Back to Browse Journals » Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry » Volume 4

Affinity of estrogens for human progesterone receptor A and B monomers and risk of breast cancer: a comparative molecular modeling study

Authors Tarique N Hasan, Leena Grace B, Tariq A Masoodi, et al

Published 8 March 2011 Volume 2011:4 Pages 29—36


Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Tarique N Hasan1,4, Leena Grace B2, Tariq A Masoodi3,5, Gowhar Shafi4 , Ali A. Alshatwi4, P Sivashanmugham3
1Department of Biotechnology, Bharathiar University, Coimbator, TN, India; 2Department of Biotechnology, V. M. K. V. College of Engineering, Salem, TN, India; 3Department of Bioinformatics, Jamal Mohammed College, Bharathidasan University, Tiruchirappalli, India; 4Molecular Cancer Biology Laboratory, Department of Food Science and Nutrition, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences; 5Department of Community Health Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Saudi Arabia

Background: The human progesterone receptor (hPR) belongs to the steroid receptor family. It may be found as monomers (A and B) and or as a dimer (AB). hPR is regarded as the prognostic biomarker for breast cancer. In a cellular dimer system, AB is the dominant species in most cases. However, when a cell coexpresses all three isoforms of hPR, the complexity of the action of this receptor increases. For example, hPR A suppresses the activity of hPR B, and the ratio of hPR A to hPR B may determine the physiology of a breast tumor. Also, persistent exposure of hPRs to nonendogenous ligands is a common risk factor for breast cancer. Hence we aimed to study progesterone and some nonendogenous ligand interactions with hPRs and their molecular docking.
Methods and results: A pool of steroid derivatives, namely, progesterone, cholesterol, testosterone, testolectone, estradiol, estrone, norethindrone, exemestane, and norgestrel, was used for this in silico study. Dockings were performed on AutoDock 4.2. We found that estrogens, including estradiol and estrone, had a higher affinity for hPR A and B monomers in comparison with the dimer, hPR AB, and that of the endogenous progesterone ligand. hPR A had a higher affinity to all the docked ligands than hPR B.
Conclusion: This study suggests that the exposure of estrogens to hPR A as well as hPR B, and more particularly to hPR A alone, is a risk factor for breast cancer.

Keywords: human progesterone receptor, breast cancer, steroid derivatives, estrogens, molecular docking

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML] 


Readers of this article also read:

Misophonia: current perspectives

Cavanna AE, Seri S

Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 2015, 11:2117-2123

Published Date: 18 August 2015

Targeted tumor imaging of anti-CD20-polymeric nanoparticles developed for the diagnosis of B-cell malignancies

Capolla S, Garrovo C, Zorzet S, Lorenzon A, Rampazzo E, Spretz R, Pozzato G, Núñez L, Tripodo C, Macor P, Biffi S

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2015, 10:4099-4109

Published Date: 22 June 2015

Silica nanoparticles increase human adipose tissue-derived stem cell proliferation through ERK1/2 activation

Kim KJ, Joe YA, Kim MK, Lee SJ, Ryu YH, Cho DW, Rhie JW

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2015, 10:2261-2272

Published Date: 24 March 2015

LifePrint: a novel k-tuple distance method for construction of phylogenetic trees

Fabián Reyes-Prieto, Adda J García-Chéquer, Hueman Jaimes-Díaz, et al

Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry 2011, 4:13-27

Published Date: 20 January 2011

Construction of random perfect phylogeny matrix

Mehdi Sadeghi, Hamid Pezeshk, Changiz Eslahchi, et al

Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry 2010, 3:89-96

Published Date: 16 November 2010

Insights into the classification of small GTPases

Dominik Heider, Sascha Hauke, Martin Pyka, et al

Advances and Applications in Bioinformatics and Chemistry 2010, 3:15-24

Published Date: 21 May 2010