Toxic elements as biomarkers for breast cancer: a meta-analysis study
Received 10 September 2017
Accepted for publication 24 November 2017
Published 10 January 2018 Volume 2018:10 Pages 69—79
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Harikrishna Nakshatri
Leila Jouybari,1 Marzieh Saei Ghare Naz,2 Akram Sanagoo,1 Faezeh Kiani,3 Fatemeh Sayehmiri,4 Kourosh Sayehmiri,5 Ali Hasanpour Dehkordi6
1Nursing Research Center, Goletsan University of Medical Sciences, Gorgan, Iran; 2Student Research Committee, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; 3Student Research Committee, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran; 4Proteomics Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; 5Department of Social Medicine, School of Medicine, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran; 6Department of Medical Surgical, Nursing and Midwifery, Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences, Shahrekord, Iran
Aims and background: Breast cancer (BC) is responsible for a large proportion of incidence of cancer in the world. Identifying the risk factors contributing to the incidence of BC is crucial to find efficient preventive and management strategies for this disease. Several studies have examined Arsenic (As), Cadmium (Cd), and Nickel (Ni) as risk factors for BC. The present study aimed at studying the link between As, Cd, and Ni concentrations and BC by using a meta-analysis.
Materials and methods: All case–control studies addressing the relationship between As, Cd, and Ni concentrations with BC were identified through electronic search databases (Scopus, ISI Web of Science, PubMed, EmBase, and Cochrane Library). The relevant data obtained from these papers were analyzed by a random-effects model. The heterogeneity of studies was secured by using I2 index. Funnel plots and Egger’s test were used to examine publication bias.
Results: In the present study, due to different measurement methods used for measuring As, Cd, and Ni, the concentration of these elements was measured in various subgroups (1: plasma, 2: breast tissue, and 3: scalp hair and nail) of individuals with BC and healthy subjects. The overall integration of data from the 3 groups led to the conclusion that there was a significant difference in Cd and Ni statuses between healthy and BC patients; the standard mean difference was 2.65 (95% CI: 1.57–3.73; P=0.000) and 2.06 (95% CI: 1.20–3.32; P=0.000), respectively. Whereas, there was no significant statistical difference in As status between healthy subjects and BC patients; the standard mean difference between them being 0.52 (95% CI: –0.12–1.16; P=0.114).
Conclusion: The present study indicates that there is a direct and positive association between Cd and Ni concentrations and BC risk. It is a warning to health care providers and policy makers to find viable solutions and take requisite measures to reduce BC risk in the society.
Keywords: malignancy, breast cancer, arsenic, cadmium, nickel, meta-analysis, toxic element
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]