Back to Journals » International Journal of Nanomedicine » Volume 21

Emerging Nanoplatforms are Effective Against Tumor Hypoxia

Authors Yu Z ORCID logo, Shang Y ORCID logo, He W ORCID logo, Xia X ORCID logo, Zhou L

Received 8 April 2026

Accepted for publication 4 June 2026

Published 15 June 2026 Volume 2026:21 615263

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S615263

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single anonymous peer review

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Farooq A. Shiekh



Zhuochen Yu, Yating Shang, Wenjing He, Xinhua Xia,* Lili Zhou*

School of Pharmacy, Hunan University of Chinese Medicine, Changsha, 410208, People’s Republic of China

*These authors contributed equally to this work

Correspondence: Lili Zhou, Email [email protected] Xinhua Xia, Email [email protected]

Abstract: Hypoxia is a characteristic feature of the solid tumor microenvironment and serves as a pivotal factor in tumor progression, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance. It has long been recognized as a significant barrier to advancing cancer therapy. Although traditional oxygen supplementation strategies can partially enhance local oxygen levels, their effectiveness is limited by the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of tumor tissues, low delivery efficiency, and biosafety concerns, making them inadequate for the precise oxygen regulation required by the complex tumor microenvironment. In recent years, nanotechnology-based platforms designed to alleviate hypoxia have emerged as innovative approaches for remodeling the tumor microenvironment and enhancing multimodal synergistic therapies. These platforms operate through three primary strategies: exogenous oxygen delivery, endogenous oxygen generation, and metabolic oxygen conservation. This review systematically elucidates the underlying mechanisms of tumor hypoxia, summarizes the design principles and recent advancements of related nanomedicines, and discusses the potential and challenges of these platforms in multimodal combination therapies. The study aims to furnish a comprehensive reference for the design of hypoxia-alleviating nanoplatforms and the optimization of synergistic therapeutic strategies, with the objective of providing novel insights and prospects for the development of nanomaterials in this domain.

Keywords: tumor hypoxia, tumor microenvironment remodeling, oxygen delivery and generation, nanomedicine, multimodal synergistic therapy

Introduction

Cancer represents a significant global public health challenge, with approximately 20 million new cases and nearly 10 million deaths occurring annually worldwide.1 Currently, conventional therapeutic modalities, including surgery, radiotherapy (RT), and chemotherapy, alongside emerging strategies such as targeted therapy, immunotherapy, cellular therapy, and gene therapy,2 have demonstrated favorable prognostic outcomes for certain patients to some extent. However, their therapeutic efficacy is constrained by various factors, including tumor drug resistance, pronounced heterogeneity, adverse toxic and side effects during treatment, and the regulation of the tumor proliferative microenvironment.3–5 Among these factors, the pervasive hypoxic condition within the tumor microenvironment (TME) is widely acknowledged as a significant barrier, contributing to therapeutic resistance, malignant progression, and poor clinical prognosis.

Under typical physiological conditions, the average partial pressure of oxygen (pO2) is approximately 40 mmHg. A hypoxic environment is established when the pO2 falls below this threshold.6 Tumor hypoxia is a common characteristic of most solid tumors, primarily resulting from excessive oxygen consumption due to rapid tumor cell proliferation, in conjunction with impaired oxygen delivery caused by abnormal neovascular structures and inadequate blood perfusion. As a result, the pO2 in tumor tissues remains chronically low, creating a persistent hypoxic microenvironment.7 This pronounced imbalance between oxygen supply and demand leads to the continuous activation of hypoxia-associated molecular signaling pathways. Among these pathways, hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) serves as a central regulatory factor, being stably expressed under hypoxic conditions. HIF-1α initiates the transcription of various downstream genes involved in tumor adaptation and progression, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), glucose transporter-1 (GLUT1), and carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX), among others. These genes play a critical role in angiogenesis, the enhancement of glycolytic pathways, cell proliferation, and immune evasion, among other processes, thereby facilitating tumor invasion and metastasis, therapeutic resistance, and poor prognosis. Hypoxia also significantly alters the immune and stromal composition of the TME, leading to immunosuppression, extracellular matrix remodeling, and further enhancement of therapeutic resistance.8,9 Additionally, the structurally abnormal and poorly perfused tumor vasculature under hypoxic conditions severely restricts the intratumoral penetration and uniform distribution of therapeutic agents. Elevated interstitial fluid pressure and dense extracellular matrix deposition further impede nanoparticle extravasation and cellular uptake,7 while the pronounced spatial heterogeneity of hypoxic regions may also compromise the targeting accuracy of ligand-modified nanoplatforms.10 Consequently, the efficacy of cancer treatment is further limited by inefficient drug delivery and insufficient targeting specificity.11–13

In recent years, the application of nanotechnology in clinical therapeutics has expanded significantly, with nanoplatform-based delivery systems offering innovative insights and strategies for modulating the hypoxic TME. Due to their distinctive physicochemical properties, nanomaterials demonstrate exceptional tumor-targeting capabilities, biocompatibility, and responsiveness to the microenvironment. These attributes facilitate not only the nanoscale delivery of small-molecule therapeutics but also the co-encapsulation of multiple therapeutic agents to achieve synergistic treatment effects.14,15 In addressing tumor hypoxia, a range of nanoplatform-based strategies have been developed. Nevertheless, comprehensive reviews of these emerging technologies are relatively scarce, with limited studies concentrating specifically on nanodelivery as the central enabling technology.

This review adopts a systematic approach to summarize key advancements in the design of nanoplatforms aimed at mitigating the hypoxic TME, with a particular emphasis on research published over the past five years. Additionally, it incorporates several seminal earlier studies to provide a comprehensive developmental context for this field. The review specifically concentrates on three principal strategies: (1) Oxygen-carrying nanoplatforms, which facilitate the delivery of exogenous oxygen to tumor sites using carriers such as perfluorocarbons (PFCs), hemoglobin (Hb), biomimetic materials, or oxygen micro/nanobubbles (MNBs); (2) In situ oxygen-generating nanoplatforms, which continuously produce oxygen within tumors through processes such as hydrogen peroxide catalysis, photocatalysis, water-splitting reactions, microbial catalysis, or biomimetic photosynthesis; and (3) Oxygen-economization nanoplatforms, which aim to decrease oxygen consumption and enhance local oxygen tension by inhibiting mitochondrial respiration, modulating tumor metabolic pathways, or promoting oxygen retention and preferential utilization. Figure 1 illustrates the construction strategies for relevant nanoplatforms aimed at alleviating tumor hypoxia. These strategies have shown considerable potential across various antitumor modalities. This review aspires to offer theoretical insights and practical references concerning structural design, synergistic mechanisms, biological metabolic behaviors, and clinical translation, thereby contributing to the advancement of more effective cancer treatment strategies.

Nanoplatform strategies to reduce tumor hypoxia: oxygen delivery, generation and economization.

Figure 1 Schematic diagram of construction strategies for different nanoplatforms to alleviate tumor hypoxia. In this schematic, upward arrows (↑) indicate upregulation of the corresponding biological indicators; downward arrows (↓) indicate downregulation of relevant factors; blunt-ended inhibitory lines represent pathway inhibition; cross symbols denote pathway blockade or suppression of the corresponding factors; the red circle highlights the intracellular oxygen preserved by reduced mitochondrial oxygen consumption following electron transport chain inhibition (Created in BioRender. Yu, (Z) (2026) https://BioRender.com/tzlz2c6).

Pathophysiological Features and Therapeutic Challenges of Tumor Hypoxia

Research into tumor hypoxia can be traced back to the 1950s. In 1953, Gray et al conducted a systematic investigation into the influence of dissolved oxygen concentration in tissues on the efficacy of radiotherapy. They were the first to report that tumor cells exposed to X-rays under well-oxygenated conditions exhibited approximately three times greater radiosensitivity compared to hypoxic cells. This study highlighted the critical role of oxygen in the radiobiological oxygen effect and established the pivotal importance of tissue pO2 in radiobiology.16 In 1955, Thomlinson and Gray, while examining tumor sections from lung cancer patients, observed necrotic centers within large tumor masses, surrounded by viable tumor cells in close proximity to blood vessels. Based on these observations, they proposed the concept of extensive hypoxic regions within solid tumors. This morphological finding is considered a significant historical milestone in the study of tumor hypoxia.17 These early studies illuminated the biological importance of hypoxia by examining its impact on radiosensitivity and histological structure, thereby directly catalyzing further investigations into the mechanisms underlying tumor hypoxia.

Subsequent studies progressively unveiled that hypoxia is not merely an incidental occurrence but rather a pervasive characteristic of the TME. At the level of pathological mechanisms, the primary cause of hypoxia is an imbalance between oxygen supply and consumption. On one hand, the rapid proliferation of tumor cells significantly elevates oxygen consumption, surpassing the limited oxygen supply and resulting in the formation of a hypoxic TME in tissue regions. On the other hand, although angiogenesis is highly active in tumors, the newly formed blood vessels often exhibit structural and functional deficiencies, such as vascular tortuosity and dilation, irregular diameters, disorganized branching, collateral circulation, insufficient pericyte coverage, and pronounced vascular leakage. These structural defects collectively diminish the efficiency of blood perfusion and result in a heterogeneous spatiotemporal distribution of oxygen, ultimately causing localized oxygen deprivation.18–20 As the tumor volume increases, the diffusion distance for oxygen within the tissue extends, leading to persistent hypoxia (ie, pO2 < 10 mmHg) in certain regions of the tumor, particularly those distant from blood vessels.21 Concurrently, the metabolic reprogramming of tumor cells further aggravates the consequences of hypoxia. Even in conditions where oxygen is sufficiently available, tumor cells preferentially utilize glycolysis for energy production, resulting in the accumulation of lactate and protons, which causes local acidification. This acidic microenvironment impairs the function of vascular endothelial cells, exacerbates perfusion disorders, and enhances the metabolic adaptation, survival, invasion, metastasis, immune evasion, and drug resistance of tumor cells.22,23 Importantly, hypoxia within tumors is not a static condition but rather exhibits a cyclic and fluctuating nature. This unstable oxygen supply further intensifies tumor heterogeneity and resistance to therapy.21

Persistent or cyclic hypoxic TMEs initiate a series of molecular and cellular adaptive mechanisms that support the survival and proliferation of tumor cells under hypoxic conditions. Numerous studies have demonstrated that HIF-1α plays a central role in facilitating tumor progression. In hypoxic conditions, HIF-1α evades hydroxylation and ubiquitination, resulting in its stable accumulation in the cytoplasm. Subsequently, it translocates into the nucleus, where it dimerizes with HIF-1β and binds to hypoxia response elements (HREs). This binding activates a wide array of target genes associated with angiogenesis (eg, VEGF), glycolytic metabolic reprogramming (eg, GLUT1), cell survival and invasion (eg, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4, CXCR4), and immune evasion (eg, cluster of differentiation 47, CD47), among others. Collectively, these mechanisms enable cancer cells to maintain proliferation and advance malignancy under hypoxic conditions.24–26

In addition to its direct impact on tumor cells, hypoxia significantly alters the immune and stromal composition of the TME. Hypoxic stress inhibits the infiltration and cytotoxic functions of CD8+ T cells and natural killer (NK) cells, while facilitating the polarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) towards an immunosuppressive M2-like phenotype.27,28 Concurrently, hypoxia orchestrates the recruitment of regulatory T cells (Tregs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), actions that collectively establish a niche conducive to tumor immune evasion.29,30 Furthermore, stromal elements such as cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) become activated under hypoxic conditions, contributing to extracellular matrix remodeling and desmoplasia, which exacerbate intratumoral transport barriers and resistance to therapy.31,32 Hypoxia also compromises DNA damage repair pathways, increases genomic instability and mutation frequency, and significantly enhances resistance to RT, chemotherapy, and photodynamic therapy (PDT).33 The key characteristics of the hypoxic TME and the associated therapeutic challenges are illustrated in Figure 2.

Diagram: Hypoxia links to immune escape, acidic tumor environment and therapy resistance.

Figure 2 Schematic illustration of core characteristics and therapeutic challenges of the tumor hypoxic microenvironment. In this schematic, solid arrows indicate activation, promotion, directional regulation, and cascading progression of biological processes; blunt-ended inhibitory lines represent blockade, suppression, or impairment of cellular activities and signaling pathways; upward arrows (↑) indicate elevated levels or upregulation of key molecules, cytokines, and pathological factors (Created in BioRender. Yu, (Z) (2026) https://BioRender.com/dy66oz5).

Within the hypoxic TME, tumor cells progressively develop increased plasticity and resistance to stress, establishing hypoxic regions as prevalent “niches” for tumor invasion, metastasis, and recurrence. Studies suggest that tumor metastasis accounts for approximately 90% of cancer-related mortalities. The hypoxic microenvironment facilitates the transition of non-cancerous cells from an epithelial to a migratory phenotype by activating the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/c-MET signaling pathway. This process reduces tumor cell adhesiveness and significantly enhances tumor invasion and metastasis. Elevated levels of HIF-1α under hypoxic conditions promote c-MET transcription, augment stromal HGF signal transduction, increase tumor cell sensitivity to HGF, and enhance their capacity to detach from the primary tumor and enter the circulatory system. Concurrently, this signaling pathway contributes to the degradation of the extracellular matrix and the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, further intensifying tumor cell migration.34–36

Tumor hypoxia significantly compromises the therapeutic efficacy of RT, PDT, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and other treatment modalities, presenting a fundamental challenge in contemporary cancer management. Hypoxia is not only an intrinsic characteristic of the TME but also a dynamically evolving obstacle throughout the treatment process. Under hypoxic conditions, the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which is essential for the mechanism of radiotherapy, is inhibited. Consequently, hypoxic tumors exhibit inherent radioresistance, leading to substantially diminished radiosensitivity.37 PDT is a minimally invasive treatment strategy that utilizes a photosensitizer (PS) activated by light of specific wavelengths to transfer energy or electrons to molecular oxygen, thereby producing cytotoxic ROS, particularly singlet oxygen (1O2). These ROS cause oxidative damage to cellular components, ultimately resulting in tumor cell death. Given that molecular oxygen is a critical substrate for ROS generation, the therapeutic efficacy of PDT is highly contingent upon the availability of local oxygen.38 During PDT, hypoxia poses a dual challenge. Initially, the low pO2 limits the efficiency with which photosensitizers are converted into ROS. Furthermore, the PDT process itself rapidly depletes local oxygen levels, while photodynamically induced microvascular embolism and occlusion further impede the supply of exogenous oxygen, exacerbating the condition into a more severe state of “secondary hypoxia”. This locally induced hypoxia not only directly restricts the sustained production of ROS but also activates HIF-1α-mediated autophagy as a cytoprotective mechanism. Consequently, this promotes multidrug resistance in tumors and significantly reduces the overall therapeutic efficacy of PDT.39 In the context of chemotherapy, low pO2 decreases the likelihood of oxidative stress, thereby impairing drug uptake and cellular response. Additionally, the structural abnormalities of tumor neovasculature under hypoxic conditions compromise drug bioavailability, collectively diminishing therapeutic effectiveness.40 Hypoxia also induces tumor cells to secrete immunosuppressive factors, which inhibit T cell activation and facilitate immune evasion by cancer cells, thereby increasing the risk of immunotherapy failure.41 Consequently, effectively mitigating the hypoxic TME constitutes a significant advancement in overcoming the complex challenges induced by hypoxia. Additionally, it offers a crucial opportunity for the development of combination therapies.

Oxygen-Carrying Nanoplatforms for Tumor Hypoxia Alleviation

The development of efficient oxygen carriers for the direct delivery of oxygen to hypoxic TMEs constitutes a highly effective and straightforward strategy with profound implications for the enhancement of cancer therapy. The central approach involves the engineering of materials with high oxygen solubility or oxygen-carrying capacity, which are incorporated into nanoplatforms. These platforms can be delivered to tumor sites with efficiency and safety, where they gradually release oxygen to increase local pO2 and alleviate hypoxia. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT), a commonly used clinical approach at present, can temporarily increase the pO2 in blood and tissues. However, due to the abnormalities in tumor blood vessels and insufficient perfusion, it fails to penetrate the core regions of tumors effectively.42 Consequently, researchers have concentrated on artificial oxygen carriers to develop more efficient targeted nanoformulations. These nanoplatforms typically employ PFCs, Hb, or MNBs to encapsulate oxygen molecules within the carrier via physical dissolution or non-covalent binding. Through ongoing modification and optimization of these structures, researchers have devised various direct oxygen-carrying nanoplatforms with diverse targeting capabilities. These platforms present distinct advantages and challenges in terms of oxygen loading efficiency, release mechanisms, and synergistic therapeutic potential. The subsequent sections will provide a detailed elaboration and comparison of these platforms.

Perfluorocarbon-Based Oxygen-Carrying Nanoplatforms

PFCs constitute a category of inert organic compounds characterized by the substitution of all hydrogen atoms in the hydrocarbon backbone with fluorine atoms. This substitution results in the formation of carbon-fluorine bonds, which possess exceptionally high bond energies. Consequently, PFCs exhibit remarkable chemical stability, excellent biocompatibility, and extremely low surface energy.43 In their liquid state, PFCs display weak intermolecular cohesion and substantial free volumes between molecules, facilitating the accommodation of significant quantities of gas molecules. The solubility of gases in PFCs is considerably higher than in water or plasma, with oxygen solubility being approximately 20 times greater than that in water. These properties render PFCs highly suitable as artificial oxygen carriers.44 The potential of PFCs to support mammalian survival was first demonstrated in a liquid breathing experiment conducted by Leland C. Clark and Frank Gollan in 1966, which pioneered the research trajectory of employing PFCs as artificial oxygen carriers.45 During the mid-to-late 1960s, PFCs were progressively investigated as potential blood substitutes and imaging contrast agents, undergoing numerous rounds of clinical validation in the ensuing decades. Despite initial clinical applications being constrained by dosage limitations, inadequate stability, and suboptimal oxygen release efficiency, these early endeavors undeniably established the groundwork for subsequent advancements in the use of PFCs for oxygen delivery.46 With the emergence of nanotechnology, researchers have employed strategies such as emulsification and surface modification to encapsulate PFCs within stable nanocarriers. These innovations confer upon PFCs an extended in vivo circulation time, improved tumor-targeting accumulation capacity, and regulated oxygen release performance. Consequently, this evolution has broadened the application of PFCs beyond their initial roles as blood substitutes and imaging agents to include the mitigation of tumor hypoxia and enhancement of therapeutic sensitization, particularly in oxygen-dependent treatment modalities such as RT, PDT, and immunotherapy.47

In the domain of nanomedicine, research concerning PFCs is predominantly concentrated on three key areas: (1) augmenting the aqueous solubility and stability of PFCs to facilitate prolonged systemic circulation and effective tumor accumulation in vivo; (2) advancing the controllability and precision of oxygen release via surface modification or external stimuli; and (3) integrating PFCs with functional modules, such as pharmaceuticals, photosensitizers, or immunomodulators, to develop multifunctional synergistic therapeutic platforms.48–50 Recent studies on PFC-based nanoplatforms have demonstrated significant advancements in tumor oxygenation within animal models, thereby substantially enhancing therapeutic efficacy and potentially overcoming hypoxia-induced drug resistance.

Passive Tumor-Targeting PFC-Based Nanoplatforms

The fundamental mechanism underpinning passively targeted PFC-based nanoplatforms is their exceptional oxygen solubility. The porous molecular architecture of PFCs facilitates the ingress of oxygen molecules into the liquid PFC core through the process of physical dissolution. These nanoplatforms preferentially accumulate at tumor sites via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Subsequently, driven by the pO2 gradient, the dissolved oxygen is gradually released at the tumor site. This release elevates the local pO2, mitigates hypoxia, and downregulates hypoxic signaling pathways, such as HIF-1α. Consequently, this process augments the efficacy of therapies that are dependent on oxygen.49

Nanoemulsions are recognized as one of the most traditional and extensively utilized carrier systems for PFCs. Concurrently with the development of PFCs, emulsification technology has transitioned from its origins in the food industry to applications within the pharmaceutical sector. In 1996, the term nanoemulsion (NE) was first introduced in the scientific literature to characterize droplets with diameters in the nanometer range, gradually supplanting earlier terminology such as “miniemulsion” and establishing a standardized definition for dispersed systems of nanoscale droplets.51 Nanoemulsions are kinetically stable colloidal dispersions comprising two immiscible liquids. Research has indicated that PFC-based nanoemulsions are typically formulated through high-energy emulsification techniques, such as microfluidization or ultrasonic emulsification, and are stabilized using emulsifiers like phospholipids, polymers, or proteins, with droplet sizes generally below 500 nm. The small droplet size and capacity to solubilize highly hydrophobic drugs render nanoemulsions an effective drug delivery system, offering enhanced bioavailability.48,52

Katarina et al designed an oxygen-carrying perfluorocarbon nanoemulsion (PFC-NE) composed of 60% (w/v) perfluorooctyl bromide (PFOB) and perfluorododecyl bromide (PFDB), stabilized by egg yolk phospholipids (EYPs), with a particle size below 200 nm. Upon intravenous administration, the PFC-NE accumulates in tumor tissues through the EPR effect. When combined with 60% oxygen inhalation, it significantly increases intratumoral pO2 and downregulated HIF-1α expression. Moreover, PFC-NE reduces adenosine accumulation and subsequently inhibits the immunosuppressive A2AR→cAMP→PKA signaling pathway, thereby enhancing the infiltration and activity of antitumor CD8+ T cells and NK cells, ultimately leading to the suppression of tumor growth.53 Similarly, Yun et al engineered nanodroplets consisting of a perfluorooctyl bromide (PFOB) core, which was encapsulated by a composite of lecithin and DPPE-PEG, resulting in an average particle size of approximately 250 nm. These nanodroplets demonstrated preferential accumulation in tumor tissues via the EPR effect within 24 hours following administration, leading to a significant increase in local pO2 levels. Quantification of hypoxia using 18F-FAZA PET imaging indicated that the reoxygenation efficacy of the PFOB nanodroplets was comparable to that achieved through conventional carbogen breathing. This finding substantiates that passive PFC-based nanoplatforms are capable of independently facilitating effective tumor reoxygenation, even in the absence of supplemental exogenous oxygen.47 Moreover, the utilization of low-dose PFC nanoemulsions has been increasingly expanded, demonstrating significant potential in imaging and diagnostic applications. Shin et al employed 19F-MRI to track the intratumoral distribution of PFC nanoemulsions (PFCNE) and applied them to guide high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) tumor ablation. This approach allowed for the quantitative assessment of the correlation between the accumulated concentration of PFCNE in the tumor and the resulting therapeutic outcomes.54 High-concentration PFC nanoemulsions (M2F8H18/PFCE NE, approximately 200 nm) have been applied for 19F-MRI imaging, demonstrating long-term stability and the ability for passive tumor targeting.55

Liposomes, among the earliest nanodelivery systems to achieve clinical translation, are spherical entities characterized by a hydrophilic core surrounded by a bilayer membrane composed of amphiphilic lipid materials, predominantly phospholipids.56 These structures demonstrate high biocompatibility, adjustable particle size and surface characteristics, and the capacity to encapsulate both hydrophilic and hydrophobic substances, rendering them highly suitable for applications in drug delivery, imaging, and tissue-targeted therapies. In contrast to normal capillary structures, the endothelial cells within the tumor microvasculature possess unique pore sizes. Consequently, by optimizing the dimensions of liposomes to facilitate extravasation into tumor tissues while preventing their escape from normal tissue capillaries, passive tumor targeting can be achieved. Liposomes offer a stable and low-toxicity encapsulation environment, which can significantly extend the plasma residence time of liquid PFCs and inhibit their droplet aggregation or rapid clearance in vivo. This positions them as one of the most promising strategies for PFC delivery in passive targeting oxygen supply applications.

