Back to Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 11

Trifocal intraocular lenses: a comparison of the visual performance and quality of vision provided by two different lens designs

Authors Gundersen KG, Potvin R

Received 5 March 2017

Accepted for publication 11 May 2017

Published 8 June 2017 Volume 2017:11 Pages 1081—1087

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S136164

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Amy Norman

Peer reviewer comments 4

Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser

Kjell G Gundersen,1 Rick Potvin2

1IFocus Øyeklinikk AS, Haugesund, Norway; 2Science in Vision, Akron, NY, USA

Purpose: To compare two different diffractive trifocal intraocular lens (IOL) designs, evaluating longer-term refractive outcomes, visual acuity (VA) at various distances, low contrast VA and quality of vision.
Patients and methods: Patients with binocularly implanted trifocal IOLs of two different designs (FineVision [FV] and Panoptix [PX]) were evaluated 6 months to 2 years after surgery. Best distance-corrected and uncorrected VA were tested at distance (4 m), intermediate (80 and 60 cm) and near (40 cm). A binocular defocus curve was collected with the subject’s best distance correction in place. The preferred reading distance was determined along with the VA at that distance. Low contrast VA at distance was also measured. Quality of vision was measured with the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire near subset and the Quality of Vision questionnaire.
Results: Thirty subjects in each group were successfully recruited. The binocular defocus curves differed only at vergences of −1.0 D (FV better, P=0.02), −1.5 and −2.00 D (PX better, P<0.01 for both). Best distance-corrected and uncorrected binocular vision were significantly better for the PX lens at 60 cm (P<0.01) with no significant differences at other distances. The preferred reading distance was between 42 and 43 cm for both lenses, with the VA at the preferred reading distance slightly better with the PX lens (P=0.04). There were no statistically significant differences by lens for low contrast VA (P=0.1) or for quality of vision measures (P>0.3).
Conclusion: Both trifocal lenses provided excellent distance, intermediate and near vision, but several measures indicated that the PX lens provided better intermediate vision at 60 cm. This may be important to users of tablets and other handheld devices. Quality of vision appeared similar between the two lens designs.

Keywords:
FineVision, Panoptix, multifocal, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]

 

Other articles by this author:

Toric intraocular lens orientation and residual refractive astigmatism: an analysis

Potvin R, Kramer BA, Hardten DR, Berdahl JP

Clinical Ophthalmology 2016, 10:1829-1836

Published Date: 20 September 2016

Retreatments after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: an analysis

Gundersen KG, Makari S, Ostenstad S, Potvin R

Clinical Ophthalmology 2016, 10:365-371

Published Date: 1 March 2016

Tear film osmolarity and dry eye disease: a review of the literature

Potvin R, Makari S, Rapuano CJ

Clinical Ophthalmology 2015, 9:2039-2047

Published Date: 2 November 2015

Cataract surgery and methods of wound closure: a review

Matossian C, Makari S, Potvin R

Clinical Ophthalmology 2015, 9:921-928

Published Date: 22 May 2015

A survey of potential and previous cataract-surgery patients: what the ophthalmologist should know

Henderson BA, Solomon K, Masket S, Potvin R, Holland EJ, Cionni R, Sandoval H

Clinical Ophthalmology 2014, 8:1595-1602

Published Date: 25 August 2014

Comparative visual performance with monofocal and multifocal intraocular lenses

Gundersen KG, Potvin R

Clinical Ophthalmology 2013, 7:1979-1985

Published Date: 7 October 2013