Back to Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 11

Sometimes new does not mean safer

Authors Bordeianu CD

Received 27 October 2016

Accepted for publication 1 November 2016

Published 4 January 2017 Volume 2017:11 Pages 149—152

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S125935

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser

Constantin-Dan Bordeianu

Private Practice, Ploiesti, Prahova, Romania
 
I was extremely interested in an article by Masuda et al,1 recently published in your Clinical Ophthalmology journal, especially after reading in the abstract that the phaco tip is the only surgical instrument required “for lens cleavage and removal”.1 The authors assert that this new technique maintains a stable intraocular pressure during hydrodissection and lens removal, whereas the existing techniques induce anterior chamber instability because three instruments are successively inserted and withdrawn. However, the attached video contradicts these assertions, as the following were observed: (i) a second instrument is used to split the grooved nucleus, to chop the quarters, and to manipulate the fragments; (ii) in all, the authors used more than three instruments: cannula for saline or for ophthalmic viscoelastic device, phaco tip, chopper, and irrigation/aspiration cannula; and (iii) the wound leakage around the chopper is obvious. Given these conditions, how could the intraocular pressure be considered stable? 
 
View the original paper by Masuda and colleagues

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]

 

Other articles by this author:

A new classification of glaucomas

Bordeianu CD

Clinical Ophthalmology 2014, 8:1801-1817

Published Date: 11 September 2014

A new manner of reporting pressure results after glaucoma surgery

Bordeianu CD, Ticu CE

Clinical Ophthalmology 2012, 6:23-31

Published Date: 30 December 2011