Xu et al encapsulated perfluorohexane (PFH), a PFC with high oxygen solubility, into liposomes (Lip(PFH)) with an average particle size of approximately 200 nm. In vivo study results showed that Lip(PFH) could passively accumulate in tumors after intravenous injection, and significantly enhance the tumor suppressive effect of X-ray RT without the need for additional oxygen inhalation, while inducing no obvious toxicity in major organs. Compared with the previously reported perfluorocarbon emulsions for radiosensitization, Lip(PFH) exhibited a markedly improved therapeutic efficacy.57

Liang et al devised a technique to encapsulate liquid perfluorooctyl bromide (PFOB) within porphyrin-grafted lipid (PGL) matrices using ultrasonic dispersion, thereby creating self-oxygenating PDT nanoparticles (O2@PFOB@PGL NPs) that integrate both a photosensitizer and oxygen. Due to the robust hydrophobic interactions between PFOB and PGL molecules, this system achieved an exceptionally high PFOB core loading efficiency of 98.15% and a substantial porphyrin loading efficiency of 38.5%. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis demonstrated that the PFOB@PGL NPs exhibited a highly uniform spherical morphology, with an average particle size ranging from 10 to 30 nm. Such small nanoparticles with a narrow size distribution facilitated their passive accumulation in tumor tissues through the EPR effect. Furthermore, O2@PFOB@PGL NPs formed after oxygen capture could passively accumulate in hypoxic tumors and release oxygen sustainably without external stimulation, thus significantly alleviating tumor hypoxia. Interestingly, the ordered arrangement of porphyrins and alkyl chains in PGL NPs not only ensured the high efficiency of 1O2 generation but also reduced the fluorescence quenching of porphyrins, endowing PGL NPs with strong fluorescence. This structural configuration enhanced the efficiency of 1O2 production, thereby augmenting the therapeutic efficacy of PDT in inhibiting tumor growth and metastasis in the HT-29 colorectal cancer liver metastasis model. Furthermore, the nanoparticles served as a fluorescent and CT bimodal contrast agent for visualizing nanoparticle accumulation, guiding the timing of light irradiation to achieve precise irradiation and reduce damage to surrounding tissues. This study exemplifies the direct delivery of PFCs to proximal sites, utilizing them as an in vivo oxygen reservoir to overcome the hypoxic limitations of PDT, thereby providing a significant theranostic strategy for the treatment of colorectal cancer and other malignancies.58

In terms of clinical visualization and long-term tracking, Liu et al reported a silica-lipid-based PFC nanocomposite (SSNP). This platform co-encapsulated perfluorohexane (PFH) and superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles in a silane-lipid hybrid shell, forming a nanotheranostic platform for MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) tumor therapy. The nanocomplex exhibits both the liquid-phase oxygen storage capability of PFH and the MRI contrast enhancement properties of SPIOs, facilitating real-time MRI monitoring of nanoparticle distribution within tumors, both pre- and post-treatment. The findings of the study further revealed that SSNPs could augment HIFU-induced tumor ablation. Moreover, the integrated imaging and therapy functionality allowed more precise control over both drug administration and irradiation timing, as image-guided optimization improved therapeutic accuracy and reproducibility.59

Additionally, Ren et al synthesized perfluorocarbon-modified Pluronic F127 (PFC-F127) as a carrier for the co-delivery of the photosensitizer chlorin e6 (Ce6) and the ferroptosis inducer sorafenib (Sor), resulting in a self-oxygenating nanomicelle platform (Ce6-Sor@PFC-F127). Benefiting from the high oxygen solubility of PFC groups on the micellar surface, this nanoplatform achieved self-oxygenation and increased surface hydrophobicity, thus promoting cellular uptake by cancer cells. In vivo tumor models demonstrated that the PFC-F127 formulation effectively enabled the synergistic delivery of Ce6 and Sor, markedly augmenting the combined efficacy of PDT and ferroptosis through ROS generation. This integrated strategy ultimately resulted in cancer cell death upon laser irradiation. The oxygen-loading strategy elucidated in this study holds significant promise for integrated anticancer therapies.60

In addition to directly leveraging the physical oxygen-carrying capacity of PFCs, several studies have extended and intensified reoxygenation effects by modulating tumor hemodynamics. Zhou et al reported an albumin-coated PFC nanoparticle system (PFTBA@HSA) and proposed a representative “two-stage oxygen delivery” mechanism. Following intravenous administration, the system first enabled a rapid initial increase in local tumor oxygen levels through passive release of highly dissolved oxygen from the PFC core. Subsequently, the PFC nanoparticles enhanced tumor blood flow and promote the infiltration of red blood cells (RBCs) into tumor tissues, facilitating a second stage of oxygen delivery. Interestingly, PFTBA@HSA exhibited no significant impact on hemoglobin content or RBC infiltration in normal tissues, including the heart, liver, spleen, lungs, and kidneys. Benefiting from this synergistic process, PFTBA@HSA significantly alleviated tumor hypoxia and markedly enhanced RT efficacy across multiple tumor models without the need for exogenous hyperoxia or carbogen breathing. This study demonstrates that PFTBA@HSA can function not only as short-term oxygen reservoirs for direct oxygen supplementation but also as modulators that cooperate with physiological oxygen delivery systems to achieve more sustained and stable tumor reoxygenation, providing important insights for the functional expansion and clinical translation of passive oxygen-delivering nanoplatforms.61

Active Tumor-Targeting PFC-Based Nanoplatforms

While the EPR effect has traditionally been considered the primary mechanism for nanocarrier accumulation in tumors, increasing evidence indicates significant heterogeneity in clinical tumor presentations.62–64 This heterogeneity is particularly pronounced in solid tumors characterized by inadequate angiogenesis, dense stromal components, or extensive necrotic areas, thereby challenging the efficacy of passive targeting strategies. Numerous reviews have highlighted that to address the constraints imposed by tumor vascular architecture, stromal barriers, and elevated interstitial fluid pressure on the distribution and penetration of nanoparticles, active targeting has emerged as a pivotal strategy in the development of next-generation nanomedicine carriers.65–68

Active targeting PFC-based nanoplatforms achieve selective recognition of tumor-associated epitopes or receptors either by introducing ligands (eg, antibodies, peptides, glyco/polysaccharide receptor ligands, oligonucleotide aptamers, etc.) onto the PFC-based core or its encapsulating shell, or through surface chemical post-modification. These ligands exhibit specificity in binding to receptors or molecular markers that are overexpressed on tumor cells, stromal cells (including endothelial cells, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs), and tumor-associated fibroblasts (TAFs)), as well as noncellular extracellular matrix components. This targeted approach significantly enhances the accumulation of nanocarriers within the TME, thereby improving oxygen transport efficiency and augmenting the sensitization effects of subsequent RT, PDT, or immunotherapy.66,69–71

In the realm of active targeting strategies, receptor-based ligand functionalization emerges as a particularly intuitive and extensively employed approach. An illustrative example of this is the nanoparticle system (O2@FHA@PFC NPs) developed by Wang et al, which employs hyaluronic acid (HA) as a targeting ligand. In this system, the PFCs were pre-saturated with oxygen. By leveraging the specific interaction between HA and the overexpressed CD44 receptors, the accumulation of PFC nanocarriers at the tumor site is significantly enhanced, thereby markedly prolonging the duration of oxygen release. RT is a prevalent clinical treatment modality that eradicates tumor cells by inducing DNA damage through ionizing radiation, with its therapeutic efficacy being largely contingent upon the oxygen levels within tumor tissues.72 Tumor hypoxia can significantly weaken the oxygen fixation effect of radiation-induced DNA damage, making the resulting lesions more susceptible to cellular repair and consequently leading to radioresistance.73,74 In vivo studies have demonstrated that this system facilitates precise oxygen delivery to tumors through the active targeted binding of HA to CD44 receptors on the tumor surface, significantly mitigating the hypoxic condition. When combined with RT, the tumor growth inhibition effect was nearly threefold greater than that observed with RT treatment alone, with no significant systemic toxicity detected. These findings suggest that active targeting of oxygen delivery can effectively enhance the therapeutic efficacy of RT in the treatment of hypoxic tumors.75

Folate receptors (FR) exhibit a high affinity for binding with folic acid (FA) and facilitate its intracellular transport through receptor-mediated endocytosis.76 Li et al designed FR-targeted nanoparticles (FRNPs) consisting of a liquid perfluorooctyl bromide (PFOB) lipid core and a targeted shell chemically conjugated with FA and polyethylene glycol (PEG), with an average particle size of approximately 300 nm. Due to PEG modification, FRNPs retained their targeting affinity for FR while exhibiting reduced uptake by reticuloendothelial system (RES) macrophages. Fluorescence imaging in xenograft tumor models demonstrated that FRNPs could accumulate in FR-overexpressing tumors and extravasate through the endothelial gaps of tumor vasculature, thus enabling targeted therapy for FR-positive malignancies.77 Tseng et al combined FA as a targeting ligand with fluorinated polymeric micelles (PFFA) to develop PFFA-Ce6, a nanocarrier for delivering the hydrophobic photosensitizer Ce6. These fluorinated micelles exhibited a low critical micelle concentration, excellent stability and markedly enhanced oxygen-carrying capacity, which significantly promoted intracellular 1O2/ROS generation and augmented PDT cytotoxicity. Furthermore, they enhanced PDT efficacy under hypoxic conditions through oxygen supplementation from the PFC phase, positioning them as a promising platform for oxygen delivery to cancer cells to mitigate hypoxic microenvironments.78

In recent years, cell membrane-coated nanocarriers have garnered significant attention in the realm of active targeted tumor delivery. This innovative approach imparts nanocarriers with the surface protein composition and biological recognition properties characteristic of natural cell membranes, thereby conferring immune evasion capabilities and homotypic targeting advantages within the complex in vivo microenvironment. Consequently, this strategy markedly enhances the efficiency of tumor accumulation. Building on this concept, Fang et al developed a cancer cell membrane-coated PFC nanoparticle (CCm-HSA-ICG-PFTBA) with a particle size of 131.3 ± 1.08 nm. In this construct, PFTBA functions as the oxygen-carrying core, while the membrane coating augments the homotypic targeting capability towards corresponding tumors. In this study, 18F-FMISO PET/CT imaging and immunohistochemical analysis demonstrated that the nanocarrier significantly increased the pO2 in tumors at 24 hours post-injection. Following administration, near-infrared (NIR) irradiation markedly inhibited tumor growth in triple-negative breast cancer in vivo, with the treatment group exhibiting the lowest tumor volume and weight. The efficacy of PDT was further enhanced by oxygen delivery, without observable systemic toxicity. This example highlights an integrated strategy combining biomimetic membrane targeting, PFC-mediated oxygen delivery, and PDT, simultaneously addressing both oxygen supply and tumor specificity, representing a key advancement in actively targeted PFC nanocarriers.79 Wang et al developed a PFC-based nanocarrier, CmPF, with a particle size of 150.17 ± 4.13 nm, capable of delivering oxygen to the TME and monitoring immunotherapy efficacy via PET imaging. In this work, a biomimetic oxygen-carrying platform CmPF was constructed by coating PFTBA nanoparticles with cancer cell membranes (CCm) derived from murine Lewis lung cancer (LLC) cells. This platform enhanced the accumulation of oxygen carriers within tumor tissues and enabled quantitative real-time in vivo imaging of TME improvements following oxygen delivery. Utilizing Granzyme B PET/CT imaging to assess alterations in immune-mediated cytotoxic activity, the findings revealed that the combination of CmPF with immunotherapy markedly suppressed tumor progression in mouse models compared to immunotherapy alone. The treatment elevated the expression of effector immune cell markers, suggesting that oxygen delivery alleviated the hypoxia-induced immunosuppression. This strategy shows potential for overcoming resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and for precise stratification of tumor immune responses, paving the way for personalized cancer therapy.80

Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) is a noninvasive tumor treatment strategy that employs ultrasound to activate sonosensitizers, generating ROS to kill tumor cells and induce immunogenic cell death (ICD), thus releasing tumor-associated antigens and activating antitumor immunity.81,82 To address the challenges posed by tumor hypoxia in SDT and immunotherapy, Zhang et al developed a targeted nanosystem, DPPM@HA, by encapsulating oxygen-carrying PFCs and the STING agonist DMXAA within PCN-222-Mn metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), followed by surface modification with HA. Within this system, PCN-222-Mn served as an effective sonosensitizer for ROS production during SDT. The high-valent manganese within the MOFs was reduced in the glutathione (GSH)-rich intracellular environment of tumor cells to release Mn2+, which worked in synergy with DMXAA to activate the STING-TBK1-IRF3 signaling pathway. The STING pathway, a pivotal connection between innate and adaptive immunity, can substantially enhance antitumor immune responses upon activation.83 Upon ultrasound stimulation, PFC enabled controlled oxygen release, effectively alleviating the hypoxic TME, thereby significantly enhancing sonodynamic ROS generation and promoting ICD of tumor cells. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that DPPM@HA efficiently accumulates within tumor tissues. When used in conjunction with ultrasound, it markedly downregulated intratumoral HIF-1α expression, promoted the infiltration of CD8+ T cells, and reduced the presence of Tregs and M2-type macrophages, thus achieving a remodeling of the immune microenvironment. In models bearing 4T1 tumors and bilateral tumors, the combination of DPPM@HA and ultrasound significantly inhibited tumor growth and induced apoptosis. Further combination with a PD-1 inhibitor elicited a durable systemic antitumor immune response and enhanced immune memory, demonstrating excellent antimetastatic efficacy in lung metastasis models. By integrating active targeting, PFC-based oxygen delivery, SDT, and STING pathway activation, this study proposes a novel nanotherapeutic strategy to reverse tumor hypoxia and amplify the efficacy of sonodynamic immunotherapy.84

In summary, PFC-based nanoplatforms offer distinct advantages in augmenting oxygen delivery to tumor tissues, mitigating local hypoxia, and enhancing therapeutic efficacy in treatments associated with hypoxic conditions. These benefits are largely attributable to their high oxygen solubility and the potential for targeted delivery through ligand modification or biomimetic interfacial engineering. Nonetheless, despite the promising outcomes observed in experimental settings, the clinical translation of PFC-based nanoplatforms has been considerably delayed, encountering substantial challenges. These limitations are fundamentally rooted in the intrinsic biophysical properties of the nanoplatforms. Firstly, PFCs demonstrate pronounced hydrophobic and lipophobic characteristics, resulting in exceptionally high interfacial tension with aqueous phases and commonly utilized biological surfactants. This interfacial instability poses significant challenges in the fabrication of long-term stable PFC nanoemulsions. Particularly within the complex in vivo circulatory environment, high shear forces and competitive displacement by endogenous lipoproteins often lead to Ostwald ripening or demulsification of the formulation, consequently resulting in uncontrolled oxygen release kinetics. For example, Fluosol-DA, an early PFC emulsion tested in clinical settings, experienced poor long-term storage stability and performance degradation due to inadequate interfacial stability and flocculation during storage, which was considered a major factor contributing to its clinical failure.85,86 Second, in the complex biological environment in vivo, PFC nanoplatforms readily undergo adsorption of plasma proteins, leading to the formation of a protein corona. This phenomenon modifies their surface physicochemical properties and influences cellular uptake pathways, thereby facilitating recognition and clearance by the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS). As a result, there is a decrease in targeting efficiency and a potential increase in immunological risks.87

While ligand functionalization or multifunctional surface modifications can enhance targeted recognition, they often alter the interfacial stability between the PFC core and its shell. This compromise can negatively impact the oxygen loading capacity and release kinetics, potentially undermining the high-efficiency oxygen-carrying characteristics that are fundamentally dependent on physical dissolution mechanisms.46 Furthermore, PFC-based systems rely on a “physical dissolution-diffusion” mechanism for oxygen loading and release, and their oxygen delivery behavior inherently lacks active regulatory capability. Within the highly heterogeneous and dynamically evolving TME, this passive mode of oxygen delivery is unable to achieve precise spatiotemporal oxygen distribution aligned with therapeutic requirements, thus constraining its sustained sensitization efficacy in RT, PDT, and SDT. These challenges have been consistently emphasized in recent systematic and critical reviews that address the translational bottlenecks of PFC-based artificial oxygen carriers (AOCs). The relevant literature indicates that current mainstream PFC formulations continue to exhibit significant limitations regarding compositional complexity, biological stability, and scalable manufacturing, which are the primary factors impeding their clinical advancement.88 Therefore, future research on PFC-based oxygen-carrying nanoplatforms urgently needs to further simplify formulation compositions, optimize interfacial stability, and establish quantifiable in vivo oxygen supply evaluation systems while maintaining high-efficiency oxygen-carrying and release performance. These efforts are essential to narrow the gap between experimental success and clinical application.

Hemoglobin-Based Biomimetic Nanoplatforms for Oxygen Delivery

In addition to PFC-based nanoplatforms that rely on the physical dissolution of oxygen, hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers (HBOCs) represent another important category of oxygen-supply strategies. Hb is a natural oxygen-transport protein in the body, consisting of a stable tetramer composed of two α-chains and two β-chains, and each subunit contains a heme prosthetic group. The central ferrous ion (Fe2+) can form reversible coordinate bonds with oxygen molecules, enabling a single hemoglobin molecule to bind up to four oxygen molecules and thus endowing it with an extremely high oxygen-carrying capacity per molecule.89 Hb demonstrates a pronounced cooperative binding effect, wherein the attachment of oxygen to one heme group triggers a conformational shift of the entire tetramer from a low-affinity T-state (Tense) to a high-affinity R-state (Relaxed). This conformational transition subsequently increases the oxygen-binding affinity of the remaining heme sites.90,91 The oxygen affinity of Hb is further modulated by local environmental factors, including pH and carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration, a mechanism referred to as the Bohr effect. An increase in CO2 levels or a decrease in pH within tissues results in a reduced oxygen affinity of Hb, thereby promoting the release of oxygen into metabolically active, hypoxic regions. Conversely, the elevated pO2 in the alveolar environment enhances oxygen binding. This physiologically adaptive regulation of oxygen loading and unloading optimizes the efficiency and flexibility of Hb-mediated oxygen transport in vivo.92

Based on these natural advantages, HBOCs have been proposed as a class of semi-synthetic oxygen delivery systems. These systems are centered on natural Hb and formed through molecular modification or structural reconstruction, initially intended primarily for oxygen-supply support in ischemic diseases and as alternatives to allogeneic blood transfusion. In comparison to PFC-based oxygen carriers, HBOCs closely mimic endogenous Hb with respect to oxygen binding, transport, and release mechanisms. Theoretically, this enables them to facilitate more efficient and regulated oxygen delivery.93 However, early research has indicated that unmodified free Hb tends to dissociate into αβ dimers in plasma, leading to a markedly reduced circulation time. Additionally, this dissociation induces adverse effects such as vasoconstriction, systemic hypertension, and nephrotoxicity through the scavenging of nitric oxide (NO), thereby significantly limiting its clinical utility. To address these challenges, researchers have devised various molecular engineering strategies focused on enhancing the structural stability and biosafety of Hb. These strategies include polymerization, cross-linking, conjugation modification, and antioxidant functionalization. The primary objectives of these approaches are to stabilize the tetrameric structure of Hb, extend its in vivo circulation time, and mitigate systemic toxicity.94

Hemoglobin-Encapsulated Nanocarriers

Nanostructural engineering constitutes a pivotal approach in the advancement of Hb-based oxygen delivery systems. A prevalent methodology entails the encapsulation of Hb within nanocarriers, including liposomes, polymeric nanoparticles, and protein-based nanostructures. These carriers substantially mitigate the deleterious effects associated with cell-free Hb in vivo, such as dissociation, rapid clearance, and nitric oxide scavenging. Concurrently, they enhance the circulation dynamics and tumor accumulation potential of Hb.

Liposome-encapsulated Hb represents one of the earliest and most widely investigated forms of Hb encapsulation. Murayama et al demonstrated that liposome-encapsulated Hb (h-LEH) significantly enhanced oxygen delivery to tumor tissues. Their results showed that a single intravenous infusion under normobaric breathing conditions could sustain a tumor oxygenation effect for up to 72 hours and reduce the accumulation of the hypoxia marker HIF-1α. In mouse tumor models, h-LEH enhanced the antitumor efficacy of RT, likely due to the ability of the liposomal carrier to facilitate Hb accumulation in tumors via the EPR effect, thus improving local pO2 and oxygenation status.95

To further improve the alleviation of tumor hypoxia and enhance antitumor efficacy, researchers have co-encapsulated Hb with chemotherapeutic agents within a single liposomal carrier. Yang et al constructed a nanosystem co-loading Hb and doxorubicin (DOX) (DOX-Hb-lipo, DHL), with a particle size of 151 ± 10.4 nm, exhibiting good stability and sustained oxygen release capacity. This nanosystem not only facilitated efficient oxygen delivery and promoted ROS generation to enhance ROS-mediated cytotoxicity of DOX but also significantly increased the uptake and accumulation of DOX in hypoxic cancer cells. Consequently, it reversed hypoxia-associated chemoresistance and exhibited enhanced antitumor efficacy in mouse tumor models. This study indicated that the presence of Hb on the carrier surface could facilitate the internalization and accumulation of nanoparticles at tumor sites, improving the synergistic effect of oxygen delivery and chemotherapy.96 Hb-encapsulated liposomal carriers have also been employed to enhance the efficacy of oxygen-dependent therapies, such as PDT. Guo et al developed liposomes (Lipo-ICG-Hb, LIH) co-loading Hb and the photosensitizer indocyanine green (ICG). The ICG served as a near-infrared photosensitizer, which was modified with octadecanamide (ODA) and incorporated into the lipid membrane, while Hb was encapsulated within the inner aqueous phase, thereby greatly enhancing ROS generation and the antitumor efficacy of PDT.97

Platinum (Pt)-based chemotherapeutic agents are extensively utilized in clinical oncology. Nevertheless, their therapeutic efficacy is frequently compromised by tumor hypoxia. Structurally, hypoxia impedes drug delivery due to disorganized tumor vasculature and elevated interstitial fluid pressure, which significantly obstructs the convective transport and deep penetration of therapeutic agents.98 Additionally, hypoxia fosters an immunosuppressive microenvironment by augmenting regulatory T cell activity, inhibiting the maturation of dendritic cells, and diminishing the infiltration of cytotoxic T cells.99 Moreover, hypoxia-induced metabolic reprogramming and the upregulation of HIF-1α contribute to intrinsic resistance to Pt-based drugs. This resistance is facilitated by mechanisms such as active drug efflux, a reduction in intracellular ROS, and the enhancement of DNA damage repair pathways, thereby circumventing apoptosis.100–102 To circumvent these limitations, Sun et al developed a biotin receptor (BR)-targeted Pt(IV) prodrug lipid nanoparticle (Hb@BTOPtIV), which co-encapsulates Hb as an oxygen carrier with a Pt(IV) prodrug to simultaneously enable oxygen delivery and targeted chemotherapy. Hb@BTOPtIV was covalently linked to hydrophilic biotin via hydrophobic long-chain lipids and self-assembled into a targeted structure in aqueous solution, achieving effective targeting to tumors. In vitro studies showed that BTOPtIV led to a 4.71-fold increase in Pt accumulation in 4T1 cells compared with traditional oxaliplatin-treated cells, confirming the efficacy of BR targeting. Moreover, the treatment did not induce significant weight loss and extended the overall survival of mice. Additionally, Hb@BTOPtIV provided a localized oxygen supply through the release of Hb, which alleviated tumor microenvironment hypoxia and enhanced chemosensitivity. In vivo investigations demonstrated that intravenously administered Hb@BTOPtIV selectively accumulated within tumor sites, where it dissociated to release platinum-based drugs and oxygen. This dual-function strategy not only enhanced the efficacy of chemotherapy but also modulated the immune microenvironment by promoting the maturation of dendritic cells, increasing the infiltration of effector T cells, and reducing regulatory T cells, thereby ultimately leading to immune activation. The preparation of Hb@BTOPtIV and its mechanism for overcoming hypoxia-induced suppression of immunochemotherapy are depicted in Figure 3. Overall, the design strategy of Hb@BTOPtIV underscores the potential of hemoglobin-encapsulated nanocarriers in mitigating tumor hypoxia, improving drug delivery, and facilitating combined immunotherapy.103

BR-targeting nanoplatform: prep, degradation, hypoxia relief in cancer therapy.

Figure 3 Preparation and hypoxia-alleviating mechanism of BR-targeting oxygen-carrying prodrug nanoplatform. (a) Degradation pathway of Lipo-OPtIV−BT. (b) Schematic preparation of Hb@BTOPtIV via electrostatic encapsulation of Hb within Lipo-OPtIV−BT. (c) BR-targeting Hb@BTOPtIV enhances PtIV drug delivery, improves tumor oxygenation, and alleviates hypoxia-induced immunosuppression during chemotherapy. In this schematic, upward arrows (↑) indicate elevated levels or upregulation of corresponding biological indicators; downward arrows (↓) indicate decreased levels or downregulation of corresponding biological indicators; the cross symbol indicates blockade of inhibitory pathways. Reproduced with permission.103 Copyright © 2026 American Chemical Society.

Abbreviation: BR, biotin receptor.

