Standard Gamble to Derive Utility Health States for Limbal Stem Cell Deficiency
Received 29 February 2020
Accepted for publication 31 July 2020
Published 15 September 2020 Volume 2020:12 Pages 535—546
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Dean Smith
Adam B Smith, Jenny Retzler, Matthew J Taylor
York Health Economics Consortium Ltd, University of York, York YO10 5NQ, UK
Correspondence: Adam B Smith
York Health Economics Consortium Ltd., Enterprise House, Innovation Way, University of York, York YO10 5NQ, United Kingdom
Tel +44 1904 363220
Fax +44 1904 323628
Purpose: To generate UK health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) data for adult patients with moderate-to-severe limbal stem cell deficiency (LSCD), unilateral or bilateral, due to physical or chemical ocular burns to help inform economic evaluations of treatments.
Patients and Methods: EQ-5D-3L with vision bolt-on scores was prospectively measured for one of five clinical scenarios of LSCD described in vignettes in a demographically representative population of 520 UK adults. These were converted to health state utilities using three different UK value sets. A standard gamble (SG) was then undertaken using 12 SG scenarios to examine the component drivers of health utility for the treatment of LSCD.
Results: For the EQ-5D-3L scenarios, the mean disutility for LSCD with poor visual acuity, pain and disfigurement in both eyes compared to one eye was − 0.084 (range=− 0.156 to − 0.045 across the value sets). The mean disutility of bilateral LSCD with pain, disfigurement, and poor visual acuity compared to unilateral LSCD with only poor visual acuity in one eye was − 0.104 (range=− 0.151 to − 0.078). Similarly, where one eye was affected, pain and disfigurement in combination were associated with a greater mean disutility than improvements in visual acuity alone: − 0.011 (range=− 0.04 to 0.005). Mean SG utilities were within a narrow range (0.682– 0.765). Where one eye was affected, the main driver was disfigurement: mean utility was 0.731 (0.709– 0.753) compared to 0.682 (0.659– 0.704) when disfigurement was removed compared to vision restored to normal. For bilateral LSCD, mean utilities were 0.693 (0.672– 0.715) for normal vision and 0.75 (0.73– 0.771) when disfigurement and pain were removed.
Conclusion: Improvements in pain and disfigurement appeared to be the main factors driving differences in health utilities associated with symptom profiles in LSCD, with improvements in visual acuity having lesser impact.
Keywords: standard gamble, utility states, limbal stem cell deficiency, LSCD, ocular burns, holoclar®
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]