Do frequent moderate exacerbations contribute to progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in patients who are ex-smokers?
Received 27 October 2014
Accepted for publication 16 December 2014
Published 10 March 2015 Volume 2015:10(1) Pages 525—533
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 4
Editor who approved publication: Dr Richard Russell
Jorge Dreyse,1 Orlando Díaz,1 Paula Repetto,2 Arturo Morales,1 Fernando Saldías,1 Carmen Lisboa1
1Department of Pulmonary Diseases, School of Medicine, 2School of Psychology, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
Background: In addition to smoking, acute exacerbations are considered to be a contributing factor to progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, these findings come from studies including active smokers, while results in ex-smokers are scarce and contradictory. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if frequent acute moderate exacerbations are associated with an accelerated decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) and impairment of functional and clinical outcomes in ex-smoking COPD patients.
Methods: A cohort of 100 ex-smoking patients recruited for a 2-year follow-up study was evaluated at inclusion and at 6-monthly scheduled visits while in a stable condition. Evaluation included anthropometry, spirometry, inspiratory capacity, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation, severity of dyspnea, a 6-minute walking test, BODE (Body mass index, airflow Obstruction, Dyspnea, Exercise performance) index, and quality of life (St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire and Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire). Severity of exacerbation was graded as moderate or severe according to health care utilization. Patients were classified as infrequent exacerbators if they had no or one acute exacerbation/year and frequent exacerbators if they had two or more acute exacerbations/year. Random effects modeling, within hierarchical linear modeling, was used for analysis.
Results: During follow-up, 419 (96% moderate) acute exacerbations were registered. At baseline, frequent exacerbators had more severe disease than infrequent exacerbators according to their FEV1 and BODE index, and also showed greater impairment in inspiratory capacity, forced vital capacity, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation, 6-minute walking test, and quality of life. However, no significant difference in FEV1 decline over time was found between the two groups (54.7±13 mL/year versus 85.4±15.9 mL/year in frequent exacerbators and infrequent exacerbators, respectively). This was also the case for all other measurements.
Conclusion: Our results suggest that frequent moderate exacerbations do not contribute to accelerated clinical and functional decline in COPD patients who are ex-smokers.
Keywords: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute exacerbations, disease progression, FEV1, BODE index, health status
Progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) assessed by decline in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is closely related to active tobacco smoking. It has been shown that smoking cessation decelerates the FEV1 decline in patients with mild-to-moderate COPD.1,2 It is also widely assumed that acute exacerbations contribute to disease progression.3 Exacerbations increase respiratory symptoms, impair exercise capacity, and cause a deterioration in quality of life.4,5 However, most studies evaluating the functional and clinical changes associated with an acute exacerbation and its recovery have included current smokers, making it difficult to separate the effects of exacerbations from those of smoking.3–6 Studies in ex-smokers are scarce and have yielded conflicting results.7–9 Analysis of the Lung Health Study data by Kanner et al indicate that acute exacerbations evaluated by self-reported episodes of lower respiratory infections resulting in physician visits during the previous year in ex-smoking patients do not contribute to FEV1 decline, whereas in a follow-up of 102 patients for 3 years, Makris et al reported that acute exacerbations produced a decline in FEV1 in ex-smokers, albeit of a lesser magnitude that in active smokers.
On the other hand, there is no information about the effect of acute exacerbations on patient-centered outcomes in ex-smoking COPD patients. The aim of the present study was to evaluate if frequent acute exacerbations in ex-smoking COPD patients are associated with disease progression by assessing functional and clinical indices over 2 years of follow-up.
