Back to Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 15

Drive-by Photoscreening [Letter]

Authors Hunter DG

Received 17 March 2021

Accepted for publication 31 March 2021

Published 8 April 2021 Volume 2021:15 Pages 1443—1444

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S311530

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser


David G Hunter

Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA

Correspondence: David G Hunter Email [email protected]rvard.edu


In their article, “Drive-by Photoscreening,” 1 Keffalos, Martin, and Arnold make impressive, hands-on efforts to modify vision screening devices to enable their continued use during a pandemic. I would like to offer two clarifications.

View the original paper by Keffalos and colleagues

A Response to Letter has been published for this article.


Dear editor

In their article, “Drive-by Photoscreening,”1 Keffalos, Martin, and Arnold make impressive, hands-on efforts to modify vision screening devices to enable their continued use during a pandemic. I would like to offer two clarifications.

First, the authors state that they determined the devices were reliable for detecting amblyopia risk factors after modification, but the results indicate that the accuracy of all 3 devices was reduced compared with published values. This is especially true for the blinq® device. As one of the inventors of the blinq technology, I should point out that the device should not be used with any sort of light shield such as was used; these materials, though black, can reflect infrared light back into the device and confuse the circuitry. Fortunately, the design of blinq allows the patient and operator to stand several feet apart, there is no physical contact with the patient, and the test lasts only 2.5 to at most 10 seconds, thus making it suitable for use during a pandemic as long as proper masking protocols are followed.

Second, the article title refers to “photoscreening,” and even though blinq mirrors photoscreeners as an instrument-based screening test that provides instant results, blinq was not designed to identify amblyopia risk factors such as refractive error (though it can identify most children who have significant refractive errors). Instead, the device conducts a functional binocular test that determines whether a child’s eyes can work together. This test requires good cooperation from children, and recent studies indicate that a child with amblyopia and/or strabismus cannot falsely “pass” a blinq test. Implementing blinq in early childhood, following manufacturer instructions for use, can confirm that a child has achieved the ability to achieve binocular vision and depth perception.

I thank Dr. Arnold and his team at Alaska Blind Child Discovery for their ongoing efforts and for their commitment to implementing safe and effective pediatric vision screening that is available to all children regardless of circumstance.

Disclosure

Dr David G Hunter is a board member for and receives equity from Rebion, Inc. and Luminopia, Inc. In addition, Dr David G Hunter has a US Patent 7,959,292 with royalties paid. The author reports no other conflicts of interest in this communication.

Reference

1. Keffalos M, Martin S, Arnold R. Drive-by photoscreening: plusoptix, 2WIN and blinq amblyopia detection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Ophthalmol. 2021;15:775–782. doi:10.2147/OPTH.S300871

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]