Back to Journals » Smart Homecare Technology and TeleHealth » Volume 3

Telephone support and adherence in patients with chronic disease – a qualitative review of reviews

Authors Balasubramanian D, Yoong J, Vrijhoef HJM

Received 5 November 2014

Accepted for publication 29 January 2015

Published 8 May 2015 Volume 2015:3 Pages 107—118

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/SHTT.S77031

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 3

Editor who approved publication: Professor Yelena Yesha


Divya Balasubramanian,1 Joanne Yoong,1–3 Hubertus JM Vrijhoef1,3–6

1Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University Singapore, Singapore; 2Center for Economic and Social Research, University of Southern California, California, USA; 3Center for Health Services and Policy Research, National University Health System, Singapore; 4Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands; 5Department of Patients & Care, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands; 6Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussels, Brussels, Belgium

Abstract: Among patients with a chronic disease, low adherence to prescribed treatments is very common, leading to substantial morbidity, mortality, and increase in health care costs. Telephone or mobile phone support is a common form of intervention that can be used to improve their adherence. We reviewed existing systematic and nonsystematic reviews to analyze the effectiveness of telephone interventions to improve treatment adherence in patients with chronic disease. Secondary aims were to evaluate the selected reviews in terms of cost-effectiveness of the intervention and frequency of messages affecting the adherence outcomes. A search for reviews was conducted in three databases, including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL, and three reviews that met the inclusion criteria were selected for final analysis. A qualitative review of the selected reviews was conducted, and reviews were evaluated to extract and summarize the characteristics and outcomes. Two of the selected reviews studied mobile phone text messaging, and one review studied telephone or mobile phone consultation. All three reviews reported an overall improvement in adherence, but the reviews varied in the types of research and the outcome measures. However, none of the reviews reported costs as an outcome. The evidence from reviews to characterize the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of telephone support as an intervention to improve adherence among people with chronic diseases is fairly small and weak. Telephone support interventions have to be evaluated more systematically in routine practice against a comprehensive set of criteria, including their relative costs and outcomes.

Keywords: literature review, compliance, telemedicine, communicable diseases, cost-effectiveness

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]