Patients and methods
A cohort of 105 consecutive ex-smoking patients with a long history of COPD according to Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria10 was enrolled in a 2-year follow-up study, based on scheduled visits every 6 months. Recruitment criteria included: age older than 40 years; smoking history greater than ten packs/year; cessation of smoking for at least 6 months before recruitment, confirmed by urine cotinine levels; absence of an acute exacerbation in the previous month at least; absence of any physical condition precluding the ability to perform a 6-minute walking test (6MWT); or a short life expectancy. Patients with asthma, bronchiectasis, sequelae of tuberculosis, or known malignancy were excluded. The institutional review board at our institution approved the study, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
For diagnosis of acute exacerbation, the following definition was applied:
A sustained worsening of the patient’s condition from the stable state and beyond normal day-to-day variation that is acute in onset and necessitates a change in regular medication.11
Patients were instructed to contact one of the investigators if they had an acute increase in symptoms (dyspnea, cough, sputum, and/or purulent sputum) for 2 consecutive days with or without symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection or fever and to attend our clinic to confirm the presence of an acute exacerbation.12
Severity of exacerbation was graded according to the health care utilization classification. Thus, exacerbation was considered: mild if it required increases in regular inhaled medication; moderate if courses of antibiotics and/or systemic corticosteroids were needed; and severe if the patient required hospital admission.13
Exacerbations were treated at our facility or at other health institutions. Those exacerbations treated at other institutions were registered during the scheduled visits, and their severity was categorized according to the treatment received using the above classification.
Evaluations were performed at recruitment and at every scheduled visit while patients were in a stable condition. At each visit, assessments included anthropometry, dyspnea, health status, peripheral capillary oxygen saturation (SpO2), lung function, 6MWT, and comorbidities.14
Magnitude of dyspnea was assessed using the modified Medical Research Council scale (mMRC).15 Lung function included spirometric testing and inspiratory capacity before and after 400 μg of albuterol following international guidelines,16 and was standardized as percentages of predicted values by using prediction equations.17,18 Measurements were carried out by the same laboratory personnel and with the same equipment over the 2 years of follow-up. Health status was assessed with two questionnaires, ie, the Spanish version of the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)19 and the Spanish version of the Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ).20 The 6MWT was measured according to current guidelines21 and its values were expressed as a predicted percentage using reference values from Troosters et al.22 The BODE (body mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea, exercise performance) index23 was calculated according to Celli et al. Inhalation therapies were registered at baseline and at each scheduled visit. We considered a drug as being the main therapy if the patients reported its use for at least more than 50% of the follow-up period. Disease progression was assessed by lung function decline and progressive impairment of symptoms, functional capacity (6MWD), health status, and BODE index.
The results are expressed as the mean ± one standard deviation or median and interquartile range in tables and text, and as the mean ± one standard error in figures. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests were used for checking distribution normality. Baseline variables were compared by the Student’s t-test for independent samples, the Mann–Whitney U-test, or chi-square test according to the type of variable and its distribution.
For analyses, patients were grouped into two categories according to the annual rate of total number of exacerbations experienced. Since the median exacerbation frequency for the whole group was two per year, those patients experiencing more than the median annual exacerbation rate (two or more acute exacerbations per year) were termed frequent exacerbators whereas those with less than the median were considered infrequent exacerbators.
Differences in changes across time in functional, clinical, and health status indices between infrequent exacerbators and frequent exacerbators were assessed by linear mixed effects models using hierarchical linear modeling (HLM). Using HLM, we examined patterns of change for all measurements (ie, fixed effects) and if there were variations among individuals in these patterns of change (ie, random effects) based on the frequency of exacerbations (ie, covariate). Baseline values for all measurements were used as intercept, allowing us to examine change from these while controlling for the initial values. For these analyses, we used data for all subjects who had at least two measurements. Although linear and quadratic changes were examined (based on number of measures over time), the simplest pattern of change was selected, ie, the most parsimonious model, for further analyses.
All analyses were conducted with the HLM version 6.08 statistical package (Scientific Software International, Inc., Lincolnwood, IL, USA).
The recruited cohort included 105 patients. Two patients died and another three were lost to follow-up before the first scheduled visit and were consequently excluded from the analyses. During follow-up, seven patients died and four declined to continue in the protocol, mainly due to transport difficulties (Figure 1). Compared with patients who completed the study, these eleven patients were older, had more severe disease according to GOLD criteria and BODE index, and nine reported frequent exacerbations during the year before recruitment. The baseline characteristics of the 100 patients included in the analyses are shown in Table 1.
Figure 1 Follow-up diagram for cohort of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Number, distribution, and severity of exacerbations
During follow-up, 83 patients had 419 exacerbations. Two hundred and fifty-six patients (61%) were seen and treated at our institution, and the remaining 163 (39%) at other institutions. According to the classification employed, exacerbations were moderate (96%) or severe (4%). Thirteen subjects had one hospitalization, one subject had two hospitalizations, and a third subject had three hospitalizations. The number of exacerbations per patient over the 2 years of follow-up was variable (Figure 2). Seventeen patients did not experience an exacerbation, whereas five experienced 14 or more exacerbations during the observation period. Median exacerbation frequency was two and one per year in patients classified as frequent exacerbators and infrequent exacerbators, respectively (P<0.001).
