Back to Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 10

Toric intraocular lens orientation and residual refractive astigmatism: an analysis

Authors Potvin R, Kramer B, Hardten D, Berdahl J

Received 2 June 2016

Accepted for publication 9 August 2016

Published 20 September 2016 Volume 2016:10 Pages 1829—1836

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S114118

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewers approved by Dr Amy Norman

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser


Video abstract presented by John P Berdahl.

Views: 627

Rick Potvin,1 Brent A Kramer,2 David R Hardten,3 John P Berdahl4

1Science in Vision, Akron, NY, 2University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, 3Minnesota Eye Consultants, Minnetonka, MN, 4Vance Thompson Vision, Sioux Falls, SD, USA

Purpose: To analyze intraocular lens (IOL) orientation data from an online toric back-calculator (astigmatismfix.com) for determining if differences were apparent by lens type.
Methods: A retrospective review of astigmatismfix.com toric back-calculations that included IOL identification and intended orientation axis.
Results: Of 12,812 total validated calculation records, 8,229 included intended orientation and lens identification data. Of the latter, 5,674 calculations (69%) involved lenses oriented 5° or more from their intended position. Using estimated toric lens usage data, the percentage of lenses with orientation ≥5° from intended was 0.89% overall, but the percentage varied significantly between specific toric lens brands (P<0.05). The percentage of back-calculations related to lenses that were not oriented as intended was also statistically significantly different by lens brand (P<0.05). When IOLs were misoriented, they were significantly more likely to be misoriented in a counterclockwise direction (P<0.05). This was found to be due to a bias toward counterclockwise orientation observed with one specific brand, a bias that was not observed with the other three brands analyzed here.
Conclusion: The percentage of eyes with lens orientation ≥5° from intended in the Toric Results Analyzer data set was <1% of toric IOLs in general, with the relative percentage of Tecnis® Toric IOLs significantly higher than AcrySof® Toric IOLs. Both of these had higher rates than the Staar® Toric and Trulign® Toric lenses, with the availability of higher Tecnis and AcrySof cylinder powers a likely contributing factor. The AcrySof Toric IOL appears to be less likely than the Tecnis Toric IOL to cause residual astigmatism as a result of misorientation. The Tecnis Toric IOL appears more likely to be misoriented in a counterclockwise direction; no such bias was observed with the AcrySof Toric, the Trulign® Toric, or the Staar Toric IOLs.

Keywords: rotation, AcrySof, Tecnis, toric back-calculator, cylinder

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]