Switching to aflibercept among patients with treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Authors Spooner K, Hong T, Wijeyakumar W, Chang AA
Received 25 October 2016
Accepted for publication 22 November 2016
Published 6 January 2017 Volume 2017:11 Pages 161—177
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser
Kimberly Spooner,1–3 Thomas Hong,1,2 Wijeyanthy Wijeyakumar,1–3 Andrew A Chang1–3
1Sydney Retina Clinic & Day Surgery, 2Sydney Institute of Vision Science, Sydney, 3Save Sight Institute, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
Purpose: To systematically review anatomical and functional outcomes subsequent to switching from bevacizumab/ranibizumab to aflibercept monotherapy in patients with treatment-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD).
Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Methods: Medline, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to July 2016 for available scientific literature which met inclusion criteria. Eligible studies reported visual and anatomical outcomes with at least 6 months of follow-up among patients with nAMD and persistent or resistant exudative fluid despite previous anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy (bevacizumab and/or ranibizumab) and were switched to aflibercept monotherapy. Mean changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were pooled using random-effects models with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Results: Of 82 papers reviewed, 28 studies met inclusion criteria of this review. Pooled results showed a small mean improvement in BCVA at 6 and 12 months following switching (1.11 letters, 95% CI -0.25 to 2.46, P=0.17 and 0.63 letters, 95% CI -0.26 to 1.52, P=0.17, respectively). There was a significant improvement in mean CRT following switching (-61.90 µm, 95% CI -77.10 to -46.80, P<0.001 and -50.00 µm, 95% CI -63.20 to -36.80, P<0.001 at 6 and 12 months, respectively).
Conclusion: Pooled analysis demonstrated significantly improved anatomical outcomes; however, visual function remained stable, having a comparable effect to other anti-VEGF agents in preservation of vision. These patients had poorly responsive chronic disease with limited potential for visual recovery. Switching to aflibercept with frequent monitoring may be a suitable option for patients who have developed treatment resistance.
Keywords: anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, macular degeneration, treatment resistance, meta-analysis, aflibercept
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]