Back to Journals » International Journal of Nanomedicine » Volume 20
Recent Advances in Nanoparticle-Based Antiretroviral Drug Delivery Systems for HIV Treatment and Prevention: A Comprehensive Review
Authors Das G
, Shin HS
, Patra JK
Received 15 May 2025
Accepted for publication 25 October 2025
Published 19 November 2025 Volume 2025:20 Pages 13877—13909
DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/IJN.S540578
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Prof. Dr. RDK Misra
Gitishree Das, Han-Seung Shin, Jayanta Kumar Patra
Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dongguk University-Seoul, Goyang-si, 10326, Republic of Korea
Correspondence: Jayanta Kumar Patra, Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Life Science and Biotechnology, Dongguk University-Seoul, Goyang-si, Republic of Korea, Email [email protected]
Background: AIDS disease, caused by HIV, is a highly prevalent disease disturbing global health and swaying economic progress and social fidelity in the world.
Purpose: Eradication and cure of HIV infection has been a difficult assignment, and not many highly effective drugs and vaccines are available in the present scenario. Besides, the suboptimal adherence, toxicity, resistance to available drugs, and presence of several viral reservoirs make lifelong HIV infection treatment very challenging. Furthermore, a cure for HIV infection cannot be attained properly unless the latency issue is addressed and antiretroviral drug delivery to its specific cellular reservoir sites for an extended time is resolved. The advancement in nanotechnology could solve these issues with the formulation of advanced drugs in the nano-scale range. Currently, several nano-based architectures and formulations like nanoparticles (gold, silver, copper, and ruthenium) as nanocarriers, carbon nanotubes, liposomes, micelles, and polymer nanomaterials with superior solubility, sustained release, target specificity, long-duration delivery, and simplification of drug–dose reductions are developed which could act as effective HIV drugs/vaccine transporters in combination with available drugs and formulations. Several nano-based drug delivery approaches are suggested to target the CD4+ T cells, which are the primary target of HIV infection. While using nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems for HIV treatment, usually, three main strategies, such as the intracellular delivery of the anti-retroviral drugs by the polymeric nanoparticles, brain delivery of the anti-retroviral drugs by the polymeric nanoparticles, and use of the polymeric nanomaterials as an adjuvant for the HIV vaccines, are followed.
Conclusion: Though nanotechnology offers many advantages over the conventional system of medications, it also gives rise to many side effects and challenges that need to be rectified for its better application. This review discusses the status and limits of conventional drug treatment and the recent advancements and updated strategies in nano-therapeutics for HIV treatment and cures, along with the possible mechanism of action of nano-mediated drugs, clinical translational challenges, and prospects of advanced nano-drug delivery schemes in HIV prevention and management.
Keywords: nanoparticles, human immunodeficiency virus, nano carriers, drug delivery, antiretroviral drugs, nano formulations
Introduction
A highly prevalent disease, which has caused substantial illness and death during the last three decades, swaying economic growth and social stability worldwide, affecting global health, is commonly called AIDS, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome caused by the HIV (human immunodeficiency virus).1,2 It continues to persist to date since its first case was reported in the year 1981.3,4 As per the 2024 HIV Joint United Nations Programme epidemiological data, a projected 1.3 million people have acquired HIV in the year 2023, which is three times of what is targeted for 2025.5 Usually, HIV is transmitted to the body by several pathways, such as sexual intercourse, from an HIV-infected mother to the child, and also by sharing of intravenous drug injection paraphernalia.6
With the advancement in basic and translational research around the World and more significantly in the USA, several biomarkers associated with HIV and its development have been invented and documented.7 Based on these HIV-related research, a substantial number of extremely effective oral antiretroviral drugs are permitted and are extensively used currently in combination with other formulations.8 There are two injectable drugs (rilpivirine and cabotegravir) currently under clinical development for HIV infection.9,10 However, the cure for HIV and AIDS remains indefinable to date due to a variety of factors.11 HIV has a high mutation rate and eventually, it deceives the body’s immune system, thereby infecting the patient. Further, the mono-drug treatments gave rise to drug-resistant viruses that ultimately led to therapeutic failure.12 Besides, the use of several traditional HIV vaccines resulted in high side effects and other associated complications, such as a lack of target specificity and difficulties in penetrating the infected cells.12 Furthermore, the traditional drugs, which exist currently, are only for oral or injectable purposes, and these are not always formed as the ideal formulation for each product.13,14 Hence, as such, there has not been any significant advancement in the HIV vaccine research and development, and currently, only a few ongoing research studies have been reported, which are under different stages of clinical trials.1 The most significant hindrance in the development of a highly effective HIV drug is that it should be targeted to the suppression of HIV reproduction without affecting the healthy cells.1
With the recent innovations in the field of nanotechnology and nanomedicine, various nanomaterials and nanoformulations have been developed to treat HIV infections and AIDS.15 A literature search in various data bases like PubMed central and Web of Science, using the keyword, HIV drug delivery (nano), a total of 14,721 articles are published till today and among them, around 12, 651 articles are published during the last 10 years that includes, 11,415 journal articles, 1,195 articles are accepted manuscripts and 41 articles are preprints (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/?term=HIV+drug+delivery+%28nano%29&sort=relevance). Furthermore, another keyword “nano HIV vaccine” resulted in a total of 11,162 articles published till today, and among them 9,892 articles were published during the last 10 years, with 8,926 published as journal articles, 833 accepted manuscripts, and 132 preprints (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/search/?term=nano+HIV+vaccine). Nanomaterials, like dendritic polymers, polymer micelles, liposomes, and metal nanoparticles, have been reported previously to boost the potential of antiretroviral drugs in the deterrence, identification, and treatment of HIV.16 It has proven to be a suitable approach to resolve the conventional HIV vaccine-related issues for HIV and AIDS management for three main reasons.17 Firstly, nanotechnology research is capable of providing an enhanced system for the transmission of HIV vaccines and drugs, and better penetration capability of physiological barriers. Secondly, there are a number of nanoparticles that possess anti-viral properties and they can easily prohibit the replication of HIV in the body by entering and counteracting the virus and snooping with the virus accumulation. Lastly, these are less toxic in nature, which makes them suitable for formulating vaccines and drugs.1 Besides, these nanomaterials can act as nanocarriers for various HIV drugs because of their improved solubility, controlled release capabilities, and target-specific abilities that enable lessening of the drug doses and targeting the drugs to the desired locations.15 Furthermore, there are so many reasons to opt for nanoparticle-mediated HIV treatment and drug delivery currently. Protein and nucleic acid-related drugs require better carrier systems for target specificity and to increase their efficaciousness.18 In such a scenario, the nanomaterials with a smaller size, larger surface area, and enhanced solubility and bioavailability properties could serve as a suitable carrier for HIV medications that can pass the blood-brain barrier (BlBrnBr), penetrate the pulmonary system, and be captivated via the tightened intersections of the endothelial cells in epithelial skin tissues.19 Besides, nanoparticles are also engineered to exhibit several counterfeits of HIV-1 antigens, which could enhance the immune response and thus can diagnose and react effectively to the virus by prompting a strong antibody and T-cell response. Additionally, nanoparticles provide a harmless and active substitute to live-attenuated viruses, which are otherwise unsafe to use for an HIV-1 vaccine.20 Recently, several long-acting nanoformulated HIV infection-targeted drugs have been tested for Phase I/II clinical trials.21 Though the development of highly effective antiretroviral nano-based treatment methodology has extensively boosted the HIV treatment procedure, it also gave rise to many side effects (drug resistance, toxicity, etc) that need to be studied more. Moreover, the application of advanced nanotechnology in HIV treatment should put emphasis on these side effects for better results. Moreover, the acquiescence of various regulatory aspects of using nanotechnology in HIV treatment requires more clarification, and ethical reports should include the detailed guidelines of using HIV related drugs. In this review, the current status and limitations of conventional HIV drugs, and advancements in the nano drug delivery strategy of HIV treatment and probable mechanisms of nano carrier action on the regulation of HIV infection, and their future directions are discussed.
Background -HIV and Its Pathogenesis
Human immunodeficiency virus, commonly known as HIV, belongs to the Lentivirus genus of the Retroviridae family.22 The viruses share most of the morphological and biological characteristics and cause many long-term ailments with long expectancy in the infected mammals.22,23 The HIV genome comprises 8 viral proteins essential for its development, and its protein capsid is made of p24viral protein enclosing its single-stranded RNA.15 The HIV genome encodes various proteins like structural (3 nos)., envelope (2 nos)., accessory proteins (6 nos)., and enzymes (3 nos).24,25 The HIV capsids are characteristically irregular cones made of capsid proteins that are dissimilar from regular icosahedral capsids.24,25 HIV is spherical with a diameter of about 120 nm.1 The lifecycle of HIV consists of 11 phases that includes binding (1), fusion (2), trafficking (3), nuclear import (4), reverse transcription (5), integration (6), transcription (7), translation (8), assembly (9), budding (10) and release/maturation (11) (Figure 1).26 The figure shows that the initial stage starts with the integration of the virus with the host cell receptor (1) causing fusion of virus and discharge of the viral core to the cytoplasm of the host cell (2). Next, the viral core is transported to the cytoplasm (3) resulting in reverse transcription and nuclear import (4). Then the viral materials reach the nucleus where they move to the active chromatin along with uncoating and reverse transcribing (5). Next step is the integration process (6) followed by the viral gene transcription (7), and translation of the gene (8) into the Gag polyproteins, which assemble (9) and pinpoint to the host membrane, resulting in the development of a nascent virion (10). Then the viral protease enzyme chops the Gag polyprotein into its integral, useful proteins at the end of the HIV-1 lifecycle (11).26 It can infect CD4+ T cells, macrophages, and microglial cells, causing immunodeficiency.1 There are two types of HIVs, HIV type 1 (HIV-1), commonly found globally, and HIV type 2 (HIV-2), mostly found in some areas of West Africa.1 The HIV-1 virus is more contagious than the HIV-2.1 Though AIDS is caused by the HIV-2 virus, the progression of the disease is slower than that of the HIV-1 virus and is usually less spread.27,28
|
Figure 1 Schematic diagram showing the life cycle of HIV-1 in 11 phases. Reproduced from Masenga SK, Mweene BC, Luwaya E, Muchaili L, Chona M, Kirabo A. HIV–Host Cell Interactions. Cells. 2023; 12(10):1351. © 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).26 |
The process of HIV infection can be summarized in six steps. The first step of the infection starts with the entering of the virus into the immune cells by adsorbing glycoproteins to cell target receptors. Next, the viral envelope is fused, and the HIV RNA molecule and diverse enzymes (integrase, protease, reverse transcriptase, and ribonuclease) are released in the cell.1 The second step includes replication and transcription. In this step, the reverse transcriptase enzymes release the single-stranded RNA genome and duplicate it into a complementary DNA molecule.1 In the third step, after the instructions were translated from the RNA to the DNA, the HIV attaches its DNA to the cell nucleus DNA.1 In the fourth step, the recombination of the two RNA genomes of HIV occurred.1 In the fifth step of the HIV viral cycle, the Env polyprotein (gp160) is conveyed to the Golgi complex by the endoplasmic reticulum, forming dual HIV envelope glycoproteins (gp41 and gp120), which enter the host cell membrane (Gp41) and anchor gp120 protein to the infected cell membrane.1 In the last step, HIV transmits between the CD4+ T cells and buds from a sick T cell and then infects another T cell by entering through the blood.1
Besides, HIV can also spread right from one sick T cell to another T cell through the process of virological synapse.1 In the case of mucosal infection, the infected cells travel to the local lymph nodes, giving rise to the elevated number of HIVs in the naive T cells.29 The viral infection is then quickly dispersed by the T cells to the lymphoid tissues associated with the bone marrow, intestine, and spleen.30 In case of the HIV infections in the digestive system, there is a significant loss of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells that cannot recover fully by antiretroviral therapy.31,32 In simple words, the occurrence of AIDS disease starts with the reduction of CD4+ T-cells and inflation in the blood p24 levels.15 Moreover, the virus encodes proteins like Vif, Vpr, Nef, and the viral protease enzymes.15 The negative regulatory factor (Nef) is one of the virulence factors that affects the immune system of human beings by permitting the transmission of the infection, together with protecting and replicating the virus in the human body.15 The viral glycoprotein formed by the gp120 and gp41 is accountable for virus binding to the host cell receptor (CD4) and its co-receptors (such as CCR5 or CXCR4), which facilitates the entry of the pathogen into the targeted cells.15
Current Situation and Restrictions of Conventional Drug Therapy and Treatment for HIV
Precise and speedy diagnosis of HIV significantly affects the clinical treatment of the disease.16 Currently used traditional diagnostic approaches are mostly influenced by HIV antibody detection in the plasma or the serum by the most sophisticated techniques, such as the ELISA or Western blot assays.16 Besides such an advancement in HIV diagnosis, there are many lacunae in the techniques, including false positive and false negative results caused by the reactions among the antigens and the samples.16
The HIV and AIDS treatment methods can be summarized into five different types. The first one is the use of blockers to halt the HIV binding to the target cells.1 The second approach uses inhibitors that can inhibit the reverse transcriptase enzyme and the HIV precursor protease enzyme.1 The third approach utilizes the inhibitors to hinder the expression of the HIV gene.1 The fourth approach involves blockers to stop the assembly and release of HIV.1 The fifth approach uses highly active antiretroviral therapy, most commonly called the HAART treatment, to kill the HIV completely.1
The ligand receptor and antibody-based HIV treatment are used that interfere with the entry of the virus into the patient’s body or for providing therapeutic drugs to the infected cells, with antibodies aiming at the viral proteins and host cell receptors, and ligands aiming at definite cellular receptors on the infected cells.33,34 The strategies for antibody treatment include neutralization of the antibodies that block the attachment of the virus and bispecific antibodies that involve the immune cells to kill the infected cells. While the ligand-based antibodies use ligands to bind to the receptors on the infected cells, thereby enhancing the drug delivery effects and decreasing the toxicity effects.34,35 Several pre-clinical and clinical studies have been carried out recently on the development of therapeutic long-term effects on the immune control of HIV-1 when antiretroviral therapy is not available. Advancements in the chimeric antigen receptor technology and enhanced design established that potent HIV-1-specific T cells can be produced.33 Continuing and strategic clinical trials of anti-HIV-1 chimeric antigen receptor cell therapy could provide further understanding into the amount of antigen required to activate the cells, the role of C-C chemokine receptor type 5, the in vivo effectiveness, and determination of these reengineered chimeric antigen receptor cells, and their effect on escape mutants.33
The HAART treatment approach was suggested for the first time by a Taiwanese-American AIDS scientist, Dr. David Ho, in the year 1996.36 The HAART treatment process involves the use of 3 or more antiretroviral drugs simultaneously directed towards the infected patient, including a nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor, a protease inhibitor, fusion and entry inhibitors, a nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and integrase inhibitors.37,38 Based on the HIV lifecycle and their known molecular targets, a substantial number of highly effective, all FDA-approved HIV medications as of July 31, 2024, are presented in Table 1.12,39,40 It shows the list of drug classes, their description, and the commercial name of the drug available in the market for use.