In recent years, the encapsulation or functionalization of Hb within MOF nanocarriers to develop oxygen delivery platforms with integrated oxygen transport and synergistic therapeutic functions has emerged as a prominent area of research. These composite systems exploit the high porosity and structural stability of MOFs to safeguard Hb, while facilitating oxygen delivery to biological tissues through the oxygen-binding and release properties of Hb. This methodology is anticipated to substantially improve the effectiveness of therapeutic strategies in hypoxic microenvironments.104 Zhao et al reported a MOF-based nanosensitizer, Hb@HP(Hf), with both radiosensitizing capability and tumor hypoxia alleviation for enhancing the synergistic efficacy of radiotherapy-radiodynamic therapy (RT-RDT). This platform was constructed using Hf clusters as metal nodes and the photosensitizing ligand tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (TCPP) as organic linkers, forming a highly ordered porous nanostructure that enabled efficient immobilization of Hb within the MOF pores, achieving a remarkably high Hb loading of up to 48.9 wt%. The high hemoglobin content endowed the system with substantial oxygen-carrying and sustained oxygen-release capacity, thus effectively alleviating tumor hypoxia and enhancing oxygen-dependent therapeutic responses. In vitro experiments have demonstrated that Oxy-Hb@HP(Hf) substantially increases ROS generation under X-ray irradiation, particularly 1O2, which leads to significant DNA double-strand breaks and apoptosis in tumor cells. In CT26 tumor-bearing mouse models, this system not only significantly inhibited tumor growth, with some instances of tumor regression, but also notably downregulated HIF-1α expression, indicating effective alleviation of tumor hypoxia.105

Despite the excellent performance of MOF-Hb composite systems in oxygen delivery and radiosensitization, their microporous structures and low physiological stability still limit their further biological applications. In response to these limitations, Jin et al introduced an innovative inside-out engineering approach to develop a stable Hb nanocarrier. This was achieved by covalently PEGylating hierarchical porous UiO-66 nanoparticles (HP-UiO-66 NPs) using diphenylcyclooctyne-azide click chemistry on the particle surface. This strategy significantly enhanced Hb loading efficiency through the introduction of mesoporous structures while preserving micropores to facilitate oxygen diffusion. When the input Hb concentration was 10 mg·mL−1, the loading efficiency reached approximately 24%. The biorthogonal PEGylation was conducted without interfering with the conformation or oxygen-carrying function of Hb, substantially increasing the colloidal and physiological stability of the particles. The PEGylated nanoparticles had a size of 140.8 ± 8.3 nm with a PDI of 0.167 and remained stable in biological media for more than one week. Their stability was much higher than that of unmodified nanoparticles, avoiding phosphate-induced degradation and enabling selective accumulation in specific organs. This work provides a reliable strategy for constructing highly efficient and stable oxygen delivery platforms.106

Self-Assembled Hemoglobin Nanocarriers

Compared with encapsulating Hb in exogenous nanocarriers, self-assembled Hb nanosystems form stable nanostructures by modulating intermolecular interactions with minimal or no carrier assistance. This provides a more concise and biocompatible oxygen delivery strategy for alleviating tumor hypoxia. These systems typically exploit hydrophobic, electrostatic, or coordination interactions among Hb molecules to facilitate nanoscale aggregation. Consequently, they prevent the rapid dissociation and clearance of free Hb while maintaining its inherent oxygen-binding and release capabilities.107

Hb-polymer conjugate self-assembly systems represent a typical class of self-assembled Hb nanocarriers. Wang et al constructed an Hb-PCL conjugate-coupled self-assembled biomimetic nano-erythrocyte system (V(Hb)), which can simultaneously carry the chemotherapeutic drug DOX and oxygen to achieve tumor hypoxia alleviation and immune microenvironment reprogramming. Empirical evidence demonstrated that V(Hb)@DOX effectively mitigated tumor hypoxia in both in vitro and in vivo experimental models. Compared with free Hb or unmodified carriers, V(Hb) exhibited oxygen-binding and release behavior more closely resembling that of natural red blood cells, indicating a higher oxygen release capacity under hypoxic conditions. In hypoxic cells, V(Hb) significantly decreased the expression of hypoxia-associated markers, including HIF-1α and PD-L1, suggesting an inhibition of hypoxia signaling pathways. Continuous monitoring of oxygen saturation in 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse models demonstrated that V(Hb) administration substantially increased tumor oxygenation levels compared to the control group. This increase was accompanied by the downregulation of hypoxia-inducible factors, thereby effectively mitigating the characteristic hypoxic TME.108

Analogous strategies have been employed in models of drug-resistant tumors. Wang et al introduced a Hb nanocluster composite carrier, designated as HPRG@SF, which co-encapsulates indocyanine green (ICG) and sorafenib (SF). This innovative system markedly enhanced oxygenation within tumor tissues and suppressed the expression of KPNA4, thereby augmenting the efficacy of PDT in drug-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Mechanistic investigations indicated that hypoxic conditions upregulate KPNA4, thereby altering mitochondrial function and contributing to SF resistance in HCC cells. The HPRG@SF formulation ameliorated the hypoxic TME through the delivery of oxygen via Hb, consequently increasing SF sensitivity. When combined with enhanced PDT, it further inhibited the proliferation of drug-resistant HCC cells, illustrating the dual benefits of self-assembled Hb nanosystems in mitigating hypoxia and counteracting drug resistance.109

Oxygen Micro/Nanobubble-Based Delivery Systems

Oxygen MNBs constitute a category of micro-nanocarrier systems distinguished by their gaseous core and a shell that may be composed of lipids, polymers, proteins, surfactants, or other materials. Unlike physical oxygen carriers, MNBs can deliver oxygen in gaseous form directly to hypoxic tumor regions and release it under certain conditions. They are anticipated to overcome the limitations associated with the blood’s oxygen-carrying capacity, thereby increasing pO2 in the hypoxic TME and augmenting the effectiveness of oxygen-dependent therapies. Contemporary systematic reviews on MNBs suggest that these carriers not only exhibit excellent oxygen-carrying capabilities but also facilitate the co-delivery of drugs and enable multimodal therapy through shell engineering and functional modifications. When compared to traditional liquid-phase oxygen carriers, MNBs offer higher gas payloads, greater flexibility in size tunability, and superior interfacial mass transfer properties. These attributes confer unique advantages to MNBs, including enhanced penetration of the abnormal tumor vasculature, improved retention within the microenvironment, and the capability for on-demand oxygen release under hypoxic conditions.110

Within the TME, MNBs facilitate the release of oxygen from their gaseous core to adjacent tissues through mechanisms of gas diffusion and mechanical rupture. This process leads to an increase in regional pO2, thereby mitigating hypoxia-associated signaling pathways, such as HIF-1α, and enhancing the efficacy of oxygen-dependent therapies. Related studies highlight the critical role of MNB design and functionalization. For example, the modulation of polymeric or liposomal shells can extend circulation half-life, enhance tumor targeting, and enable concurrent drug delivery.111 Furthermore, under hypoxic conditions, the direct oxygen delivery by MNBs can significantly impact essential cellular functions, including mitochondrial respiration and redox homeostasis. The restoration of oxygen levels aids in the recovery of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and reduces dependence on anaerobic glycolysis, thereby decreasing lactic acid accumulation and the exacerbation of an acidic microenvironment, while also attenuating hypoxia-related inflammatory and immunosuppressive characteristics.112 Building upon the comprehension of these molecular mechanisms, recent research has evolved MNBs from simple oxygen delivery systems into sophisticated multimodal platforms. These nanoplatforms feature adjustable oxygen-release kinetics, responsiveness to external stimuli, and functionalized designs. This advancement provides the biological basis for the further development of diverse MNB configurations and integrated therapeutic strategies.

pH-Responsive Oxygen Micro/Nanobubbles

Due to the mildly acidic nature of the TME (pH ~6.5–6.8), researchers have leveraged the pH disparity between tumor and normal tissues to engineer pH-responsive oxygen MNBs that facilitate targeted oxygen release at tumor sites. These MNBs are typically designed with acid-sensitive components within their shell structure, ensuring stability under neutral pH conditions. In the slightly acidic TME, these structural components undergo changes that trigger the release of oxygen, thereby more effectively mitigating local hypoxia. This design concept has led to the development of various pH-responsive MNBs in recent years, aimed at enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of RT, PDT, and combined treatment strategies.113,114

Song et al engineered a nanobubble carrier capable of spontaneous oxygen delivery in mildly acidic TME by utilizing a pH-sensitive acetalated dextran polymer as the inner layer and biocompatible lipids as the outer shell. This nanobubble system was designed to overcome limitations of conventional oxygen carriers, such as premature gas release during circulation and dependence on external triggers. In a CNE2 tumor-bearing mouse model, treatment with these pH-responsive oxygen nanobubbles significantly increased intratumoral pO2 by approximately 6-fold, demonstrating a direct effect on improving tumor hypoxia. The autonomous oxygen release mechanism operates without the need for external stimuli, with the nanobubble shell effectively sequestering oxygen during circulation and facilitating rapid release upon reaching the tumor site. This approach effectively reverses hypoxia-induced drug resistance and cell survival pathways, offering a potent strategy for hypoxia intervention without external excitation.115

Wang et al coupled ethylenediamine-modified dextran oxygen-carrying nanobubbles with PD-1 antibodies to design a nanobubble carrier (αPD1-O2-NB) capable of accelerated oxygen release in acidic regions. αPD1-O2-NB selectively inhibits PD-1 protein in CD8+ T cells within tumor tissues, thereby enhancing the sensitivity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) to 125I radionuclide therapy. These nanobubbles, encapsulated in an acetylated dextran (Ac-DEX) polymer shell, act as a robust barrier preventing gas dissolution in the bloodstream and preserving most of the oxygen payload. The abundant acetal bonds in the Ac-DEX backbone exhibit significant pH sensitivity and undergo rapid hydrolysis in acidic environments (pH 5.0–6.5), accelerating shell degradation and enabling prompt oxygen release from the nanobubbles. In vitro oxygen release studies showed that αPD1-O2-NB exhibited a faster release rate and higher sustained oxygen levels under acidic conditions. In contrast, the nitrogen bubble (N2-NB) group showed no obvious increase in oxygen concentration under either pH condition, confirming the pH-responsive behavior. In 125I RT mouse models, 125I treatment alone increased CD8+ T cell activity and cytokine (eg, IFN-γ, GZMB) secretion, whereas the combination of αPD1-O2-NB and 125I significantly enhanced these effects, resulting in higher CD8+ T cell survival rates and cytokine levels. This enhancement not only attenuated the immunosuppressive effects of PD-1 signaling but also improved TME oxygenation, indirectly boosting the antitumor activity of immune cells.116

Ultrasound-Triggered Oxygen Micro/Nanobubbles

Ultrasound-responsive MNBs represent a distinct category of acoustic carriers that react to the physical energy imparted by ultrasound waves. These carriers typically consist of a gaseous core encapsulated by a biocompatible shell, which may be composed of lipids, polymers, or biomimetic cell membranes. Upon activation by ultrasound, MNBs can undergo controlled oscillation, cavitation, and rupture. The cavitation effects significantly increase the permeability of vascular and cellular membranes, facilitating spatiotemporally controlled drug release, enhanced tumor penetration, and augmented ICD. Consequently, MNBs offer unique advantages in tumor therapy, diagnostic imaging, and drug delivery applications.117,118

Tian et al developed a multifunctional nanobubble system (Ce6-O2NB) designed to induce necroptosis. This innovative system utilized lipid nanobubbles to co-encapsulate Ce6 and oxygen, with the nanobubbles serving as agents for ultrasound-targeted nanobubble destruction (UTND) and Ce6 facilitating SDT. In vitro analyses demonstrated that these nanobubbles exhibited excellent biocompatibility and a uniform size distribution, which allowed for efficient accumulation at tumor sites. Upon activation through UTND, the Ce6-O2NBs underwent cavitation and rupture, releasing substantial concentrations of oxygen at the targeted locations. This significantly elevated oxygen levels within the TME and mitigated hypoxia. The “in situ oxygen supply” approach significantly enhanced the effectiveness of SDT and triggered a substantial increase in ROS generation. In 4T1 breast cancer mouse models, the combination of Ce6-O2NBs and ultrasound markedly inhibited tumor growth and effectively stimulated antitumor immune responses. This was achieved through the dual mechanisms of ameliorating hypoxia and inducing necroptosis, thus offering a novel strategy for sonodynamic immunotherapy targeting hypoxic tumors.119

Therapeutic Agent-Co-Loaded Oxygen Micro/Nanobubbles

In the field of tumor hypoxia research and the development of clinical treatment strategies, merely augmenting oxygen concentration often proves inadequate in completely mitigating hypoxia-induced therapeutic resistance. As a result, a growing body of research has focused on the integration of oxygen MNBs with antitumor drugs or functional molecules to create bifunctional or multifunctional nanosystems. These advanced systems are designed to concurrently alleviate hypoxia and enhance the synergistic efficacy of tumor therapies.

A notable approach within this paradigm is the utilization of nanobubble systems that co-load chemotherapeutic agents and oxygen. Khan et al developed doxorubicin-conjugated oxygen nanobubbles (Dox/ONBs) and conducted a systematic evaluation of their therapeutic efficacy in hypoxic models of MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and HeLa cells. The findings revealed that post-oxygen release, this system effectively alleviated the hypoxia-induced upregulation of HIF-1α, thereby attenuating hypoxia-associated drug resistance pathways. Concurrently, enhanced oxygenation significantly increased intracellular ROS generation, substantially amplifying the cytotoxic effects mediated by Dox. In comparison to Dox delivery systems lacking oxygen loading, Dox/ONBs demonstrated superior tumor cell-killing efficacy under hypoxic conditions, underscoring the critical role of oxygen supplementation in restoring chemosensitivity. This study validated at the cellular level that the co-delivery of oxygen and chemotherapeutic agents transcends a mere physical combination, instead augmenting the overall efficacy of chemotherapy by modulating hypoxia signaling and oxidative stress dynamics.120 Agent-co-loaded oxygen nanobubbles represent an advanced strategy that deeply integrates oxygen supply with pharmacotherapy. They can not only alleviate hypoxia and enhance therapeutic response but also significantly improve the efficacy of oxygen-dependent therapies, providing a reliable pathway for the future development of more efficient and targeted tumor treatment platforms.

Gas Vesicle-Based Oxygen Delivery Systems

Gas vesicles (GVs) are hollow protein nanostructures that are naturally synthesized by specific bacteria and archaea. A defining characteristic of GVs is their rigid shell, which is formed through the highly ordered assembly of gas vesicle proteins, primarily GvpA and GvpC, in the absence of a lipid membrane. This structural feature facilitates the stable encapsulation of gas molecules.121 Typically, GVs exhibit spindle-shaped or cylindrical morphologies, with dimensions ranging from 100 to 250 nm. They possess a hydrophobic gas core, which permits the free diffusion of small gas molecules, such as oxygen, while effectively repelling water molecules.122 In recent years, biogenic gas vesicles have garnered significant attention as promising carriers for oxygen delivery and the regulation of tumor hypoxia. Compared to conventional synthetic nanobubbles, biogenic gas vesicles offer distinct advantages, including enhanced stability, improved systemic circulation, and targeted oxygen release, owing to their naturally protein-based gas cavity structures.123,124

Building on the inherent structure of natural GVs, researchers have successfully engineered these entities into stable oxygen-carrying nanobubbles aimed at mitigating tumor hypoxia and enhancing therapies reliant on oxygen. For instance, Song et al demonstrated the lipid coating of natural GVs, thereby creating a stable oxygen delivery system termed lipid-GVs(O2). In vitro experiments revealed that this nanoplatform substantially increased oxygen concentrations in both the surrounding solution and cells under hypoxic conditions. Furthermore, it was effective in elevating local tumor pO2 in subcutaneous mouse tumor models. Quantitative analyses indicated that tumor regions in the treatment group exhibited significantly higher pO2 levels compared to the control group, which was associated with the downregulation of HIF-1α expression and an increased proportion of apoptotic cells. Importantly, this oxygen delivery system demonstrated excellent biocompatibility in vivo, as evidenced by the absence of significant tissue damage or systemic toxicity following injection. These findings suggest that surface-modified natural GVs can be safely employed in research focused on tumor hypoxia intervention.125

In addition to facilitating oxygen delivery, GVs offer distinct advantages in the realm of integrated tumor theranostics. The pronounced disparity in acoustic impedance between their internal gas cavities and the surrounding medium endows GVs with the ability to enhance ultrasound contrast, making them a focal point of research in molecular imaging and ultrasound-based diagnostics. Shapiro et al have demonstrated that GVs can function as genetically encodable ultrasound contrast agents, with their acoustic signals being closely linked to their structural integrity. This characteristic enables the “visualized oxygen delivery” necessary for modulating tumor hypoxia, allowing for real-time monitoring of GV distribution, accumulation, and potential rupture behavior under ultrasound guidance. Consequently, this provides critical feedback for precision therapy.126

Oxygen-Generating Nanoplatforms for Tumor Hypoxia Alleviation

Unlike passive strategies that deliver exogenous oxygen via the circulatory system, in situ oxygen-generating nanoplatforms adopt a more active and efficient approach. These platforms facilitate autonomous oxygen production within lesions by incorporating catalytically active agents (such as nanozymes or photo-/electrocatalysts) and leveraging the elevated levels of endogenous substrates (such as hydrogen peroxide or water) present in tumor tissues. Distinct from oxygen-carrying nanoplatforms, in situ oxygen-generating nanoplatforms can trigger catalytic, photocatalytic, or hydrolytic reactions in response to the TME. This strategy mitigates the risks of oxygen leakage and systemic oxygen toxicity associated with conventional oxygen carriers, while enabling precise spatial delivery of oxygen to hypoxic regions within tumors.127,128 Table 1 provides a summary of representative nanoplatforms, detailing the tumor cells they target, their synergistic applications with other therapies, advantages, and mechanisms for tumor targeting.

Table 1 Summary of the Construction Strategies, Therapeutic Advantages, and Tumor-Targeting Mechanisms of Oxygen-Generating Nanoplatforms

H2O2-Catalytic Nanoplatforms for in situ Oxygen Generation

As a result of aberrant metabolic processes, tumor tissues tend to accumulate elevated concentrations of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), often reaching levels of several hundred micromolar, thereby providing a substrate for localized oxygen generation.170 Consequently, the utilization of nanocatalysts to efficiently decompose H2O2 into O2 at tumor sites has emerged as a prominent area of research. This strategy not only elevates the local pO2, thereby effectively alleviating hypoxia and enhancing the efficacy of oxygen-dependent therapies, but also reduces oxidative damage to cells caused by excessive H2O2. Thus, it achieves a dual improvement of the TME.171

Enzyme-Inspired Protein Catalytic Nanoplatforms

Protein-based catalytic nanoplatforms utilize the decomposition of H2O2 by natural enzymes as their fundamental mechanism to produce oxygen. These platforms achieve in situ conversion of endogenous H2O2 into oxygen within tumors by either directly delivering catalase (CAT) or employing nanocatalysts that mimic its active sites. This conversion process significantly increases local oxygen concentrations, thereby mitigating tumor hypoxia and enhancing the efficacy of oxygen-dependent therapeutic interventions. Natural catalase-based delivery systems, which directly catalyze the decomposition of H2O2 into O2, represent the earliest iteration of such platforms. However, their direct application is constrained by rapid inactivation in vivo and limited systemic circulation time.172 In response, recent studies have focused on integrating CAT or CAT-like nanozymes into nanocarriers to improve accumulation at tumor sites and enhance catalytic stability,129,130 thus facilitating sustained in situ oxygen generation.173,174

Tan et al developed a self-oxygen-generating soft nanomotor (SMONs-CAT-Ce6) composed of soft mesoporous organosilica nanoparticles and CAT. In the H2O2-rich TME, this system not only decomposes H2O2 to O2 but also enables the autonomous propulsion of the nanomotors along H2O2 gradients, thereby enhancing targeted accumulation and deep tumor penetration. In vivo experiments demonstrated that SMONs-CAT-Ce6 significantly alleviated the hypoxic in 143B osteosarcoma models. Furthermore, it synergizes with the photosensitizer Ce6 to augment the efficacy of PDT, thereby inhibiting tumor growth and preventing lung metastasis. With a particle size of approximately 234 nm, SMONs-CAT-Ce6 demonstrates excellent biocompatibility and nanomotor propulsion capabilities, offering an innovative strategy for integrating in situ H2O2-catalyzed oxygenation with nanodelivery systems.131

Cheng et al developed a multifunctional nanozyme-prodrug system LCC@Ce6-NPs by self-assembling lactobionic acid (LA), acid-sensitive DOX prodrug (CAD), CAT, and the photosensitizer Ce6. This system facilitates the catalytic decomposition of H2O2 to produce O2 within tumor cells, leading to a substantial downregulation of HIF-1α and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression, thereby enhancing the cytotoxic efficacy of chemotherapy and PDT. In vivo experiments revealed that this combinatorial nanoplatform achieved a tumor growth inhibition (TGI) rate exceeding 90%, accompanied by partial tumor regression. These results highlight the significant sensitizing potential of protein-based oxygen-generating catalytic platforms in combination therapeutic strategies.132

Metal Oxide Catalytic Nanoplatforms

Metal oxide-based intelligent nanomaterials have emerged as significant nanoplatforms for the in situ catalytic decomposition of H2O2 and subsequent oxygenation, attributed to their capacity to emulate diverse oxidoreductase activities. In comparison to natural enzyme systems, oxide-based nanozymes offer notable advantages, including enhanced structural stability, increased in vivo durability, and superior catalytic efficiency. Given that metal oxides typically exhibit multiple catalytic activities, they have the potential not only to generate oxygen but also to synergize with therapeutic mechanisms such as reactive ROS production, GSH depletion, and imaging functionalities. This multifunctionality facilitates the integrated design of multimodal therapeutic strategies.128

MnO2-based nanomaterials are among the earliest and most extensively investigated oxide-based smart platforms. MnO2 demonstrates catalase-like activity, enabling the decomposition of excessive H2O2 in the TME into O2 and H2O. Additionally, under acidic conditions, MnO2 can be reduced to generate active Mn2+, thereby fulfilling dual roles in oxygen supply and microenvironment regulation.133,175 For example, Veroniaina et al designed a nanoplatform MnO2-Dox@HFn that exhibits pronounced catalase-like and peroxidase-like activities. In the presence of H2O2, this system efficiently generated O2, while the released Mn2+ enhanced magnetic resonance imaging signals. As a result, MnO2-Dox@HFn effectively alleviated tumor hypoxia and improved therapeutic responsiveness, enabling the integration of therapy with diagnostic and imaging functions.134 Similarly, Jia et al covalently modified catalase onto the surface of MnO2 nanoaggregates to construct MH@CAT-Ce6. In the tumor, this system can be triggered by H2O2 for sustained oxygen production, while MnO2 is decomposed into Mn2+ under high intracellular GSH conditions, achieving simultaneous oxygen supply and GSH depletion. This programmed regulation of oxygen delivery and oxidative stress significantly enhances the efficacy of PDT.135

The composite oxide system of CeO2-MnO2 core-shell nanomaterials has demonstrated significant advantages in synergistic catalytic oxygen generation. In vitro experiments conducted by Pi et al revealed that this nanoplatform achieved an H2O2 scavenging rate of nearly 60% at a concentration of 100 μg/mL, resulting in a rapid increase in dissolved oxygen levels within 5 minutes. This swift oxygenation is beneficial for counteracting hypoxia-induced radioresistance. In environments with high GSH levels, MnO2 undergoes further decomposition to release Mn2+, thereby enhancing MRI contrast. Concurrently, the enhanced ROS generation, in conjunction with X-ray irradiation, significantly augments tumor cell eradication. These findings underscore the potential of this multifunctional nanoplatform for MRI-guided radiotherapy.136

In addition to the most extensively studied MnO2 and CeO2 systems, recent research has increasingly shifted its focus toward more complex oxide-based nanoplatforms. For example, CoFe2O4 multienzyme nanozymes possess catalase-, peroxidase-, and oxidase-like activities. In the TME, they can simultaneously alleviate hypoxia and enhance ROS-mediated therapeutic responses, showing excellent antitumor efficacy against refractory tumors such as osteosarcoma.137 Mn3O4-based composite nanozymes have been used to induce immune activation and synergistically alleviate hypoxia,138 while composite oxide nanozymes such as CuMnOx achieve functional coupling between oxygen production and ROS generation through multimodal catalytic pathways.139 These multicomponent oxide platforms not only improve the efficiency of in situ oxygen generation but also provide novel design paradigms for combination therapies such as PDT, photothermal therapy (PTT), and immunotherapy. This suggests that future material innovation can be centered on multienzyme coexistence and microenvironment responsiveness to further enhance hypoxia relief and therapeutic sensitization.176,177

Noble Metal and Single-Atom Nanozymes

Noble metal-based nanozymes (eg, Au,140,178 Ag,141 Pt,179 Pd,180,181 Ir,142 Ru,150 Rh143,182) have emerged as ideal candidates for alleviating tumor hypoxia and enhancing oxygen-dependent therapies due to their excellent catalytic activity, high chemical stability, and photothermal, optical, and X-ray responsive properties. These nanozymes effectively emulate the functions of natural enzymes, including peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), oxidase (OxD), and superoxide dismutase (SOD). Their catalytic activity, selectivity, and multifunctional synergy can be precisely tailored through the rational manipulation of particle size, exposed crystal facets, structural defects, surface ligands, and heterostructure engineering. Furthermore, the distinctive plasmonic and photothermal properties of noble metal nanozymes facilitate their application in PDT, PTT, and CT/PAI imaging, thereby offering highly customizable solutions for in situ oxygen generation and TME modulation.183–185

As a prominent example of noble metal-based nanozymes, gold nanozymes have been extensively employed in the regulation of the TME due to their superior catalytic activity, chemical stability, and biocompatibility.178 Zhang et al utilized disulfide-containing mesoporous silica nanoparticles (SS-MSN) as a framework to anchor gold nanozymes onto the pore surfaces via NaBH4 reduction, followed by encapsulation with bovine ovarian membranes (BOM) to construct the biomimetic nanozyme structure SS-MSN-Au@BOM. The Au nanozymes exhibited multiple catalytic activities in the TME, including glucose oxidase (GOx)-like, POD-like, and CAT-like functions. This enables the decomposition of endogenous H2O2 into O2 while simultaneously producing ROS. The CAT-like oxygen-generating function of SS-MSN-Au@BOM supplied sufficient oxygen to sustain the GOx-like cascade reaction. The underlying mechanism is illustrated in Figure 4. This system not only effectively alleviated tumor hypoxia in vivo but also promoted immunogenic cell death, enhanced dendritic cell maturation, and activated T cells, thereby demonstrating significant tumor growth inhibition with favorable biocompatibility and circulatory stability. It provides a novel strategy for constructing nanotherapeutic platforms with dual functions of oxygen generation and immune modulation.144

SS-MSN@Au-BOM synthesis: boosts tumor hypoxia relief via ROS generation and immune response.

Figure 4 Schematic illustration of the synthesis of the self-oxygenated biomimetic nanozyme SS-MSN@Au-BOM and its mechanism for alleviating tumor hypoxia via catalytic generation of reactive oxygen species to promote immune responses in tumor catalytic immunotherapy. In this schematic, upward arrows (↑) indicate elevated levels or upregulation of corresponding biological indicators; downward arrows (↓) indicate decreased levels or downregulation of corresponding biological indicators. Reproduced with permission.144 Copyright © 2026 Wiley.

