Spinal matrix metalloproteinase 8 regulates pain after peripheral trauma

Introduction

The sensation of pain carries out a vital protective role against tissue damage. In many cases, however, the pain outlasts the original injury and itself becomes a pathology that is typically resistant to classical forms of treatment. This concept of pain chronification refers to sensory events that parallel peripheral trauma and gradually alter the central nervous system (CNS), thereby augmenting injury-associated pain or resulting in the experience of pain in the absence of any injury.¹ These CNS alterations encompass aberrant activity in the spinal cord (SC) dorsal horn neurons as well as hyperactive glial cells, which contribute to the pathologic somatosensory signals that are conveyed to the brain.²

While most studies have focused on cellular plasticity and chronic pain, we have recently described a key role for the hippocampal extracellular matrix (ECM) in regulating pain and memory function following peripheral injury in mice.³ In particular, our biophysical analyses showed decreased ECM rigidity and dysregulated microarchitecture that were paralleled by biochemical changes in various ECM components and enzymes, including increased levels of matrix metalloproteinase 8 (MMP8), also known as collagenase-2 or neutrophil collagenase. Furthermore, we showed that normalizing MMP8 upregulation is sufficient in reversing the behavioral and cellular alterations observed after injury.

The current manuscript aims at translating these findings to spinal tissues, a direction that stems from well-characterized SC plasticity in pain. In our rodent model of chronic pain due to distal tibia fracture, we have observed neuronal and glial parallels of central sensitization. In particular, we have reported biochemical and molecular correlates of allodynia, hyperalgesia, and latent sensitization in terms of altered glutamatergic tone in the SC^4,5 as well as neuroinflammation and glial activation.⁶ Furthermore, we have described broad spinal transcriptomic changes as the animals progress from an acute to a more chronic stage of pain.⁷ These observations have prompted us to look at the ECM where these cells function, with the supposition that SC cellular plasticity requires a plastic ECM niche.⁸

Our central hypothesis is that chronic pain is associated with disturbed spinal ECM homeostasis. In the current study, we took aim at examining the role of specific SC matrix remodeling enzymes following peripheral injury. Using biochemical, behavioral, and molecular tools, we demonstrate a key role for spinal MMP8 in regulating pain after peripheral trauma.

Methods

All testing and analysis was blinded to the identity and experimental condition of the animal/tissue.

Animals

Male C57BL/6J mice aged 12–14 weeks were purchased from a commercial supplier (Jackson Labs, Sacramento, CA, USA) and were allowed to habituate to the animal facility for a minimum of 10 days prior to the experiments. Mice were housed in groups of 4 on a 12-hr light/dark cycle and an ambient temperature of 22±3 °C, with food and water available ad libitum. All animal procedures and experimental designs were approved by the Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (Palo Alto, CA, USA) and followed the “animal subjects” guidelines of the International Association for the Study of Pain.

Tibia fracture and cast immobilization

Following the random allocation to the control or the fracture/cast group, mice were anesthetized with 1.5% isoflurane and underwent a distal tibial fracture in the right leg followed by cast immobilization as previously described.⁴ Casts were removed 3 weeks after surgery under brief isoflurane anesthesia.

Behavioral testing of tactile allodynia

Mice were habituated to handling by the experimenter for a few minutes each day for 7 days before initiation of the behavioral tests. Calibrated monofilaments (Stoelting Co., Wood Dale, IL, USA) were applied to the plantar surface of the hind paw and the 50% threshold to withdraw (grams) was calculated as previously described.⁹

Biochemical analysis

Mice were euthanized under isoflurane anesthesia, and ipsilateral lumbar SCs were quickly isolated. Tissues were homogenized using T-PER Protein Extraction Reagent (cat. # 87793; Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in the presence of proteinase and phosphatase inhibitors (cat. # 04906837001; Roche Applied Science, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and centrifuged at 12,000 g for 4 mins at 4°C. Supernatant fractions were then frozen at 80°C until use. An aliquot was subjected to protein assay (cat. # 500-0001; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) to normalize protein levels. The MMP8 ELISA kit was used as per manufacturer’s instructions (cat. # ab206982; abcam, USA).

