Back to Browse Journals » Clinical Optometry » Volume 3

Refractive surgery or contact lenses – how and when to decide?

Authors Xu K, Jhanji V

Published 11 November 2011 Volume 2011:3 Pages 63—72


Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 2

Kunyong Xu1, Vishal Jhanji2
1Michael G DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong

Abstract: Correction of refractive errors can be achieved with spectacles, contact lenses, and refractive surgery. The past decade has seen a surge in the availability of alternatives for patients and surgeons in terms of both surgical and nonsurgical options for the management of refractive errors. Newer generation contact lenses provide enhanced safety and better handling, whereas modern-day refractive surgery presents a plethora of choices based on the clinical characteristics and requirements of patients. We have moved from an era of "one size fits all" to a purely customized way of treating patients with refractive errors. This review presents the background, advantages, and disadvantages of the two most commonly used options for correction of ametropia, ie, contact lenses and refractive surgery.

Keywords: laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis, contact lens, patient selection, complications, outcomes

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF] 


Readers of this article also read:

Smartphone applications to support weight loss: current perspectives

Pellegrini CA, Pfammatter AF, Conroy DE, Spring B

Advanced Health Care Technologies 2015, 1:13-22

Published Date: 15 July 2015

What pulmonologists think about the asthma–COPD overlap syndrome

Miravitlles M, Alcázar B, Alvarez FJ, Bazús T, Calle M, Casanova C, Cisneros C, de-Torres JP, Entrenas LM, Esteban C, García-Sidro P, Cosio BG, Huerta A, Iriberri M, Izquierdo JL, López-Viña A, López-Campos JL, Martínez-Moragón E, Pérez de Llano L, Perpiñá M, Ros JA, Serrano J, Soler-Cataluña JJ, Torrego A, Urrutia I, Plaza V

International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 2015, 10:1321-1330

Published Date: 15 July 2015

Functionalized magnetic iron oxide/alginate core-shell nanoparticles for targeting hyperthermia

Liao SH, Liu CH, Bastakoti BP, Suzuki N, Chang Y, Yamauchi Y, Lin FH, Wu KCW

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2015, 10:3315-3328

Published Date: 4 May 2015

The antitumor activity of tumor-homing peptide-modified thermosensitive liposomes containing doxorubicin on MCF-7/ADR: in vitro and in vivo

Wang C, Wang X, Zhong T, Zhao Y, Zhang WQ, Ren W, Huang D, Zhang S, Guo Y, Yao X, Tang YQ, Zhang X, Zhang Q

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2015, 10:2229-2248

Published Date: 19 March 2015

Photo activation of HPPH encapsulated in “Pocket” liposomes triggers multiple drug release and tumor cell killing in mouse breast cancer xenografts

Sine J, Urban C, Thayer D, Charron H, Valim N, Tata DB, Schiff R, Blumenthal R, Joshi A, Puri A

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2015, 10:125-145

Published Date: 19 December 2014

Erratum - Intracellular heavy metal nanoparticle storage

Iannitti T, Capone S, Gatti A, et al

International Journal of Nanomedicine 2011, 6:239-240

Published Date: 26 January 2011