|
Table 1 List of All FDA-Approved HIV Medications |
This HAART treatment process stabilizes the disease symptoms considerably, thereby extending the survival percentage of the patient to a greater rate.37 While there has been substantial progress in these drug therapies, and it has contributed immensely towards the management of HIV infections, a number of limitations and issues always persist in patients, which are presented in the following figure (Figure 2). Usually, three types of issues are raised during the process of management of HIV, which includes the issue of long-acting and extended release resulting in non-compliance, fatigue due to taking so many drugs and failure of the treatment process; the issue of combination therapy resulting in gene mutation, resistance of multiple drugs and lower efficiency of the available drugs; and the targeting of virus reservoirs resulting in lack of target specificity and several side effects.12 Unlike other viral infections, HIV is a specific type of retrovirus that targets the CD4+ T cells, the main coordinators in the immune system of the body. The HAART treatment could not cure the patient completely, nor could it reduce the AIDS symptoms. It cannot eradicate HIV from the infected patients’ body parts, specifically from the brain, intestine, kidney, liver, testis, and lymphoid tissues.41 On the other hand, the HAART treatment is not able to eradicate the HIV-1 virus from resting in the blood CD4+ T cells since the virus is already present in dormancy form at several sites in the patient’s body.42 It can trigger fresh infections in the tissues with less exposure to drugs, such as the brain and lymph nodes, between the administration of oral doses.43 Despite the HAART treatment, the suppressed sick cells may seepage the viral immune response and continue to live for a longer time in the body and favorable conditions; these cells can reactivate and cause HIV infections again in the body.44 In case of less drug exposure, the virus in the affected tissues could proliferate at lower concentrations and could enter the slow-replicating memory T cells’ DNA, and vigorously-duplicating CD4+ T cells.43 Because of these properties, the memory CD4+ T cells are deliberated as a precarious pool of latent HIV-1 proviral DNA.44 The cost of HIV medication is too high considering the long-term use of the drugs. Several aftereffects of HIV drug use for a longer period, such as headache and dizziness, puffiness of the mouth, and injury to the liver and immune system, are reported.41 Furthermore, there are some side effects like lipodystrophy, hyperlipidemia, and osteoporosis, which appear after months or years of taking the HIV medications.41
|
Figure 2 Limitations of HIV treatment. Adapted with permission from Gao Y, Kraft JC, Yu D, Ho RJ. Recent developments of nanotherapeutics for targeted and long-acting, combination HIV chemotherapy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2019;138:75–91.12 |
Complete removal of the HIV from the body of an infected patient is almost impossible due to the viral reservoirs such as the cellular (astrocytes, B-cells, T-cells, macrophages, dendritic cells, microglia, natural killer cells, monocytes, etc.) and tissue reservoirs (central nervous system, lungs, spleen, kidney, gut-associated lymphoid tissue, and reproductive organs, etc).45 Besides, for the removal of the virus from these reservoirs, early diagnosis and therapy with a more effective bioavailability and drug delivery approach is required.46 In the case of conventional vaccination methods, usually, a live or dead virus component is used as a vaccine for the development of antibodies in the injected person’s body. However, this is not the case for HIV infection, as live HIV cannot be used since it is very virulent, and a dead virus does not retain the antigenicity that could trigger the body’s immune system to develop antibodies.47,48 Considering all these issues associated with the current HIV and AIDS treatment process, scientists have started looking for the most advanced medication and treatment procedures, which could be highly effective, reliable, less toxic, and above all, low-cost. In such a scenario, the advanced nanotechnology approach could prove to be effective, and an HIV vaccine can be formulated, or the most advanced AIDS treatment procedure can be designed.
NP in HIV Treatment and Diagnosis
Currently, the advancement in the field of nanotechnology and Nanomedicine has shown encouraging results in the diagnosis, eradication, and cure for the dreadful disease HIV and AIDS, particularly in the drug delivery and detection of virus.18 The conventional systems of HIV drug delivery have a series of issues, such as low availability, limited targeting, site specificity, drug resistance, and inefficient drug release, and thus, maximum efficiency cannot be attained.49 In such a case, an urgency in the development of modern scientific technology is required, which could solve the above issues and regulate the drugs for controlled drug delivery with maximum accuracy.50 The controlled release of HIV drugs is very much crucial in the HIV/AIDS treatment since the maintenance of drug levels in plasma at a tenacious rate in the body for a prolonged period is the key to the success of these drugs. In addition, without the proficient delivery machinery, the whole HIV treatment process is much less effective. The idea of formulating nano-drugs is not new, and many nano-sized drug candidates such as nano-emulsions, colloidal nanoparticles have already been used in the pharma sectors.12 Recently, research on advanced nano drug delivery systems has gained momentum for developing target and site-specific combination drugs to meet the current requirement in the HIV drug management and cure.12 In addition, through the nanotechnology methodology, the nano-drug delivery of anti-retroviral drugs and target-specific delivery of drugs could impart better efficacy to HIV therapy.1,2 In order to attain the target-specific nano drugs, it is important to surface-modify the drug-loaded nano-carrier with a targeting ligand with high specificity towards the chosen target, which will guarantee the entry of the carrier drug only into the preferred cells without affecting the adjacent non-targeted cells. Specific properties such as the physical nature, varying size, and suitable chemical properties of the nanoparticles have made them an effective tool for developing drug candidates in HIV treatment. Nanomaterials can be designed as per the requirement; they can be customized to different surface charges, nontoxic, biodegradable, etc., to make them target specific and cell-specific, and these characteristics add to amplified bioavailability of drugs and diminished peripheral toxicity and other side effects.51,52 The nanoparticles are solid, colloidal particles of varying sizes (10 to 100 nm). It is ideal to dissolve, entangle, absorb, or attach a specific drug in the nanoparticle and reduce its size and properties to the nanometer scale.44 Thus, the properties and efficiency of the drug candidate can be improved since the nanoparticles can protect against the degradation of drugs during storage and inside the body’s fluid.53 It can also be targeted to specific locations of the patient’s body by modifying its surface charge with added ligands, surfactants, polymers, etc.44,54 Further, the drug release capacity can also be improved by nanoencapsulation.44,55 Drugs in sustained-release nanocarrier systems are able to decrease the metabolism and cellular efflux, thereby extending the retention of an adequate amount in the target cells.12 Besides, the nano-drug delivery system is able to integrate medications with diverse physicochemical properties to fight against drug resistance.
Several types of nanomaterials (solid lipid nanoparticles, dendrimers, liposomes, nano-emulsion, carbon nanotubes, polymeric nanoparticles, micelles, and nano-mediated lipid carriers, etc.) are formulated to develop anti-HIV treatments and used as vaccine adjuvants for improving the defensive immune responses, etc.2,47,56–59 Further, nanovector-mediated delivery of antiretroviral drugs has been reported to show positive outcomes in the treatment of HIV infections.60,61 Apart from being used as a drug carrier system, nanomaterials (like gold, silver, copper, and ruthenium) and their derivatives of ligands have also been reported to possess anti-HIV effects by reversing the transcriptase inhibitor (atevirdine), and protease inhibitor (VX-950).62 Some of the major nanomaterials used in the treatment of HIV are shown in Table 2.2 The table shows the types of nano-carrier used, the therapeutic agents attached to the nanomaterial, the drug details such as the size and charge of the nanoparticle used, the drug loading percentage, in vitro/ in vivo efficacy of the drug, and its delivery route, along with the drug target and its effects. Taken together, all these benefits exhibited by the nanomaterials and nanocarrier drug delivery could enhance patient acquiescence and overall therapeutic consequences.
|
Table 2 Major Nanomaterials Used in the HIV Treatment |
Strategies of Nanoparticles in the HIV Treatment
It is said that the nanotechnology-based HIV drug delivery methodology is only applicable either passively or actively on the reservoir sites of the virus to help in the elimination of the infection.60 Besides, several nano-based drug delivery approaches are suggested to target the CD4+ T cells, which are the primary target of HIV infection. Some of these remedial factors include antiviral siRNA or antiretroviral drugs targeted to CD4+ T cells to avert the replication of HIV.84 In the case of the nano-based drug delivery methodology, the immune response swayed by them usually depends on the potentiality of the vaccine, and the nanomaterial vaccine conjugates aid in target specificity.85 Usually, three main strategies are followed while using nanoparticle-based drug delivery systems for HIV treatment, and these include the intracellular delivery of the anti-retroviral drugs by the polymeric nanoparticles; brain delivery of the anti-retroviral drugs by the polymeric nanoparticles, and use of the polymeric nanomaterials as an adjuvant for the HIV vaccines.44
The term, blood-brain barrier (BlBrnBr) is given to the obstruction caused between the blood capillary and the brain’s interstitial fluid. It constitutes a basement membrane, endothelial cells, neuroglial membrane, and the projections of astrocytes. It hinders the passage of substances or drugs in the central nervous system (CNrS).86–88 The BlBrnBr, along with its aftereffects, makes the treatment of neurological disorders a difficult affair.89 Several viruses, including HIV, can easily cross this BlBrnBr endothelium by viral transcytosis and infect the CNrS. However, this barrier obstructs the entry of antiretroviral drugs into the infected site, thereby diminishing the treatment of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders like neuroinflammation and brain damage in the infected person.89–92 Nano-based drug delivery strategies could be effective in penetrating these BlBrnBr to deliver the drugs to the targeted sites and targeted cells, thereby enhancing the effect of the HIV drugs by many folds.93 Specific versatile properties of nanoparticles (enormous surface-to-volume ratio, nanoscale range, external charge, etc. made them an effective nano-carrier for advanced drug delivery through the BlBrnBr to the CNrS.94 Various modifications in the nanocarrier material properties can be made to make them target specific, for example, for targeting them to the CNrS, the surface coupling of specific molecules and ligands can be done so that they can pass through the BlBrnBr to reach the targeted HIV-reservoir locations.95 Besides, another strategy is the transporter-mediated nano delivery of drugs that facilitates easy penetration of nanomaterials into the BlBrnBr on the principle of using transporters expressed on endothelial cells at the BlBrnBr by recognizing and binding to target antigens or receptors, which are well-expressed or subjectively expressed by specific cells or tissues.93 Likewise, antiretroviral drugs attached to nanomaterials have been effectively used in treating HIV infection in the CNrS because of their target specificity and bioavailability properties.96 Figure 3 demonstrates the entry of HIV into the brain interstitial area over the BlBrnBr to infect the microglia, causing HIV infection.88 Later, the nano-based HIV drug (nano silver + highly active anti-retroviral drug) penetrates the BlBrnBr and cures the infected cells. It shows that nano-mediated antiretroviral drugs prove more effective by inhibiting HIV duplication with fewer neurocognitive illnesses.88,97–99
|
Figure 3 Nano-based antiretroviral drug therapy and its mechanism of action. Reproduced from Lawal SK, Olojede SO, Faborode OS, et al. Nanodelivery of antiretroviral drugs to nervous tissues. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1025160. © 2022 Lawal, Olojede, Faborode, Aladeyelu, Matshipi, Sulaiman, Naidu, Rennie and Azu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).88 Abbreviation: AgNPs, silver nanoparticles; HAART, Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy; BBB, blood-brain barrier. |
In a study by Endsley and Rodney,84 the authors formulated a lipid nanoparticle targeting the CD4+ cells and enclosed an anti-retroviral drug indinavir. The author concluded that the drug candidate could provide a selective binding to the CD4+ cells by delivering the drugs to them, thereby improving the anti-HIV effect of the drug even in the dynamic washout conditions, also.84 In another study, Soundararajan et al,2 have discussed how a surface-altered gold nanoparticle conjugated with an antiretroviral medication provides binding sites to the free HIVs so that they cannot bind to the CD4 cells, thus preventing infection in patients (Figure 4).