MMP8 downregulation

Pharmacological inhibition of MMP8

Mice were randomized to receive either intraperitoneal injections of vehicle (saline +1%DMSO) or the specific MMP8 inhibitor, M8I (3R)-(+)-[2-(4-methoxybenzenesulfonyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydroisoquinoline-3-hydroxamate, dose=1mg/kg] (cat. # CAS 236403-25-1; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA, USA). Daily injections of vehicle or MMP8 inhibitor spanned 14 days, starting at 5 weeks post-injury. CNS penetration of the compound was verified by western blot analysis, demonstrating a decreased level of MMP8 in CNS tissues (data not shown).

Lentiviral delivery of shRNA

We manipulated MMP generation capacity in the SC using short hairpin RNA (shRNA) administration through lentiviral delivery. Lentiviral particles for mouse MMP8-specific shRNA (MMP8 Mission® shRNA; 1 × 106 TU/mL; pLKO.1 vector) or nontarget shRNA control (Mission® pLKO.1 puro non-target shRNA control) were purchased commercially (Sigma Aldrich, St Louis, MO, USA). The sequence for MMP8-specific shRNA is: CCGGGCCTTGATGTACCCAAACTATCTCGAGATAGTTTGGGTACATCAAGGCTTTTTG. Three weeks after injury, mice were allocated to random groups to receive a single intrathecal injection (isoflurane anesthesia, injection volume =5 µl) of lentivirus delivering MMP8-specific shRNA or nontarget shRNA control. This method of CNS MMP8 downregulation has been previously validated by our group.³

Lentiviral delivery was confirmed via visual inspection following the spinal administration of a pLKO.1-CMVtGFP vector with a nontarget SHC016 shRNA sequence (Sigma Aldrich) which was used as described above.

Statistical analysis

The data for biochemical measurements were analyzed by unpaired 2-tailed t-tests. F tests were carried out to measure differences of variance between groups. Behavioral data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA followed by Sidak post-hoc test for multiple comparisons. All data are presented as mean ± SEM and for all analyses, p<0.05 were taken to be significant.

Results

Biochemical dysregulation of the ECM is observed after injury

To assess the overall integrity of the SC ECM after peripheral injury, protein measurements of MMP8 were carried out. Compared to control mice, injured mice displayed decreased levels of ipsilateral SC MMP8 (F=3.7, p=0.02) 3 weeks after injury (Figure 1A).

Figure 1 Distal tibial fracture is associated with increased levels of MMP8 in the ipsilateral lumbar spinal cord (A). Both the systemic pharmacological (M8I administration (B) and localized genetic (shRNA administration, C) downregulation of MMP8 resulted in improvements in mechanical sensitivity. n=5–12 mice/group.*p<0.05. Error bars indicate the SE of the mean.Abbreviations: MMP8, matrix metalloproteinase 8; M8I inhibitor of matrix metalloproteinase 8; shRNA, short hairpin RNA.

Pharmacological inhibition of MMP ameliorates mechanical allodynia after injury

In order to link biochemical ECM stability to the phenotype of ongoing pain after injury, we systemically treated mice with a selective MMP8 inhibitor for 2 weeks. Behavioral measures of tactile allodynia at the 7-week timepoint demonstrate an amelioration of mechanical sensitivity in the group that was treated with the MMP8 inhibitor. Compared to vehicle-treated injured mice, M8I-treated injured mice showed an increase in mechanical threshold values on the ipsilateral hindpaw (mean difference=−0.38±0.18, Figure 1B).

shRNA downregulation of spinal MMP8 results in a progressive increase in mechanical thresholds after injury

In order to ascertain the role of MMP8 in spinal tissues, we complemented our systemic M8I administration studies with intrathecal injections of MMP8-downregulating shRNA using lentiviral vectors. Our data show that a single injection at the 3w timepoint was sufficient to elicit improvements in mechanical hypersensitivity. Compared to injured mice treated with control-shRNA, injured mice treated with MMP8-downregulating shRNA showed increased mechanical thresholds on the ipsilateral hindpaw at the 6- (mean difference=0.59±0.2) and 7- (mean difference=0.61±0.2) week timepoints (Figure 1C).