Silver nanomaterials have also been demonstrated to exhibit multiple enzyme-like activities. Their CAT-like and POD-like activities facilitate their involvement in the catalytic conversion of H2O2 within the TME, thereby enabling in situ oxygen generation and modulating ROS levels to a certain degree. In the context of tumor therapeutic applications, Ag is predominantly utilized as a structural or optical functional unit, often in conjunction with CAT or other highly efficient oxygen-generating components, to enhance tumor oxygenation and downregulate hypoxia-associated pathways. At present, Ag-based nanomaterials primarily serve an auxiliary role in the modulation of hypoxia, and their potential as standalone, highly efficient oxygen-generating nanozymes requires further systematic investigation and validation.141,186

Beyond the commonly studied nanomaterials like Au and Ag, other noble metal-based nanomaterials such as Pt, Pd, and Ru are also gained significant research attention due to their unique electronic structures and surface plasmon resonance effects. These materials exhibit robust catalytic activity and stability, enabling the rapid generation of ROS. Additionally, they have been reported to exhibit remarkable antibacterial properties.187 Yang et al immobilized ultrasmall Pt nanoparticles onto MOF-derived carbon supports via in situ reduction. The catalase-like activity of Pt effectively enhanced oxygen generation at the tumor site, thereby boosting the synergistic antitumor effect of PTT and PDT. In vivo experiments demonstrated that this platform effectively suppressed tumor growth, providing compelling evidence for the practical efficacy of Pt-catalyzed oxygenation in cancer treatment.145 Zhang et al designed a Pt@Au nanozyme by combining Pt and Au, which further exhibited an oxygen pump function. Its GOx-like activity first oxidizes glucose to generate H2O2, and the subsequent catalase-like activity of Pt decomposes H2O2 into O2, achieving a self-oxygen-supplying cycle via cascade catalysis. This strategy greatly alleviates tumor hypoxia and improves radiosensitivity.140

Wang et al reported a Pd-modified nanozyme (Pd/H‑TiO2‑PEG nanosheets) constructed by decorating TiO2 with Pd atoms. The integration of Pd conferred the nanomaterial with enhanced catalytic activity towards endogenous H2O2, facilitating its conversion into O2 and thus ensuring a continuous oxygen supply at the tumor site. In vivo experiments revealed a significant reduction in hypoxia due to the Pd/H‑TiO2‑PEG nanosheets. Compared to the control group, there was a substantial increase in tumor oxygen saturation levels, which was associated with synergistically improved SDT and chemodynamic therapy (CDT) effectiveness. Additionally, this Pd-based nanozyme system significantly augmented ROS production and effectively inhibited tumor growth, all while demonstrating excellent biocompatibility and no detectable systemic toxicity. These findings suggest that palladium-based nanozymes not only ameliorate tumor hypoxia through oxygen generation but also significantly enhance oxygen-dependent therapeutic responses within the TME.146

Hu et al designed bimetallic RuCu nanozymes (RuCu NPs), which combine the high atomic number of Ru and the catalytic properties of Cu modification, exhibiting both peroxidase-like and catalase-like activities. In the acidic TME, RuCu NPs enhanced ROS production and relieved tumor hypoxia under X-ray irradiation, thus improving radiosensitivity in the MDA-MB-231 breast cancer model. Both simulated kinetic analyses and in vitro/in vivo results demonstrated that, compared with single-metal nanomaterials, the RuCu composite nanozyme achieved higher catalytic efficiency in decomposing H2O2 into O2, thereby further improving therapeutic outcomes. These findings provide experimental evidence supporting the use of noble metal composite nanozymes to surmount hypoxia tolerance in tumor therapy.147,188

Noble metals and single-atom nanozymes facilitate the enhancement of biocompatibility and in vivo selectivity through the precise modulation of size, ligands, and heterostructures. Nevertheless, their long-term metabolic fate in vivo has yet to undergo systematic and comprehensive evaluation, posing a significant challenge to the clinical translation of these materials. Current research indicates that non-biodegradable noble metal nanomaterials are not readily excreted through conventional metabolic pathways in vivo and tend to accumulate in MPS organs, such as the liver and spleen, resulting in prolonged retention.189 Recent research has demonstrated that the degradation and clearance of nanoparticles within biological systems are significantly influenced by their material composition, size, and surface chemical properties. Noble metal nanozymes, characterized by their inherent chemical inertness and structural stability, typically lack well-defined biodegradation pathways and predictable excretion mechanisms. Conversely, single-atom nanozymes, with their atomically dispersed structures and molecule-like properties, may exhibit enhanced metabolic potential under specific conditions. Nonetheless, the structural stability, evolution of coordination environments, and potential metal ion release behavior of these nanozymes in complex physiological environments remain largely uncertain.

Additionally, the long-term retention of inorganic nanomaterials may lead to chronic inflammatory responses, cumulative oxidative stress, and potential organ toxicity. Despite these concerns, most current studies focus on short-term toxicity assessments over periods of 14 to 30 days, which are insufficient for evaluating biosafety over extended durations of several months or even years. Therefore, existing conclusions regarding the “favorable biocompatibility” of noble metal-based and single-atom nanozymes are largely based on short-term toxicity assessments. This limited evidence is insufficient to meet the stringent safety standards required for long-term clinical applications. Future research should extend beyond the “functional stacking” phase. Instead, advanced detection techniques such as radioisotope tracing or ICP-MS should be utilized to develop pharmacokinetic models that encompass the entire life cycle of these nanozymes. Concurrently, the development of metallic alloys with biologically programmable degradability, or the engineering of bio-triggered dissociation platforms utilizing removable ultrasmall noble metal components, is crucial. These approaches aim to fundamentally resolve the ultimate metabolic fate of non-degradable inorganic constituents in vivo, thereby representing an essential pathway for advancing these nanozymes toward clinical translation.

Photocatalytic Oxygen-Generating Nanoplatforms

Unlike enzymatic reactions that depend on the endogenous concentration of H2O2 within tumors, photocatalytic oxygen generation emulates the process of natural photosynthesis. When exposed to light, semiconductor materials produce electron-hole pairs (e/h+), which directly facilitate the oxidation of water or hydrogen peroxide, resulting in oxygen production. This approach, which generates oxygen exclusively under illumination and halts in the absence of light, demonstrates exceptional spatiotemporal control, thereby effectively mitigating the risk of off-target oxidative damage.128,190

Visible Light-Responsive Oxygen-Generating Nanoplatforms

Visible light-responsive photocatalytic systems absorb light in the visible range (400–700 nm) to generate electron-hole pairs. The photogenerated holes facilitate water oxidation reactions, whereas the electrons contribute to the decomposition of H2O2, thus enabling continuous in situ oxygen production within tumor tissues. Graphitic carbon nitride (g‑C3N4) is a layered polymeric semiconductor composed of carbon and nitrogen atoms connected through covalent bonds, and it possesses a graphite-like π-conjugated network. This distinctive structure provides g‑C3N4 with a moderate bandgap (~2.7 eV) in the visible light region, which is conducive to effective light absorption, as well as high thermal and chemical stability. As a metal-free and environmentally benign photocatalyst, g‑C3N4 has become a pivotal material in this domain.148,191,192 Zheng et al constructed a carbon dot-modified g-C3N4 nanocomposite (PCCN), which increased intracellular O2 levels through photocatalytic water splitting even under hypoxic conditions, thereby enhancing ROS generation and partially reversing hypoxia-induced resistance to PDT.149 Sun et al constructed a composite system (PPIC) by covalently anchoring indocyanine green (ICG) and Ce6 onto Janus mesoporous Pt-organosilica (JMPO) nanoparticles. Under 660 nm visible light irradiation, this system leverages the catalase-like catalytic activity of the Pt component to decompose excess intratumoral H2O2 into O2, significantly enhancing tumor oxygenation. In the group receiving PPIC-mediated PDT in combination with other treatments, 4 out of 6 mice (66.7%) demonstrated complete tumor regression, a result that was markedly superior to those observed in the control groups. These findings underscore the critical role of visible light-induced in situ oxygen generation in alleviating tumor hypoxia and enhancing the efficacy of PDT.193

However, the evaluation of such platforms should not be limited to their instantaneous oxygen-generating efficiency; instead, it is essential to assess their long-term effects on tumor vascular biology. In PDT, oxygen metabolism exhibits pronounced dynamics and stage dependence. The persistent consumption of oxygen during photosensitization reactions, coupled with ROS-mediated microvascular damage, can lead to localized secondary hypoxia. Although a high availability of oxygen is a fundamental prerequisite for 1O2 generation, in vascular-targeted PDT (V-PDT) strategies, premature or excessive in situ oxygen production may inadvertently support the survival of endothelial cells. This, in turn, could mitigate the desired “ischemic necrosis” effect that results from vascular shutdown.194,195 Furthermore, if oxygen generation occurs only during light irradiation, the subsequent post-treatment rebound in pO2 often activates pro-angiogenic signaling pathways, triggering compensatory proliferation of residual tumor cells.196 Consequently, an optimal visible-light-driven oxygen-generating system should deliver an oxygen supply profile that aligns precisely with the specific PDT modality. This alignment is crucial to prevent the unintended restoration of tumor interstitial fluid pressure and microvascular homeostasis that can result from excessive reoxygenation.

Near-Infrared (NIR-I/II) Driven Oxygen-Generating Nanoplatforms

Near-infrared (NIR) light exhibits a tissue penetration depth ranging from 1 to 2 cm. Through the upconversion process, it can be excited by light in the NIR-I (700–1000 nm) or NIR-II (1000–1700 nm) spectral windows, resulting in visible light emission.197 NIR-II, due to its deeper tissue penetration and lower light scattering background, offers unique advantages for in situ photocatalytic oxygen generation in deep-seated tumors.151,152 Wang et al developed a Z-Scheme photocatalytic platform based on FeS2/CoS2@PEG nanosheets (FCs@PEG) for alleviating tumor hypoxia and enhancing therapy under NIR-II (1064 nm) irradiation. FCs@PEG (~80 nm) exhibited a high photothermal conversion efficiency of 50.5% and enabled effective separation of photogenerated electron-hole pairs upon NIR-II excitation. FeS2 (1.16 eV) and CoS2 (1.37 eV) were simultaneously excited under low-energy NIR-II laser irradiation and generated high-energy holes and electrons via the Z-scheme photocatalytic mechanism. The generated holes were utilized for water oxidation to produce oxygen, while the electrons participated in ROS generation, thus enhancing the effects of PDT and photothermal therapy.153

Liu et al constructed self-assembled Ru-based nanozymes (CS–DA@Ru NPs) for NIR-II photoacoustic imaging (PAI)-guided PTT/PDT. The system generated Ru nanoparticles on chitosan-based carriers via dopamine-mediated reduction of RuCl3 and exhibited significant catalase-like activity. In the mildly acidic TME, CS–DA@Ru NPs efficiently decomposed excess H2O2 into O2, effectively alleviating hypoxic regions. By employing NIR-II PAI to monitor changes in blood oxygen saturation, the study demonstrated a significant increase in the oxyhemoglobin signal within the tumor region over time following injection, peaking at 12 hours, in contrast to the control group (saline), which exhibited negligible changes. This result provides robust evidence for the in situ oxygenation capability of Ru nanozymes in vivo. In 4T1 tumor-bearing mouse models, CS–DA@Ru NPs under 1064 nm laser irradiation elevated the tumor temperature to approximately 57 °C and markedly enhanced 1O2 production and therapeutic efficacy. These findings highlight the dual advantages of hypoxia alleviation through oxygenation and the synergistic killing effects of PDT/PTT.150

From a clinical translation standpoint, the effectiveness of these nanoplatforms should not be assessed solely based on baseline pO2 prior to treatment. Instead, it is crucial to consider the dynamic oxygenation profiles throughout the entire treatment course. Current research often lacks systematic monitoring of oxygen levels at critical post-treatment intervals, such as 24 and 72 hours. Notably, rapid oxygen consumption and vascular damage during PDT can lead to a sustained hypoxic state, which is closely linked to blood flow obstruction and tumor control in V-PDT.198 Based on this, the design of oxygen-generating nanoplatforms should consider the synchronization of pharmacokinetics and oxygen kinetics (PK/OK). The oxygen production rate should be dynamically matched to oxygen consumption during PDT to sustain efficient ROS generation. In the later stages of treatment, it is also necessary to evaluate whether the nanoplatforms interfere with therapeutically beneficial vascular occlusion by modulating oxygen levels. Existing studies suggest that post-treatment reoxygenation may activate HIF-1α-related signaling and promote angiogenesis, thereby influencing the risk of tumor recurrence.199 Consequently, future research should transition from solely focusing on maximizing peak oxygen generation to quantitatively regulating oxygen exposure over time. This can be achieved by developing dynamic evaluation systems that incorporate oxygenation trajectories at various time intervals (eg, 24–72 hours). Such process-based, dynamic assessment strategies are more effective in determining whether a nanoplatform can achieve complete tumor eradication or, alternatively, facilitate therapeutic escape and subsequent recurrence due to insufficient oxygenation management. This approach would thereby offer more predictive evidence for its clinical translation.

X-Ray Activated Radiodynamic Oxygen-Generating Nanoplatforms

Due to their superior ability to penetrate deep tissues and their well-established clinical use in RT, X-rays are considered a crucial external energy source for addressing the hypoxic microenvironment characteristic of deep-seated solid tumors. Traditional RT predominantly utilizes X-rays to directly cause DNA damage and generate free radicals, thereby leading to tumor cell death. However, the biological effectiveness of this approach is significantly influenced by the pO2, a phenomenon known as the oxygen enhancement effect. Consequently, tumor hypoxia emerges as a principal factor contributing to suboptimal RT outcomes and the development of radioresistance. To overcome this limitation and enable PDT in deep-seated tissues, nanoscintillators have emerged. Nanoscintillators are a class of nanomaterials capable of generating detectable photon emission upon exposure to ionizing radiation, such as X-rays or γ-rays. This luminescent phenomenon, known as scintillation, involves the absorption of high-energy radiation followed by the rapid re-emission of energy in the form of ultraviolet or visible light photons.200,201 In recent years, the field of radiodynamic therapy (RDT) has advanced through the integration of X-rays with nanomaterials and photosensitizers to improve therapeutic outcomes. This approach involves the introduction of nanoscintillators or radiosensitizers enriched with high atomic number (high-Z) elements, which serve as energy conversion centers. These centers facilitate the transformation of high-energy X-rays into secondary photons or excited-state electrons, thereby initiating catalytic reactions.155,202 In this process, researchers have developed nanoplatforms with water-splitting activity to achieve in situ oxygen generation during RT. This real-time oxygenation strategy not only elevates the local oxygen concentration to alleviate hypoxia-induced radioresistance but also amplifies oxidative stress damage through oxygen-mediated free radical cascade reactions.203

Zhu et al proposed a low-dose X-ray RDT platform based on gold nanoclusters (AuNC@DHLA). This system uses gold nanoclusters encapsulated by dihydrolipoic acid (DHLA) as RDT sensitizers, which can efficiently generate ROS under low-dose (0.5–2 Gy) X-ray irradiation without the need for additional scintillators or photosensitizers. In vitro experiments revealed that AuNC@DHLA, when subjected to 4 Gy X-ray irradiation, significantly enhanced the production of 1O2 and hydroxyl radicals (·OH), sustaining ROS generation even under hypoxic conditions to effectively induce cell death. In deep hypoxic solid tumor-bearing mouse models, either single or fractionated low-dose X-ray irradiation combined with AuNC@DHLA significantly inhibited tumor growth and enhanced tumor-infiltrating immune responses. These findings suggest that this strategy not only directly kills tumors but also improves overall therapeutic efficacy through ROS-mediated immunomodulatory effects.156

To further optimize energy conversion efficiency and biocompatibility, Gu et al developed an organic phosphorescent nanoscintillator (BPT-HOF@PEG) based on a hydrogen-bonded organic framework (HOF), which can emit phosphorescence upon X-ray exposure. Unlike traditional complex systems that rely on heavy metal inorganic scintillators and photosensitizers, BPT-HOF@PEG integrates the functions of both a scintillator and a photosensitizer. It can efficiently absorb X-rays and directly generate 1O2, thus achieving deep PDT in tumor tissues. In vitro and in vivo results demonstrated that this nanosystem effectively produced a substantial amount of 1O2 under X-ray irradiation. Through the synergistic effects of direct DNA damage and ROS cascade reactions, it significantly inhibited tumor growth in HCC models, achieving an in vivo inhibition rate of up to 90.4%. In addition, this organic material exhibited high biocompatibility, which effectively reduced the toxicity risks associated with traditional metal scintillators. This study demonstrates the potential of organic HOF nanoscintillators in efficient, low-toxicity, and deep-tumor X-ray-induced PDT, providing a reference for the design of novel energy conversion nanomaterials in the future.157

Furthermore, several studies have reported that pure organic phosphorescent nanoscintillators can achieve efficient 1O2 generation even at extremely low X-ray doses (0.4 Gy). These materials effectively convert X-ray energy into usable energy to activate local oxygen for ROS generation via highly efficient electronic excitation and enhanced intersystem crossing (ISC) processes. Such findings further demonstrate the feasibility of non-metallic materials in mediating X-ray-triggered oxygen/ROS production.155

Hydrolysis-Driven Oxygen-Releasing Nanoplatforms

Hydrolysis-driven oxygen-releasing nanoplatforms alleviate hypoxia by leveraging the chemical hydrolysis of metal peroxides or related precursor materials in the TME. These systems provide a sustained and controllable local oxygen source to support oxygen-dependent therapies. The fundamental principle of this approach is based on the exploitation of the instability of metal peroxides (MPs), such as CuO2, CaO2, MgO2, and ZnO2, in acidic conditions. These materials react with protons to directly release O2 or its precursor, H2O2. This active oxygen-supplying strategy eliminates dependence on endogenous hydrogen peroxide levels within tumors and enables stable oxygen perfusion even in extremely hypoxic deep tissues.204,205

Stimuli-Responsive Metal Peroxide Nanoplatforms

In research concerning responsive MP nanoparticles, the primary challenge lies in achieving an optimal balance between the rate of oxygen generation and systemic biosafety. Given that MPs tend to undergo spontaneous hydrolysis under neutral physiological conditions, it is a common practice among researchers to utilize pH-sensitive polymers, MOFs, or polyphenol-based protective layers to encapsulate the core.206–208

Tang et al developed a tumor pH-responsive nanoreactor based on CuO2, utilizing human serum albumin (HSA) as a scaffold to achieve stable encapsulation of CuO2 via biomineralization. In the mildly acidic TME (pH ~6.5), the nanoreactor rapidly dissociates. During hydrolysis, it instantaneously releases Cu2+, H2O2, and O2, supplementing the insufficient oxygen supply in tumors while providing H2O2 substrate for CDT to generate highly cytotoxic ·OH radicals. This enhances oxidative stress and significantly improves the therapeutic efficacy of PDT/photosensitizer-mediated therapy. In vitro experiments confirmed that O2 produced from CuO2 notably ameliorated the photosensitive response of hypoxic cells.158 Chen et al developed a functional material (DOX-TAPP-CaO2@OA@PAA, DTCOP) by coating CaO2 with polyacrylic acid (PAA). This material achieves stable oxygen release under low pH conditions and can synergize with photosensitizers to significantly enhance PDT efficiency and alleviate tumor hypoxia. The acid-triggered O2 release addresses the reduced activity of photosensitizers caused by hypoxia, offering potential to improve the response of oxygen-dependent therapies.159 Similarly, Mo et al designed a pH-responsive nanoplatform CaO2@CUR@ZIF‑Cu, in which the CaO2 core releases H2O2 and O2 in the acidic TME, while ZIF-Cu serves as a pH-sensitive encapsulation shell to prevent premature hydrolysis in normal tissues. Under acidic conditions, this nanoplatform effectively releases oxygen and provides H2O2 substrates, significantly amplifying Fenton-like ROS generation. This cascade enhances the outcomes of both CDT and immunotherapy while maintaining low systemic toxicity.160

Qiao et al engineered polydopamine-coated ZnO2@PDA nanoparticles capable of undergoing hydrolysis within the acidic TME to release H2O2 and O2. Additionally, the liberated Zn2+ ions interfere with the metabolic-redox equilibrium of tumor cells, offering an alternative mechanism for tumor growth inhibition. This innovative design illustrates the strategic application of shell functionalization to regulate the acid-responsive hydrolysis of MPs, thereby augmenting oxygen production while maintaining the biostability and biosafety of the nanoparticles.161

Cascade Catalytic Oxygen-Generating Nanoplatforms

To overcome the challenges posed by insufficient H2O2, low pH, and high antioxidant capacity within the TME, cascade catalytic oxygen-generating systems utilize multiple chemical and enzymatic reaction pathways to continuously enhance the local oxygen supply. Li et al developed a PFC nanoemulsion to construct a PFC-H2O “liquid–liquid” interfacial system. Their study confirmed that during high-frequency liquid–liquid contact/separation processes induced by ultrasonic vibration, oxygen atoms in water molecules lose electrons to generate ·OH. Under ultrasound assistance, oxygen in water can also extract electrons from negatively charged PFC (PFC*), producing superoxide anion radicals (·O2-). The researchers applied this ROS generation mechanism to cancer therapy. By employing human serum albumin (HSA)-modified perfluorotributylamine (PFTBA) PFC nanoemulsions, ROS were generated under ultrasound irradiation, triggering immunogenic cell death in tumor cells. This work provides a promising strategy for cancer therapy.162

Yu et al developed a H‑MnO2/GOX&CQ‑iRGD cascade nanoamplifier, a responsive cascade system specifically designed for pancreatic cancer. The hollow MnO2 shell undergoes decomposition in the acidic TME, resulting in the release of Mn2+ ions and O2. The encapsulated glucose oxidase (GOx) facilitates the conversion of intracellular glucose into H2O2, which is then either reconverted into O2 through the catalytic action of MnO2 or participates in Fenton-like reactions to generate ·OH. This cyclical process markedly enhances the efficacy of CDT and mitigates hypoxia within the TME. The cascade nanosystem not only significantly augments the production of H2O2 and O2 but also demonstrates a robust capability for ·OH generation in a simulated TME, as evidenced by changes in UV-visible absorption and methylene blue (MB) probe assays. Both in vitro and in vivo studies demonstrate that this “targeting–decomposition–catalysis–inhibition” cascade mechanism substantially improves tumor suppression while maintaining excellent biosafety and selectivity.163

Zhang et al developed a hybrid nanozyme that integrates mineralized MnO2 with a MOF carrier. In the multilayered architecture of Fe3O4@ZIF‑8/GOx@MnO2, the ZIF-8 shell undergoes acid-induced decomposition within the TME, releasing GOx and Fe3O4. The H2O2 generated through GOx catalysis is converted into O2 by MnO2 to alleviate hypoxia. Concurrently, the Mn2+ ions released from MnO2 decomposition facilitate the Fenton reaction, producing ·OH and thereby enhancing the CDT effect. This platform amalgamates multiple synergistic functionalities, such as oxygen supply, inhibition of glucose metabolism, and ROS generation, demonstrating augmented antitumor activity and immunomodulatory effects in both in vitro and in vivo settings.164 Despite the significant advantages of cascade oxygen-generating systems in amplifying in situ oxygen supply efficiency and synergistic sensitization, their intricate multi-component structures present challenges related to the controllability of reaction pathways, biosafety, and the assessment of in vivo metabolic behavior.163 Future research should prioritize the precise regulation of reaction kinetics, emphasizing the integration of self-regulatory or feedback inhibition mechanisms and the development of biodegradable or low-loading catalytic units. These approaches have the potential to facilitate the creation of intelligent, self-sensing kinetic regulatory networks characterized by improved controllability, reproducibility, and clinical relevance, as opposed to the mere aggregation of multiple independent catalytic events to achieve therapeutic outcomes.

Microbial or Biomimetic Photosynthetic Nanoplatforms

With an enhanced comprehension of the pathogenic mechanisms associated with hypoxia in the TME, microbial or biomimetic photosynthetic nanoplatforms have been proposed as innovative light-driven strategies for in situ oxygen production. These systems are designed to continuously improve the hypoxic microenvironment, facilitate oxygen-dependent therapies, and initiate robust immune responses. In nature, photosynthetic organisms such as algae and cyanobacteria efficiently convert light energy into chemical energy, releasing oxygen through photosynthesis, and are characterized by high quantum efficiency and excellent biocompatibility. This approach not only ensures sustained and controllable oxygen delivery but also utilizes carbon dioxide produced by tumor metabolism through photosynthesis, thereby mitigating hypoxia and modulating the local acidic TME.165,166,209

Living Photosynthetic Microorganism-Based Nanoplatforms

Living microbial platforms leverage the metabolic pathways of intact organisms, offering potential for self-replication and environmental sensing. Among these platforms, cyanobacteria and Chlorella are the most extensively studied vectors. Their integrated photosystem I (PS I) and photosystem II (PS II) complexes facilitate efficient oxygen evolution, even under conditions of extremely low light intensity.210 For example, Zhang et al described the development of an in situ formed microalgae-integrated living hydrogel (ACG gel), comprising alginate, Chlorella sorokiniana (C. soro), and GOx, which undergoes crosslinking directly at the tumor site. The incorporated microalgae continuously generated substantial amounts of oxygen under visible light through photosynthesis, thereby increasing intratumoral oxygen saturation and enhancing GOx-catalyzed glucose depletion to disrupt the energy supply. This mechanism ultimately converts the immunosuppressive TME into an immunoresponsive state. In vitro studies demonstrated that 4T1 cells in the hypoxic PBS group exhibited pronounced red fluorescence of HIF-1α. Conversely, in the group co-cultured with C. soro-containing gels under illumination, the red fluorescence of HIF-1α was absent, indicating that the ACG gel effectively mitigated hypoxia through photosynthetic oxygenation. In vivo experiments using the 4T1 tumor model further demonstrated that the ACG gel significantly inhibited tumor growth and effectively prevented postoperative recurrence, thereby confirming the potential of living photosynthetic microorganisms as natural oxygenators.165

Zhong et al enhanced the biocompatibility and in vivo retention of photosynthetic microalgae by encapsulating them with biomineralized calcium phosphate (CV@CaP). In mouse tumor models, this system significantly alleviated hypoxia through sustained photosynthetic oxygen generation, enhanced RT efficacy, and triggered infrared-mediated synergistic PTT/PDT, demonstrating the application potential of living microalgae delivery platforms in multimodal cancer therapy.167 However, the introduction of such living exogenous microorganisms into the human body inevitably presents substantial biosafety concerns. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) present on the surface of prokaryotes, such as cyanobacteria, along with the unique cell wall components of microalgae, are readily recognized by the host’s innate immune system, leading to significant complement activation or systemic inflammatory responses (SIRS).211 Furthermore, live microorganisms have the potential to proliferate and migrate unintentionally within the intricate in vivo environment. They may also acquire genetic mutations through horizontal gene transfer, which can lead to deviations from their intended therapeutic design and result in unpredictable ecological impacts. Additionally, in immunocompromised cancer patients, microorganisms generally considered non-pathogenic may display conditional pathogenicity, leading to uncontrollable infections.212 Therefore, to advance the clinical translation of such living microbial platforms, priority should be given to constructing “genetic kill switches” via synthetic biology approaches, or to developing engineered microbial systems that are metabolically active but replication-deficient.213 These strategies aim to preserve photosynthetic activity while eliminating self-replication capacity, rather than drawing conclusions regarding biosafety solely based on oxygen-generating performance.