|
Figure 4 Schematic diagram showing the selective adherence properties of gold nanoparticles with HIV. Reproduced with permission from Soundararajan D, Ramana LN, Shankaran P, Krishnan UM. Nanoparticle-based strategies to target HIV-infected cells. Colloids Surf B. 2022;213:112405.2 |
Reports say that the nano co-crystal hydrogels (PF-127 hydrogels and chitosan) have effectively enhanced the bioavailability, lessened the use of the drugs, and extended dosing frequency.16 A study by Kumar et al,100 showed that a lactoferrin nanoparticle-loaded tripartite drug amalgamation of efavirenz, lamivudine, and zidovudine was helpful in enhancing the efficacy and decreasing toxicity in the infected patients. The author concluded that this nanoparticle drug combination could enhance the bioavailability of drugs with decreased side effects and tissue-related inflammation.100 A similar study on the porous iron (III) carboxylates-based metal-organic frameworks displayed promising effects on the loading of busulfan- an alkylating agent widely used in chemotherapy, conferring the use of nanoparticles as nanocarriers in HIV-controlled drug delivery treatment.101 In another study, Abadi et al,102 showed that gold nanoparticles combined with the drug tenofovir displayed promising anti-HIV-1 and anti-HIV-1 protease activities. Similarly, Gong et al103 developed a poloxamer-based nanoformulation loaded with elvitegravir- an antiretroviral drug and studied their biocompatibility, stability, protein corona, and cellular internalization pathway for its possible clinical interpretation. The author has also studied the effect of the drug combination on the BlBrnBr and suppression of HIV-1 infections.103
Several applications of lipid-based nanomaterials in HIV treatment have been developed recently.104–106 Lipid nanoparticles can deliver antiretroviral drugs effectively due to their ability to lower the toxicity of these drugs, and are easy to synthesize, offering functionalization abilities, targeted specificity, measured release of drugs, and improved load capability.104,105 In a review by Suriyarachchi and Katuwavila,104 the authors have discussed the types of liposomal formulations used in the treatment of HIV/AIDS (Table 3). The table shows the different types of liposomes on the basis of their configuration and applications, the specific drugs loaded into the liposomes, and their significance in treating HIV.
|
Table 3 Different Types of Lipid-Based Nanoformulations Used in the HIV/AIDS Treatment |
Zhou et al105 have discussed the application of lipid nanoparticles in the management of several diseases, including HIV. Rojekar et al115 studied the designing of a nanostructured lipid carrier surface-modified with selenium nanoparticles and loaded with efavirenz, which displays synergistic targeting ability against HIV-1 infection, improves the intracellular antioxidant balance, and increases the effectiveness of long-term HIV therapy. Likewise, Joshy et al116 synthesized a gelatin-modified hybrid polymeric lipid nanoparticle which could encapsulate the antiretroviral drug candidate, zidovudine, and provide a sustained release of the drug in the targeted site.116 In a study by Bazargani et al,117 the authors formed solid lipid nanoparticles with variable PEGylation levels (0–15% w/w of PEGylated lipid), co-encapsulated with Elvitegravir and Atazanavir as an integrase and protease inhibitor, respectively. This encapsulated nano-based drug candidate was able to overcome issues like enzymatic degradation in the nasal mucosa, low penetrability, and mucociliary clearance within the nasal cavity for the intranasal drug administration in HIV treatment.117 Islam et al,118 have developed a fostemsavir encapsulated lipid nanoparticle formulation that could prevent HIV-1 infection. This drug formulation was able to create a drug depot in the monocyte-derived macrophages that prolonged the drug’s plasma residence time.118
The cell-penetrating peptides are the most important candidate in the adsorptive-mediated transcytosis mechanism that is used as the nanoparticle surface targeting elements. These ligands enable superior intracellular drug delivery by the process of endocytosis or by the creation of a transitory assembly with the cell membrane.119 At present, the HIV-1 Tat peptide is among the best extensively verified cell-penetrating peptides.120 Furthermore, these peptide ligands possess protein-transduction domain regions that can help pass through the biological membranes.120 In the case of the BlBrnBr, the entry of the drug is not dependent on the transporters and receptor-mediated endocytosis; rather, it depends on the combination of β-galactosidase enzymes to Tat peptide.121,122 Using a nanocarrier for the delivery of drugs has several benefits, such as controlled release of drugs, site and target specificity, enhanced solubility of a less soluble drug candidate, and enhanced bioavailability of the medication for an extended time with less toxicity.123,124
Similarly, in the case of HIV diagnosis, various nano-mediated biosensors are developed and tested. Hu et al,125 developed a 3,4,9,10-perylene tetracarboxylic acid functionalized graphene sheets and decorated them with gold nanoparticles with an amine-terminated ionic liquid and tested them for the presence of the pol gene of HIV 1 in patients. In another study, Jia et al,126 a bimetallic NiCo-based metal-organic framework pyrolyzed into an innovative complex encompassing NiCo2O4 spinel, CoO, and metallic Co/Ni nanoparticles entrenched with carbon nanotubes was used as a bio-platform for electrochemical biosensors for HIV-1 gene identification. Diao et al,127 formulated a surface plasmon resonance (SPR) biosensing approach based on double-layer DNA tetrahedrons and dynamic entropy-driven chain shift reactions for the diagnosis of enzyme-free or label-free HIV.127 Several biosensors are established for identifying HIV-1 proteases, including SPR and quartz crystal microbalances. Esseghaier et al,128 have established a new sensing assay using a gold sensor for label-free recognition of HIV-1 protease, useful in the diagnosis of HIV-1 virus. Yang et al,129 formulated a quick detection kit by conjugation of the HIV antigen gp41 and gp36, using a nano-immunomagnetic lateral method for detecting HIV. In another review study, Patil et al,130 the authors have critically examined the potential of nanocarrier-based preparations, such as solid lipid nanoparticles, lipid nanoemulsions, supersaturated self-nanoemulsifying drug delivery systems, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles, and cubosomes, in elevating darunavir (a nonpeptidic protease inhibitor) pharmacokinetics in the antiretroviral treatment of HIV.
Possible Mechanism of Action of Nano-Mediated Drugs on HIV Treatment
The current HIV infection treatment has some drawbacks. Understanding the mechanism of actions of nanoparticle-mediated drug delivery and their effect on HIV treatment is of utmost importance to better apply the advanced technology effectively. Nanomaterials are used in HIV treatment in various ways, such as carriers for nano drug delivery, nanoformulations, etc., and hence it is essential to understand their mechanism of action. Some possible mechanisms of action of nano-mediated HIV treatment are discussed below.
Nanocarriers Used in HIV Treatment
In recent times, the use of nanocarriers in HIV drug delivery has garnered much attention among scientists around the world. The use of nanocarriers in anti-retroviral drug delivery displayed particular advantages like target specificity, dose specificity, continuous drug discharge for extended time, enhanced stability, and lessened toxicity.2 The nanocarriers are also able to penetrate the cellular and physiological barriers to reach the specific targeted tissues and cells in the infected person.2 A patient’s immune cells got infected by HIV because of their interaction with the gp120 HIV glycoproteins. However, several free HIVs not interacting with the immune cells undergo several mutations. Hence, targeting the infected cells with the antiretroviral drugs is much easier. Thus, many cellular components, such as chemokine receptors, CD4 proteins, carbohydrate-binding antigens, C-X-C chemokine receptor type-4 protein, etc., are explored for their possible targets in the nanocarrier-based HIV treatment process.2,131,132 The designed nanocarriers carry the antiretroviral drugs to the targeted cells and inhibit the HIV enzymes at different HIV lifecycle stages.133
Various types of nanoparticle-related carrier systems have been developed for the delivery of multiple antiretroviral drugs to their specific locations.12 It includes lipid-based nanocarrier systems like liposomes, which are formulated with coordinated lipid layers that can protect the attached drugs and make them biocompatible and biodegradable. The liposomes can hold both the hydrophilic and hydrophobic drugs in their phospholipid bilayer.12 Another type is the ethosomes that contain alcohols and phospholipids at very high concentrations together with water molecules, that is used for transdermal delivery of antiretroviral drugs.12 Some anti-HIV drugs are also covalently conjugated with polymers, encapsulated into polymeric nanoparticles, and used in HIV treatment.12 Lactoferrin protein, a component of the body’s immune system, is used as a carrier for HIV drugs.100 In a study by Kuo and Su,134 the authors studied the permeability of antiretroviral drugs such as tavudine, delavirdine, and saquinavir using polybutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles, methylmethacrylate-sulfopropylmethacrylate nanoparticles, and solid lipid nanoparticles as the carrier system across the in vitro BlBrnBr model.95 In another study, some researchers have conjugated the Poly(l-lactic acid) nanoparticles with Tat peptide and explored their effect on the transport of ritonavir across the BlBrnBr and into the CNrS.122,135 Besides, several inorganic nanoparticles like iron oxide nanoparticles, silver nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles, quantum dots, carbon nanotubes, silica dots, etc. are also tested for drug delivery abilities.136 Some reports suggest that monocyte-derived macrophages are also used as nanocarriers for HIV drug delivery.137 Many RNAi approaches in the treatment of HIV-1 infection using two different groups of approaches (RNA targeting via antisense and protein targeting via decoy or aptamers) based on the mechanism of action have been investigated recently.138,139 However, in the case of HIV, the key challenge in the RNA-based therapy is the delivery of RNA to the targeted host cells since the latent reservoir is spread throughout the body, resulting in rapid removal of RNAs from circulation, and thus not easily taken up by cells, and are incompetent at endosome escape in the target cells.140 To address these issues, a specific delivery system is required, which could avoid the renal clearance and pass these barriers and reach the target cells without any hindrance.141 Currently, the manufacture of siRNAs and nanocarrier systems is a very multifaceted process and has been a major blockage in getting the treatments to the clinic due to issues in scalability and reproducibility. A new platform called the NanoAssemblr®, has been developed which could successful manufacture lipid based nanoparticles with reliable sizes and encapsulation of drugs.142
Nanomaterials Trigger an Immune Response
The application of cell-based therapies in HIV-1 treatment has been reported recently.96,143,144 This type of treatment is based on the transfer of allogenic immune cells into the patients after ex vivo growth and/or alteration, to remove the HIV-1-infected cells.96 Nanoparticles have been reported to improve the potentiality of the immune cells to target and destroy the HIV-1-infected cells. Basically, the nanobased immunomodulatory systems (NIMS) are categorized into 4 different groups, such as lipids and carbohydrate-based NIMS, polymeric nanoparticles, metallic nanomaterials (gold, silver, copper, carbon nanotubes, etc)., natural organic substances (rosmarinic acid, bilirubin, cell membrane-based nanoparticles), and hybrid immunomodulatory systems (protein-polymer, polymer-polymer, etc).145 Figure 5, by Khatun et al,145 shows the different types of nano-based immunomodulators used with their respective inherent properties and different types of compounds used to synthesize them. Here, the author has categorized the nano-based immunomodulatory systems into 4 groups named organic (containing polymers, lipids, carbohydrates, and proteins), inorganic (containing metallic nanoparticles, silica nanoparticles and carbon nanotubes), biomimetic (trigger-responsive nanobased immunomodulatory system, nano-generators, and biomimetic nanoparticles), and naturally derived (containing bilirubin, hyaluronic acid, rosmarinic acid, and exosomes).145 The first group of polymeric nanoparticles operates with double potentiality as adjuvants and delivery materials for diversified payloads like antigens and co-adjuvants, and delivers them to the immune cells with continuous release, protecting the drug from an adverse environment. The second group of metallic nanoparticles has higher binding properties with specific functional groups and ligands that enhance their therapeutic properties. The third group assists the natural communication between the biological components and the nanoparticles mimicking the properties of the native cells. The fourth group showed synergistic effects with enhanced therapeutic properties.145
|
Figure 5 Different groups of nanobased immunomodulatory systems and their respective characteristics. Adapted with permission from Khatun S, Putta CL, Hak A, Rengan AK. Immunomodulatory nanosystems: an emerging strategy to combat viral infections. Biomaterials and Biosystems. 2023;9:100073. Copyright 2023, Elsevier.145 |
In a report by Sweeney et al,146 the authors have developed a poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanodepots that co-encapsulate the prostratin, a latency-reversing agent, and anti-CD25, a cell surface binding antibody, to improve the function of the primary NK cell against HIV.146 The formulated nanomaterials increased the NK cell cytotoxicity of the target cells, which is a case of enhancement of the immune cell function concerning the HIV-1 infection.146 In another study, the author validated that by conjugating lipid nanoparticle-based drugs to the surface of Cytotoxic T-Lymphocytes, their lytic mechanism can be designated to lyse the cell-bound drug carrier, delivering the discharge of drug cargo when exposed to the targeted cells.147
Furthermore, the HIV-1 virus has developed a methodology to disrupt the immune function of the body, and thus, to eradicate the HIV-1 infection from the body, its immune mechanism requires reestablishment. It is reported that the HIV-1 virus characteristically hinders the cGAS-STING pathway that usually functions via the cGAMP binding to STING on the endoplasmic reticulum, subsequently leading to an IFN-1-mediated antiviral response.147,148 It is reported that pH-sensitive polymeric nanoparticles were able to deliver a STING agonist to offset the HIV-1 immune evasion via the cGAS-STING pathway and demonstrate promising antiretroviral activity.147 In a study by Bahr et al,149 it was reported that a synthetic derivative of muramyl dipeptide (a nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-containing 2 agonist) named murabutide has completed the Phase II clinical trial, representing its clinical tolerance and effectiveness for enhancing the antiviral immunity in HIV-infected patients.149 In another study, the author has prepared an ultra pH-sensitive cGAMP-loaded micelle named PC7A as an adjuvant for modulating the innate immune response in HIV and concluded that the formulation was able to affect the replication of two HIV-1 strains (IIIB and LAI) in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells.150 In 2021, Astorga-Gamaza et al151 have formulated a bispecific gold nanoparticle conjugated with anti-HIVgp120 and anti-human CD16 antibodies, which were able to enhance the contact between the natural killer cells and the HIV-expressing cells, thus triggering a cytotoxic response against the HIV-infected cells.151 A schematic diagram shows how the nanoengagers decorated with anti-CD16 and anti-tumor antigen antibodies are able to target the tumor cells, triggering a cytotoxic response (Figure 6).152 Applications of nanoengagers against the human immunodeficiency virus-infected cells can be explored in future studies.
