Back to Journals » Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management » Volume 4 » Issue 2

Update on local anesthetics: focus on levobupivacaine

Authors Crina L Burlacu, Donal J Buggy

Published 11 April 2008 Volume 2008:4(2) Pages 381—392

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S1433

Crina L Burlacu, Donal J Buggy

Department of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Mater Misericordiae, University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland

Abstract: In recent years levobupivacaine, the pure S (−)-enantiomer of bupivacaine, emerged as a safer alternative for regional anesthesia than its racemic parent. It demonstrated less affinity and strength of depressant effects onto myocardial and central nervous vital centers in pharmacodynamic studies, and a superior pharmacokinetic profile. Clinically, levobupivacaine is well tolerated in a variety of regional anesthesia techniques both after bolus administration and continuous postoperative infusion. Reports of toxicity with levobupivacaine are scarce and occasional toxic symptoms are usually reversible with minimal treatment with no fatal outcome. Yet, levobupivacaine has not entirely replaced bupivacaine in clinical practice. In anesthesia and analgesia practice, levobupivacaine and bupivacaine produce comparable surgical sensory block with similar adverse side effects, and equal labor pain control with comparable maternal and fetal outcome. The equipotency of the two drugs has been recently questioned, prompting clinicians to increase the dose of levobupivacaine in an attempt to ensure adequate anesthesia and analgesia and offsetting, therefore, the advantages of less motor block with levobupivacaine. In this review we aim to discuss the pharmacological essentials of the safer profile of levobupivacaine, and analyze the evidence regarding the current clinical indications.

Keywords: regional anesthesia, levobupivacaine, pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, therapeutic use

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF] 

 

Readers of this article also read:

Methotrexate diethyl ester-loaded lipid-core nanocapsules in aqueous solution increased antineoplastic effects in resistant breast cancer cell line

Yurgel VC, Oliveira CP, Begnini KR, Schultze E, Thurow HS, Leon PMM, Dellagostin OA, Campos VF, Beck RC, Guterres SS, Collares T, Pohlmann AR, Seixas FK

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1583-1591

Published Date: 25 March 2014

Ocular findings in two siblings with Joubert syndrome

Makino S, Tampo H

Clinical Ophthalmology 2014, 8:229-233

Published Date: 15 January 2014

Docetaxel in the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

Alexander Rapidis, Nicholas Sarlis, Jean-Louis Lefebvre, Merrill Kies

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2008, 4:865-886

Published Date: 10 October 2008

Guar gum and similar soluble fibers in the regulation of cholesterol metabolism: Current understandings and future research priorities

Todd C Rideout, Scott V Harding, Peter JH Jones, Ming Z Fan

Vascular Health and Risk Management 2008, 4:1023-1033

Published Date: 10 October 2008

Pharmacological management of acute bronchiolitis

Melvin Wright, Charles J Mullett, Giovanni Piedimonte

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2008, 4:895-903

Published Date: 10 October 2008

Editorial  ||FREE PAPER||

Garry M Walsh

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2008, 4:0-0

Published Date: 6 June 2008

Darbepoetin alpha in the treatment of cancer chemotherapy-induced anemia

Alberto Grossi, Francesca Balestri, Simone Santini

Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 2007, 3:269-275

Published Date: 15 May 2007