Plant-Derived Biomimetic Thylakoid Nanoplatforms

Plant-derived nanothylakoids or nanovesicles utilize photosynthetic organelles or membranes to construct biomimetic oxygen carriers. Upon exposure to light at the tumor site, these systems can be activated to produce oxygen, thereby improving the efficacy of photosensitizers and facilitating immune activation.214 Mei et al systematically utilized the endogenous chlorophyll system within plant-derived nanovesicles as an “in vivo photosynthetic oxygenator” for on-demand oxygen generation at the tumor site, precisely amplifying the PDT effect. The researchers developed a multifunctional nanoplatform based on spinach-derived nanovesicles (SDNVs) encapsulated with aggregation-induced emission luminogens (AIEgens), denoted as AIE@SDNVs, integrating drug delivery, oxygen production, and immune activation. The construction of AIE@SDNV and the underlying mechanism of its synergistic photoimmunotherapy are depicted in Figure 5. Utilizing their inherent photosynthetic capabilities, SDNVs release significant amounts of oxygen upon exposure to light, serving as a substrate for AIEgens and thereby enhancing the generation of ROS. This sequential process intensifies lipid peroxidation and disrupts calcium homeostasis in tumor cells, ultimately inducing ICD. Notably, this approach of photosynthetic nanovesicle-mediated photoimmunotherapy not only inhibited the growth of primary tumors in a bilateral tumor model but also effectively suppressed distant, non-irradiated tumors and extended survival. These findings highlight the significant potential of plant-derived photosynthetic vesicles in alleviating tumor hypoxia and reversing the immunosuppressive TME.168 Compared with conventional synthetic nanocarriers, plant-derived biomimetic systems offer multiple advantages, including superior biocompatibility, intrinsically robust oxygen-generating capability, and high drug-loading capacity and photosensitizer activation efficiency. As emerging biomimetic photosynthetic nanoplatform, these systems hold the potential to yield groundbreaking outcomes in future integrated photo-immunotherapy strategies.

AIE@SDNV nanoplatform: photoimmunotherapy with oxygen generation and immune activation.

Figure 5 Construction and photoimmunotherapeutic mechanism of the biomimetic nanoplatform AIE@SDNV. (A) Preparation of AIE@SDNV nanoparticles. (B) Light-triggered photosynthetic oxygen generation and AIEgen delivery by SDNV enhance PDT, induce ICD, and activate antitumor immune responses in a bilateral tumor model. Reproduced with permission.168 Copyright © 2026 American Chemical Society.

Bio-Inorganic Hybrid Photosynthetic Microrobots

Bio-inorganic hybrid photosynthetic systems represent an innovative integration of photosynthetic microorganisms or biological components with inorganic nanomaterials to develop microrobotic platforms. These platforms facilitate a synergistic interaction between photosynthetic oxygen production and functional inorganic elements, such as magnetic responsiveness, photothermal effects, and radiation enhancement. A typical representative is a composite platform combining cyanobacteria with radiotherapy-sensitizing nanoparticles. Li et al synthesized La2O3 NPs via a solid-phase reaction method. The particle surfaces were coated with membrane structures formed from extracellular substances (eg, polysaccharides and proteins), with visible thylakoid stacks inside and an average diameter of 145.17 ± 58.49 nm. This nanoplatform alleviates tumor hypoxia through laser-activated cyanobacterial photosynthesis, while La2O3 enhances radiation-induced ROS generation and triggers pyroptosis via the ROS-NLRP3-GSDMD pathway. This process is further enhanced after RT, promoting the secretion of immune factors such as IL-1β and IL-6. In vivo studies using LLC and CT26 tumor models confirmed that this dual-enhanced RT platform exhibits excellent antitumor efficacy, offering a promising strategy for treating hypoxic solid tumors. Despite these encouraging results, clinical translation faces challenges, including the long-term stability of cyanobacterial components, standardized preparation of nanoparticle-hydrogel systems, and individual differences among patients. Beyond colorectal cancer, this platform also demonstrated efficacy in hypoxic lung cancer models, suggesting potential applications for other hypoxic solid tumors. Future studies will explore combination therapies with chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors and assess long-term safety.169

In situ oxygen-generating nanoplatforms have demonstrated a substantial capacity to elevate local oxygen partial pressure and improve the efficacy of oxygen-dependent therapies across various tumor models. However, their further development is impeded by several critical challenges. Notably, there is inadequate efficiency of externally driven energy in penetrating deep tumors, coupled with a lack of comprehensive evaluations of their long-term metabolic behavior and immunological compatibility. Consequently, future research may benefit more from focusing on the development of programmable, on-demand oxygen generation systems integrated with therapeutic processes, rather than merely enhancing oxygen production efficiency. For instance, aligning oxygen release with radiotherapy dosage, light irradiation intervals, or stages of immune activation could be advantageous. Additionally, simplifying material composition, minimizing the proportion of non-degradable components, and incorporating systematic pharmacokinetic and immunological safety assessments at an early stage are likely to be pivotal steps in advancing in situ oxygen-generating strategies from laboratory research to clinical application.

Oxygen-Economization Nanoplatforms for Tumor Hypoxia Alleviation

The development of a hypoxic TME arises not only from an inadequate supply of oxygen but also from the elevated oxygen consumption rate (OCR) of tumor cells, the latter of which represents a significant limiting factor for the effectiveness of oxygen-dependent therapeutic interventions. Conventional nanoplatforms, such as oxygen-carrying and in situ oxygen-generating nanoplatforms, primarily concentrate on augmenting oxygen supply. However, these methodologies encounter challenges related to the efficiency and duration of oxygen delivery, as well as maintaining a balanced interaction with the metabolic oxygen consumption of tumors. Consequently, the concept of oxygen-economization nanoplatforms has emerged in recent years. This strategy is centered on either reducing oxygen consumption within tumor tissues or enhancing the efficiency of oxygen utilization, thereby improving overall tumor oxygenation and bolstering the efficacy of oxygen-dependent therapeutic modalities.128,215 Unlike conventional oxygen supplementation methods, this strategy emphasizes more efficient reversal of hypoxia by decreasing intracellular oxygen consumption, inhibiting oxidative metabolic pathways, or enhancing the rate of oxygen utilization in therapeutic reactions, rather than merely augmenting local oxygen supply. Within this context, nanoplatforms can serve multiple functions, such as delivering drugs that suppress oxygen consumption,216 catalyzing the redirection of tumor metabolic pathways,217,218 or integrating responsive functions to achieve on-demand regulation of oxygen utilization. Table 2 provides a summary of representative oxygen-economization nanoplatforms designed to alleviate tumor hypoxia.

Table 2 Summary of Oxygen-Economization Nanoplatforms Construction Strategies

Mitochondrial Respiration Inhibitors

Inhibiting the activity of key complexes in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) is an effective strategy to reduce oxygen consumption in tumor cells, improve local oxygen availability, and sensitize tumors to oxygen-dependent therapies.234,235 Complex I (NADH-CoQ reductase) and Complex III (CoQ-cytochrome c reductase) within the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) serve as primary sites for oxygen consumption. Targeted inhibitors of these complexes can markedly reduce the OCR of tumor cells, consequently preserving oxygen to augment therapeutic efficacy.236,237

Inhibition of Complex I

Complex I in the mitochondrial ETC serves as the initiating site of oxidative phosphorylation. It is responsible for oxidizing NADH and transferring electrons to ubiquinone (CoQ), accompanied by proton transmembrane translocation, making it one of the major oxygen-consuming sites in tumor cells.238 Therefore, targeting Complex I with specific inhibitors can reduce intracellular oxygen consumption, induce an energy crisis, and alleviate the hypoxic microenvironment by modulating oxygen metabolism.239 BAY 87–2243 is a notable inhibitor of Complex I, effectively suppressing its activity even at low nanomolar concentrations, which results in the disruption of the mitochondrial respiratory chain and a substantial reduction in OCR. Previous research has shown that BAY 87–2243 possesses significant antitumor efficacy across various cancer cell lines and xenograft tumor models. In models of BRAF-mutant melanoma, oral administration of approximately 9 mg·kg−1 notably reduced both tumor volume and weight. At the cellular level, treatment with BAY 87–2243 significantly decreased both basal and maximal OCR and induced a metabolic shift towards glycolysis, reflecting characteristics of mitochondrial reprogramming.240 Su et al developed a hyaluronic acid (HA)-crosslinked liposomal nanocarrier system, HA‑P‑LBAY, for delivering BAY 87‑2243. By meticulously optimizing the physical integrity of the liposomal membrane, this system facilitates enhanced transcellular penetration of the drug within tumor tissues, thereby overcoming the limitations of conventional drug delivery systems that are often unable to penetrate deeply into tumors. The HA-mediated CD44 targeting enables the initial accumulation of liposomes in tumor tissues, followed by active transcytosis to overcome elevated interstitial fluid pressure and deliver BAY 87–2243 to deep-seated tumor cells. Once internalized, the drug precisely inhibits mitochondrial respiratory chain Complex I, reducing endogenous OCR and effectively alleviating tumor hypoxia. Concurrently, it suppresses malignant tumor behavior by downregulating HIF-1α and its downstream target genes. This nanoplatform achieves a synergistic effect of oxygen conservation and deep drug delivery, underscoring the potential of modulating membrane integrity to optimize the antitumor efficacy of respiratory inhibitors.219

Metformin, a widely utilized antidiabetic medication, has been demonstrated to decrease the OCR of tumor cells by inhibiting Complex I activity, thereby mitigating hypoxia within the TME. This action subsequently ameliorates the immunosuppressive milieu and enhances the effectiveness of oxygen-dependent therapies.220 Mechanistically, metformin inhibits mitochondrial Complex I to reduce oxygen consumption and activate the AMPK signaling pathway. This results in decreased stability of HIF-1α and downregulation of its downstream targets, such as CA9 and VEGF, thereby exerting dual regulatory effects on both tumor metabolism and the immune microenvironment.216,221,222,241

Dai et al engineered oxygen-carrying polymeric micelles, PSCe6-PFH, co-loaded with metformin and a photosensitizer, drawing inspiration from the biological circadian rhythm. Metformin, by inhibiting Complex I activity, significantly curtailed oxygen consumption in tumor cells, thereby reducing oxygen consumption at its source and prolonging local oxygen availability within tumors. Mechanistic investigations revealed that during the dark phase, the release of oxygen from the micelles, coupled with metformin-mediated suppression of mitochondrial respiration, mitigated tumor hypoxia, enhanced dendritic cell (DC) maturation by 1.5-fold, and decreased the infiltration of immunosuppressive Treg cells. In the subsequent light phase, the improved oxygen environment further augmented ROS generation and ICD induced by PDT/photoimmunotherapy (Figure 6A). In breast cancer mouse models, the group subjected to alternating light-dark treatment demonstrated significantly reduced tumor volume, extensive apoptosis within tumor tissue, and manageable systemic toxicity, thereby achieving a synergistic amplification effect characterized by “inhibiting oxygen consumption–alleviating hypoxia–sensitizing therapy”. This study first highlights the critical role of the dark phase in photoimmunotherapy. By aligning biological rhythm with therapeutic rhythm through biomimetic design, it provides a new strategy for metformin-based nanotherapeutic approaches.223

Three schematics of nanoplatforms for enhancing cancer therapy through oxygen modulation and immune response.

Figure 6 Oxygen-economization nanoplatforms. (A) Schematic illustration of the PSCe6-PFH nanoplatform for establishing irradiation-darkness therapeutic rhythms to enhance photodynamic immunotherapy in hypoxic tumors through amplification of the cancer-immunity cycle. Reproduced with permission.223 Copyright © 2026 Tsinghua University Press Ltd. (B) Synthesis and function of NPs-aPD-1/HbO2/ATO. Reproduced with permission.226 Copyright © 2026 Wiley. (C) Schematic illustration of a synergistic oxygen modulation nanoplatform that enhances oxygen supply and reduces oxygen consumption for improved antitumor therapy. Reproduced with permission.231 Copyright © 2026 Elsevier. In this schematic, solid arrows indicate activation or cascading progression of biological processes; blunt-ended inhibitory lines represent the blockade of relevant pathways; downward arrows (↓) indicate downregulation of corresponding biological indicators; cross symbols denote the inhibition of related biological processes.

Abbreviations: CRT, calreticulin; HMGB1, high-mobility group box 1 protein; ATP, adenosine-5′-triphosphate; Met, metformin; aPD-1, PD-1 antibody; Hb, hemoglobin; ATO, atovaquone; i.v., intravenous; HbO2, oxygenated hemoglobin; ROS, reactive oxygen species.

Inhibition of Complex III

Complex III facilitates the electron transfer from ubiquinone to cytochrome c and constitutes a crucial oxygen-utilizing component within the ETC. The strategic inhibition of Complex III with specific inhibitors can diminish oxygen consumption by obstructing electron flow, while concurrently promoting electron leakage and the generation of ROS. This dual action can potentiate the cytotoxic efficacy of therapies reliant on oxygen.242,243

Atovaquone, an antimalarial agent structurally similar to coenzyme Q10, functions as a Complex III inhibitor and has demonstrated significant research potential in the regulation of cancer metabolism and the amelioration of hypoxia.224 Ashton et al reported that atovaquone rapidly decreases the OCR by over 80% across various tumor cell lines, an effect considerably more pronounced than that elicited by other metabolic inhibitors. In tumor spheroid models of FaDu, HCT116, and H1299, atovaquone treatment notably reduced hypoxic regions, accompanied by a significant decrease in OCR, while also enhancing radiosensitivity.244 In a clinical trial involving patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the administration of standard dosages of atovaquone resulted in a significant reduction in hypoxic volume, with a median change of −28%. Additionally, it led to the downregulation of hypoxia-related gene expression, all without notable adverse events. This represents the first clinical evidence that targeting tumor mitochondrial metabolism can alleviate tumor hypoxia and exert significant antitumor effects at the mRNA level.245 In addition, atovaquone exhibits significant OCR inhibition and induces metabolic reprogramming in cell lineages highly dependent on mitochondrial metabolism, such as breast cancer stem cells.246 Its ability to reduce hypoxia and enhance radiosensitivity has also been validated in refractory diffuse midline glioma models.247

To enhance the bioavailability and tumor-targeting efficacy of atovaquone and to further augment its immunotherapeutic potential, Wang et al engineered nanoparticles composed of human serum albumin and atovaquone (HSA-ATO NPs). The utilization of this nanocarrier markedly increased systemic drug accumulation and ameliorated the hypoxic TME. By alleviating hypoxia, these nanoparticles promoted the infiltration of CD8+ T cells, thereby enhancing the antitumor efficacy of PD-1 immune checkpoint blockade therapy.225 In addition, Zhang et al developed a multifunctional nanoplatform (NPs-aPD-1/HbO2/ATO) by integrating atovaquone with oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) and an anti-PD-1 antibody, thereby achieving the triple functions of “inhibiting oxygen consumption, direct oxygen supplementation, and immune activation”. Figure 6B illustrates the preparation method and mechanism of action of NPs-aPD-1/HbO2/ATO. In vivo experiments showed that the nanoaggregate significantly alleviated tumor hypoxia by inhibiting Complex III-mediated oxygen consumption, and synergized with HbO2 to provide additional oxygen, thus enhancing the immunotherapeutic response. This system achieved synergy between oxygen conservation and oxygen supplementation. Notably, NPs-aPD-1/HbO2/ATO exhibited distinct tumor-targeting capability in vivo, with tumor accumulation levels 4.2-fold higher than those observed in the liver. This study holds substantial significance for achieving targeted drug delivery, overcoming tumor hypoxia, and advancing immunotherapy, providing valuable references for the development of cancer treatment strategies.226

These studies illustrate that strategies for economizing oxygen can optimize the tumor’s oxygen metabolic environment by decreasing mitochondrial oxygen consumption and enhancing the effective utilization of local oxygen under conditions of limited overall oxygen supply. Given that the most used type II photosensitizers in clinical settings exhibit high sensitivity to oxygen concentration, their efficacy is constrained by the kinetics of molecular oxygen conversion into 1O2. Therefore, enhancing oxygen utilization efficiency by reducing endogenous oxygen consumption offers a viable approach to improving the efficacy of PDT. Although oxygen-economization strategies present certain limitations compared to other alternative approaches aimed at reducing the oxygen dependence of PDT, type I photosensitizers, which can generate free radicals through electron transfer mechanisms, are less reliant on oxygen concentration. This characteristic allows them to fundamentally circumvent the limitations associated with 1O2 generation.248 V-PDT prompts occlusion of tumor vasculature, resulting in rapid and sustained ischemic necrosis, and its therapeutic effectiveness is independent of maintaining elevated oxygen levels during irradiation.195 In addition, fractionated irradiation strategies can effectively alleviate acute oxygen depletion during treatment by restoring tissue oxygenation during the intervals between light exposures.249 Conversely, oxygen-economization strategies do not inherently augment the total oxygen content; their effectiveness is contingent upon the initial pO2 and the degree of respiratory inhibition, and they may be constrained in regions of severe hypoxia. Consequently, contemporary research increasingly advocates for the integration of these approaches with oxygen-carrying or oxygen-generating strategies to achieve a coordinated regulation of oxygen supply and demand, thereby optimizing the overall efficacy of PDT and other oxygen-dependent therapies.

Other Inhibition Strategies

In addition to targeting Complexes I and III of the electron transport chain, an increasing body of research has concentrated on disrupting other critical mitochondrial oxygen metabolic enzymes or associated metabolic pathways to modulate oxygen consumption and energy metabolism. A typical example is the multifunctional hemicyanine-based nanoplatform (CyOA NPs) reported by Wang et al By targeting succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) within Complex II of the mitochondrial respiratory chain, CyOA NPs inhibit OXPHOS, enabling oxygen-economization PDT that enhances phototoxicity against cancer stem cells (CSCs). By inhibiting SDH activity, the nanoformulation significantly decreases oxygen consumption in tumor cells. Concurrently, as a photosensitizer, it generates ROS upon light irradiation. This synergy between oxygen conservation and explosive ROS production results in an approximately 50.4-fold increase in phototoxicity compared to non-targeted systems, alongside remarkable tumor inhibition in breast cancer stem cell models. Owing to its self-assembly capability and integrated dual functionality, this SDH-inhibiting nanoplatform offers a carrier-free, easily prepared, and highly effective design strategy for mitochondrial metabolic inhibition.227

Other researchers have employed nanocarriers to deliver specific mitochondrial metabolic disruptors. Wen et al developed a nanoplatform by co-assembling 3-bromopyruvate (3BP) with a carrier polymer and a photosensitizing dye. This system preferentially accumulates in mitochondria, where it concurrently decreases cellular oxygen consumption and reduces the ROS threshold. This dual action enhances the therapeutic efficacy of PDT and addresses the limitations posed by hypoxia. Consequently, this strategy facilitates a dual-targeted disruption of tumor cell energy metabolism, thereby improving overall antitumor efficacy.228

Metabolic Reprogramming-Based Oxygen Conservation Strategies

Metabolic reprogramming is a fundamental characteristic of cancer, facilitating malignant tumors in maintaining energy supply, synthesizing essential macromolecules, and withstanding therapeutic stress amidst conditions of rapid proliferation, nutrient scarcity, and microenvironmental challenges. This metabolic adaptation includes the well-known Warburg effect,250,251 glutamine addiction,252 alterations in lipid metabolism, and remodeling of OXPHOS pathways.253 Tumor metabolic reprogramming provides ATP and intermediate metabolites for rapid proliferation, and drives therapeutic resistance and recurrence by modulating redox balance, regulating signaling pathways (such as PI3K/AKT/mTOR and HIF-1α), and interacting with the immune microenvironment.229,230,254,255 Consequently, intervention strategies targeting these metabolic pathways have emerged as a pivotal direction in cancer therapy research.

Jiang et al designed an oxygen-regulated enzymatic nanoplatform (OAGO) that integrates GOx with the mitochondrial inhibitor oligomycin A, facilitating simultaneous intervention in both glycolysis and OXPHOS. In 4T1 mouse tumor models, this strategy enhanced intratumoral oxygen availability and GOx reaction efficiency while impairing mitochondrial function, thus imposing a dual blockade on tumor energy supply. It markedly inhibited tumor proliferation and improved the efficacy of combination therapy (Figure 6C). The study clearly demonstrates the mechanistic advantage of continuously targeting the two major energy metabolism pathways while regulating oxygen utilization, representing a promising approach for efficient antitumor therapy.231 In models of colorectal and gastric cancer, Aisu et al developed a small-molecule dual inhibitor that concurrently targets OXPHOS and lactate metabolism. This intervention disrupts the complementary interaction between these two principal energy-generating pathways, resulting in energy depletion and degradation of the TME, thereby augmenting the overall therapeutic efficacy. High-resolution metabolic imaging (HP-MRSI) offers the capability to monitor these metabolic alterations in real time, underscoring the potential of this strategy as a prospective option in cancer treatment.256

Oxygen Conservation and Enhanced Oxygen Utilization Strategies

In the complex TME, oxygen is not only rapidly consumed by proliferating tumor cells but also inefficiently utilized by cancer-associated fibroblasts, immune cells, and various non-therapeutic redox reactions. This results in the non-targeted, dispersed utilization of limited oxygen resources, weakening the actual efficacy of oxygen-dependent therapies. In light of this understanding, strategies have been proposed to conserve oxygen and enhance its targeted utilization. The central concept involves regulating oxygen diffusion, retention, and preferential usage, thereby obstructing non-target oxygen-consuming pathways and facilitating precise spatiotemporal management of oxygen within the tumor.232,257

Situ et al developed an oxygen-economization, tumor-targeted photosensitive magnetic nanomaterial (ACSN/Fe3O4@MSNs-iRGD) for the integrated diagnosis and therapy of gastric cancer. This system co-delivers atovaquone (ATO) and the photosensitizer ACSN via a nanocarrier. The two components are integrated into a composite photosensitive functional unit, in which ATO is used to inhibit oxygen consumption and ACSN participates in the photodynamic reaction. Upon internalization into tumor cells, ATO specifically targets the mitochondria, inhibiting cellular aerobic respiration and thereby diminishing unnecessary oxygen consumption within the tumor. This oxygen-economization strategy enables the photosensitizer to more efficiently convert the remaining oxygen molecules into ROS upon laser irradiation, markedly improving the efficiency of PDT against hypoxic tumors. Studies demonstrated that this nanoplatform remarkably boosts ROS generation and augments the tumor-killing effect of PDT both in vitro and in vivo, achieving effective oxygen retention and preferential utilization.233

Nonetheless, compared with direct oxygen-carrying or in situ oxygen-generating strategies, oxygen-economization approaches present both advantages and limitations. These strategies do not rely on exogenous oxygen or substrates, thereby enhancing their potential for system simplification and applicability in deep tumor regions. However, they do not intrinsically increase overall oxygen levels, and their effectiveness is significantly influenced by the initial tumor pO2 and the degree of metabolic inhibition. Consequently, in regions characterized by severe hypoxia, a singular oxygen-economization strategy may be insufficient to fully restore therapeutic efficacy. Therefore, there is an increasing research emphasis on integrating oxygen-economization strategies with oxygen-carrying or oxygen-generating methods to achieve a coordinated regulation of oxygen supply and demand, thereby optimizing the overall efficacy of oxygen-dependent therapies.