|
Figure 6 Schematic diagram showing the effect of nanoengagers against the tumor cells. Reproduced with permission from Mikelez-Alonso I, Magadán S, González-Fernández Á, Borrego F. Natural killer (NK) cell-based immunotherapies and the many faces of NK cell memory: A look into how nanoparticles enhance NK cell activity. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2021;176:113860. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.152 Abbreviations: CD16, IgG Fc receptor (FcγRIIIa); α-CD16, antibody binding CD16; α-TA, antibody binding TA; TA, Tumor antigen; EGFR, Epidermal growth factor receptor; HER-2, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; CEA, Carcinoembryonic antigen. |
Improved Cellular Uptake of HIV Vaccine
Using nanomaterials for antiretroviral drug delivery is very helpful for the targeted delivery of drugs to specific locations, such as to the cells associated with the HIV infection.153 A study by Panyam et al,154 has tested the effectiveness of two formulation doses of nanoparticle-based drugs (dexamethasone) for their cytoplasmic delivery to the intracellular locations. The author concluded that the drug interacts with the cytoplasmic receptors, forming a composite that is conveyed to the cell nucleus, triggering the initiation of definite genes responsible for cell proliferation. Loading the drug with nanoparticles like PLGA, PLA, etc., and controlling its release for a longer period enhances its antiproliferative effect for vascular muscle cells.154
Improved Penetrability and Effectiveness of HIV Vaccine
Nanoparticle-mediated delivery of antiretroviral drugs increases the drug penetration capacity through the BlBrnBr.155 Besides, through the use of nanomaterials, the amount of drug dose and its frequency are also reduced and controlled because of its target-specific properties, thereby decreasing the side effects of HIV drugs.155 In an old report from 1993, the author compared the nanoparticle-mediated azidothymidine medication with only azidothymidine medication and found that liposomal-mediated azidothymidine medication displayed enhanced effect with very few side effects as compared with treatment with only azidothymidine medication in HIV patients.156
Nanotechnology and Gene Therapy
The use of gene therapy in HIV treatment has been explored recently. Nanoparticle-mediated gene therapy is introduced into the HIV-infected cells for treatment.153 By application of gene therapy, progressive HIV infection can be prevented by continued meddling with the viral replication in the absence of chronic chemotherapy.157 Earlier, Scientists used the gene-editing system to knock out the chemokine receptor type 5 in CD4+ T cells, blocking HIV-1 virus entry.158,159 With the advancement of nanotechnology, gold nanoparticles have been developed with surface conjugation of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats, which target the two locations within the hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell genome, chemokine receptor type 5 and the gamma-globin gene promoter.96,160 Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats conjugated gold nanoparticles were able to enter the CD34+ hematopoietic cell line, which is difficult to transfect. Finally, this conjugated particle was able to exhibit gene editing and homologous directed repair at the chemokine receptor type 5 and the gamma-globin promoter locus at a higher potential than the electroporation-driven process.96,160
In a study by Dash et al,161 the authors have demonstrated the combined effect of two techniques to investigate the synergism in HIV treatment. The author showed that out of the seven tested mice, only two mice that received the sequential long-acting slow-effective release antiviral therapy followed by successive AAV9-based delivery of CRISPR-Cas9 treatment resulted in an undetectable amount of virus and integrated DNA. The portion of the HIV-1 genome was treated for viral return and saw a reestablishment of their CD4+ T cells, signifying HIV-1 deterioration and abolition.161 It has been reported that CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing can hinder the various HIV-1 infection stages.162 In a study by Hultquist et al,163 the authors used CRISPR-Cas9 techniques for the mechanistic examination of the HIV host factors in CD4+ T cells.163 A number of factors, such as apolipoprotein B mRNA-editing enzyme and TRIM5α gene expression, could result in the host restriction against HIV infections, and the use of CRISPR-Cas9 technology could enhance these expressions and thus are useful in the anti-HIV therapies.164,165
Dendrimer siRNA on Suppression of HIV Replication
Unchanged dendrimers are reported as highly useful RNA interference regulator carriers.166 Cationic triethanolamine-polyamidoamine dendrimers G5 are used to transport siRNA precursors (Dicer-substrate siRNAs), for multi-target elimination of HIV.166 In a study by Zhou et al,167 the authors assessed the in vivo effectiveness of mechanically bendable, cationic poly(amidoamine) dendrimers as a small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery arrangement in a Rag2(-)/-γc-/- (RAG-hu) humanized mouse model for HIV-1 infection.167 The author concluded that the treatment of dendrimer-dsiRNA was able to inhibit the HIV-1 infection by several folds, followed by protection against the virus-induced CD4+ T-cell exhaustion. Besides, the author also proved that the follow-up injections of the dendrimer-based dsRNA, when the infection resurfaced, led to a thorough eradication of the HIV-1 titers.167 Besides, the NN16 dendrimers have been reported to be used effectively to deliver the siRNA that eliminates the important HIV-1 proteins (NEF, COX2, GAG, and p24), with a reduction of the viral load from 35 to 60% in different cell lines under in vitro conditions.168,169 Briz et al,170 demonstrated the elimination effect of the HIV-1 contamination in the primary human peripheral blood mononuclear cells with a fourth-generation phosphorus dendrimer complexed with anti-NEF siRNA and reported effective virus repression with less toxicity.170 Table 4 summarizes the dendrimer-centered siRNA gene delivery systems for HIV treatment.166 The table shows the details of the target protein and the type of sRNA, the object it is targeted at, the dendrimer and dendrimer-based constructions, and their significant effects.
|
Table 4 Dendrimer-Based Gene Delivery Systems for siRNA Therapeutics in HIV Treatment |
Nanoparticle Methods for Targeting CD4+ T Cells
In HIV contamination, the virus targets the CD4+ T cells of the infected person. Hence, in order to eradicate the virus from the patient’s body, an important strategy is to target these CD4+ T cells, and a variety of nano-based systems are developed to deliver the drugs or antiviral siRNA to these CD4+ T cells to hinder replication of HIV.153 In a study by Campbell et al,175 the authors examined the effectiveness of nano-mediated CD4+ T cell membrane-coated nanoparticles encapsulated with DIABLO/SMAC mimetics to both deactivate HIV-1 and kill the HIV-1-infected resting CD4+ T cells and macrophages. In another study, the author examined the synthesis of a novel lipid nanoparticle combined with protein kinase C activator bryostatin-2 and targeted them to the primary human CD4+ T cells to activate them and motivate the production of latent virus from human T-cell lines under in vitro conditions and in a humanized mouse model under ex vivo conditions. Additionally, they demonstrated that these nano systems can also be loaded with the protease inhibitor nelfinavir, fabricating a particle that can activate the latent virus and inhibit the spread of the virus.176 Tombacz et al,177 demonstrated that the CD4-targeted mRNA- lipid nanoparticles can penetrate all T cell subtypes and targeted tissues (lymph nodes) passing through the BlBrnBr under in vivo conditions. This application enables the delivery of mRNA therapy and engineered genome editing enzymes to T cells for effective HIV treatment, by eliminating the HIV combined provirus from the genome of latently infected cells.177 In a recent study by Cevaal et al178 the authors have developed an mRNA-based lipid nanoparticle formulation (encapsulated with the HIV Tat protein, an activator of HIV transcription) with extraordinary strength to deliver mRNA to the resting CD4+ T cells in the absence of cellular toxicity or activation. This drug was able to enhance the transcription of HIV in ex vivo CD4+ T cells from people living with HIV.178 It also allows the delivery of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) stimulation mechanism to control both viral and host gene transcription.178
Nanoparticles Boost Permeation of Blood-Brain Barrier
Apart from the presence of HIV-1 in CD4+ helper T cells, it is also present in the microglial cells of macrophages of the CNrS. It may resist the highly active antiretroviral treatment process or could spread the HIV-1 contamination in the adjacent tissues, which are important in the progression of the HIV-1 virus-linked neurocognitive ailments.179,180
BlBrnBr is a regular protective membrane mechanism of the body that guards the CNrS from entry of toxins and pathogens in the blood.91,181,182 However, due to this natural barrier of the body, several CNrS-related ailments are difficult to treat, as most of the drugs and formulations are obstructed from entering the brain, leading to low therapeutic efficiency as well as intensified side effects due to the accumulation of these drugs in other organs and tissues.91,181 It is important to formulate a mechanism to overcome the anatomical BlBrnBr and deliver the required drugs to the stubborn HIV-1 in microglial cells. Figure 7 shows the regulation strategies of the BlBrnBr and the process of brain-targeted drug delivery systems.181 The figure discusses various mechanism of action of drugs crossing the BlBrnBr that occurs through the pathways of paracellular and transcellular diffusion, receptor-based, cell-based, transporter-based, and adsorptive-based transcytosis process (a). The different cell structures of the BlBrnBr include astrocytes, pericytes, junctions, endothelial cells, and capillary lumen (b). The transcytosis mechanism includes the stages like passive transcytosis, intranasal administration, ligand functionalization, membrane coating, and disruption of the BlBrnBr (c). Different types of engineered materials, such as liposomal formulation, polymeric materials, gold, carbon, and iron oxide, silica, and biomass-based materials, are used in the brain-targeted drug delivery (d).181
|
Figure 7 Brain blood barrier regulation Strategies and brain-targeted drug delivery. (a) Mechanism of crossing of the brain blood barrier; (b) structure of the brain blood barrier; (c) different non-invasive strategies for crossing the brain blood barrier; and (d) various engineered particles for targeted drug delivery. Reproduced from Wu D, Chen Q, Chen X, Han F, Chen Z, Wang Y. The blood–brain barrier: Structure, regulation and drug delivery. Sig Transd Target Ther. 2023;8(1):217. © The Author(s) 2023. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.181 |
To penetrate the BlBrnBr, site-specific antiretroviral drugs combined with small-sized nanoparticles are formulated.183 The nano-conjugated drugs can cross the BlBrnBr via transient pathways without compromising the neurological integrity, and concurrently preserve the innate healing effects of the original drug. Besides, another factor is the charge and surface moieties that can functionalize the nanoparticles to provide specificity to the targeted receptors.91 A study by Gong et al,103 demonstrated that PLGA-coated elvitegravir nanoparticles penetrate through the BlBrnBr system and efficiently suppress the replication of HIV, followed by a decrease of brain interface inflammation.103 In another study, the authors formulated the surface-modified nanodiamonds conjugated to the efavirenz drug to cross the BlBrnBr system and display promising results. Besides, the inert, nontoxic carbon nanosystem helps in the retention of the drug at the CNrS for a longer time with no neuronal plasticity side effects.184 Research by Kanazawa et al,185 showed the formulation of a nose-to-brain delivery system joined with cell-penetrating peptide-modified nano-micelles that encompass polyethylene glycol–polycaprolactone copolymers conjugated with the cell-penetrating peptide (Tat) to expand the efficacy of the delivery of small interfering RNA to the brain. The author concluded that this system was able to transport the drug in a faster way along the olfactory and trigeminal nerve pathways because of its high permeation across the nasal mucosa.185 This mechanism could be helpful in HIV treatment. Garrido et al,186 revealed that HIV integrase inhibitors connected to gold nanoparticles can enter the BlBrnBr and exhibit improved antiviral effects.
