Retrospective analysis of relationships among the dose regimen, trough concentration, efficacy, and safety of teicoplanin in Chinese patients with moderate–severe Gram-positive infections
Authors Zhou L, Gao Y, Cao W, Liu J, Guan H, Zhang H, Shi Y, Lv W, Cheng L
Received 30 July 2017
Accepted for publication 21 November 2017
Published 5 January 2018 Volume 2018:11 Pages 29—36
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single-blind
Peer reviewers approved by Dr Colin Mak
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Professor Suresh Antony
Lijuan Zhou,1,* Yanqiu Gao,2 Wei Cao,1 Jia Liu,1 Hongya Guan,1 Hua Zhang,2 Yun Shi,3 Wenying Lv,4 Long Cheng5,*
1Translational Medicine Center, 2Department of Respiratory Medicine, Affiliated Zhengzhou Central Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 3Department of Gynecology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 4Chaoyangmen Community Health Service Center, 5Key Laboratory of Bioactive Substances and Resources Utilization of Chinese Herbal Medicine, Institute of Medicinal Plant Development, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
*These authors contributed equally to this work
Objectives: Teicoplanin, an antibiotic, has poor clinical efficacy when using the current drug label’s recommended regimen, which is approved by the China Food and Drug Administration. This study explores the appropriate loading and maintenance doses of teicoplanin and evaluates the therapeutic target of teicoplanin trough concentration (minimum concentration [Cmin]).
Subjects and methods: All patients treated with teicoplanin from February 2015 to August 2016 at Zhengzhou Central Hospital were screened for enrollment. A total of 113 subjects were included and then divided into four groups: A (received three to six doses at a loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour intervals, followed by maintenance dosing of 400 mg/day), B (received three doses at a loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour intervals, followed by maintenance dosing of 400 mg/day), C (received two doses at a loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour intervals, followed by maintenance dosing of 200 mg/day), and D (received one to three doses at a loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour intervals, followed by maintenance dosing of 200 mg/day). Cmin values of teicoplanin were detected with high-performance liquid chromatography on day 4, 30 minutes before maintenance-dose administration. Teicoplanin Cmin, efficacy, and safety were compared among the four groups.
Results: Mean Cmin differed significantly among the four groups (A, 18.11±6.37 mg/L; B, 15.91±4.94 mg/L; C, 17.06±5.66 mg/L; D, 11.97±3.76 mg/L) (P<0.001), with creatinine clearance of 89.62 (53.72–162.48), 49.66 (40.69–59.64), 27.17 (9.7–39.45), and 96.6 (17.63–394.73) mL/min, respectively. The ratio of loading dose for 3 days to creatinine clearance and serum Cmin were significantly correlated (R=0.59, P<0.001). The correlation between the estimated probability of success and teicoplanin Cmin was assessed using binary logistic regression (OR 2.049, P<0.001). Hepatotoxicity- and nephrotoxicity-incidence rates did not significantly differ among the four groups (P=0.859 and P=0.949, respectively).
Conclusion: A loading dose of 400 mg at 12-hour intervals three to six times is needed to achieve the early target range (15–20 mg/L) and improve the clinical efficacy rate for normal-renal-function patients. It is urgently necessary to amend the drug label for the recommended regimen.
Keywords: teicoplanin, loading dose, serum trough concentration, efficacy, safety, Chinese drug label
Corrigendum for this paper has been published
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]