The Advances of Key Nanoplatforms Effective Against Tumor Hypoxia

Tumor hypoxia is not an isolated microenvironmental feature, but is highly coupled with multiple resistance mechanisms including radioresistance, failure of photo/sonodynamic therapy, immunosuppression, and metabolic adaptation.20 Consequently, strategies aimed solely at alleviating hypoxia or employing isolated therapeutic modalities often demonstrate limited efficacy within the complex tumor ecosystem.258 In recent years, research has progressively transitioned from focusing on single-module hypoxia alleviation to utilizing hypoxia-relieving nanoplatforms as central components for combination therapy. By strategically integrating these platforms with RT, PDT, SDT, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and other treatment modalities, therapeutic responses are enhanced across both spatial and temporal dimensions.259,260 Under this framework, alleviating hypoxia is no longer merely an auxiliary function. Instead, it serves as a pivotal driver that directly governs key therapeutic processes, including ROS generation efficiency,172,261,262 the extent of DNA damage,263 induction of immunogenic cell death (ICD),264,265 and remodeling of the tumor immune microenvironment.170 A plethora of studies have illustrated that the strategic integration of oxygen regulation with multiple therapeutic modalities can overcome the limitations of monotherapy in hypoxic conditions. This synergistic approach results in markedly enhanced tumor suppression and can even trigger a systemic antitumor immune response in solid tumor models.266 Consequently, this trend has catalyzed the rapid advancement of multifunctional nanoplatforms designed for triple or higher-order combination therapies, establishing a critical pathway for the translation of tumor hypoxia-relieving strategies into clinical applications.267

Dual-Mode Synergistic Antitumor Therapy

The integration of chemotherapy and PDT has demonstrated significant advancements in preclinical studies. Lee et al engineered Hb-based self-assembled nanoclusters, designated as DOX@HPBC, with an approximate diameter of 220 nm. In this system, Hb was conjugated with PEG-biotin and the photosensitizer Ce6, while also incorporating the chemotherapeutic agent DOX. In hypoxic HeLa cell models, this nanoplatform reduced hypoxia levels by approximately 64.8% and significantly restored the expression of hypoxia-related markers, such as HIF-1α and MDR1. In xenograft mouse models, it achieved a tumor volume reduction of approximately 96.6%, demonstrating excellent hypoxia alleviation and potent synergistic efficacy of chemo-PDT (Figure 7A).268

Three-panel diagram showing scientific mechanisms: chemo-PDT, hemoglobin microgels and TME-responsive nanoenzyme.

Figure 7 Illustrates the following processes: (A) Chemo photodynamic therapeutic mechanism of DOX@HPBC. Reproduced with permission.268 Copyright © 2026 Elsevier. (B) Hemoglobin microgels with erythrocyte size capable of generating heat, oxygen and reactive oxygen species. Reproduced with permission.269 Copyright © 2026 Elsevier. (C) Structural design and therapeutic mechanism of the TME responsive Cu2-xO@MnO2@GOx@HA nanoenzyme. Reproduced with permission.154 Copyright © 2026 Elsevier.

While the advent of chemotherapy has improved cytotoxic effects, the pronounced oxygen dependency of PDT continues to constrain its therapeutic effectiveness in deep-seated tumor areas. Conversely, integrating PDT with oxygen-independent PTT can significantly expand tumor vasculature through localized hyperthermia induced by the photothermal effect. This approach enhances blood oxygen supply, thereby fundamentally mitigating the oxygen deprivation challenge associated with PDT.270–272 Kim et al designed a representative erythrocyte-sized Hb microgel system (Hb μGels) composed of Hb, upconversion nanoparticles (UCNPs), and a photosensitizer. This platform can not only supply oxygen but also generate heat and ROS under NIR irradiation, thereby achieving highly efficient PDT and PTT under extremely hypoxic conditions. The system is composed of Hb, bovine serum albumin (BSA), Ce6, and Er@Lu UCNPs. The UCNPs are designed to convert an 808 nm laser into visible light, thereby activating the photosensitizer to produce 1O2, while Hb releases oxygen to mitigate tumor hypoxia, enabling multimodal synergistic antitumor effects (Figure 7B). In 4T1 mouse models, the Hb μGels demonstrated a significant inhibition of hypoxic tumor spheroid growth and an improvement in tumor pO2, with hypoxic regions (pO2 < 5 mmHg) being notably alleviated. These findings underscore the potent synergistic efficacy of PDT/PTT and confirm that Hb encapsulation can effectively alleviate tumor hypoxia, thereby enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of oxygen-dependent treatments.269

To overcome the limitations imposed by the hypoxic TME on SDT and immunotherapy, Huang et al encapsulated perfluorohexane (PFH) as an oxygen reservoir together with the photosensitizer Ce6 into liposomes, constructing a functional PFC-based oxygen-carrying nanodroplet PCL@O2. This nanosystem demonstrated a substantial enhancement in ROS generation both in vitro and in vivo, facilitating SDT to induce a higher rate of apoptosis through an oxygen-dependent mechanism. Furthermore, it effectively alleviated tumor hypoxia by supplying additional oxygen. Notably, this study integrated the nanoplatform with immune checkpoint inhibitors, specifically the PD-1 antibody, to treat residual lesions following insufficient radiofrequency ablation (iRFA). In vivo experiments revealed that this combination therapy not only significantly inhibited the growth of primary and metastatic tumors but also markedly increased the proportion of antitumor immune cells, enhanced immune memory responses, reduced the number of Tregs, and improved long-term survival rates. This research provides a preclinical proof-of-concept for ultrasound-guided, self-oxygen-enriching SDT to augment cancer immunotherapy post-iRFA in solid tumors, offering a novel therapeutic strategy.273

Multi-Modal Cascade Synergistic Therapeutic Strategies

To enhance therapeutic outcomes, recent research has transcended bimodal synergy by focusing on the development of integrated, multidimensional triple or even quadruple therapeutic paradigms, alongside cascade catalytic synergistic therapies. These approaches are designed to expand the therapeutic window by achieving cascade amplification effects at each stage, thereby offering innovative technical pathways for the effective eradication of complex solid tumors. Chen et al constructed a TME-mediated NIR-II light-activated multifunctional cascade nanoenzyme system (Cu2-xO@MnO2@GOx@HA) to achieve intratumoral self-supply of O2/H2O2 and combine multiple therapeutic modalities. This nanoenzyme exploits the acidic conditions of the TME to selectively decompose the MnO2 layer, resulting in the release of Mn2+ ions and oxygen, thereby effectively mitigating TME-associated hypoxia. The released oxygen subsequently acts as a substrate for GOx, catalyzing the production of H2O2 and thereby enhancing the GOx-mediated self-supply of H2O2. Upon exposure to NIR-II (1064 nm) laser irradiation, Cu2-xO is transformed into Cu2-xS, facilitating photothermal effects that synergize with CDT to augment tumor cell eradication (Figure 7C). In summary, this NIR-induced photocatalytic and cascade-reaction nanoenzyme not only alleviates tumor hypoxia but also enhances the efficacy of GOx-mediated starvation therapy and CDT. Additionally, the generated ROS induce ICD, thereby activating adaptive immune responses to achieve a multimodal synergistic antitumor effect, encompassing PTT, CDT, starvation therapy, and immunotherapy.154

Similarly, Tang et al constructed a TME-responsive self-oxygenating nanoplatform CaO2@Cu-TCPP/DSF/HA (CaO2-MD), which integrates in situ oxygen generation, sonodynamic therapy, cuproptosis induction, and immunotherapy activation into a single system to achieve deep multi-module synergy. The nanoplatform is activated by endogenous H2O2 and the dysregulated copper metabolism characteristic of the TME, resulting in continuous in situ oxygen production. This process effectively mitigates tumor hypoxia and significantly enhances the efficiency of ROS generation during SDT. Concurrently, the platform facilitates mitochondrial accumulation of copper ions, which induces cuproptosis marked by an imbalance in lipoylated proteins, thereby disrupting the metabolic survival mechanisms of tumor cells. The oxidative stress induced by SDT further exacerbates mitochondrial damage, creating a positive feedback loop with cuproptosis for synergistic cytotoxicity. Both in vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that this approach substantially counteracted the inhibitory effects of hypoxia on SDT and cuproptosis, achieving a 96% tumor inhibition rate in the 4T1 breast cancer model. When combined with PD-L1 immune checkpoint blockade, the complete tumor regression rate reached 80%, and long-term immune memory was induced to prevent recurrence, providing a novel platform for multimodal therapy that breaks through the hypoxia limitation of solid tumors.274

In order to address the complex pathological issues associated with hypoxia and oxidative stress, Choi et al developed an innovative metal-free polyphenol-enzyme cascade nanoplatform (EGCG-catalase complex, EC), which is designed to autonomously scavenge ROS and continuously produce oxygen within hypoxic and oxidative microenvironments. The fundamental mechanism of this platform is based on a “scavenging-conversion-regeneration” cascade logic. By leveraging the multi-enzyme-mimetic activities (SOD/POD/GPx) of EGCG in conjunction with catalase, the system effectively transforms deleterious superoxide anions into hydrogen peroxide, which is subsequently decomposed into oxygen and water, thereby establishing a closed-loop antioxidant and oxygen-supplying system. In vitro experiments have demonstrated that the EC significantly decreases ROS levels in hypoxic endothelial cells, inhibits cellular senescence, and enhances angiogenesis. In a model of glucocorticoid-induced muscle atrophy, administration of the antioxidant malotilate through the EC platform effectively restored muscle fiber area and function. In a diabetic hindlimb ischemia model, the EC platform mitigated tissue necrosis and fibrosis, while synergistically interacting with VEGF to significantly enhance blood flow reperfusion. This study presents a comprehensive therapeutic strategy for hypoxia-related diseases, addressing both inadequate oxygen supply and oxidative damage concurrently.275

Challenges and Perspectives for Clinical Translation

Research on mitigating tumor hypoxia is experiencing a paradigm shift from straightforward oxygen supplementation to systemic remodeling.276–278 It is important to note, however, that although these multicomponent cascade nanosystems offer considerable benefits in terms of functional integration and therapeutic synergy, their complex structural design introduces new challenges for clinical translation. The precise assembly of multiple components necessitates multistep synthesis and stringent control of reaction conditions, which may complicate the maintenance of batch-to-batch consistency in compliance with Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) guidelines.279 Simultaneously, variables such as the preservation of enzymatic activity, regulation of inorganic component ratios, and interfacial stability may exhibit variability during large-scale production, potentially impacting the therapeutic efficacy and safety of the final product. Furthermore, the scale-up of multicomponent systems may face additional challenges, including intricate manufacturing processes, elevated production costs, and the absence of well-defined quality control standards.280 Consequently, future research should not only focus on enhancing the therapeutic performance of these nanoplatforms but also prioritize the development of scalable fabrication strategies, streamlined component design, and the establishment of standardized quality control systems to facilitate their successful translation into clinical applications.

Outlook

Future research on hypoxia-alleviating nanoplatforms should focus on designs that are both clinically translatable and dynamically regulated. Despite significant progress in enhancing intratumoral oxygen delivery, production, and retention, critical barriers continue to hinder clinical translation. The structural complexity of many existing nanoplatforms presents substantial challenges for scalable manufacturing, batch-to-batch reproducibility, and adherence to GMP standards. This underscores the necessity for simplified, modular, and robust design strategies. Furthermore, the long-term in vivo fate of nanomaterials, particularly those incorporating inorganic or non-degradable components, remains inadequately understood. Comprehensive investigations into pharmacokinetics, biodistribution, metabolic pathways, and long-term biosafety are therefore crucial to thoroughly evaluate their clinical applicability and safety profiles. Furthermore, contemporary oxygen-regulation strategies predominantly depend on static oxygen supplementation or modulation of consumption. In contrast, tumor oxygenation is intrinsically dynamic and spatially heterogeneous. Future research should prioritize the development of intelligent, self-adaptive systems that can synchronize oxygen regulation with the real-time metabolic demands of tumors. Additionally, standardized quantitative in vivo methods for oxygen detection are essential for reliable cross-platform comparisons and preclinical validation. Building on promising early-phase clinical data from studies on pancreatic and breast cancers, the next generation of nanomedicine should incorporate highly biocompatible and bioresponsive platforms alongside innovative combination regimens. Precisely remodeling the dynamic TME through these synchronized strategies offers significant potential for overcoming therapeutic resistance and optimizing anticancer clinical outcomes.

Data Sharing Statement

No datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.

Author Contributions

All authors made a significant contribution to the work reported, whether that is in the conception, study design, execution, acquisition of data, analysis and interpretation, or in all these areas; took part in drafting, revising or critically reviewing the article; gave final approval of the version to be published; have agreed on the journal to which the article has been submitted; and agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work.

Funding

This study was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (No. 2025JJ80119), the Excellent Youth Project of Hunan Provincial Department of Education (No. 23B0362), the General Subjects of Hunan Provincial Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine (No. B2024015), the Key Discipline Project on Chinese Pharmacology of Hunan University of Chinese Medicine [202302].

Disclosure

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. Ca A Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229–50. doi:10.3322/caac.21834

2. Liu B, Zhou H, Tan L, Siu KTH, Guan X-Y. Exploring treatment options in cancer: tumor treatment strategies. Signal Transduction Targeted Ther. 2024;9(1):175.

3. Ramos A, Sadeghi S, Tabatabaeian H. Battling chemoresistance in cancer: root causes and strategies to uproot them. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(17):9451. doi:10.3390/ijms22179451

4. Marusyk A, Polyak K. Tumor heterogeneity: causes and consequences. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2010;1805(1):105–117. doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2009.11.002

5. Kennedy LB, Salama AK. A review of cancer immunotherapy toxicity. Ca A Cancer J Clin. 2020;70(2):86–104. doi:10.3322/caac.21596

6. Alimoradi H, S Matikonda S, B Gamble A, I Giles G, Greish K. Hypoxia responsive drug delivery systems in tumor therapy. Curr Pharm Des. 2016;22(19):2808–2820. doi:10.2174/1381612822666160217130049

7. Liao C, Liu X, Zhang C, Zhang Q. Tumor hypoxia: from basic knowledge to therapeutic implications. In: Seminars in Cancer Biology. Elsevier; 2023.

8. Vaish U, Jain T, Are AC, Dudeja V. Cancer-associated fibroblasts in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: an update on heterogeneity and therapeutic targeting. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(24):13408. doi:10.3390/ijms222413408

9. Xue X, Wang X, Pang M, et al. An exosomal strategy for targeting cancer-associated fibroblasts mediated tumors desmoplastic microenvironments. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):196. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-02452-1

10. Enjalbert R, Köry J, Krüger T, Bernabeu MO. Abnormal vasculature reduces overlap between drugs and oxygen in a tumour computational model: implications for therapeutic efficacy. PLOS Comput Biol. 2025;21(12):e1013801. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1013801

11. Wigerup C, Påhlman S, Bexell D. Therapeutic targeting of hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors in cancer. Pharmacol Ther. 2016;164:152–169. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.04.009

12. Semenza GL. Targeting HIF-1 for cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2003;3(10):721–732. doi:10.1038/nrc1187

13. Jing X, Yang F, Shao C, et al. Role of hypoxia in cancer therapy by regulating the tumor microenvironment. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):157. doi:10.1186/s12943-019-1089-9

14. Xu X, Ho W, Zhang X, Bertrand N, Farokhzad O. Cancer nanomedicine: from targeted delivery to combination therapy. Trends Mol Med. 2015;21(4):223–232. doi:10.1016/j.molmed.2015.01.001

15. Yao Y, Zhou Y, Liu L, et al. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery in cancer therapy and its role in overcoming drug resistance. Front Mol Biosci. 2020;7:193. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2020.00193

16. Gray LH, Conger AD, Ebert M, Hornsey S, Scott O. The concentration of oxygen dissolved in tissues at the time of irradiation as a factor in radiotherapy. Brit J Radiol. 1953;26(312):638–648. doi:10.1259/0007-1285-26-312-638

17. Thomlinson RH, Gray LH. The histological structure of some human lung cancers and the possible implications for radiotherapy. Br J Cancer. 1955;9(4):539. doi:10.1038/bjc.1955.55

18. Carmeliet P, Jain RK. Angiogenesis in cancer and other diseases. Nature. 2000;407(6801):249–257. doi:10.1038/35025220

19. Goel S, Duda DG, Xu L, et al. Normalization of the vasculature for treatment of cancer and other diseases. Physiol Rev. 2011;91(3):1071–1121. doi:10.1152/physrev.00038.2010

20. Vaupel P, Mayer A. Hypoxia in cancer: significance and impact on clinical outcome. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2007;26(2):225–239. doi:10.1007/s10555-007-9055-1

21. Bigos KJ, Quiles CG, Lunj S, et al. Tumour response to hypoxia: understanding the hypoxic tumour microenvironment to improve treatment outcome in solid tumours. Front Oncol. 2024;14:1331355. doi:10.3389/fonc.2024.1331355

22. Pérez-Tomás R, Pérez-Guillén I. Lactate in the tumor microenvironment: an essential molecule in cancer progression and treatment. Cancers. 2020;12(11):3244. doi:10.3390/cancers12113244

23. Sun M, Wang K, Lu F, Yu D, Liu S. Regulatory role and therapeutic prospect of lactate modification in cancer. Front Pharmacol. 2025;16:1508552. doi:10.3389/fphar.2025.1508552

24. Basheeruddin M, Qausain S. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1-alpha (HIF-1α) and cancer: mechanisms of tumor hypoxia and therapeutic targeting. Cureus. 2024;16(10):1.

25. Zhang H, Lu H, Xiang L, et al. HIF-1 regulates CD47 expression in breast cancer cells to promote evasion of phagocytosis and maintenance of cancer stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(45):E6215–E23. doi:10.1073/pnas.1520032112

26. Wu Q, You L, Nepovimova E, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factors: master regulators of hypoxic tumor immune escape. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15(1):77. doi:10.1186/s13045-022-01292-6

27. Standiford TJ, Kuick R, Bhan U, Chen J, Newstead M, Keshamouni VG. TGF-β-induced IRAK-M expression in tumor-associated macrophages regulates lung tumor growth. Oncogene. 2011;30(21):2475–2484. doi:10.1038/onc.2010.619

28. Ojaroodi AF, Shokravi S, Eskandarzadeh S, et al. The hypoxic tumor microenvironment: functional and metabolic reprogramming of key immune populations. Pathol Res Pract. 2026;282:156443. doi:10.1016/j.prp.2026.156443

29. Tharp KM, Kersten K, Maller O, et al. Tumor-associated macrophages restrict CD8+ T cell function through collagen deposition and metabolic reprogramming of the breast cancer microenvironment. Nat Cancer. 2024;5(7):1045–1062. doi:10.1038/s43018-024-00775-4

30. Hurez V, Daniel BJ, Sun L, et al. Mitigating age-related immune dysfunction heightens the efficacy of tumor immunotherapy in aged mice. Cancer Res. 2012;72(8):2089–2099. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3019

31. C-w C, S-r Z, Y-m Y, et al. Exosomal S100A9 promotes lung metastasis of adenoid cystic carcinoma via activating cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cell Death Discovery. 2026;12. doi:10.1038/s41420-026-02991-6

32. Caligiuri G, Tuveson DA. Activated fibroblasts in cancer: perspectives and challenges. Cancer Cell. 2023;41(3):434–449. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2023.02.015

33. Kaplan AR, Glazer PM. Impact of hypoxia on DNA repair and genome integrity. Mutagenesis. 2020;35(1):61–68. doi:10.1093/mutage/gez019

34. Spina A, De Pasquale V, Cerulo G, et al. HGF/c-MET axis in tumor microenvironment and metastasis formation. Biomedicines. 2015;3(1):71–88. doi:10.3390/biomedicines3010071

35. Pennacchietti S, Michieli P, Galluzzo M, Mazzone M, Giordano S, Comoglio PM. Hypoxia promotes invasive growth by transcriptional activation of the met protooncogene. Cancer Cell. 2003;3(4):347–361. doi:10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00085-0

36. Wang W, Mu S, Zhang J, et al. Trojan horse strategy: how biomimetic nanomedicine remodels the tumor microenvironment. Adv Sci. 2026;13(10):e19213. doi:10.1002/advs.202519213

37. Graham K, Unger E. Overcoming tumor hypoxia as a barrier to radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy in cancer treatment. Int J Nanomed. 2018;Volume 13:6049–6058. doi:10.2147/IJN.S140462

38. Correia JH, Rodrigues JA, Pimenta S, Dong T, Yang Z. Photodynamic therapy review: principles, photosensitizers, applications, and future directions. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(9):1332. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics13091332

39. Pucelik B, Sułek A, Barzowska A, Dąbrowski JM. Recent advances in strategies for overcoming hypoxia in photodynamic therapy of cancer. Cancer Lett. 2020;492:116–135. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2020.07.007

40. Akman M, Belisario DC, Salaroglio IC, et al. Hypoxia, endoplasmic reticulum stress and chemoresistance: dangerous liaisons. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2021;40(1):28. doi:10.1186/s13046-020-01824-3

41. Kopecka J, Salaroglio IC, Perez-Ruiz E, et al. Hypoxia as a driver of resistance to immunotherapy. Drug Resist Updates. 2021;59:100787. doi:10.1016/j.drup.2021.100787

42. Fernández E, Morillo V, Salvador M, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen and radiation therapy: a review. Clin Transl Oncol. 2021;23(6):1047–1053. doi:10.1007/s12094-020-02513-5

43. Riess JG. Oxygen carriers (“blood substitutes”) raison d’être, chemistry, and some physiology blut ist ein ganz besondrer saft. Chem Rev. 2001;101(9):2797–2920. doi:10.1021/cr970143c

44. Riess JG. Understanding the fundamentals of perfluorocarbons and perfluorocarbon emulsions relevant to in vivo oxygen delivery. Artificial Cells Blood Subst Biotechnol. 2005;33(1):47–63. doi:10.1081/BIO-200046659

45. Clark JLC, Gollan F. Survival of mammals breathing organic liquids equilibrated with oxygen at atmospheric pressure. Science. 1966;152(3730):1755–1756. doi:10.1126/science.152.3730.1755

46. Jägers J, Wrobeln A, Ferenz KB. Perfluorocarbon-based oxygen carriers: from physics to physiology. Pflügers Archiv-Euro J Physiol. 2021;473(2):139–150. doi:10.1007/s00424-020-02482-2

47. Xiang Y, Bernards N, Hoang B, Zheng J, Matsuura N. Perfluorocarbon nanodroplets can reoxygenate hypoxic tumors in vivo without carbogen breathing. Nanotheranostics. 2019;3(2):135. doi:10.7150/ntno.29908

48. Vichare R, Janjic J. Perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions in drug delivery: design, development, and manufacturing. Theranostics. 2025;15(7):3013. doi:10.7150/thno.103820

49. Kakaei N, Amirian R, Azadi M, Mohammadi G, Izadi Z. Perfluorocarbons: a perspective of theranostic applications and challenges. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023;11:1115254. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2023.1115254

50. Lin S, Yang Z, Yu B, et al. Fluorinated polymeric nanoplatform relieves tumor hypoxia and enhances chemo-sonodynamic therapy. Acta Biomater. 2026;214:527–541. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2026.03.008

51. Calvo P, Vila-Jato JL, Alonso MJ. Comparative in vitro evaluation of several colloidal systems, nanoparticles, nanocapsules, and nanoemulsions, as ocular drug carriers. J Pharmaceut Sci. 1996;85(5):530–536.

52. Singh Y, Meher JG, Raval K, et al. Nanoemulsion: concepts, development and applications in drug delivery. J Control Release. 2017;252:28–49. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2017.03.008

53. Halpin-Veszeleiova K, Mallouh MP, Williamson LM, et al. Oxygen-carrying nanoemulsions and respiratory hyperoxia eliminate tumor hypoxia–induced immunosuppression. JCI Insight. 2025;10(6):e174675. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.174675

54. Shin SH, Park E-J, Min C, et al. Tracking perfluorocarbon nanoemulsion delivery by 19F MRI for precise high intensity focused ultrasound tumor ablation. Theranostics. 2017;7(3):562. doi:10.7150/thno.16895

55. Heaton AR, Lechuga LM, Tangsangasaksri M, Ludwig KD, Fain SB, Mecozzi S. A stable, highly concentrated fluorous nanoemulsion formulation for in vivo cancer imaging via 19F-MRI. NMRBiomed. 2024;37(5):e5100. doi:10.1002/nbm.5100

56. Alavi M, Hamidi M. Passive and active targeting in cancer therapy by liposomes and lipid nanoparticles. Drug Metabol Personalized Ther. 2019;34(1). doi:10.1515/dmpt-2018-0032

57. Xu L, Qiu X, Zhang Y, et al. Liposome encapsulated perfluorohexane enhances radiotherapy in mice without additional oxygen supply. J Transl Med. 2016;14(1):268. doi:10.1186/s12967-016-1033-3

58. Liang X, Chen M, Bhattarai P, Hameed S, Dai Z. Perfluorocarbon@ Porphyrin nanoparticles for tumor hypoxia relief to enhance photodynamic therapy against liver metastasis of colon cancer. ACS Nano. 2020;14(10):13569–13583. doi:10.1021/acsnano.0c05617

59. Liu S, Hou X, Zhu W, et al. Lipid perfluorohexane nanoemulsion hybrid for MRI-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy of tumors. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:846446. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.846446

60. Ren H, Hao M, Liu G, et al. Oxygen self-supplied perfluorocarbon-modified micelles for enhanced cancer photodynamic therapy and ferroptosis. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2024;7(5):3306–3315. doi:10.1021/acsabm.4c00251

61. Zhou Z, Zhang B, Wang H, Yuan A, Hu Y, Wu J. Two-stage oxygen delivery for enhanced radiotherapy by perfluorocarbon nanoparticles. Theranostics. 2018;8(18):4898. doi:10.7150/thno.27598

62. Liu D, Lu N, Zang F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-based radiogenomic analysis reveals genomic determinants for nanoparticle delivery into tumors. ACS Nano. 2024;18(51):34615–34629. doi:10.1021/acsnano.4c09387

63. Sun R, Xiang J, Zhou Q, et al. The tumor EPR effect for cancer drug delivery: current status, limitations, and alternatives. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2022;191:114614. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2022.114614

64. Nomani A, Yousefi S, Sargsyan D, Hatefi A. A quantitative MRI-based approach to estimate the permeation and retention of nanomedicines in tumors. J Control Release. 2024;368:728–739. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.03.019

65. Sharifi M, Cho WC, Ansariesfahani A, et al. An updated review on EPR-based solid tumor targeting nanocarriers for cancer treatment. Cancers. 2022;14(12):2868. doi:10.3390/cancers14122868

66. Sebak AA, El-Shenawy BM, El-Safy S, El-Shazly M. From passive targeting to personalized nanomedicine: multidimensional insights on nanoparticles’ interaction with the tumor microenvironment. Current Pharm Biotechnol. 2021;22(11):1444–1465. doi:10.2174/1389201021666201211103856

67. Tian H, Zhang T, Qin S, et al. Enhancing the therapeutic efficacy of nanoparticles for cancer treatment using versatile targeted strategies. J Hematol Oncol. 2022;15(1):132.