Clinical Translational Challenges and Nano-Drug Delivery Prospects in HIV Management
Several studies have been developed on the uses of nanotechnology in the treatment of chronic and infectious diseases recently.187 Largely, the advancement of nanotechnology in antiretroviral therapy is primarily in its initial clinical translation stage.12 Recently, several long-acting nanoformulated HIV infection-targeted drugs have been tested for Phase I/II clinical trials.21 Some of these nanomediated drugs are discussed below. A therapeutic vaccine called DermaVir (NCT00711230 and NCT00712530) patch (Genetic Immunity, Budapest, Hungary) has entered Phase II clinical trials.188,189 The drug is in the form of a patch, and it includes mannosylated poly(ethyleneimine), glucose, and an HIV antigen-coding DNA plasmid, which are articulated into nanoparticles, and these nanodrugs are delivered to the epidermal cells, which then engulf the nanoparticles and evolve to produce an immune response.21,190 It was reported that the drug was safe and tolerable by patients and could induce a long-term effect in the memory T cells, thereby reducing the load of HIV in the viral reservoirs.21,190 Another drug, long-acting injectable nanoformulations combinations of rilpivirine and GSK1265744 (cabotegravir, an HIV-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor and equivalent of dolutegravir) (NCT05697289, NCT06185452, NCT01467531) was reported to have progressed through clinical trials. This drug, GSK1265744 (NCT02178800),191 has been detected in the plasma of patients at 48 weeks under phase II clinical trial.191 A carbomer gel (Vivagel® (NCT00740584)192 (Starpharma, Melbourne, Australia)), containing a dendrimer (SPL7013) with inherent but unspecific antiviral activity, is another nano-microbicide drug under clinical trial phase.192,193 SPL7013 contains naphthalene disulfonate-terminated polylisine branches adhered to a central benzhydrylamine amide group, and its outer sulfonate groups are accountable for interrelating with the viral gp120, which inactivates the HIV at submicromolar concentrations under in vitro conditions.194 Its Phase I trials show positive results of Vivagel.195,196 Besides, some more nanomediated antiretroviral drugs are also under development for HIV-1 treatments.21 These include TMC278-LA (long-acting) with poloxamer 338 and d-a-tocopheryl polyethylene glycol under phase II clinical trials.197 Enfuvirtide, a fusion inhibitor with iron oxide nanoparticles coated amphiphilic polymer under in vitro testing stage.198
A study by Mielke et al,199 in Thailand on the RV144 trial, is the only HIV-1 vaccine trial that showed positive results. Here, the author demonstrated that a vaccine with computationally selected immunogens could maximize the coverage of the subtype C V1V2 region and is able to protect the NHPs from a heterologous SHIV challenge.199 Another study by Shen et al,200 studied the effect of breadth of the anti-V1V2 vaccine response on the broadening by including HIV-1 Env strains computationally designed to improve the subtype C V1V2 sequence diversity coverage.200 Further, some more studies related to the RV144 trial are also reported in the clinicalTrial databases (NCT00337181, NCT03875209, NCT00223080, NCT03368053, NCT01435135, NCT01931358)(https://clinicaltrials.gov/expert-search?term=RV144%20trial). Apart from these, in a preclinical study by Zhang et al,201 have demonstrated that a single-component, self-assembling protein nanoparticle (1c-SApNP) conjugated to BG505 uncleaved prefusion-optimized trimers to prompt the production of broadly neutralizing antibodies in mice, rabbits, and nonhuman primates.201 Moreover, the author also reported that exact modification of the glycan could also enhance the response of the vaccine.201 In some clinical studies like Leggat et al202 and Cohen et al,203 the researchers have formulated an outer domain germline that targets the version 8 (eOD-GT8) 60-mer nanoparticle, which can prim the VRC01-class HIV-1-specific B cells for production of broadly neutralizing Abs.202 And they also discovered that the eOD-GT5 60-mer induced a CD4 T cell response, which proves the highly active immunogenic abilities of the nanoparticle-based vaccine.203
Sufficient information on residual virus sites and their impact on the virus return is just developing. It is important to focus on treatment measures for removing HIV from the body’s residual location using various advanced nano-techniques, including targeted drugs and immune-therapeutics.12 Though nanotechnology offers many advantages over the conventional system of medications, it also gives rise to a number of side effects and challenges that need to be rectified for its better application.12,187 In a review by Huang et al,187 the authors discussed such limitations and challenges faced by the nanotechnology-mediated HIV treatment process (Figure 8). Among them, one of the major challenges is to achieve target specificity during the drug delivery process. Due to specific biological barriers in the lungs and gastrointestinal tract, nano-mediated drug candidates are not able to achieve 100% targeted drug delivery.187 Furthermore, there are certain challenges faced during the manufacture of nanomaterials and nanoformulations due to diverse physicochemical properties. And at last, the major challenge is the high cost of nano-mediated HIV treatment procedure, along with addressing various regulatory issues.12,187
|
Figure 8 Major challenges faced by nanomediated drug delivery systems. Reproduced from Huang Y, Guo X, Wu Y, et al. Nanotechnology’s frontier in combatting infectious and inflammatory diseases: prevention and treatment. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):34. © The Author(s) 2024. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.187 |
The widespread applications of nanotechnology in HIV treatment have provided an upper hand in the treatment process. Nevertheless, it also gave rise to toxicity and safety issues, and some reports suggested that organs like kidneys, lungs, and liver, where there is speedy perfusion, are vulnerable to accumulation of nanoparticle traces leading to damage by cytotoxicity, oxidative stress, genotoxicity, and inflammation.204–206 Some liposomal formulations have been evaluated clinically for their safety, acceptability, and effectiveness in patients with HIV/AIDS.21,106,207 However, no liposomal formulations of antiretroviral therapy have received regulatory approval for their clinical use in HIV/AIDS treatment due to their several limitations, including stability, variability, biological barriers, high cost, toxicity, tissue specificity, and hurdles in their clinical translation.106,208 Similarly, carrier-mediated targeted drug delivery encounters several hurdles such as selectivity, location specificity, stability of drug formulations, immune response, synthesis, large-scale production, regulatory obstacles, and patient inconsistency.106 Furthermore, the natural barriers in the body, such as the blood barrier, immune system, and cell membrane blockage systems, act as hindrances for targeted drug delivery of nano-mediated drugs and thus sometimes affect the efficacy and target specificity of the nano-drugs.187 Some studies showed that the efficient target-specific delivery of nano-mediated drugs is associated with the surface condition of the target site and delivery route.209,210 In most of the drug delivery systems, the mononuclear phagocyte system is responsible for the fast clearance of several medication carriers, decreasing the time they spend in circulation and their therapeutic efficacy.211 Recently, research has been undertaken to develop a stealth, such as polyethylene glycol coating, to evade immune detection.211,212 However, challenges, such as the immunogenicity of these polyethylene glycol, are still unsolved. Another important factor is to maintain the consistency of the nanoparticles during their fabrication, repository, and application stage.213,214 In addition, any change in its stability leads to a decrease in the efficacy of the nano-mediated drug delivery, affecting its long-term performance.215 Besides, high cost and regulatory and ethical issues are some of the other challenges that have affected the widespread applications of nano-mediated drug delivery in HIV treatment.
Besides, the fate of nanocarrier systems, post-drug delivery in the HIV treatment, is another important issue that needs to be evaluated for enhancing the usability of the nano-based ATR medications. It is known that different types of carrier systems have different mechanisms for their drug release.216 Some carriers can release the drugs to the targeted site at the site of the lesions without entering the cells, while other types of carrier systems directly interact with the cell membranes and discharge the drugs into the cytoplasm and do not enter the cells.216 Further, some types of carrier systems directly enter the cells through various pathways and are then transported to the specific subcellular sites to deliver the drugs; in such a case, some drugs are degraded in one way while others escape the degradation.216 In case of using the nanocarriers in the HIV treatment, the nanocarriers are designed to be degraded and cleared from the body after its purpose is achieved, however their fate depends on the type of nanocarrier used to deliver the drugs, such as lipid and polymeric nanocariers are usually degraded in the body and subsequently get out of the body through the fecal matter.2,17,138 While some nanocarriers carrying long-term use drugs are usually coated with polyethylene glycol, they get accumulated at the targeted sites and remain there until all the drugs have been utilized by avoiding the immune response of the body.217
Advanced future application of gene therapy with CRISPR-Cas9 is promising for the clinical sciences and rapidly developing for its applications in therapy for human diseases.218 Though the CRISPR-Cas9 technology is at its initial stage and is only used for patients with severe life-threatening diseases, most of its clinical trials are in the phase ½ stage and are mostly concerned with the safety and effectiveness of the genome editing in humans to boost the molecular processes involved in genome editing.218 Besides, the therapeutic genome editing techniques are currently advancing to the ethical dubious variation in the human early stage embryo genome to protect from HIV infection.219 Thus, there should be rules and regulations for the application of these advanced technologies. There are various substantial regulatory hurdles for the application of long-acting injectables and CRISPR-based genome editing therapies in HIV, concerning their long-term effects, immunogenicity, target-specific delivery, and safety.
A key advantage of nano-mediated drug delivery technology is that it can be connected with adjuvants, which could improve the body’s immune response to an antigen by exciting the pro-inflammatory cytokines release.220 A recent research demonstrated that the nano-based adjuvants can enhance the antibody production after the HIV-1 vaccination significantly.221 Besides, the adjuvants are able to help in creating a more vigorous and long-lasting immune response in the patient’s body.220,222 Though these studies highlight the effectiveness of integrating adjuvants into the vaccination treatment,220 using these formulations has contributed immensely to “vaccine hesitancy”, due to some side effects such as body aches, inflammation of tissue, and fever in patients.223,224
Summary and Future Orientation of HIV Treatment
In the current scenario, the formulation of the HIV vaccine has not been fruitful. However, a number of continuous efforts in this field are presently going on around the World, and the application of nanotechnology is playing a major role in this process. Presently, numerous investigations are being undertaken using nanomaterials as potential HIV vaccine carriers or adjuvants. Moreover, these nano-based treatment processes have shown promising capabilities to develop the solubility, distribution, penetrability, consistency, and pharmacokinetics of HIV vaccines. Currently, many nanoparticles are used in the anti-retroviral drug delivery treatment process, and further, some of the nanomaterials, like inorganic nanoparticles, liposomes, dendrimers, carbon-based nanomaterials, and fullerenes, are reported to possess anti-HIV properties. The application of nanomaterials in the HIV treatment process (drugs, diagnosis, and carriers) could play a major role in solving the hurdles faced by conventional HIV treatment methods. Advances in the nanoparticle-based anti-retroviral drug delivery system that includes dendrimers, nanovesicles, liposomes, polymeric micelles, nanoemulsions, etc., deliver an efficient and better-targeted drug delivery with controlled pharmacokinetics and high therapeutic values. Presently, more research is focused on the study of HIV vaccine adjuvants using biocompatible and biodegradable nanomaterials. Several factors, such as the shape, size, physical and chemical properties, encapsulation effect of the nanocarriers, and variable circumstances in between the immune response of the experimental animal to that of humans, significantly prove the potential of nano-adjuvants and their exact mechanism of action. Besides, the cost-effectiveness of the nano-carrier drugs should also be evaluated for their better application in the HIV treatment process.