Figure 2 Number of exacerbations per patient.
Characteristics of patients according to frequency of exacerbations
At baseline, patients with frequent exacerbations showed significant differences in the number of acute exacerbations during the previous year, FEV1 % predicted, forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted, inspiratory capacity % predicted, and SpO2, as well as a greater impairment in mMRC, health status (SGRQ and CRQ) and the BODE index, as compared with infrequent exacerbators (see Table 2).
The slopes for all these variables, representing changes over the 2-year follow-up period, were not significantly different between the two groups (Table 3). Thus, FEV1 decreased 57±13 mL/year (1.7% predicted/year) and 85±15.8 mL/year (2.8% predicted/year) in frequent exacerbators and infrequent exacerbators, respectively.
Figure 3 shows lung function indices at baseline and at each scheduled visit in both groups of patients. Over the study period, frequent exacerbators had consistently lower values for inspiratory capacity, FVC, FEV1, and FEV1/FVC than infrequent exacerbators, but changes across time did not differ between the two groups. Similar behavior was observed for functional exercise capacity (6MWT) and health-related quality of life (Figure 4).
Patients with frequent exacerbations were treated more frequently with inhaled corticosteroids, whereas short-acting bronchodilators were used as the main therapy more often by infrequent exacerbators (Table 4).
The main findings of this prospective observational study in patients with COPD who had quit smoking and were followed up for 2 years are: frequent moderate exacerbations did not accelerate the decline in FEV1 nor worsen other functional indices as compared with infrequent exacerbations, and there were no significant differences in patient-centered outcomes over time between the two groups. Our results also confirm that exacerbations are more frequent in patients with more severe disease and that previous history of exacerbations is a predictor of frequent exacerbations.24
To our knowledge, this is the first study performed solely in ex-smoking COPD patients that included several clinical indices in addition to lung function to evaluate the effect of exacerbations on disease progression. Our findings are consistent with results reported in other studies, where no significant differences were found in the FEV1 decline between frequent and infrequent exacerbators.4,7,9,25,26 Some of these studies included current smokers.4,25,26 Two studies have previously assessed the effects of exacerbations on FEV1 decline in ex-smokers, with conflicting results.7,9 Kanner et al performed a secondary analysis of the Lung Health Study and found that, in intermittent and continuous smokers, frequent lower respiratory infections were associated with a greater 5-year averaged annual rate of FEV1 loss (−52 mL/year and −69 mL/year, respectively) than in sustained quitters (−12 mL/year). Makris et al evaluated the effect of acute exacerbations in current and ex-smokers during a 3-year prospective study including 58 ex-smokers and 44 current smokers. The FEV1 decline was greater in current smokers than in ex-smokers.
Our results are in agreement with those of the ex-smoker group reported by Kanner et al but differed from those reported by Makris et al. This may be explained by differences between the present study and the study by Makris et al with regard to the number of ex-smoking patients (100 versus 58, respectively) and length of follow-up (2 versus 3 years, respectively), but mainly in the annual rate of hospitalizations (0.10 versus 0.35 per year, respectively), indicating more severe exacerbations in their study.
The effect of exacerbations on decline in lung function has not been clearly established. The role of exacerbation frequency in FEV1 decline is largely based on findings of studies that have included active smokers.3–6 Even so, differences in FEV1 decline between frequent exacerbators and infrequent exacerbators have been small: 8 mL/year was reported by Donaldson et al in a group of 32 patients followed for 4 years and, according to Makris et al frequent exacerbations added −1.4% predicted/year to FEV1 decline.
