán-Hernández,1 Sandra O Gutiérrez-Enríquez,1 Anahid E Campuzano-Barajas,2 Luz E Alcántara-Quintana3
1Facultad de Enfermería y Nutrición, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis, Potosí 78240, SLP, México; 2Hospital General de Soledad, Secretaría de Salud, Soledad de Graciano Sánchez 78435, SLP, México; 3Cátedra CONACYT, adscrito a Facultad de Enfermería y Nutrición, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis, Potosí 78240, SLP, México
Correspondence: Luz E Alcántara-Quintana
Facultad de Enfermeria y Nutrición, UASLP, Av. Niño Artillero 130 Zona Universitaria, SLP 78240, SLP Tel +52 444 826 23 00 ext 5032
Aim: Cervical cancer (CC) is considered as a major public health problem; this disease affects mainly vulnerable women in poverty, causing a negative effect on a country’s workforce.
Objective: To determine the histopathological diagnosis variation after examining three more levels of cervical biopsy paraffin blocks from patients with HPVI, CIN and CC.
Materials and Methods: A quantitative, retrospective correlational study was performed in a hospital with a second level of health care. We worked with 152 paraffin blocks of CIN (CIN, I, II and III) and cervical cancer samples. Currently, CIN I is considered as a set of low-grade injuries (low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, LSIL), while CIN II, CIN III and cancer in situ are considered as high-grade lesions (high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions, HSIL). A slab was prepared with the 50micron block, which was subsequently cut into 5 microns; later, the same thing was done at two more levels to reevaluate the histopathological diagnosis and correlate it with the initial diagnosis issued by the institution.
Results: During the examination of the additional block levels, a difference was observed from the initial diagnosis: of 32 cases of HPV diagnosis, there were 17 changes to CIN I; of 31 cases of CIN I, there were 4 changes to CIN II; of 30 cases of CIN II, there were 8 changes to CIN III and 1 change to invasive cancer; of 29 cases of CIN III, there were 9 changes to cancer in situ; and finally, of 14 cases of cancer in situ, there was 1 change to invasive cancer. After the statistical analysis, a value of p < 0.05 was obtained, which indicated that the differences were statistically significant.
Conclusion: By modifying the histopathological study technique, guidelines can be given to generate a more accurate diagnosis with a more solid base, and thus, a more appropriate and timely treatment can be offered to avoid the development of cervical cancer.
Keywords: histopathological diagnosis, levels, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, CIN, cervical cancer, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, LSIL, high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion, HSIL
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]