68. Deng X, Zhang Z, Ren T, Chen L. Regulation of oxidative stress and inflammation caused by drug accumulation in the TME based on EPR-passive strategy and active targeting. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2025;16(1):40. doi:10.1186/s12645-025-00342-1

69. Kwon IK, Lee SC, Han B, Park K. Analysis on the current status of targeted drug delivery to tumors. J Control Release. 2012;164(2):108–114. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.07.010

70. Xu J, Gattacceca F, Amiji M. Biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of EGFR-targeted thiolated gelatin nanoparticles following systemic administration in pancreatic tumor-bearing mice. Mol Pharmaceut. 2013;10(5):2031–2044. doi:10.1021/mp400054e

71. Chen W, Li J, Li H, Liu Y, Lu X. A hybrid membrane-biomimetic nanoplatform for synergistic photothermal/photodynamic therapy of hypoxic tumors. J Mat Chem B. 2026. doi:10.1039/D6TB00549G

72. Begg K, Tavassoli M. Inside the hypoxic tumour: reprogramming of the DDR and radioresistance. Cell Death Discovery. 2020;6(1):77. doi:10.1038/s41420-020-00311-0

73. Shi Z, Hu C, Zheng X, Sun C, Li Q. Feedback loop between hypoxia and energy metabolic reprogramming aggravates the radioresistance of cancer cells. Exp Hematol Oncol. 2024;13(1):55. doi:10.1186/s40164-024-00519-1

74. Boulefour W, Rowinski E, Louati S, et al. A review of the role of hypoxia in radioresistance in cancer therapy. Med Sci Monit. 2021;27:e934116–1. doi:10.12659/MSM.934116

75. Wang W, Wang X, Tao F, et al. Fluorinated hyaluronic acid encapsulated perfluorocarbon nanoparticles as tumor-targeted oxygen carriers to enhance radiotherapy. Mol Pharmaceut. 2022;19(11):3948–3958. doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.2c00432

76. Zhao R, Matherly LH, Goldman ID. Membrane transporters and folate homeostasis: intestinal absorption and transport into systemic compartments and tissues. Expert Rev Mol Med. 2009;11:e4. doi:10.1017/S1462399409000969

77. Li K, Liu Y, Zhang S, et al. Folate receptor-targeted ultrasonic PFOB nanoparticles: synthesis, characterization and application in tumor-targeted imaging. IntJ Mol Med. 2017;39(6):1505–1515. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2017.2975

78. Tseng T-H, Chen C-Y, Wu W-C, Chen C-Y. Targeted and oxygen-enriched polymeric micelles for enhancing photodynamic therapy. Nanotechnology. 2021;32(36):365102. doi:10.1088/1361-6528/ac020d

79. Fang H, Gai Y, Wang S, et al. Biomimetic oxygen delivery nanoparticles for enhancing photodynamic therapy in triple-negative breast cancer. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19(1):81. doi:10.1186/s12951-021-00827-2

80. Wang X, Fang H, Hu W, et al. Oxygen-delivery nanoparticles enhanced immunotherapy efficacy monitored by granzyme B PET imaging in malignant tumors. J Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23(1):1–15. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-02937-z

81. Zhang Y, Qiu N, Zhang Y, et al. Oxygen-carrying nanoparticle-based chemo-sonodynamic therapy for tumor suppression and autoimmunity activation. Biomater Sci. 2021;9(11):3989–4004. doi:10.1039/D1BM00198A

82. Wang T, Peng W, Du M, Chen Z. Immunogenic sonodynamic therapy for inducing immunogenic cell death and activating antitumor immunity. Front Oncol. 2023;13:1167105. doi:10.3389/fonc.2023.1167105

83. Ren M, Ai Z, Zhang Y, et al. cGAS-STING signaling in the tumor microenvironment induces myeloid cell activation and favors T cell-mediated antitumor immunity. Cancer Biol Ther. 2025;26(1):2585562. doi:10.1080/15384047.2025.2585562

84. Zhang S-M, Gui B, Liu Q, et al. A sonosensitizing nanoshuttle for synergistic hypoxia relief and immune activation to strengthen sonodynamic immunotherapy against triple-negative breast cancer. ACS Nano. 2025;2025:1.

85. Mali A, Nayak NU, van Doesburg J, et al. Polymeric (poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid)) particles entrapping perfluorocarbons are stable for a minimum of six years. ACS Omega. 2025;10(7):6768–6779. doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c08663

86. Day RA, Estabrook DA, Wu C, Chapman JO, Togle AJ, Sletten EM. Systematic study of perfluorocarbon nanoemulsions stabilized by polymer amphiphiles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2020;12(35):38887–38898. doi:10.1021/acsami.0c07206

87. De A, Jee J-P, Park Y-J. Why Perfluorocarbon nanoparticles encounter bottlenecks in clinical translation despite promising oxygen carriers? Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2024;199:114292. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2024.114292

88. Castro CI, Briceno JC. Perfluorocarbon-based oxygen carriers: review of products and trials. Artif Organs. 2010;34(8):622–634. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1594.2009.00944.x

89. Perutz MF. Stereochemistry of cooperative effects in haemoglobin: haem–haem interaction and the problem of allostery. Nature. 1970;228(5273):726–734. doi:10.1038/228726a0

90. Nagatomo S, Nagai M, Kitagawa T. Structural origin of cooperativity in human hemoglobin: a view from different roles of α and β subunits in the α2β2 tetramer. Biophys Rev. 2022;14(2):483–498. doi:10.1007/s12551-022-00945-7

91. Montgomery RM. Hemoglobin: structure, function and oxygen transport in mammals-integrating epidemiological, genomic, environmental, evolutionary and recent morphological findings. J Mol Genet Gene Res. 2025;1(2):01–16.

92. Benner A, Patel AK, Singh K, Dua A. Physiology, Bohr effect. 2018.

93. Zhu K, Wang L, Xiao Y, et al. Nanomaterial-related hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers, with emphasis on liposome and nano-capsules, for biomedical applications: current status and future perspectives. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):336. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-02606-1

94. Grzegorzewski W, Czerniecka-Kubicka A, Gołda K, et al. Hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers: selected advances and challenges in the design of safe oxygen therapeutics (A Focused Review). Int J Mol Sci. 2025;26(19):9775. doi:10.3390/ijms26199775

95. Murayama C, Kawaguchi AT, Ishikawa K, et al. Liposome-encapsulated hemoglobin ameliorates tumor hypoxia and enhances radiation therapy to suppress tumor growth in mice. Artif Organs. 2012;36(2):170–177. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1594.2011.01418.x

96. Yang J, Li W, Luo L, et al. Hypoxic tumor therapy by hemoglobin-mediated drug delivery and reversal of hypoxia-induced chemoresistance. Biomaterials. 2018;182:145–156. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.08.004

97. Guo X, Qu J, Zhu C, et al. Synchronous delivery of oxygen and photosensitizer for alleviation of hypoxia tumor microenvironment and dramatically enhanced photodynamic therapy. Drug Delivery. 2018;25(1):585–599. doi:10.1080/10717544.2018.1435751

98. Salavati H, Pullens P, Debbaut C, Ceelen W. Image-guided patient-specific prediction of interstitial fluid flow and drug transport in solid tumors. J Control Release. 2025;378:899–911. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.12.048

99. You S, Li S, Zeng L, et al. Lymphatic-localized Treg-mregDC crosstalk limits antigen trafficking and restrains anti-tumor immunity. Cancer Cell. 2024;42(8):1415–33.e12. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2024.06.014

100. Liu Y, Dong W, Ma Y, et al. Nanomedicines with high drug availability and drug sensitivity overcome hypoxia-associated drug resistance. Biomaterials. 2023;294:122023. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122023

101. Jia C, Deacon GB, Zhang Y, Gao C. Platinum (IV) antitumor complexes and their nano-drug delivery. Coord Chem Rev. 2021;429:213640. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213640

102. Shaikat AH, Azad SAK, Tamim MAR, et al. Investigating hypoxia-inducible factor signaling in cancer: mechanisms, clinical implications, targeted therapeutic strategies, and resistance. Cancer Pathogen Ther. 2026;4(3):174–191. doi:10.1016/j.cpt.2025.07.003

103. Sun K, Wei X, Han S, Sun Y, Xiao H, Wei D. Biotin receptor-targeting PtIV oxygen carrying prodrug amphiphile for alleviating tumor hypoxia induced immune chemotherapy suppression. ACS Nano. 2025;19(13):13300–13313. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c00691

104. Liu X, Jansman MM, Hosta-Rigau L. Haemoglobin-loaded metal organic framework-based nanoparticles camouflaged with a red blood cell membrane as potential oxygen delivery systems. Biomater Sci. 2020;8(21):5859–5873. doi:10.1039/D0BM01118E

105. Zhao Y, Liang C, Mei Z, et al. Oxygen-enriched MOF-hemoglobin X-ray nanosensitizer for enhanced cancer radio–radiodynamic therapy. ACS Mater Lett. 2023;5(12):3237–3247. doi:10.1021/acsmaterialslett.3c01158

106. Jin W, Bor G, Asgari M, et al. Biorthogonal PEGylation of hierarchical porous metal–organic frameworks as robust, functional nanocarriers for hemoglobin-based oxygen delivery. J Am Chem Soc. 2025;147(47):43400–43414. doi:10.1021/jacs.5c10582

107. Li S, Sun W, Ouyang M, et al. Hemoglobin-related biomaterials and their applications. Adv NanoBiomed Res. 2023;3(3):2200103. doi:10.1002/anbr.202200103

108. Wang Y, Yu J, Luo Z, et al. Engineering endogenous tumor-associated macrophage-targeted biomimetic nano-RBC to Reprogram tumor immunosuppressive microenvironment for enhanced chemo-immunotherapy. Adv Mater. 2021;33(39):2103497. doi:10.1002/adma.202103497

109. Wang Y, Li N, Qu L, et al. Hemoglobin nanoclusters-mediated regulation of KPNA4 in hypoxic tumor microenvironment enhances photodynamic therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):473. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-02717-9

110. Khan MS, Hwang J, Lee K, et al. Oxygen-carrying micro/nanobubbles: composition, synthesis techniques and potential prospects in photo-triggered theranostics. Molecules. 2018;23(9):2210. doi:10.3390/molecules23092210

111. Terlikowska KM, Dobrzycka B, Terlikowski SJ. Modifications of nanobubble therapy for cancer treatment. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(13):7292. doi:10.3390/ijms25137292

112. Viafara Garcia SM, Khan MS, Haidar ZS, Acevedo Cox JP. NanoBubble-mediated oxygenation: elucidating the underlying molecular mechanisms in hypoxia and mitochondrial-related pathologies. Nanomaterials. 2023;13(23):3060. doi:10.3390/nano13233060

113. Rahman MA, Yadab MK, Ali MM. Emerging role of extracellular pH in tumor microenvironment as a therapeutic target for cancer immunotherapy. Cells. 2024;13(22):1924. doi:10.3390/cells13221924

114. Li F, Jiang J, Jin L, et al. Design and application of proton gradients-based pH-responsive nanomaterials in the tumor microenvironment. Nanoscale. 2025;2025:1.

115. Song R, Peng S, Lin Q, et al. pH-responsive oxygen nanobubbles for spontaneous oxygen delivery in hypoxic tumors. Langmuir. 2019;35(31):10166–10172. doi:10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b03650

116. Wang Y, Zhong B, Chen X, et al. Unveiling new therapeutic targets for esophageal cancer treatment through single-cell transcriptomics: pH-responsive nanobubbles enhance the efficacy of 125I radiotherapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23(1):515. doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03552-2

117. Liu D, Ling Y, Liu W, Deng J, Guo Y. Ultrasound-responsive micro/nanobubbles based intelligent theranostic systems for precision tumor therapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2025;24. doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03959-x

118. Yang Y, Cheng Y, Chen Z, Liu Y. A review on the structure-response-efficacy optimization of ultrasound-responsive micro/nanobubbles for cancer therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(11):1378. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics17111378

119. Tian S, Liu Y, Tan Y, et al. Necroptosis-inducing nanobubbles for effective oxygen delivery and enhanced sonodynamic immunotherapy of breast cancer via UTND. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2025;210:114675. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2025.114675

120. Khan MS, Hwang J, Lee K, et al. Anti-tumor drug-loaded oxygen nanobubbles for the degradation of HIF-1α and the upregulation of reactive oxygen species in tumor cells. Cancers. 2019;11(10):1464. doi:10.3390/cancers11101464

121. Feng R, Lan J, Goh MC, Du M, Chen Z. Advances in the application of gas vesicles in medical imaging and disease treatment. J Biol Eng. 2024;18(1):41. doi:10.1186/s13036-024-00426-3

122. Pfeifer F. Recent advances in the study of gas vesicle proteins and application of gas vesicles in biomedical research. Life. 2022;12(9):1455. doi:10.3390/life12091455

123. Bourdeau RW, Lee-Gosselin A, Lakshmanan A, et al. Acoustic reporter genes for noninvasive imaging of microorganisms in mammalian hosts. Nature. 2018;553(7686):86–90. doi:10.1038/nature25021

124. Iburg M, Anderson AP, Wong VT, Anton ED, He A, Lu GJ. Elucidating the assembly of gas vesicles by systematic protein-protein interaction analysis. EMBO J. 2024;43(19):4156–4172. doi:10.1038/s44318-024-00178-2

125. Song L, Wang G, Hou X, et al. Biogenic nanobubbles for effective oxygen delivery and enhanced photodynamic therapy of cancer. Acta Biomater. 2020;108:313–325. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.03.034

126. Shapiro MG, Goodwill PW, Neogy A, et al. Biogenic gas nanostructures as ultrasonic molecular reporters. Nature Nanotechnol. 2014;9(4):311–316. doi:10.1038/nnano.2014.32

127. Qin S, Xu Y, Li H, Chen H, Yuan Z. Recent advances in in situ oxygen-generating and oxygen-replenishing strategies for hypoxic-enhanced photodynamic therapy. Biomater Sci. 2022;10(1):51–84. doi:10.1039/D1BM00317H

128. Zou M-Z, Liu W-L, Chen H-S, et al. Advances in nanomaterials for treatment of hypoxic tumor. Natl Sci Rev. 2021;8(2):nwaa160. doi:10.1093/nsr/nwaa160

129. He M, Cheng Z, Wang Z, et al. Controllable regulation of Ag2S quantum-dot-mediated protein nanoassemblies for imaging-guided synergistic PDT/PTT/chemotherapy against hypoxic tumor. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2023;12(25):2300752. doi:10.1002/adhm.202300752

130. Mehravanfar H, Farhadian N, Abnous K, Zavvar T. Catalase enzyme-modified carbon quantum dot nanoparticles with hypoxia alleviation associated with indocyanine green for synchronous augmented photodynamic therapy and cell imaging of melanoma. Nanoscale. 2025;17(34):19631–19655. doi:10.1039/D5NR02133B

131. Tan X, Wang Y, Yuan Y, et al. A catalase-powered self-oxygen-generating soft nanomotor for photodynamic therapy of osteosarcoma. Mater Today Bio. 2025;32:101796. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.101796

132. Cheng X, He L, Xu J, et al. Oxygen-producing catalase-based prodrug nanoparticles overcoming resistance in hypoxia-mediated chemo-photodynamic therapy. Acta Biomater. 2020;112:234–249. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2020.05.035

133. Sun Y, Sun M, Sun X, et al. H-MnO2 nanoparticles loaded with photosensitizer IR825 target the tumor microenvironment to alleviate hypoxia and synergy therapy. Res Chem. 2025;17:102602. doi:10.1016/j.rechem.2025.102602

134. Veroniaina H, Wu Z, Qi X. Innate tumor-targeted nanozyme overcoming tumor hypoxia for cancer theranostic use. J Adv Res. 2021;33:201–213. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2021.02.004

135. Jia W, Zhang A, Hou H, et al. Intelligent catalase-coated MnO 2 nanoparticles with programmed oxygen supply and glutathione depletion for enhanced photodynamic therapy. J Mat Chem B. 2026;14(1):311–324. doi:10.1039/D5TB01925G

136. Pi F, Deng X, Xue Q, et al. Alleviating the hypoxic tumor microenvironment with MnO2-coated CeO2 nanoplatform for magnetic resonance imaging guided radiotherapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2023;21(1):90. doi:10.1186/s12951-023-01850-1

137. Yang Y, Gu H, Qin S, et al. CoFe2O4-based multifunctional nanozymes remodel tumor redox balance for enhanced osteosarcoma treatment. Int J Nanomed. 2025;Volume 20:13741–13758. doi:10.2147/IJN.S556295

138. Chang P, Chen D, Yang X, et al. A dual-enzyme-like nanozyme adjuvant alleviates tumor hypoxia to enhance photothermally ferroptosis-immune synergistic tumor therapy. Mater Today Bio. 2025;35:102503. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2025.102503

139. Lv W, Cao M, Liu J, Hei Y, Bai J. Tumor microenvironment-responsive nanozymes achieve photothermal-enhanced multiple catalysis against tumor hypoxia. Acta Biomater. 2021;135:617–627. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2021.08.015

140. Zhang Y, Li X, Ren X, et al. Nanozymes as glucose scavengers and oxygenerators for enhancing tumor radiotherapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(45):61805–61819. doi:10.1021/acsami.4c18066

141. Wang M, Chang M, Zheng P, et al. A noble AuPtAg-GOx nanozyme for synergistic tumor immunotherapy induced by starvation therapy-augmented mild photothermal therapy. Adv Sci. 2022;9(31):2202332. doi:10.1002/advs.202202332

142. Wu H, Jiang Q, Luo K, et al. Synthesis of iridium-based nanocomposite with catalase activity for cancer phototherapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19(1):203. doi:10.1186/s12951-021-00948-8

143. Wei C, Liu Y, Zhu X, et al. Iridium/ruthenium nanozyme reactors with cascade catalytic ability for synergistic oxidation therapy and starvation therapy in the treatment of breast cancer. Biomaterials. 2020;238:119848. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.119848

144. Zhang B, Yuan Y, Xin Q, et al. Self-oxygenated biomimetic nanozyme for tumor catalytic immunotherapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2025;35(1):2411103. doi:10.1002/adfm.202411103

145. Yang Y, Zhu D, Liu Y, et al. Platinum-carbon-integrated nanozymes for enhanced tumor photodynamic and photothermal therapy. Nanoscale. 2020;12(25):13548–13557. doi:10.1039/D0NR02800B

146. Qiao X, Xue L, Huang H, Dai X, Chen Y, Ding H. Engineering defected 2D Pd/H-TiO2 nanosonosensitizers for hypoxia alleviation and enhanced sono-chemodynamic cancer nanotherapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2022;20(1):186. doi:10.1186/s12951-022-01398-6

147. Hu B, Xiao X, Chen P, et al. Enhancing anti-tumor effect of ultrasensitive bimetallic RuCu nanoparticles as radiosensitizers with dual enzyme-like activities. Biomaterials. 2022;290:121811. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2022.121811

148. Khoshtabiat L, Meshkini A, Matin MM. g-C3N4-based photoresponsive magnetic nanocatalyst drives type-I photodynamic therapy under visible light irradiation, boosting chemo/chemodynamic synergistic therapy of colon cancer. Cancer Nanotechnol. 2023;14(1):40. doi:10.1186/s12645-023-00188-5

149. Zheng D-W, Li B, Li C-X, et al. Carbon-dot-decorated carbon nitride nanoparticles for enhanced photodynamic therapy against hypoxic tumor via water splitting. ACS Nano. 2016;10(9):8715–8722. doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b04156

150. Liu G, Li Z, Lv Z, et al. A self-assembled Ru nanozyme with H 2 O 2-activated oxygenation for NIR-II photoacoustic imaging-guided photothermal/photodynamic therapy. Mater Adv. 2024;5(11):4902–4912. doi:10.1039/D4MA00103F

151. Chen S, Luo Y, He Y, et al. In-situ-sprayed therapeutic hydrogel for oxygen-actuated Janus regulation of postsurgical tumor recurrence/metastasis and wound healing. Nat Commun. 2024;15(1):814. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45072-x

152. Han F, Guo M, Zhou X, et al. Precise molecular engineering of heptamethine cyanine-based near-infrared type-I photosensitizers for pro-death autophagy and hypoxia-tolerant antitumor treatment. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2025;64(34):e202504227. doi:10.1002/anie.202504227

153. Wang L, Kang K, Hou H, et al. NIR-II-driven intracellular photocatalytic oxygen-generation on Z-Scheme iron sulfide/cobalt sulfide nanosheets for hypoxic tumor therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;625:145–157. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2022.06.031

154. Chen Y, Cao H, Jiang C, Li Y. Tumor-microenvironment-mediated second near-infrared light activation multifunctional cascade nanoenzyme for self-replenishing O2/H2O2 multimodal tumor therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;683:930–943. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2024.12.228

155. Wang X, Sun W, Shi H, et al. Organic phosphorescent nanoscintillator for low-dose X-ray-induced photodynamic therapy. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):5091. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32054-0

156. Zhu S, Yan F, Yang L, et al. Low-dose X-ray radiodynamic therapy solely based on gold nanoclusters for efficient treatment of deep hypoxic solid tumors combined with enhanced antitumor immune response. Theranostics. 2023;13(3):1042. doi:10.7150/thno.78649

157. Gu L, Wu H, Li X, et al. Hydrogen-bonded organic framework nanoscintillators for X-ray-induced photodynamic therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma. Adv Mater. 2025;37(13):2417001. doi:10.1002/adma.202417001

158. Liu F, He T, Gong S, et al. A tumor pH-responsive autocatalytic nanoreactor as a H2O2 and O2 self-supplying depot for enhanced ROS-based chemo/photodynamic therapy. Acta Biomater. 2022;154:510–522. doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2022.10.002

159. Chen X, Song P, Li W, et al. A pH-responsive polymer-coated CaO2 as oxygen-generating nanoparticle in situ for enhanced chemo-photodynamic synergistic therapy against tumors. Nanotechnology. 2023;34(45):455101. doi:10.1088/1361-6528/aced9c

160. Mo XW, Phan NM, Nguyen TL, Kim J. H2O2 self-supplying CaO2 nanoplatform induces Ca2+ overload combined with chemodynamic therapy to enhance cancer immunotherapy. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2024;16(43):58337–58345. doi:10.1021/acsami.4c12748

161. Qiao Y, Jia X, Wang Y, Liu L, Zhang M, Jiang X. Polydopamine-encapsulated zinc peroxide nanoparticles to target the metabolism-redox circuit against tumor adaptability for mild photothermal therapy. Nanoscale Horiz. 2024;9(6):1002–1012. doi:10.1039/D4NH00070F

162. Li H, Wang Z, Chu X, et al. Free radicals generated in perfluorocarbon–water (liquid–liquid) interfacial contact electrification and their application in cancer therapy. J Am Chem Soc. 2024;146(17):12087–12099. doi:10.1021/jacs.4c02149

163. Yu J, Feng L, Tang Y, et al. Pancreatic cancer-targeting cascade nanoamplifier enables self-replenishing H2O2 generation and autophagy disruption in chemodynamic therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2025;17(9):1201. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics17091201

164. Zhang Y, Yang Y, Shi J, Wang L. A multimodal strategy of Fe 3 O 4@ ZIF-8/GOx@ MnO 2 hybrid nanozyme via TME modulation for tumor therapy. Nanoscale. 2021;13(39):16571–16588. doi:10.1039/D1NR04196G

165. Zhang C, Han Z-Y, Chen K-W, et al. In situ formed microalgae-integrated living hydrogel for enhanced tumor starvation therapy and immunotherapy through photosynthetic oxygenation. Nano Lett. 2024;24(12):3801–3810. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.4c00471

166. Wang W, Zheng H, Jiang J, et al. Engineering micro oxygen factories to slow tumour progression via hyperoxic microenvironments. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):4495. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-32066-w

167. Zhong D, Li W, Hua S, et al. Calcium phosphate engineered photosynthetic microalgae to combat hypoxic-tumor by in-situ modulating hypoxia and cascade radio-phototherapy. Theranostics. 2021;11(8):3580. doi:10.7150/thno.55441

168. Mei J, Pan W, Li B, et al. Photosynthetic plant-derived nanovesicles precisely amplify photodynamic effect by light-activated oxygen generation for enhanced cancer photoimmunotherapy. ACS Nano. 2025;19(40):35933–35950. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c13350

169. Li T, Zhang Y, Li C, et al. Microbial photosynthetic oxygenation and radiotherapeutic sensitization enables pyroptosis induction for combinatorial cancer therapy. Adv Mater. 2025;37:2503138. doi:10.1002/adma.202503138

170. Feng Y, Tang Q, Wang B, et al. Targeting the tumor microenvironment with biomaterials for enhanced immunotherapeutic efficacy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):737. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-03005-2

171. Li D, Li M, He Q, et al. Cascade-driven β-Lapachone cycle in a photothermal/self-oxygenating MXene nanoplatform for synergistic tumor therapy. Bioorg Chem. 2026;178:109936. doi:10.1016/j.bioorg.2026.109936

172. Ruan C, Su K, Zhao D, Lu A, Zhong C. Nanomaterials for tumor hypoxia relief to improve the efficacy of ROS-generated cancer therapy. Front Chem. 2021;9:649158. doi:10.3389/fchem.2021.649158

173. Yang Z, Shi C, Cheng D, et al. Biomimetic nanomaterial-facilitated oxygen generation strategies for enhancing tumour treatment outcomes. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:1007960. doi:10.3389/fbioe.2022.1007960

174. Shao L, Wang X, Du X, et al. Application of multifunctional nanozymes in tumor therapy. ACS Omega. 2024;9(14):15753–15767. doi:10.1021/acsomega.4c00258

175. Zhang H, Sun M, Zhu X, et al. Smart MnO2 nanosheet-copper carbon dot nanoplatform enabling multimodal therapy to reverse hypoxia and reprogram the tumor immune microenvironment. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2026;18(16):23491–23516. doi:10.1021/acsami.5c24938

176. Zheng J, Peng W, Shi H, Zhang J, Hu Q, Chen J. Emerging engineered nanozymes: current status and future perspectives in cancer treatments. Nanoscale Adv. 2025;7(5):1226–1242. doi:10.1039/D4NA00924J

177. Roy S, Shao N, Wei X, et al. NIR-II fluorescent nanoplatforms with defect-regulated piezoelectricity for dual NIR-II/MRI-guided, hypoxia-resilient piezo-chemodynamic therapy and cGAS-STING activation in orthotopic liver tumor. Small;2026. e73808. doi:10.1002/smll.73808

178. Dan Q, Yuan Z, Zheng S, et al. Gold nanoclusters-based NIR-II photosensitizers with catalase-like activity for boosted photodynamic therapy. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(8):1645. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14081645

179. Zhang R, Shen Y, Zhou X, et al. Hypoxia-tropic delivery of nanozymes targeting transferrin receptor 1 for nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy sensitization. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):890. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-56134-z

180. Wang C, Li Y, Yang W, Zhou L, Wei S. Nanozyme with robust catalase activity by multiple mechanisms and its application for hypoxic tumor treatment. Adv Healthcare Mater. 2021;10(19):2100601. doi:10.1002/adhm.202100601

181. Luo M, F-k Z, Y-m W, Bian J. Au@ Pd nanozyme-mediated catalytic therapy: a novel strategy for targeting tumor microenvironment in cancer treatment. J Transl Med. 2024;22(1):814. doi:10.1186/s12967-024-05631-8

182. Li A, Zhao T, Yuan M, et al. Tripartite cascading functions of ultrathin RhMo nanozymes in tumor catalytic therapy. Adv Funct Mater. 2026;36(40):e32065. doi:10.1002/adfm.202532065

183. Wang X, Shu C, Wang G, et al. Recent progress of noble metal-based nanozymes: structure engineering and biomedical applications. Nanoscale. 2025;17:10557–10580.