In the present study, which included only ex-smoking patients, the decline in FEV1, although not significant, was smaller in frequent exacerbators (54.7 mL/year) than in infrequent exacerbators (85.4 mL/year). This unexpected nonsignificant faster decline in infrequent exacerbators could be explained by their higher baseline FEV1 value, in agreement with previous data from Casanova et al.27 It is also consistent with the findings from the analysis of data obtained from the placebo arms of several recent clinical series by Tantucci and Modena,28 which showed that “the loss of lung function, assessed as expiratory airflow reduction, seems more accelerated and therefore more relevant in the initial phases of COPD”. Other possible explanations for the lack of a more rapid FEV1 decline in frequent exacerbators are frequent treatment with systemic corticosteroids due to acute exacerbations as well as more regular use of inhaled corticosteroids than in infrequent exacerbators. Moreover, the effects of acute exacerbations on FEV1 decline are difficult to assess due to the heterogeneity of the patient behavior over time. Several recent studies, independent of the frequency of exacerbations, show a heterogeneous FEV1 decline in COPD.29–31 According to these studies, FEV1 may remain stable in some patients, increase in others, or experience a slow or accelerated decline. Accelerated FEV1 decline was associated with a high baseline FEV1, low body mass index, active smoking, bronchodilator reversibility, and greater magnitude of emphysema. Our results confirm the heterogeneous FEV1 decline reported by these authors, independently of the frequency of exacerbations.29–31
In addition to the lack of effect of acute exacerbations on FEV1 decline, the present results also demonstrate no effects on other physiological or clinical outcomes in ex-smoking COPD patients. To our knowledge, the effects of exacerbations on patient-centered outcomes in ex-smoking COPD patients have not been previously assessed. The few data available derive from the study by Cote et al4 in a cohort of 205 patients (95% men), including active smokers, who were followed for 2 years after their first acute exacerbation. Although no significant changes in FEV1 decline were observed, they found a significant deterioration of mMRC, 6MWT, and BODE index in their frequent exacerbators. In addition to differences in cohort characteristics, our results differ from theirs in the percentage of patients who required hospital admissions. Fifty of their patients with frequent acute exacerbations were hospitalized, of whom 39% required one hospitalization, 35% required two hospitalizations, and 26% required three or more hospitalizations. In our cohort, 13 patients required hospitalization and only four of them required a second hospitalization. As it is known that severe acute exacerbations contribute to deterioration and mortality in COPD patients,32 the greater number of patients and hospital admissions reported by Cote et al4 may explain the clinical deterioration of their patients.
The most advanced therapy (long-acting muscarinic antagonist + long-acting beta-2 agonists + inhaled corticosteroids), mostly received by the frequent exacerbators given their greater COPD severity, could partly explain the lack of significant differences in the measured indices.
Our study has some limitations: the sample size was relatively small; most exacerbations were moderate and treated in an outpatient setting; severe exacerbations, which are known to contribute to mortality and hospitalization, were infrequent; no mild acute exacerbations, ie, those needing only an increase in bronchodilator therapy, were registered, probably because they resolved without medical assistance; and follow-up was relatively short. However, we believe that these limitations do not affect our main findings, indicating no effect of moderate acute exacerbations on FEV1 decline or clinical progression of COPD in ex-smokers.
In summary, our findings suggest that acute moderate exacerbations in ex-smoking patients do not contribute to COPD progression assessed by FEV1 decline and by the BODE index during a follow-up of 2 years. They also confirm that changes in FEV1 over time are heterogeneous independent of exacerbation frequency. Although patients with frequent exacerbations had greater baseline impairment of functional and clinical indices than those with infrequent acute exacerbations, their parameters behaved similarly over time. Replication of these findings may help us to better understand how the effects of frequency of exacerbations among ex-smoking COPD patients impacts their disease behavior.
This work was funded by a grant from FONDECYT (1085268).
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
Fletcher C, Peto R. The natural history of chronic airflow obstruction. BMJ. 1977;1(6077):1645–1648.
Anthonisen NR, Connett JE, Murray RP. Smoking and lung function of Lung Health Study participants after 11 years. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(5):675–679.
Donaldson GC, Seemungal TA, Bhowmik A, Wedzicha JA. Relationship between exacerbation frequency and lung function decline in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2002;57(10):847–852.
Cote CG, Doderlly LJ, Celli BR. Impact of COPD exacerbations on patient-centered outcomes. Chest. 2007;131(3):696–704.
Seemungal TA, Donaldson GC, Paul EA, Bestall JC, Jeffries DJ, Wedzicha JA. Effect of exacerbations on quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;157(5 Pt 1):1418–1422.
