Effect of preoperative loading dose ticagrelor and clopidogrel on no-reflow phenomenon during intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors Dai W, Ye Z, Li L, Su Q
Received 13 February 2018
Accepted for publication 2 May 2018
Published 4 July 2018 Volume 2018:12 Pages 2039—2049
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Anastasios Lymperopoulos
Weiran Dai, Ziliang Ye, Lang Li, Qiang Su
Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Guangxi Cardiovascular Institute, Nanning, Guangxi, China
Background: Previous studies have shown that ticagrelor is more effective than clopidogrel in platelet inhibition. However, this conclusion remains controversial. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis to assess the effect of preoperative loading dose ticagrelor and clopidogrel on no-reflow (NRF) during intervention in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI).
Materials and methods: Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were reviewed. The retrieval time was limited from inception to October 1, 2017. The retrieved databases included PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CBM, CNKI, the VIP database, and the Wang Fang database. RevMan 5.3 software was used for data analysis.
Results: Fourteen randomized controlled trials and one observational study, including 4,162 patients, were included. In these articles, 1,521 patients were in the ticagrelor group (180 mg) and 2,641 patients were in the clopidogrel group (600 mg). The meta-analysis showed that compared with clopidogrel group, preoperative loading dose ticagrelor: 1) significantly reduced the incidence of NRF during PPCI (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.15, 0.39, P<0.05) as well as the level of postoperative corrected thrombolysis in myocardial infarction frame count (95% CI: -8.89, -6.91, P<0.05); 2) significantly reduced the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events during hospitalization, including 30 and 180 days after PPCI (95% CI: 0.41, 0.82, P<0.05; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.46, P<0.05, respectively); and 3) significantly improved thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow after PPCI (95% CI: 1.40, 2.45, P<0.05). No significant difference was observed in terms of bleeding events within 30 and 180 days after PPCI (95% CI: 0.71, 1.54, P=0.82; 95% CI: 0.81, 3.19, P=0.18, respectively).
Conclusion: Compared with clopidogrel, loading dose ticagrelor effectively reduced both the occurrence of NRF during PPCI and the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular event in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing PPCI. Furthermore, it did not increase the risk of bleeding after PPCI.
Keywords: ticagrelor, clopidogrel, primary PCI, no-reflow, meta-analysis
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]