Feasibility of spirometry in primary care to screen for COPD: a pilot study
Authors Giraud V, Beauchet A, Gomis T, Chinet T
Received 15 September 2015
Accepted for publication 21 December 2015
Published 12 February 2016 Volume 2016:11(1) Pages 335—340
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Richard Russell
Violaine Giraud,1,2 Alain Beauchet,3 Thierry Gomis,4 Thierry Chinet1,2
1AP-HP, Department of Pneumology and Thoracic Oncology, Ambroise-Paré Hospital, 2UEFR Paris île-de-France Ouest, Versailles Saint Quentin-en-Yvelines University, 3Public Health Department, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Ile-de-France Ouest, 4Boulogne-Billancourt, Paris, France
Background: COPD is a frequent but underdiagnosed disease whose diagnosis relies on the spirometric demonstration of bronchial obstruction. Spirometry use by general practitioners could represent the first line in COPD diagnosis.
Objective: Because duration of spirometry is retarding its development in primary care, we decided to measure the time it requires in the primary-care context in France.
Methods: Ten volunteer general practitioners were trained during two 3-hour theoretical and practical continuing education sessions. Then, from October 2013 to May 2014, they included patients without any known respiratory disease but at risk of developing COPD (age: ≥40 years, smoker: ≥20 pack-years). The duration of spirometry and its quality were evaluated according to the following acceptability criteria: 1) expiration ≥6 seconds or reaching a plateau; 2) good start with an early peak flow, curve peaked on top and not flat; 3) no artifacts; and 4) reproducibility criteria, ie, forced expiratory volume in 1 second and forced vital capacity differences between the two best spirometry curves ≤0.15 L. Quality of the spirograms was defined as optimal when all the criteria were met and acceptable when all the criteria were satisfied except the reproducibility criterion, otherwise, it was unacceptable.
Results: For the 152 patients included, the 142 assessable spirometries lasted for 15.2±5.9 minutes. Acceptability criteria 1–3, respectively, were satisfied for 90.1%, 89.4%, and 91.5% of patients and reproducibility criterion 4 for 56.3%. Quality was considered optimal for 58.5% of the curves and acceptable for 30.2%.
Conclusion: The duration of spirometry renders it poorly compatible with the current primary-care practice in France other than for dedicated consultations. Moreover, the quality of spirometry needs to be improved.
Keywords: spirometry workshop, general practitioners, COPD
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]