Halpin DMG, Decramer M, Celli BR, Kesten S, Liu D, Tashkin DP. Exacerbation frequency and course of COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:653–661.
Kanner RE, Anthonisen NR, Connet JE; for the Lung Health Study Research Group. Lower respiratory illnesses promote FEV1 decline in current smokers but not ex-smokers with mild chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Results from the Lung Health Study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164(3):358–364.
Silverman EK. Exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Do they contribute to disease progression? Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2007;4(8):586–590.
Makris D, Moschandreas J, Damaniaki A, et al. Exacerbations and lung function decline in COPD: new insights in current and ex-smokers. Respir Med. 2007;101(6):1305–1312.
Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management and prevention of chronic obstructive lung disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2007;176(6):532–555.
Rodríguez-Roisin R. Towards a consensus definition for COPD exacerbations. Chest. 2000;117(5 Suppl 2):398S–401S.
Anthonisen NR, Manfreda J, Warren CPW, Hershfield ES, Harding GKM, Nelson NA. Antibiotic therapy in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med. 1987;106(2):196–204.
Wedzicha JA, Seemungal T. COPD exacerbations: defining their cause and prevention. Lancet. 2007;370(9589):786–796.
Charlson M, Szatrowski TP, Peterson J, Gold J. Validation of a combined comorbidity index. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47(11):1245–1251.
Mahler D, Wells C. Evaluation of clinical methods for rating dyspnea. Chest. 1988;93(3):580–586.
Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, et al. Standardization of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005;26(2):319–338.
Hankinson JL, Odencrantz JR, Fedan KB. Spirometric reference values from a sample of the general U.S population. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;159(1):179–187.
Lisboa C, Leiva A, Pinochet R, Repetto P, Borzone G, Diaz O. [Valores de referencia de la capacidad inspiratoria en sujetos sanos no fumadores mayores de 50 años]. Arch Bronconeumol. 2007;43(9):485–489. Spanish.
Quirk FH, Jones PW, Baveystock CM, Littlejohns P. A self complete measure for chronic airflow limitation: the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1992;145(6):1321–1327.
Williams JE, Singh SJ, Sewell L, Guyatt GH, Morgan MD. Development of a self-reported chronic respiratory questionnaire (CRQ-SR). Thorax. 2001;56(12):954–959.
ATS Committee on Proficiency Standards for Clinical Pulmonary Function Laboratories. American Thoracic Society Statement. Guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;166(1):111–117.
Troosters T, Gosselink S, Decramer M. Six minute walking distance in healthy elderly subjects. Eur Respir J. 1999;14(2):270–274.
Celli BR, Cote CG, Marin JM, et al. The body-mass index, airflow obstruction, dyspnea and exercise capacity index in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2004;350(10):1005–1012.
Hurst JR, Vestbo J, Anzueto A, et al; for the Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) Investigators. Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(12):1128–1138.
Miratvilles M. Ferrer M, Pont A, et al. Effect of exacerbations on quality of life in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a 2 years follow up study. Thorax. 2004;59(5):387–395.
Spencer S, Calverley PMA, Burge PS, Jones PW. Impact of preventing exacerbations on deterioration of health status in COPD. Eur Respir J. 2004;23(5):698–702.
Casanova C, Cote CG, Marin JM, et al. The six-minute walk distance: long term follow up in patients with COPD. Eur Respir J. 2007;29(3):535–540.
Tantucci C, Modena D. Lung function decline in COPD. Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2012;7:95–99.
Casanova C, de Torres JP, Aguirre-Jaime A, et al. The progression of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is heterogeneous. The experience of the BODE cohort. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;184(9):1015–1021.
Vestbo J, Edwards LD, Scanlon PD, et al; for the ECLIPSE Investigators. Changes in forced expiratory volume in 1 second over time in COPD. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(13):1184–1192.
Nishimura M, Makita H, Nagai K, et al; for the Hokkaido COPD Cohort Study Investigators. Annual change in pulmonary function and clinical phenotype in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;185(1):44–52.
Soler-Cataluña JJ, Martínez-García MA, Román Sanchez P, Salcedo E, Navarro M, Ochando R. Severe acute exacerbation and mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Thorax. 2005;60(11):925–931.
© 2015 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.