Discussion

In this report, we provide evidence for a novel spinal mechanism that may support the transition of acute to chronic pain. Our data show that spinal ECM dysregulation in the form of increased MMP8 is observed following peripheral trauma and that its normalization can reverse pain hypersensitivity in a mouse model of tibia fracture, thereby proposing a novel mechanism of pain-related SC plasticity.

Recent studies have outlined a role for MMP8 following frank injury to the SC. Acute MMP8 upregulation was recently demonstrated in a model of SC compression, and its inhibition was linked to neuroprotective effects in rats;¹⁰ similarly, clinical studies have shown the upregulation of serum MMP8 levels in patients with SC injury.^11,12 However, to our knowledge, this is the first report of spinal MMP8 involvement in chronic pain due to peripheral trauma.

The CNS ECM is a dynamic entity that continues to change in adulthood. A wealth of studies support the hypothesis that CNS damage is accompanied by profound ECM alterations: traumatic spinal injury and multiple sclerosis are both paralleled by an upregulation in chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans, key components of the CNS ECM¹³ that are generally linked to restricted neuronal plasticity.¹⁴ Additionally, heparin sulfate proteoglycan involvement has been demonstrated in neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease and Parkinson’s disease.¹⁵ While chronic pain is often the result of an injury to the periphery rather than CNS insult, significant SC and brain neuroplasticity is observed in various chronic pain conditions,¹⁶ suggesting the involvement of a plastic ECM. This direction is quickly gaining traction: for example, a recent manuscript describes the spinal upregulation of the astrocyte-secreted ECM protein thrombospondin-4 and its role in the development of aberrant excitatory synaptogenesis and peripheral neuropathy in rats.¹⁷ Finally, in our recent manuscript,³ we show structural and biochemical alterations in the hippocampal ECM that are linked to pain, cognitive dysfunction, and cellular plasticity in a mouse model of chronic pain.

How does a dysregulated ECM contribute to pain chronification? We propose the following possible mechanisms: first, the degradation of ECM structural components could result in a less rigid matrix that is no longer able to support the cytoarchitectural changes in neuronal dendrites,³ thus preventing adaptive neuronal plasticity. Second, a dysregulated ECM might be deficient in the storage of pronociceptive cytokines, thus making them more available to neurons and glia. In particular, proteoglycans have been shown to interact with cytokines and modify their binding to cell surface receptors as well as their storage within the ECM.¹⁸ Third, it is possible that the perineuronal net, a specialized ECM that predominantly surrounds inhibitory interneurons, is affected, thereby resulting in destabilized inhibitory interneurons. Diminished inhibition in the SC dorsal horn is a well-studied mechanism of chronic pain.¹⁹ Fourth, excessive proteolytic activity by MMPs could result in damage to tight junctions and the subsequent compromise of the blood–SC barrier.¹⁰ Increased blood-SC permeability has been reported in models of peripheral neuropathy.²⁰ Future studies targeting each of these hypotheses will be undertaken.

The current report is the first statement of SC ECM involvement in pain regulation. While we show that MMP8 downregulation is sufficient in ameliorating the pain phenotype, further studies localizing these ECM changes, both to specific SC regions and to specific cell types, are needed.

Understanding ECM mechanisms of CNS plasticity can significantly improve our understanding of chronic pain. Additionally, it can provide valuable tools in research methodology: for instance, a recent study described an approach to magnetomechanical neuromodulation of dorsal root ganglion neurons via a 3D magnetic hyaluronic acid hydrogel.²¹ Finally, this direction can offer novel therapeutic venues where relevant ECM components, rather than cell types, can be targeted. Such interventions, administered after injury, have the potential to prevent the chronification of pain, thereby greatly enhancing recovery.