184. Li X, Wu Y, Zhang R, Bai W, Ye T, Wang S. Oxygen-based nanocarriers to modulate tumor hypoxia for ameliorated anti-tumor therapy: fabrications, properties, and future directions. Front Mol Biosci. 2021;8:683519. doi:10.3389/fmolb.2021.683519

185. Zhang Y, Jin Y, Cui H, Yan X, Fan K. Nanozyme-based catalytic theranostics. RSC Adv. 2020;10(1):10–20. doi:10.1039/C9RA09021E

186. Wei F, Cui X, Wang Z, Dong C, Li J, Han X. Recoverable peroxidase-like Fe3O4@ MoS2-Ag nanozyme with enhanced antibacterial ability. Chem Eng J. 2021;408:127240. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2020.127240

187. Qi R, Cui Y, Liu J, Wang X, Yuan H. Recent advances of composite nanomaterials for antibiofilm application. Nanomaterials. 2023;13(19):2725. doi:10.3390/nano13192725

188. Xu K, Cui Y, Guan B, et al. Nanozymes with biomimetically designed properties for cancer treatment. Nanoscale. 2024;16(16):7786–7824. doi:10.1039/D4NR00155A

189. Alarcon JF, Soliman M, Lüdtke TU, et al. Long-term retention of gold nanoparticles in the liver is not affected by their physicochemical characteristics. Nanoscale. 2023;15(19):8740–8753. doi:10.1039/D3NR00685A

190. Tsang CY, Zhang Y. Nanomaterials for light-mediated therapeutics in deep tissue. Chem Soc Rev. 2024;53(6):2898–2931. doi:10.1039/D3CS00862B

191. Zhurenok AV, Vasilchenko DB, Kozlova EA. Comprehensive review on g-C3N4-based photocatalysts for the photocatalytic hydrogen production under visible light. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;24(1):346. doi:10.3390/ijms24010346

192. Bosio GN, Mártire DO. Carbon nitride nanomaterials with application in photothermal and photodynamic therapies. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. 2022;37:102683. doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2021.102683

193. Sun T, Wang Y, Zhang Z, et al. Photoacoustic-imaging nanomotors enhance tumor penetration and alleviate hypoxia for photodynamic therapy of breast cancer. Biomater Sci. 2025;13(20):5717–5729. doi:10.1039/D5BM01112D

194. Shirmanova MV, Lukina MM, Sirotkina MA, et al. Effects of photodynamic therapy on tumor metabolism and oxygenation revealed by fluorescence and phosphorescence lifetime imaging. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(3):1703. doi:10.3390/ijms25031703

195. Mashayekhi V, Op’t Hoog C, Oliveira S. Vascular targeted photodynamic therapy: a review of the efforts towards molecular targeting of tumor vasculature. J Porphyrins Phthalocyanines. 2019;23(11n12):1229–1240. doi:10.1142/S1088424619300180

196. Liang J, Lai X, Mei Y, et al. Oxygenation: nanotechnological Strategies for Conquering Tumor Hypoxia in Photodynamic Therapy. Int J Nanomed. 2026;21:12475765. doi:10.2147/IJN.S569340

197. Bi S, Deng Z, Huang J, Wen X, Zeng S. NIR-II responsive upconversion nanoprobe with simultaneously enhanced single-band red luminescence and phase/size control for bioimaging and photodynamic therapy. Adv Mater. 2023;35(7):2207038. doi:10.1002/adma.202207038

198. Huang L, Zhao S, Wu J, et al. Photodynamic therapy for hypoxic tumors: advances and perspectives. Coord Chem Rev. 2021;438:213888. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2021.213888

199. Sun W, Cheng Y, Ma X, Jin Z, Zhang Q, Wang G. Photodynamic therapy upregulates expression of HIF-1α and PD-L1 in related pathways and its clinical relevance in non-small-cell lung cancer. Eur J Med Res. 2024;29(1):230. doi:10.1186/s40001-024-01780-0

200. Fulbert C, Stelse-Masson S, Elleaume H, Bulin A-L. Nanoscintillators for X-ray induced PDT: unravelling the complex mechanisms involved. Photodiagn Photodyn Ther. 2023;41:103426. doi:10.1016/j.pdpdt.2023.103426

201. Cline B, Xie J. Nanoscintillator-based X-ray-induced photodynamic therapy. In: Biomedical Engineering Technologies. 2. Springer; 2022:811–822.

202. Sun W, Zhou Z, Pratx G, Chen X, Chen H. Nanoscintillator-mediated X-ray induced photodynamic therapy for deep-seated tumors: from concept to biomedical applications. Theranostics. 2020;10(3):1296. doi:10.7150/thno.41578

203. Zhang G, Guo M, Ma H, Wang J, Zhang X-D. Catalytic nanotechnology of X-ray photodynamics for cancer treatments. Biomater Sci. 2023;11(4):1153–1181. doi:10.1039/D2BM01698B

204. Rajaram J, Kuthati Y. Metal peroxide nanoparticles for modulating the tumor microenvironment: current status and recent prospects. Cancers. 2024;16(21):3581. doi:10.3390/cancers16213581

205. Mbugua SN. Targeting tumor microenvironment by metal peroxide nanoparticles in cancer therapy. Bioinorg Chem Appl. 2022;2022(1):5041399. doi:10.1155/2022/5041399

206. Chu S, Shi X, Tian Y, Gao F. pH-responsive polymer nanomaterials for tumor therapy. Front Oncol. 2022;12:855019. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.855019

207. Hu D, Liang Z, Zhang Y, et al. Metal‒organic frameworks for on-demand drug release and precision drug delivery. One Health Adv. 2025;3(1):34. doi:10.1186/s44280-025-00098-8

208. Hashemzadeh A, Abdulrazzaq Al-hakeem M, Hsu C-Y, et al. Polyphenol-functionalized metal-organic frameworks: a strategic platform for advanced cancer drug delivery and synergistic therapy. Mater Res Bull. 2025;2025:113778.

209. Qiao Y, Yang F, Xie T, et al. Engineered algae: a novel oxygen-generating system for effective treatment of hypoxic cancer. Sci Adv. 2020;6(21):eaba5996. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba5996

210. Huo M, Wang L, Zhang L, Wei C, Chen Y, Shi J. Photosynthetic tumor oxygenation by photosensitizer-containing cyanobacteria for enhanced photodynamic therapy. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2020;59(5):1906–1913. doi:10.1002/anie.201912824

211. Zhang X, Tian X, Wang Y, et al. Application of lipopolysaccharide in establishing inflammatory models. Int J Biol Macromol. 2024;279:135371. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.135371

212. Jin K, Huang Y, Che H, Wu Y. Engineered bacteria for disease diagnosis and treatment using synthetic biology. Microb Biotechnol. 2025;18(1):e70080. doi:10.1111/1751-7915.70080

213. Rottinghaus AG, Ferreiro A, Fishbein SR, Dantas G, Moon TS. Genetically stable CRISPR-based kill switches for engineered microbes. Nat Commun. 2022;13(1):672. doi:10.1038/s41467-022-28163-5

214. Xing H, Li G, Qi C, Zhang M, Ding N, Zhang X. Emerging role of plant-derived nanostructures in nanomedicine. Int J Nanomed. 2025;12715–12731. doi:10.2147/IJN.S547550

215. Pan Y, Liu L, Mou X, Cai Y. Nanomedicine strategies in conquering and utilizing the cancer hypoxia environment. ACS Nano. 2023;17(21):20875–20924. doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c07763

216. Liu J, Li X, Li Y, Gong Q, Luo K. Metformin-based nanomedicines for reprogramming tumor immune microenvironment. Theranostics. 2025;15(3):993. doi:10.7150/thno.104872

217. Zhao Y, Zhu Y, Ding K, Li S, Liu T. Biomimetic nanovesicle co-delivery system impairs energy metabolism for cancer treatment. J Nanobiotechnol. 2023;21(1):299. doi:10.1186/s12951-023-02061-4

218. Wang X, Wang L, Hao Q, Cai M, Wang X, An W. Harnessing glucose metabolism with nanomedicine for cancer treatment. Theranostics. 2024;14(17):6831. doi:10.7150/thno.100036

219. Su J, Wu C, Zou J, et al. Fine-tuning of liposome integrity for differentiated transcytosis and enhanced antitumor efficacy. J Control Release. 2024;372:69–84. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2024.06.025

220. Zhang Z, Zeng W, Guo N, et al. A nanodrug loading indocyanine green and metformin dually alleviating tumor hypoxia for enhanced chemodynamic/sonodynamic therapy. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2025;680:341–355. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2024.11.133

221. Song X, Feng L, Liang C, Gao M, Song G, Liu Z. Liposomes co-loaded with metformin and chlorine6modulate tumor hypoxia during enhanced photodynamic therapy. Nano Res. 2017;10(4):1200–1212. doi:10.1007/s12274-016-1274-8

222. Zhao Y, Lv B, Xue G, Sun Y, Cao J. Smart nanosystem-mediated inhibition of mitochondrial respiration for enhanced phototherapy-induced antitumor immunity. Int J Nanomed. 2023;3443–3457. doi:10.2147/IJN.S413204

223. Dai Y, Tang Y, Jiang W, et al. Biological clock-inspired polymeric micelles for enhanced photoimmunotherapy of hypoxic tumors. Nano Res. 2025;18(9):94907675. doi:10.26599/NR.2025.94907675

224. Gao Y, Li Y, Pan Z, et al. OXPHOS-targeted nanoparticles for boosting photodynamic therapy against hypoxia tumor. Int J Pharm. 2024;654:123943. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.123943

225. Wang S, Zhou X, Zeng Z, et al. Atovaquone-HSA nano-drugs enhance the efficacy of PD-1 blockade immunotherapy by alleviating hypoxic tumor microenvironment. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19(1):302. doi:10.1186/s12951-021-01034-9

226. Zhang Y, Liang L, Li H, et al. Smart multi-functional aggregates reoxygenate tumor microenvironment through a two-pronged strategy to revitalize cancer immunotherapy. Aggregate. 2024;5(4):e545. doi:10.1002/agt2.545

227. Wang Q, Yang T, Li S, et al. Unimolecular self-assembled hemicyanine–oleic acid conjugate acts as a novel succinate dehydrogenase inhibitor to amplify photodynamic therapy and eliminate cancer stem cells. Research. 2023;6:0223. doi:10.34133/research.0223

228. Wen J, Luo Y, Gao H, et al. Mitochondria-targeted nanoplatforms for enhanced photodynamic therapy against hypoxia tumor. J Nanobiotechnol. 2021;19(1):440. doi:10.1186/s12951-021-01196-6

229. Wei X, Han R, Gao Y, et al. Boosting energy deprivation by synchronous interventions of glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation for bioenergetic therapy synergetic with chemodynamic/photothermal therapy. Adv Sci. 2024;11(23):2401738. doi:10.1002/advs.202401738

230. Yin J, Yang S, Liu Z, et al. Regulating tumor metabolic reprogramming with biomimetic co-delivery of simvastatin and kynureninase for immunotherapy. Adv Sci. 2025;13:e08107. doi:10.1002/advs.202508107

231. Jiang S, Li W, Zhang Y, Lin J, Huang P. Oxygen-regulated enzymatic nanoplatform for synchronous intervention in glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation to augment antitumor therapy. J Control Release. 2025;381:113594. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2025.113594

232. Li S, Yang F, Wang Y, Jia L, Hou X. Self-reported and self-facilitated theranostic oxygen nano-economizer for precise and hypoxia alleviation-potentiated photodynamic therapy. Mater Horizons. 2023;10(12):5734–5752. doi:10.1039/D3MH01244A

233. Situ J, Yang Y, Zhang L, Yan H, Cheng Y. Integration of O 2-economised tumour-targeted photosensitive magnetic nanomaterials in the diagnosis and therapy of gastric cancer. RSC Adv. 2024;14(14):9920–9932. doi:10.1039/D4RA00497C

234. Boreel DF, Span PN, Heskamp S, Adema GJ, Bussink J. Targeting oxidative phosphorylation to increase the efficacy of radio-and immune-combination therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(11):2970–2978. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-3913

235. Boreel DF, Beerkens AP, Heskamp S, et al. Inhibition of OXPHOS induces metabolic rewiring and reduces hypoxia in murine tumor models. Clin Transl Radiation Oncol. 2024;49:100875. doi:10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100875

236. Machado ND, Heather LC, Harris AL, Higgins GS. Targeting mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation: lessons, advantages, and opportunities. Br J Cancer. 2023;129(6):897–899. doi:10.1038/s41416-023-02394-9

237. Osman AM, Arabi AA. Targeting mitochondrial complexes for cancer therapy. Biochem Pharmacol. 2026;117695. doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2026.117695

238. Hirst J. Mitochondrial complex I. Annu Rev Biochem. 2013;82(1):551–575. doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-070511-103700

239. Ashton TM, McKenna WG, Kunz-Schughart LA, Higgins GS. Oxidative phosphorylation as an emerging target in cancer therapy. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(11):2482–2490. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3070

240. Schöckel L, Glasauer A, Basit F, et al. Targeting mitochondrial complex I using BAY 87-2243 reduces melanoma tumor growth. Cancer Metabol. 2015;3(1):11. doi:10.1186/s40170-015-0138-0

241. Zhou X, Chen J, Yi G, et al. Metformin suppresses hypoxia-induced stabilization of HIF-1α through reprogramming of oxygen metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget. 2015;7(1):873. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.6418

242. Yang Y, An Y, Ren M, et al. The mechanisms of action of mitochondrial targeting agents in cancer: inhibiting oxidative phosphorylation and inducing apoptosis. Front Pharmacol. 2023;14:1243613. doi:10.3389/fphar.2023.1243613

243. Rodriguez-Berriguete G, Puliyadi R, Machado N, et al. Antitumour effect of the mitochondrial complex III inhibitor Atovaquone in combination with anti-PD-L1 therapy in mouse cancer models. Cell Death Dis. 2024;15(1):32. doi:10.1038/s41419-023-06405-8

244. Ashton TM, Fokas E, Kunz-Schughart LA, et al. The anti-malarial atovaquone increases radiosensitivity by alleviating tumour hypoxia. Nat Commun. 2016;7(1):12308. doi:10.1038/ncomms12308

245. Skwarski M, McGowan DR, Belcher E, et al. Mitochondrial inhibitor atovaquone increases tumor oxygenation and inhibits hypoxic gene expression in patients with non–small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(9):2459–2469. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-20-4128

246. Fiorillo M, Lamb R, Tanowitz HB, et al. Repurposing atovaquone: targeting mitochondrial complex III and OXPHOS to eradicate cancer stem cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7(23):34084. doi:10.18632/oncotarget.9122

247. Mudassar F, Chang C, Ing P, et al. DIPG-09. ATOVAQUONE RADIOSENSITISES DIFFUSE MIDLINE GLIOMAS BY INHIBITING MITOCHONDRIAL METABOLISM AND HYPOXIA. Neuro-Oncology. 2023;25(Suppl 1):i14. doi:10.1093/neuonc/noad073.056

248. Ju M, Yang L, Wang G, et al. A type I and type II chemical biology toolbox to overcome the hypoxic tumour microenvironment for photodynamic therapy. Biomater Sci. 2024;12(11):2831–2840. doi:10.1039/D4BM00319E

249. Sun H, Yang W, Ong Y, Busch TM, Zhu TC. Fractionated photofrin-mediated photodynamic therapy significantly improves long-term survival. Cancers. 2023;15(23):5682. doi:10.3390/cancers15235682

250. Pang B, Wu H. Metabolic reprogramming in colorectal cancer: a review of aerobic glycolysis and its therapeutic implications for targeted treatment strategies. Cell Death Discovery. 2025;11(1):321. doi:10.1038/s41420-025-02623-5

251. Zhao X, Liu D, Li G, Xu W, Wu G. Nanomedicines reshape the tumor microenvironment: multidimensional strategies from modulating “barriers” to metabolic intervention. Int J Nanomed. 2026;2026:1–24.

252. Wise DR, Thompson CB. Glutamine addiction: a new therapeutic target in cancer. Trends Biochem Sci. 2010;35(8):427–433. doi:10.1016/j.tibs.2010.05.003

253. Furukawa T, Tabata S, Minami K, Yamamoto M, Kawahara K, Tanimoto A. Metabolic reprograming of cancer as a therapeutic target. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 2023;1867(3):130301. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2022.130301

254. Xiao Y, Yu T-J, Xu Y, et al. Emerging therapies in cancer metabolism. Cell Metab. 2023;35(8):1283–1303. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2023.07.006

255. Fu X, Zhang H, Liu W, Wu -T-T, Zheng Y-Z. Hypoxia-responsive self-assembled nanoparticles for reprogramming tumor-associated macrophages into an anti-tumor M1 phenotype in breast cancer. Mater Today Bio. 2026;102956. doi:10.1016/j.mtbio.2026.102956

256. Aisu Y, Oshima N, Hyodo F, et al. Dual inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis exerts a synergistic antitumor effect on colorectal and gastric cancer by creating energy depletion and preventing metabolic switch. PLoS One. 2024;19(12):e0309700. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0309700

257. Chen G, Wu K, Li H, Xia D, He T. Role of hypoxia in the tumor microenvironment and targeted therapy. Front Oncol. 2022;12:961637. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.961637

258. Wilson WR, Hay MP. Targeting hypoxia in cancer therapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2011;11(6):393–410. doi:10.1038/nrc3064

259. Fan W, Huang P, Chen X. Overcoming the Achilles’ heel of photodynamic therapy. Chem Soc Rev. 2016;45(23):6488–6519. doi:10.1039/C6CS00616G

260. Li X, Wang H, Li Z, et al. Oxygen switches: refueling for cancer radiotherapy. Front Oncol. 2023;12:1085432. doi:10.3389/fonc.2022.1085432

261. Zou J, Jiang C, Hu Q, et al. Tumor microenvironment-responsive engineered hybrid nanomedicine for photodynamic-immunotherapy via multi-pronged amplification of reactive oxygen species. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):424. doi:10.1038/s41467-024-55658-0

262. Wen M, Chen H, Xu S, et al. Novel drug-free cascaded nanoparticles induce tumor-specific ROS storms via multimodal synergistic anticancer therapy. J Nanobiotechnol. 2025;23(1):1–20. doi:10.1186/s12951-025-03705-3

263. Ding G, Liu S, Yang X, et al. Metabolizable alloy clusters assemble nanoinhibitor for enhanced radiotherapy of tumor by hypoxia alleviation and intracellular PD-L1 restraint. J Nanobiotechnol. 2024;22(1):774. doi:10.1186/s12951-024-03057-4

264. Zhang N, Zhou J, Li S, et al. Advances in nanoplatforms for immunotherapy applications targeting the tumor microenvironment. Mol Pharmaceut. 2024;21(2):410–426. doi:10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00846

265. Phan NM, Nguyen TL, Kim J. Nanozyme-based enhanced cancer immunotherapy. Tissue Eng and Regener Med. 2022;19(2):237–252. doi:10.1007/s13770-022-00430-y

266. Yang B, Chen Y, Shi J. Nanocatalytic medicine. Adv Mater. 2019;31(39):1901778. doi:10.1002/adma.201901778

267. Shi J, Kantoff PW, Wooster R, Farokhzad OC. Cancer nanomedicine: progress, challenges and opportunities. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17(1):20–37. doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.108

268. Lee HS, Yoo S-Y, Lee SM, et al. Hypoxia-alleviating hemoglobin nanoclusters for sensitizing chemo-photodynamic therapy of cervical cancer. Chem Eng J. 2023;457:141224. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2022.141224

269. Kim H, Yoon J, Kim HK, et al. Upconverting nanoparticle-containing erythrocyte-sized hemoglobin microgels that generate heat, oxygen and reactive oxygen species for suppressing hypoxic tumors. Bioact Mater. 2023;22:112–126. doi:10.1016/j.bioactmat.2022.09.020

270. Overchuk M, Weersink RA, Wilson BC, Zheng G. Photodynamic and photothermal therapies: synergy opportunities for nanomedicine. ACS Nano. 2023;17(9):7979–8003. doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c00891

271. Urazaliyeva A, Kanabekova P, Beisenbayev A, et al. All organic nanomedicine for PDT–PTT combination therapy of cancer cells in hypoxia. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):17507. doi:10.1038/s41598-024-68077-4

272. Omidian H, Dey Chowdhury S. Advances in photothermal and photodynamic nanotheranostics for precision cancer treatment. J Nanotheranost. 2024;5(4):228–252. doi:10.3390/jnt5040014

273. Huang T, Wu W, Wu J, et al. Perfluorocarbon nanodrug induced oxygen self-enriching sonodynamic therapy improves cancer immunotherapy after insufficient radiofrequency ablation. Front Immunol. 2023;14:1124152. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2023.1124152

274. Tang Y, Ge L, Zhu D, et al. A tumor microenvironment-responsive self-oxygenating nanoplatform for dual-enhanced cuproptosis and sonodynamic synergistic immunotherapy. ACS nano. 2025;19(45):39228–39240. doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c12847

275. Choi S, Heo JH, Kim Y-S, et al. Engineering multi-functional enzyme-mimetic polyphenol-catalase complex for reversing hypoxia and redox homeostasis in vascular and muscular regeneration. ACS nano. 2025;2025:1.

276. Yuan F, Wang L, Ning L, Zhang J, Guo Y. Gas-mediated reinforcement of cancer therapies: emerging strategies and future perspectives. Chem Sci. 2025;16(43):20108–20123. doi:10.1039/D5SC04798F

277. Ghassemifar V, Zahedi A, Meigoli MSS, et al. Harnessing nanotechnology to modulate hypoxic tumor microenvironments: enhanced strategies for oncological innovations. Biomed Pharmacother. 2025;191:118543. doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2025.118543

278. Chen M, Wang Y, Niu Y, et al. pH-responsive CaCO3 nanoplatform amplifies SDT via calcium overload-ROS loop for deep tumor therapy. Iscience. 2026;29(3):1.

279. Agrahari V, Agrahari V. Facilitating the translation of nanomedicines to a clinical product: challenges and opportunities. Drug Discovery Today. 2018;23(5):974–991. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.01.047

280. Tong F, Wang Y, Gao H. Progress and challenges in the translation of cancer nanomedicines. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2024;85:103045. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2023.103045

Creative Commons License © 2026 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.