Back to Journals » Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy » Volume 8

A systematic review and meta-analysis of Harmonic technology compared with conventional techniques in mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery with lymphadenectomy for breast cancer

Authors Cheng H, Clymer J, Ferko N, Patel L, Soleas IM, Cameron CG, Hinoul P

Received 13 April 2016

Accepted for publication 26 May 2016

Published 18 July 2016 Volume 2016:8 Pages 125—140

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/BCTT.S110461

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Lucy Goodman

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Professor Pranela Rameshwar

Hang Cheng,1 Jeffrey W Clymer,1 Nicole C Ferko,2 Leena Patel,2 Ireena M Soleas,2 Chris G Cameron,2 Piet Hinoul1

1Ethicon Inc., Cincinnati, OH, USA; 2Cornerstone Research Group, Burlington, ON, Canada

Background: Mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) are important treatment options for breast cancer patients. A previous meta-analysis demonstrated that the risk of certain complications can be reduced with the Harmonic technology compared with conventional methods in mastectomy. However, the meta-analysis did not include studies of BCS patients and focused on a subset of surgical complications. The objective of this study was to compare Harmonic technology and conventional techniques for a range of clinical outcomes and complications in both mastectomy and BCS patients, including axillary lymph node dissection.
Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed for randomized controlled trials comparing Harmonic technology and conventional methods in breast cancer surgery. Outcome measures included blood loss, drainage volume, total complications, seroma, necrosis, wound infections, ecchymosis, hematoma, hospital length of stay, and operating time. Risk of bias was analyzed for all studies. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects models for mean differences of continuous variables and a fixed-effects model for risk ratios of dichotomous variables.
Results: Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria. Across surgery types, compared to conventional techniques, Harmonic technology reduced total complications by 52% (P=0.002), seroma by 46% (P<0.0001), necrosis by 49% (P=0.04), postoperative chest wall drainage by 46% (P=0.0005), blood loss by 38% (P=0.0005), and length of stay by 22% (P=0.007). Although benefits generally appeared greatest in mastectomy patients with lymph node dissection, ­Harmonic technology showed significant reductions in complications in the BCS study subgroup.
Conclusion: In this meta-analysis of both mastectomy and BCS procedures, the use of ­Harmonic technology reduced the risk of most complications by about half across breast cancer surgery patients. These benefits may be due to superior hemostatic capabilities of Harmonic technology and better dissection, particularly lymph node dissection. Reduction in complications and other resource outcomes may engender lower downstream health care costs.

Keywords: dissection, complications, ultrasonic

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]

 

Other articles by this author:

An in vivo comparison of the efficacy of hemostatic powders, using two porcine bleeding models

MacDonald MH, Wang AY, Clymer JW, Hutchinson RW, Kocharian R

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 2017, 10:273-279

Published Date: 30 November 2017

Ex vivo and in vivo evaluation of an ultrasonic device for precise dissection, coagulation, and transection

Bertke BD, Scoggins PJ, Welling AL, Widenhouse TV, Chen C, Kallakuri S, Cavanaugh JM, Clymer JW, Amaral JF

Open Access Surgery 2015, 8:1-7

Published Date: 18 December 2014

Sealing vessels up to 7 mm in diameter solely with ultrasonic technology

Timm RW, Asher RM, Tellio KR, Welling AL, Clymer JW, Amaral JF

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 2014, 7:263-271

Published Date: 30 July 2014

Tissue effects in vessel sealing and transection from an ultrasonic device with more intelligent control of energy delivery

Broughton D, Welling AL, Monroe EH, Pirozzi K, Schulte JB, Clymer JW

Medical Devices: Evidence and Research 2013, 6:151-154

Published Date: 16 September 2013

Comparison of two ultrasonic coagulating shears in sealing pulmonary vessels

Raghavan D, Howington JA, Broughton D, Henderson CE, Clymer JW

Open Access Surgery 2013, 6:15-21

Published Date: 21 March 2013