Annular closure device lowers reoperation risk 4 years after lumbar discectomy
Received 20 June 2019
Accepted for publication 17 August 2019
Published 4 September 2019 Volume 2019:12 Pages 327—335
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Cristina Weinberg
Peer reviewer comments 3
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Dharmin Nanda1, Mark P Arts2, Larry E Miller3, Hans-Peter Köhler4, Jason M Perrin5, Charlotte Flüh6, Peter Vajkoczy7
1Department of Neurosurgery, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands; 2Department of Neurosurgery, Haaglanden Medical Center Westeinde, The Hague, the Netherlands; 3Miller Scientific Consulting, Inc., Asheville, NC, USA; 4Department of Neurosurgery, Asklepios Westklinikum Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany; 5Department of Neurosurgery, University Clinic Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany; 6Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany; 7Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
Correspondence: Dharmin Nanda
Department of Neurosurgery, Isala Klinieken, Dokter van Heesweg 2, AB Zwolle 8025, The Netherlands
Tel +31 038 424 5000
Objective: To determine whether implanting an annular closure device (ACD) following a lumbar discectomy procedure in patients with large defects in the annulus fibrosus lowers the risk of reoperation after 4 years.
Methods: In a multicenter randomized trial, patients with large annular defects following single-level lumbar discectomy were intraoperatively randomized to additionally receive an ACD or no treatment (Controls). Clinical and imaging follow-up were performed at routine intervals over 4 years of follow-up. Main outcomes included reoperations at the treated lumbar level, leg pain scores on a visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) scores from the SF-36 questionnaire.
Results: Among 550 patients (ACD 272, Control 278), the risk of reoperation over 4 years was 14.4% with ACD and 21.1% with Controls (P=0.03). The reduction in reoperation risk with ACD was not significantly influenced by patient age (P=0.51), sex (P=0.34), body mass index (P=0.21), smoking status (P=0.85), level of herniation (P=0.26), leg pain severity at baseline (P=0.90), or ODI at baseline (P=0.54). All patient-reported outcomes improved in each group from baseline to 4 years (all P<0.001). The percentage of patients who achieved the minimal clinically important difference without a reoperation was proportionally higher in the ACD group compared to Controls for leg pain (P=0.07), ODI (P=0.10), PCS (P=0.02), and MCS (P=0.06).
Conclusion: The addition of a bone-anchored ACD following lumbar discectomy in patients with large post-surgical annular defects reduces the risk of reoperation and provides better long-term pain and disability relief over 4 years compared to lumbar discectomy only.
Keywords: annular closure device, annulus fibrosus, disc herniation, lumbar discectomy, randomized controlled trial, reoperation, sciatica
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]