Recently, most of the sustained-release anti-HIV treatments are based on the optimization of their pharmaceutic and pharmacokinetics features in the preclinical models, and only the long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine treatments have advanced to the clinical trial stage in humans, and their acceptability is under investigation. Besides, there are a few nano-mediated drug formulations targeting HIV host cells, and more research in various nano combinations in the antiretroviral drug delivery treatment process needs to be explored. In 2021, a pharmaceutical company named ModernaTX, Inc. started a clinical trial for the first HIV mRNA vaccine. Besides, several nano-mediated antiretroviral oral drugs (efavirenz) have also been developed, tested, and compared with the normal Sustiva® product. Another drug, Rilpivirine, which was used as an oral drug, has been combined with nanoformulations to form a long-acting injectable format. A nano-mediated solid drug lopinavir that was pro-ethanol-free for pediatric treatment has been modified for mono and combinational drug preparations. Two more preclinical trials of nanoparticle-mediated HIV drug candidates were also developed by the research group at Creighton University in 2018 and 2019. Its results proved the clinical effectiveness of PLGA-bicteravir complex and PLGAtenofovir@ elvitegravir@emtricitabine complex in HIV treatment. In the future, advanced nanomaterials-based clinical research and treatment should focus more on several underlying issues, such as the physical and chemical characteristics of the nanoparticles, their toxicity and stability issues, as well as their pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetic models in a specific situation, and their association with various tissues and cells. Besides the HIV vaccine development, more advanced research is also focused on the development of anti-HIV drugs, antiretroviral candidates, and nucleic acid-based therapies. One of the major hurdles faced in the case of HIV treatment is the target specificity of the drugs to the remote reservoirs like the bone marrow, brain, testicles, and other cellular and subcellular locations. Though the development of highly effective antiretroviral treatment has extensively boosted HIV treatment, it also gave rise to many after-effects like drug resistance, toxicity, low drug penetrability, and lower bioavailability. In addition, the advanced nanomaterials-based HIV treatment should emphasize these hurdles for better results. The advanced application of nanotechnology in HIV prevention, treatment, and therapies might result in the emergence of more effective therapeutic mediations for fighting against the dreadful disease HIV AIDS. Besides, compliance of regulatory aspects of use of nanotechnology in HIV treatment is another topic that needs to be clarified, and ethical reports should include detailed guidelines for using HIV related drugs. Furthermore, the convergence of AI technology with nanoscience should be explored for further improvement in targeted drug delivery mechanisms. The synergy between AI technology and nanoscience could catalyze the enhancement of highly tailored and specific targeted drug delivery treatments. These nano-carrier-based drug delivery signifies an exemplary shift in medicine, offering extraordinary prospects to develop patient health and well-being on a universal scale.
Abbreviations
AIDS, Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; CD4+ T cells, helper T cells; BlBrnBr, blood-brain barrier; RNA, Ribonucleic acid; DNA, Deoxyribonucleic acid; Vif, Viral Infectivity Factor; Vpr, Viral Protein R; Nef, negative regulatory factor; CCR5, C-C chemokine receptor type 5; CXCR4, C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4; HAART, Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy; CNrS, central nervous system; siRNA, small interfering RNA; NIMS, nanobased immunomodulatory system.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to Dongguk University, Republic of Korea, for support.
Funding
No funding is received for this manuscript.
Disclosure
Prof. Dr. Jayanta Kumar Patra is serving as an editorial board member of this journal, but did not participate in the editorial handling and did not have information for the peer-review process of this work. The authors declare no competing interests with this manuscript.
References
1. Liu Y, Chen C. Role of nanotechnology in HIV/AIDS vaccine development. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2016;103:76–89. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2016.02.010
2. Soundararajan D, Ramana LN, Shankaran P, Krishnan UM. Nanoparticle-based strategies to target HIV-infected cells. Colloids Surf B. 2022;213:112405. doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2022.112405
3. Hymes K, Greene J, Marcus A, et al. Kaposi’s sarcoma in homosexual men—a report of eight cases. Lancet. 1981;318(8247):598–600. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(81)92740-9
4. Control CfD. Kaposi’s sarcoma and pneumocystis pneumonia among homosexual men-New York City and California. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1981;3:305.
5. JUNP. The Urgency of Now: AIDS at a Crossroads (2024 GLOBAL AIDS UPDATE). Vol. 2024. Geneva: Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2024. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS; 2024.
6. Baba TW, Liska V, Hofmann-Lehmann R, et al. Human neutralizing monoclonal antibodies of the IgG1 subtype protect against mucosal simian-human immunodeficiency virus infection. Nature Med. 2000;6(2):200–206. doi:10.1038/72309
7. Pau AK, George JM, Warren KE. Antiretroviral therapy: current drugs. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2014;28(3):371–402. doi:10.1016/j.idc.2014.06.001
8. Günthard HF, Saag MS, Benson CA, et al. Antiretroviral drugs for treatment and prevention of HIV infection in adults: 2016 recommendations of the international antiviral society–USA panel. JAMA. 2016;316(2):191–210. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.8900
9. Trezza C, Ford SL, Spreen W, Pan R, Piscitelli S. Formulation and pharmacology of long-acting cabotegravir. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2015;10(4):239–245. doi:10.1097/COH.0000000000000168
10. Williams PE, Crauwels HM, Basstanie ED. Formulation and pharmacology of long-acting rilpivirine. Curr Opin HIV AIDS. 2015;10(4):233–238. doi:10.1097/COH.0000000000000164
11. Richman DD, Margolis DM, Delaney M, Greene WC, Hazuda D, Pomerantz RJ. The challenge of finding a cure for HIV infection. Science. 2009;323(5919):1304–1307. doi:10.1126/science.1165706
12. Gao Y, Kraft JC, Yu D, Ho RJ. Recent developments of nanotherapeutics for targeted and long-acting, combination HIV chemotherapy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2019;138:75–91. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.04.014
13. Allhoff F, Lin P, Moore D. What Is Nanotechnology and Why Does It Matter?: From Science to Ethics. John Wiley & Sons; 2009.
14. McNeil SE. Unique benefits of nanotechnology to drug delivery and diagnostics. Characterization Nanopart Intended Drug Deliv. 2011:3–8.
15. Asl FD, Mousazadeh M, Taji S, et al. Nano drug-delivery systems for management of AIDS: liposomes, dendrimers, gold and silver nanoparticles. Nanomedicine. 2023;18(3):279–302. doi:10.2217/nnm-2022-0248
16. Wang J, Guo N, Hou W. Antiviral drug carriers for human immunodeficiency virus. Nano Trends. 2023;4:100027. doi:10.1016/j.nwnano.2023.100027
17. Mamo T, Moseman EA, Kolishetti N, et al. Emerging nanotechnology approaches for HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention. Nanomedicine. 2010;5(2):269–285. doi:10.2217/nnm.10.1
18. Oti VB. Nanoparticles and its implications in HIV/AIDS therapy. Curr Drug Discov Technol. 2020;17(4):448–456. doi:10.2174/1570163816666190620111652
19. Wong HL, Chattopadhyay N, Wu XY, Bendayan R. Nanotechnology applications for improved delivery of antiretroviral drugs to the brain. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2010;62(4–5):503–517.
20. Aikins ME, Bazzill J, Moon JJ. Vaccine nanoparticles for protection against HIV infection. Nanomedicine. 2017;12(6):673–682. doi:10.2217/nnm-2016-0381
21. Roy U, Rodríguez J, Barber P, Das Neves J, Sarmento B, Nair M. The potential of HIV-1 nanotherapeutics: from in vitro studies to clinical trials. Nanomedicine. 2015;10(24):3597–3609. doi:10.2217/nnm.15.160
22. Cancer IAfRo. Human immunodeficiency viruses and human T-cell lymphotropic viruses. Human Immunodeficiency Virus Human T-Cell Lymphotropicvirus. 1996:424.
23. Levy JA. HIV pathogenesis and long-term survival. Aids. 1993;7(11):1401–1410.
24. Briggs JAG, Simon MN, Gross I, et al. The stoichiometry of Gag protein in HIV-1. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004;11(7):672–675. doi:10.1038/nsmb785
25. Zhao G, Perilla JR, Yufenyuy EL, et al. Mature HIV-1 capsid structure by cryo-electron microscopy and all-atom molecular dynamics. Nature. 2013;497(7451):643–646. doi:10.1038/nature12162
26. Masenga SK, Mweene BC, Luwaya E, Muchaili L, Chona M, Kirabo A. HIV–host cell interactions. Cells. 2023;12(10):1351. doi:10.3390/cells12101351
27. Marlink R, Kanki P, Thior I, et al. Reduced rate of disease development after HIV-2 infection as compared to HIV-1. Science. 1994;265(5178):1587–1590. doi:10.1126/science.7915856
28. De Cock KM, Adjorlolo G, Ekpini E, et al. Epidemiology and transmission of HIV-2: why there is no HIV-2 pandemic. JAMA. 1993;270(17):2083–2086. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510170073033
29. Simon V, Ho DD, Abdool Karim Q. HIV/AIDS epidemiology, pathogenesis, prevention, and treatment. Lancet. 2006;368(9534):489–504. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69157-5
30. Mehandru S, Poles MA, Tenner-Racz K, et al. Primary HIV-1 infection is associated with preferential depletion of CD4+ T lymphocytes from effector sites in the gastrointestinal tract. J Exp Med. 2004;200(6):761–770. doi:10.1084/jem.20041196
31. Guadalupe M, Reay E, Sankaran S, et al. Severe CD4+ T-cell depletion in gut lymphoid tissue during primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 infection and substantial delay in restoration following highly active antiretroviral therapy. J Virol. 2003;77(21):11708–11717. doi:10.1128/JVI.77.21.11708-11717.2003
32. Brenchley JM, Douek DC. HIV infection and the gastrointestinal immune system. Mucosal Immunol. 2008;1(1):23–30. doi:10.1038/mi.2007.1
33. Choudhary MC, Cyktor JC, Riddler SA. Advances in HIV-1-specific chimeric antigen receptor cells to target the HIV-1 reservoir. J Virus Eradication. 2022;8(2):100073. doi:10.1016/j.jve.2022.100073
34. Kufel WD. Antibody-based strategies in HIV therapy. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020;56(6):106186. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2020.106186
35. Umotoy JC, de Taeye SW. Antibody conjugates for targeted therapy against HIV-1 as an emerging tool for HIV-1 cure. Front Immunol. 2021;12:708806. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.708806
36. Michaels SH, Clark R, Kissinger P. Declining morbidity and mortality among patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus infection [1]. N Engl J Med. 1998;339(6):405–406. doi:10.1056/NEJM199808063390612
37. Giudici B, Vaz B, Bossolasco S, et al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy: effects on cerebrospinal fluid markers of JC virus replication and immune response. Clinl Infect Dis. 2000;30(1):95–99. doi:10.1086/313598
38. De Clercq E. Anti-HIV drugs: 25 compounds approved within 25 years after the discovery of HIV. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2009;33(4):307–320. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2008.10.010
39. Spreen W, Ford SL, Chen S, et al. GSK1265744 pharmacokinetics in plasma and tissue after single-dose long-acting injectable administration in healthy subjects.
40. FDA-Approved HIV Medicines. The following table lists HIV medicines recommended for the treatment of HIV infection in the United States, based on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) HIV and AIDS medical practice guidelines. All of these drugs are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2025. Available from: https://hivinfo.nih.gov/understanding-hiv/fact-sheets/fda-approved-hiv-medicines.
