Should patients set the agenda for informed, consent? A prospective survey of desire for information and discussion prior to routine cataract surgery
Lee Teak Tan1,2, Huw Jenkins1,2, John Roberts-Harry2, Michael Austin1
1Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK; 2West Wales General Hospital, Carmarthen, UK
Purpose: To ascertain the level of information relating to specific risks desired by patients prior to cataract surgery.
Setting: Dedicated cataract surgery pre-assessment clinics of 2 hospitals in South West Wales, UK.
Methods: Consecutive patients (106) were recruited prospectively. Of these, 6 were formally excluded due to deafness or disorientation. Eligible patients (100) were asked a set of preliminary questions to determine their understanding of the nature of cataract, risk perception, and level of information felt necessary prior to giving consent. Those who desired further information were guided through a standardized questionnaire, which included an audio-visual presentation giving information relating to each potential surgical complication, allowing patients to rate them for relevance to their giving of informed consent.
Results: Of the entire group of 100, 32 did not wish to know “anything at all” about risks and would prefer to leave decision making to their ophthalmologist; 22 were interested only in knowing their overall chance of visual improvement; and 46 welcomed a general discussion of possible complications, of whom 25 went on to enquire about specific complications. Of these 25, 18 wished to be informed of posterior capsular (PC) tearing, 17 of endophthalmitis, 16 each of dropped lens, retinal detachment and corneal clouding, and 15 of bleeding, sympathetic ophthalmia, and PC opacification.
Conclusion: Patients differ in their desire for information prior to cataract surgery, with one significant minority favoring little or no discussion of risk and another wishing detailed consideration of specific risks. A system of consent where patients have a choice as to the level of discussion undertaken may better suit patients’ wishes than a doctor-specified agenda.
Keywords: cataract extraction, informed consent, patient-centered care
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF]
Readers of this article also read:
Enhanced bioavailability and anthelmintic efficacy of mebendazole in redispersible microparticles with low-substituted hydroxypropylcellulose
Torre-Iglesias PM, García-Rodriguez JJ, Torrado G, Torrado S, Torrado-Santiago S, Bolás-Fernández F
Published Date: 18 September 2014
Hoffman AJ, Brintnall RA, von Eye A, Jones LW, Alderink G, Patzelt LH, Brown JK
Published Date: 10 March 2014
Triolein-based polycation lipid nanocarrier for efficient gene delivery: characteristics and mechanism
Zhang ZW, Fang XL, Hao JG, Li YJ, Sha XY
Published Date: 7 October 2011
Mostafa A El-Helw, Ahmed M Emarah
Published Date: 11 May 2010
Andrea De Giacomo, Claudia Portoghese, Domenico Martinelli, Isabella Fanizza, et al.
Published Date: 18 June 2009
Michael Untch, Christian Jackisch
Published Date: 5 December 2008
Melvin Wright, Charles J Mullett, Giovanni Piedimonte
Published Date: 10 October 2008
Ann G Neff, Matthew Turner, Diya F Mutasim
Published Date: 6 June 2008
Patrick G Clay, Tracey AH Taylor, Alan G Glaros, MaryPeace McRae, Charlott Williams, et al
Published Date: 11 April 2008
Current approach to cancer pain management: Availability and implications of different treatment options
Hrachya Nersesyan, Konstantin V Slavin
Published Date: 15 July 2007