Back to Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 5

Visual perception changes and optical stability after intracorneal ring segment implantation: comparison between 3 months and 1 year after surgery

Authors Paranhos J, Pereira Avila, Paranhos Jr, Schor

Published 29 July 2011 Volume 2011:5 Pages 1057—1062

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S23147

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 2


Juliane de Freitas Santos Paranhos, Marcos Pereira Ávila, Augusto Paranhos Jr, Paulo Schor
Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Purpose: To prospectively evaluate intracorneal ring segment (ICRS) implantation on quality of life (QoL) of patients with keratoconus changes and identify factors responsible.
Methods: Sixty-nine eyes of 42 keratoconus patients were implanted with the Keraring (Mediphacos, Belo Horizonte, Brazil). Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refraction, and steep keratometry were analyzed 3 months and 1 year after surgery. All patients self-administered the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of life instrument at 2 time points: after having worn best correction for at least 30 days since evaluation (mean 4 months after surgery) and 1 year after surgery. To analyze if the use of the appropriate correction at 1 year follow up had any impact on visual acuity and V-QoL, patients were divided into 2 groups: group A (appropriate correction) and B (not appropriate correction).
Results: After 1 year, QoL changes related to scales ‘clarity of vision’, ‘near vision’, and ‘far vision’. Keratometric values, sphere, and spherical equivalent did not differ significantly between 3 months and 1 year postoperative. Cylinder increase was statistically but not clinically significant. Binocular BCVA did not change 1 year after surgery in group A and showed a clinically significant impairment in group B. A year after surgery, 18 patients did not use correction suggested by a physician 3 months after surgery. QoL was not statistically different 1 year after surgery between group A and group B.
Conclusion: Our findings show that the way keratoconic patients see is difficult to analyze using only quantitative and 1-visit metrics. They highlight the importance of patients’ self perception and performing longitudinal analysis to consider neural compensation to optical changes from surgery.

Keywords: keratoconus, cornea, quality of life
 

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]