41. Harrigan PR, Hogg RS, Dong WWY, et al. Predictors of HIV Drug-resistance mutations in a large antiretroviral-naive cohort initiating triple antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2005;191(3):339–347. doi:10.1086/427192
42. Chun T-W, Justement JS, Moir S, et al. Decay of the HIV reservoir in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy for extended periods: implications for eradication of virus. J Infect Dis. 2007;195(12):1762–1764. doi:10.1086/518250
43. Sarmati L, D’Ettorre G, Giuseppe Parisi S, Andreoni M. HIV replication at low copy number and its correlation with the HIV reservoir: a clinical perspective. Curr HIV res. 2015;13(3):250–257. doi:10.2174/1570162X13666150407142539
44. Khalil NM, Carraro E, Cótica LF, Mainardes RM. Potential of polymeric nanoparticles in AIDS treatment and prevention. Expert Opin Drug Delivery. 2011;8(1):95–112. doi:10.1517/17425247.2011.543673
45. Saksena NK, Wang B, Zhou L, Soedjono M, Ho YS, Conceicao V. HIV reservoirs in vivo and new strategies for possible eradication of HIV from the reservoir sites. HIV/AIDS-Res Palliative Care. 2010;103–122. doi:10.2147/HIV.S6882
46. Chun T-W, Moir S, Fauci AS. HIV reservoirs as obstacles and opportunities for an HIV cure. Nat Immunol. 2015;16(6):584–589. doi:10.1038/ni.3152
47. Robinson HL. HIV/AIDS vaccines: 2007. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007;82(6):686–693. doi:10.1038/sj.clpt.6100408
48. Fauci AS. An HIV vaccine: breaking the paradigms. Proc Assoc Am Phys. 1996;108(1):6–13.
49. Saste VS, Kale SS, Sapate MK, Baviskar DT. Modern aspects for antiretroviral treatment. Int J Pharm Sci Rev Res. 2011;9(1):18–24.
50. Adepu S, Ramakrishna S. Controlled drug delivery systems: current status and future directions. Molecules. 2021;26(19):5905. doi:10.3390/molecules26195905
51. Nagpal K, Singh SK, Mishra DN. Drug targeting to brain: a systematic approach to study the factors, parameters and approaches for prediction of permeability of drugs across BBB. Expert Opin Drug Delivery. 2013;10(7):927–955. doi:10.1517/17425247.2013.762354
52. Lockman P, Mumper R, Khan M, Allen D. Nanoparticle technology for drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2002;28(1):1–13. doi:10.1081/DDC-120001481
53. Min Y, Caster JM, Eblan MJ, Wang AZ. Clinical translation of nanomedicine. Chem Rev. 2015;115(19):11147–11190. doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00116
54. Hoffart V, Lamprecht A, Maincent P, Lecompte T, Vigneron C, Ubrich N. Oral bioavailability of a low molecular weight heparin using a polymeric delivery system. J Control Release. 2006;113(1):38–42. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2006.03.020
55. Allémann E, Gurny R, Doelker E. Drug-loaded nanoparticles: preparation methods and drug targeting issues. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 1993;39(5):173–191.
56. Bell IR, Schwartz GE, Boyer NN, Koithan M, Brooks AJ. Advances in integrative nanomedicine for improving infectious disease treatment in public health. Eur J Int Med. 2013;5(2):126–140.
57. Kumar L, Shivani V, Nandan PD, Ankur B, Bhuvaneshwar V, Jain AK. Nanotechnology: a magic bullet for HIV AIDS treatment. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2015;43(2):71–86. doi:10.3109/21691401.2014.883400
58. Garg B, Beg S, Kumar R, Katare OP, Singh B. Nanostructured lipidic carriers of lopinavir for effective management of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 2019;53:101220. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2019.101220
59. Patra JK, Das G, Fraceto LF, et al. Nano based drug delivery systems: recent developments and future prospects. J Nanobiotechnol. 2018;16(1):71. doi:10.1186/s12951-018-0392-8
60. Shahiwala A, Amiji MM. Nanotechnology-based delivery systems in hiv/aids therapy. Future HIV Therapy. 2007;1(1):49–59. doi:10.2217/17469600.1.1.49
61. Raina H, Kaur S, Jindal AB. Development of efavirenz loaded solid lipid nanoparticles: risk assessment, quality-by-design (QbD) based optimisation and physicochemical characterisation. J Drug Delivery Sci Technol. 2017;39:180–191. doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2017.02.013
62. Galal SA, Abd El-All AS, Hegab KH, Magd-El-Din AA, Youssef NS, El-Diwani HI. Novel antiviral benzofuran-transition metal complexes. Eur J Med Chem. 2010;45(7):3035–3046. doi:10.1016/j.ejmech.2010.03.034
63. Patel BK, Parikh RH, Patel N. Targeted delivery of mannosylated-PLGA nanoparticles of antiretroviral drug to brain. Int J Nanomed. 2018;13(sup1):97–100. doi:10.2147/IJN.S124692
64. Martins C, Araújo F, Gomes MJ, et al. Using microfluidic platforms to develop CNS-targeted polymeric nanoparticles for HIV therapy. Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2019;138:111–124. doi:10.1016/j.ejpb.2018.01.014
65. Pattnaik G, Biswadip S, Biswajit M, et al. Submicron-size biodegradable polymer-based didanosine particles for treating HIV at early stage: an in vitro study. J Microencapsul. 2012;29(7):666–676.
66. Mainardes RM, Khalil NM, Gremião MPD. Intranasal delivery of zidovudine by PLA and PLA–PEG blend nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2010;395(1):266–271. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2010.05.020
67. Mainardes RM, Gremião MPD, Brunetti IL, da Fonseca LM, Khalil NM. Zidovudine-loaded PLA and PLA–PEG blend nanoparticles: influence of polymer type on phagocytic uptake by polymorphonuclear cells. J Pharmaceut Sci. 2009;98(1):257–267. doi:10.1002/jps.21406
68. Shah LK, Amiji MM. Intracellular delivery of saquinavir in biodegradable polymeric nanoparticles for HIV/AIDS. Pharm Res. 2006;23(11):2638–2645. doi:10.1007/s11095-006-9101-7
69. Kurd M, Soroor SM, Saeed R, Mehrdad H, Derakhshandeh K. Oral delivery of indinavir using mPEG-PCL nanoparticles: preparation, optimization, cellular uptake, transport and pharmacokinetic evaluation. Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2019;47(1):2123–2133. doi:10.1080/21691401.2019.1616553
70. Vats R, Ravi PR, Aditya N. Polymeric nanoparticles of lopinavir to improve its oral bioavailability.
71. Aghasadeghi M, Heidari H, M Sadat S, et al. Lamivudine-PEGylated chitosan: a novel effective nanosized antiretroviral agent. Curr HIV Res. 2013;11(4):309–320. doi:10.2174/1570162X113119990043
72. Meng J, Sturgis TF, Youan -B-BC. Engineering tenofovir loaded chitosan nanoparticles to maximize microbicide mucoadhesion. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2011;44(1):57–67. doi:10.1016/j.ejps.2011.06.007
73. Ramana LN, Sharma S, Sethuraman S, Ranga U, Krishnan UM. Evaluation of chitosan nanoformulations as potent anti-HIV therapeutic systems. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014;1840(1):476–484. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.10.002
74. Vacas-Córdoba E, Galán M, de la Mata FJ, Gómez R, Pion M, Muñoz-Fernández MÁ. Enhanced activity of carbosilane dendrimers against HIV when combined with reverse transcriptase inhibitor drugs: searching for more potent microbicides. Int J Nanomed. 2014;3591–3600. doi:10.2147/IJN.S62673
75. Dutta T, AH B, Minakshi G, Prahlad B, Madhulika K, Jain NK. Poly (propyleneimine) dendrimer based nanocontainers for targeting of efavirenz to human monocytes/macrophages in vitro. J Drug Targeting. 2007;15(1):89–98. doi:10.1080/10611860600965914
76. Ramana LN, Sharma S, Sethuraman S, Ranga U, Krishnan UM. Investigation on the stability of saquinavir loaded liposomes: implication on stealth, release characteristics and cytotoxicity. Int J Pharm. 2012;431(1):120–129. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2012.04.054
77. Okafor NI, Nkanga CI, Walker RB, Noundou XS, Krause RWM. Encapsulation and physicochemical evaluation of efavirenz in liposomes. J Pharm Invest. 2020;50:201–208. doi:10.1007/s40005-019-00458-8
78. Jain S, Tiwary AK, Sapra B, Jain NK. Formulation and evaluation of ethosomes for transdermal delivery of lamivudine. AAPS Pharm Sci Tech. 2007;8:249–257. doi:10.1208/pt0804111
79. Tsai C-H, Whiteley CG, Lee D-J. Interactions between HIV-1 protease, silver nanoparticles, and specific peptides. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2019;103:20–32. doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2019.07.019
80. Kumar SD, Singaravelu G, Ajithkumar S, Murugan K, Nicoletti M, Benelli G. Mangrove-mediated green synthesis of silver nanoparticles with high HIV-1 reverse transcriptase inhibitory potential. J Clust Sci. 2017;28:359–367. doi:10.1007/s10876-016-1100-1
81. Chiodo F, Marradi M, Calvo J, Yuste E, Penadés S. Glycosystems in nanotechnology: gold glyconanoparticles as carrier for anti-HIV prodrugs. Beilstein J Org Chem. 2014;10:1339–1346. doi:10.3762/bjoc.10.136
82. Di Gianvincenzo P, Marradi M, Martínez-ávila OM, Bedoya LM, Alcamí J, Penadés S. Gold nanoparticles capped with sulfate-ended ligands as anti-HIV agents. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2010;20(9):2718–2721. doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.03.079
83. Nair M, Guduru R, Liang P, Hong J, Sagar V, Khizroev S. Externally controlled on-demand release of anti-HIV drug using magneto-electric nanoparticles as carriers. Nat Commun. 2013;4(1):1707. doi:10.1038/ncomms2717
84. Endsley AN, Ho RJY. Enhanced anti-HIV efficacy of indinavir after inclusion in CD4-Targeted lipid nanoparticles. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;61(4):417–424. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e3182653c1f
85. Aline F, Brand D, Pierre J, et al. Dendritic cells loaded with HIV-1 p24 proteins adsorbed on surfactant-free anionic PLA nanoparticles induce enhanced cellular immune responses against HIV-1 after vaccination. Vaccine. 2009;27(38):5284–5291. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.05.028
86. Dotiwala AK, McCausland C, Samra NS. Anatomy, head and neck, blood brain barrier. 2018.
87. Ortiz GG, Pacheco-Moisés FP, Macías-Islas MÁ, et al. Role of the blood–brain barrier in multiple sclerosis. Archiv Med Res. 2014;45(8):687–697. doi:10.1016/j.arcmed.2014.11.013
88. Lawal SK, Olojede SO, Faborode OS, et al. Nanodelivery of antiretroviral drugs to nervous tissues. Front Pharmacol. 2022;13:1025160. doi:10.3389/fphar.2022.1025160
89. Warren KE. Beyond the blood: brain barrier: the importance of central nervous system (CNS) pharmacokinetics for the treatment of CNS tumors, including diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma. Front Oncol. 2018;8:239. doi:10.3389/fonc.2018.00239
90. Rahimy E, Li F-Y, Hagberg L, et al. Blood-brain barrier disruption is initiated during primary HIV infection and not rapidly altered by antiretroviral therapy. J Infect Dis. 2017;215(7):1132–1140. doi:10.1093/infdis/jix013
91. Osborne O, Peyravian N, Nair M, Daunert S, Toborek M. The paradox of HIV blood-brain barrier penetrance and antiretroviral drug delivery deficiencies. Trends Neurosci. 2020;43(9):695–708. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2020.06.007
92. Lorin V, Danckaert A, Porrot F, Schwartz O, Afonso PV, Mouquet H. Antibody neutralization of HIV-1 crossing the blood-brain barrier. mBio. 2020;11(5). doi:10.1128/mbio.02424-02420
93. Juillerat-Jeanneret L. The targeted delivery of cancer drugs across the blood–brain barrier: chemical modifications of drugs or drug-nanoparticles? Drug Discovery Today. 2008;13(23–24):1099–1106. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2008.09.005
