Back to Journals » Patient Preference and Adherence » Volume 5

Treatment discontinuation and clinical outcomes in the 1-year naturalistic treatment of patients with schizophrenia at risk of treatment nonadherence

Authors Kelin K, Lambert TJR, Brnabic AJM, Newton R, Ye W, Escamilla RI, Chen KP, Don L, Montgomery W, Karagianis J, Ascher-Svanum H

Published 9 May 2011 Volume 2011:5 Pages 213—222

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S16800

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 2

Katarina Kelin1, Timothy JR Lambert2, Alan JM Brnabic3, Richard Newton4, Wendy Ye3, Raúl I Escamilla5, Kuang-Peng Chen6, Liana Don7, William Montgomery1, Jamie Karagianis8, Haya Ascher-Svanum9
1Eli Lilly Australia Pty Ltd, West Ryde, NSW, Australia; 2Discipline of Psychiatry, Brain and Mind Research Institute, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia; 3Intercontinental Information Sciences, Eli Lilly Australia Pty Ltd, Macquarie Park, NSW, Australia; 4Peninsula Health Psychiatric Services, Frankston Hospital, Frankston, VIC, Australia (current affiliation: Department of Psychiatry, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia); 5Schizophrenia Clinic, National Institute of Psychiatry, Mexico City, Mexico; 6Department of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital, Yun-Lin, Taiwan; 7Department of Psychiatry, University of Medicine Iuliu Hatieganu Cluj Napoca, Romania; 8Lilly USA, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA; 9Global Health Outcomes, Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA
Background: This study aimed to improve physicians' understanding of the treatment circumstances and needs of outpatients with schizophrenia at risk of nonadherence, by naturalistically assessing antipsychotic treatment patterns, clinical outcomes, and health care service use in this little-studied patient population.
Methods: In this one-year, prospective, multicenter, noninterventional, observational study, patients considered at risk of nonadherence by their physicians were switched from their primary oral antipsychotic to another oral or a depot antipsychotic at study entry. All cause treatment discontinuation (antipsychotic switch, augmentation, or discontinuation) during the study was assessed using Kaplan–Meier survival analyses and descriptive statistics. Patients’ illness severity, quality of life, attitude towards medication, patient-reported adherence, and health care resource utilization were assessed during the study.
Results: Of the 406 enrolled patients, 43 (10.6%) were switched to depot and 363 (89.4%) were switched to oral antipsychotics at study entry. During the study, 99 (24.4%) patients switched, augmented, or discontinued their antipsychotic (all cause treatment discontinuation). Of the 99 patients who switched, augmented, or discontinued their antipsychotic, 8 (18.6%) were taking depot and 91 (25.0%) were taking oral antipsychotics. These patients were switched to either depot (n = 15) or oral (n = 78) antipsychotics, or discontinued their antipsychotic medication (n = 6). Inadequate response was the most frequently reported reason for medication discontinuation. During the study, patients’ clinical and functional status improved significantly and service use was low. Most patients considered themselves to be adherent at study entry, and this favorable self-perception increased during the study (from 68.5% to 88.1%).
Conclusion: Although identified as at risk of nonadherence, few patients in this naturalistic study discontinued their prescribed antipsychotic medication during the study. The discrepancy between the physicians’ perception of their patient’s medication adherence and the patients’ self-perceived adherence highlights the need to better understand the underlying reasons for this phenomenon.
Keywords: antipsychotic drugs, medication persistence, outpatients, schizophrenia, depot antipsychotic, nonadherence

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]

 

Other article by this author:

Baseline characteristics and initial treatment decisions for patients with schizophrenia at risk of treatment nonadherence

Katarina Kelin, Alan JM Brnabic, Richard Newton, et al

Patient Preference and Adherence 2010, 4:301-311

Published Date: 11 August 2010

Readers of this article also read:

Green synthesis of water-soluble nontoxic polymeric nanocomposites containing silver nanoparticles

Prozorova GF, Pozdnyakov AS, Kuznetsova NP, Korzhova SA, Emel’yanov AI, Ermakova TG, Fadeeva TV, Sosedova LM

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2014, 9:1883-1889

Published Date: 16 April 2014

Methacrylic-based nanogels for the pH-sensitive delivery of 5-Fluorouracil in the colon

Ashwanikumar N, Kumar NA, Nair SA, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5769-5779

Published Date: 15 November 2012

A novel preparation method for silicone oil nanoemulsions and its application for coating hair with silicone

Hu Z, Liao M, Chen Y, Cai Y, Meng L, Liu Y, Lv N, Liu Z, Yuan W

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:5719-5724

Published Date: 12 November 2012

Cross-linked acrylic hydrogel for the controlled delivery of hydrophobic drugs in cancer therapy

Deepa G, Thulasidasan AK, Anto RJ, Pillai JJ, Kumar GS

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2012, 7:4077-4088

Published Date: 27 July 2012

Crystallization after intravitreal ganciclovir injection

Pitipol Choopong, Nattaporn Tesavibul, Nattawut Rodanant

Clinical Ophthalmology 2010, 4:709-711

Published Date: 14 July 2010