Repeated Cesarean Delivery Predicted a Higher Risk of Inadequate Analgesia Than Primary Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Study with Propensity Score Match Analysis
Authors Yang G, Bao X, Peng J, Li J, Yan G, Jing S, Li H, Duan G
Received 2 September 2019
Accepted for publication 7 March 2020
Published 18 March 2020 Volume 2020:13 Pages 555—563
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr E Alfonso Romero-Sandoval
Guiying Yang, Xiaohang Bao, Jing Peng, Jie Li, Guangming Yan, Sheng Jing, Hong Li, Guangyou Duan
Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing 400037, People’s Republic of China
Correspondence: Hong Li; Guangyou Duan
Department of Anesthesiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Army Medical University, Chongqing, People’s Republic of China
Email firstname.lastname@example.org; email@example.com
Purpose: This study aimed to compare the analgesic outcomes between primary and repeated cesarean delivery.
Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis based on the medical records of a teaching hospital in China from January 2018 to March 2019. We collected data on demographic characteristics, perioperative complications, anesthesia, and surgical factors for cesarean delivery patients. We also recorded the postoperative analgesic strategy, pain intensity (assessed by the number rating scale) during the first 48 hrs after surgery, hospital cost, and hospital stay. Postoperative inadequate analgesia was defined by a score of ≥ 4 in the number rating scale. Analgesic outcomes after cesarean delivery between primiparas and multiparas were compared using propensity score matching analysis. Moreover, subgroup logistic analysis for different age groups (≥ 35 and < 35 years) was performed to investigate the effect of the maternal category on postoperative inadequate analgesia.
Results: A total of 1543 patients were included in the analysis and 571 pairs (1142 patients) were matched in the primiparas and multiparaparas group according to their propensity score. In both the non-matched and matched cohort, the incidence of inadequate analgesia in the primiparas group was lower than that in the multiparas group (16.7% vs. 24.0%, P < 0.001 and 16.1% vs. 23.5%, P = 0.002; respectively). The multiparas group was identified as being at risk of inadequate analgesia after cesarean delivery in both age groups (age ≥ 35 years, odds ratio: 2.18, 95% confidence interval: 1.20– 3.95; age < 35 years, odds ratio: 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.08– 1.89).
Conclusion: Multiparas that undergo a repeat cesarean delivery had a significantly higher risk of inadequate postoperative pain treatment than primiparas. The maternal category should be considered when formulating the postoperative analgesia strategy after cesarean delivery.
Keywords: cesarean delivery, analgesia, primipara, multipara
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF] View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]