Back to Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 15

Drive-by Photoscreening [Response to Letter]

Authors Arnold R, Keffalos M, Martin S

Received 1 April 2021

Accepted for publication 1 April 2021

Published 9 April 2021 Volume 2021:15 Pages 1463—1464

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S313977


Robert Arnold, 1 Mason Keffalos, 2 Samuel Martin 1

1Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Anchorage, AK, USA; 2Boise State University, Boise, ID, USA

Correspondence: Robert Arnold
Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Alaska Children’s EYE & Strabismus, 3500, Latouche #280, Anchorage, AK, 99508, USA
Tel +1 907561-1917
Fax +1 907563-5373
Email [email protected]


Thank you for the opportunity to respond to the excellent and informative letter by Dr. David Hunter.

For our attempt at Drive by Photoscreening,1 the wire-and-opaque-plastic shielded sufficient ambient light so that blinq could get a reading outdoors, but the performance of blinq suffered compared to conventional indoor use. We surmised this may have been due to the lack of facial view for the aiming beams, but we agree with Dr. Hunter that disruption of infrared light could also have been the culprit.
 
View the original paper by Keffalos and colleagues
 
This is in response to the Letter to the Editor
 

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]