94. Jain KK, Jain KK. The Handbook of Nanomedicine. Vol. 404. Springer; 2008.
95. Gomes MJ, Neves J, Sarmento B. Nanoparticle-based drug delivery to improve the efficacy of antiretroviral therapy in the central nervous system. Int J Nanomed. 2014;1757–1769. doi:10.2147/IJN.S45886
96. Bowen A, Sweeney EE, Fernandes R. Nanoparticle-based immunoengineered approaches for combating HIV. Front Immunol. 2020;11:789. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2020.00789
97. Lawal SK, Olojede SO, Dare A, et al. Silver nanoparticles conjugate attenuates highly active antiretroviral therapy-induced hippocampal nissl substance and cognitive deficits in diabetic rats. J Diabet Res. 2021;2021(1):2118538. doi:10.1155/2021/2118538
98. Lawal SK, Olojede SO, Dare A, et al. Highly active antiretroviral therapy-silver nanoparticle conjugate interacts with neuronal and glial cells and alleviates anxiety-like behaviour in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2022;13:57–68. doi:10.1016/j.ibneur.2022.06.003
99. Lawal SK, Olojede SO, Sulaiman SO, et al. Tenofovir-silver nanoparticles conjugate ameliorates neurocognitive disorders and protects ultrastructural and cytoarchitectonic properties of the prefrontal cortex in diabetic rats. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2022;22(4):569. doi:10.17305/bjbms.2021.6699
100. Kumar P, Lakshmi YS, Kondapi AK. Triple drug combination of zidovudine, efavirenz and lamivudine loaded lactoferrin nanoparticles: an effective nano first-line regimen for HIV therapy. Pharm Res. 2017;34(2):257–268. doi:10.1007/s11095-016-2048-4
101. Chalati T, Horcajada P, Couvreur P, et al. Porous metal organic framework nanoparticles to address the challenges related to busulfan encapsulation. Nanomedicine. 2011;6(10):1683–1695. doi:10.2217/nnm.11.69
102. Fotooh Abadi L, Kumar P, Paknikar K, Gajbhiye V, Kulkarni S. Tenofovir-tethered gold nanoparticles as a novel multifunctional long-acting anti-HIV therapy to overcome deficient drug delivery-: an in vivo proof of concept. J Nanobiotechnol. 2023;21(1):19. doi:10.1186/s12951-022-01750-w
103. Gong Y, Chowdhury P, Nagesh PK, et al. Novel elvitegravir nanoformulation for drug delivery across the blood-brain barrier to achieve HIV-1 suppression in the CNS macrophages. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):3835.
104. Suriyarachchi DDC, Katuwavila NP. Lipid nanoparticles in antiretroviral therapy: a nanotechnology breakthrough for HIV/AIDS treatment. HIV med. 2025;26(5):658–676. doi:10.1111/hiv.13770
105. Zhou Y, Ge Q, Wang X, et al. Advances in lipid nanoparticle‐based disease treatment. ChemMedChem. 2025;20(9):e202400938. doi:10.1002/cmdc.202400938
106. Woldu MA. Enhancing antiretroviral efficacy: a comprehensive exploration of liposomal and receptor-targeted drug delivery for HIV. Discov Med. 2024;1(1):105. doi:10.1007/s44337-024-00121-8
107. Franquelim HG, De-Sousa FF, Veiga AS, Santos NC, Castanho MA. Cationic liposomes are possible drug-delivery systems for HIV fusion inhibitor sifuvirtide. Soft Matter. 2011;7(23):11089–11092. doi:10.1039/c1sm06553j
108. Jain S, Tiwary A, Jain N. Sustained and targeted delivery of an anti-HIV agent using elastic liposomal formulation: mechanism of action. Curr drug deliv. 2006;3(2):157–166. doi:10.2174/156720106776359221
109. Pollock S, Nichita NB, Böhmer A, Radulescu C, Dwek RA, Zitzmann N. Polyunsaturated liposomes are antiviral against hepatitis B and C viruses and HIV by decreasing cholesterol levels in infected cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2010;107(40):17176–17181. doi:10.1073/pnas.1009445107
110. Sunil B, Rajendra D, Narendra D, Manvi F, Kankate R. Liposomal drug delivery system for zidovudine: design and characterization. Int J Drug Dev Res. 2010;2:8–14.
111. Dubey V, Nahar M, Mishra D, Mishra P, Jain N. Surface structured liposomes for site specific delivery of an antiviral agent-indinavir. J Drug Targeting. 2011;19(4):258–269. doi:10.3109/1061186X.2010.499460
112. Wang L, Sassi AB, Patton D, et al. Development of a liposome microbicide formulation for vaginal delivery of octylglycerol for HIV prevention. Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2012;38(8):995–1007. doi:10.3109/03639045.2011.637048
113. Bronshtein T, Toledano N, Danino D, Pollack S, Machluf M. Cell derived liposomes expressing CCR5 as a new targeted drug-delivery system for HIV infected cells. J Control Release. 2011;151(2):139–148. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2011.02.023
114. Saiyed ZM, Gandhi NH, Nair MP. Magnetic nanoformulation of azidothymidine 5’-triphosphate for targeted delivery across the blood–brain barrier. Int J Nanomed. 2010;157–166. doi:10.2147/ijn.s8905
115. Rojekar S, Pai R, Abadi LF, et al. Dual loaded nanostructured lipid carrier of nano-selenium and Etravirine as a potential anti-HIV therapy. Int J Pharm. 2021;607:120986. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2021.120986
116. Joshy K, Snigdha S, Laly AP, Pothen LA, Thomas S. Gelatin modified lipid nanoparticles for anti-viral drug delivery. Chem Phys Lipids. 2017;207:24–37. doi:10.1016/j.chemphyslip.2017.07.002
117. Bazargani A, Hejazi M, Fernandez M, et al. PEGylated solid lipid nanoparticles for the intranasal delivery of combination antiretroviral therapy composed of Atazanavir and Elvitegravir to treat NeuroAIDS. Int J Pharm. 2025;670:125166. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2025.125166
118. Islam F, Das S, Ashaduzzaman M, et al. Development of an extended action fostemsavir lipid nanoparticle. Commun Biol. 2024;7(1):917. doi:10.1038/s42003-024-06589-5
119. Lindgren M, Langel Ü. Classes and prediction of cell-penetrating peptides. In: Langel, Ü. (eds) Cell-Penetrating Peptides. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 683. Humana Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-919-2_1. 2010:3–19.
120. Rao KS, Ghorpade A, Labhasetwar V. Targeting anti-HIV drugs to the CNS. Expert Opin Drug Delivery. 2009;6(8):771–784. doi:10.1517/17425240903081705
121. Smurzynski M, Wu K, Letendre S, et al. Effects of central nervous system antiretroviral penetration on cognitive functioning in the ALLRT cohort. Aids. 2011;25(3):357–365. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e32834171f8
122. Rao KS, Reddy MK, Horning JL, Labhasetwar V. TAT-conjugated nanoparticles for the CNS delivery of anti-HIV drugs. Biomaterials. 2008;29(33):4429–4438. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.004
123. Ould-Ouali L, Noppe M, Langlois X, et al. Self-assembling PEG-p (CL-co-TMC) copolymers for oral delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs: a case study with risperidone. J Control Release. 2005;102(3):657–668. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.10.022
124. Kipp J. The role of solid nanoparticle technology in the parenteral delivery of poorly water-soluble drugs. Int J Pharm. 2004;284(1–2):109–122. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2004.07.019
125. Hu Y, Hua S, Li F, et al. Green-synthesized gold nanoparticles decorated graphene sheets for label-free electrochemical impedance DNA hybridization biosensing. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2011;26(11):4355–4361. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2011.04.037
126. Jia Z, Ma Y, Yang L, et al. NiCo2O4 spinel embedded with carbon nanotubes derived from bimetallic NiCo metal-organic framework for the ultrasensitive detection of human immune deficiency virus-1 gene. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2019;133:55–63. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2019.03.030
127. Diao W, Tang M, Ding S, et al. Highly sensitive surface plasmon resonance biosensor for the detection of HIV-related DNA based on dynamic and structural DNA nanodevices. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2018;100:228–234. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2017.08.042
128. Esseghaier C, Ng A, Zourob M. A novel and rapid assay for HIV-1 protease detection using magnetic bead mediation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2013;41:335–341. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2012.08.049
129. Yang FQ, Lee T, Wang CN, Sun SY, Li SS, Tian H. [Development of a rapid test kit for antibody to HIV by nano immunomagnetic lateral flow method]. Zhonghua shi yan he lin chuang bing du xue za zhi = Zhonghua shiyan he linchuang bingduxue zazhi =. Chin J Exp Clin Virol. 2010;24(3):235–237.
130. Patil SR, Adhyapak A, Koli R. Advancing darunavir delivery: nanoformulation strategies and innovations in HIV therapy. Pharm Dev Technol. 2025; 2025:1–59.
131. Obisesan O, Katata-Seru L, Mufamadi S, Mufhandu H. Applications of nanoparticles for herpes simplex virus (HSV) and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2021;17(5):793–808. doi:10.1166/jbn.2021.3074
132. Ramana LN, Anand AR, Sethuraman S, Krishnan UM. Targeting strategies for delivery of anti-HIV drugs. J Control Release. 2014;192:271–283. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.08.003
133. Rizvi SAA, Saleh AM. Applications of nanoparticle systems in drug delivery technology. Saudi Pharm J. 2018;26(1):64–70. doi:10.1016/j.jsps.2017.10.012
134. Kuo Y-C, Su F-L. Transport of stavudine, delavirdine, and saquinavir across the blood–brain barrier by polybutylcyanoacrylate, methylmethacrylate-sulfopropylmethacrylate, and solid lipid nanoparticles. Int J Pharm. 2007;340(1–2):143–152. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2007.03.012
135. Borgmann K, Rao KS, Labhasetwar V, Ghorpade A. Efficacy of Tat-conjugated ritonavir-loaded nanoparticles in reducing HIV-1 replication in monocyte-derived macrophages and cytocompatibility with macrophages and human neurons. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2011;27(8):853–862. doi:10.1089/aid.2010.0295
136. Anselmo AC, Mitragotri S. A review of clinical translation of inorganic nanoparticles. AAPS J. 2015;17:1041–1054. doi:10.1208/s12248-015-9780-2
137. Dou H, Grotepas CB, McMillan JM, et al. Macrophage delivery of nanoformulated antiretroviral drug to the brain in a murine model of neuroAIDS. J Immunol. 2009;183(1):661–669. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0900274
138. Agbosu EE, Ledger S, Kelleher AD, Wen J, Ahlenstiel CL. Targeted nanocarrier delivery of RNA therapeutics to control HIV infection. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14(7):1352. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics14071352
139. Scarborough RJ, Gatignol A. RNA interference therapies for an HIV-1 functional cure. Viruses. 2017;10(1):8. doi:10.3390/v10010008
140. Weng Y, Huang Q, Li C, et al. Improved nucleic acid therapy with advanced nanoscale biotechnology. Mol Ther Nucleic Acids. 2020;19:581–601. doi:10.1016/j.omtn.2019.12.004
141. Bobbin ML, Burnett JC, Rossi JJ. RNA interference approaches for treatment of HIV-1 infection. Genome med. 2015;7(1):50. doi:10.1186/s13073-015-0174-y
142. Forbes N, Hussain MT, Briuglia ML, et al. Rapid and scale-independent microfluidic manufacture of liposomes entrapping protein incorporating in-line purification and at-line size monitoring. Int J Pharm. 2019;556:68–81. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2018.11.060
143. Sung JA, Patel S, Clohosey ML, et al. HIV-specific, ex vivo expanded t cell therapy: feasibility, safety, and efficacy in ART-suppressed HIV-infected individuals. Mol Ther. 2018;26(10):2496–2506. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.08.015
144. Lam S, Bollard C. T-cell Therapies for HIV. Immunotherapy. 2013;5(4):407–414. doi:10.2217/imt.13.23
145. Khatun S, Putta CL, Hak A, Rengan AK. Immunomodulatory nanosystems: an emerging strategy to combat viral infections. Biomaterials and Biosystems. 2023;9:100073. doi:10.1016/j.bbiosy.2023.100073
146. Sweeney EE, Balakrishnan PB, Powell AB, et al. PLGA nanodepots co-encapsulating prostratin and anti-CD25 enhance primary natural killer cell antiviral and antitumor function. Nano Res. 2020;13(3):736–744. doi:10.1007/s12274-020-2684-1
147. Jones RB, Mueller S, Kumari S, et al. Antigen recognition-triggered drug delivery mediated by nanocapsule-functionalized cytotoxic T-cells. Biomaterials. 2017;117:44–53. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.048
148. Yan N, Regalado-Magdos AD, Stiggelbout B, Lee-Kirsch MA, Lieberman J. The cytosolic exonuclease TREX1 inhibits the innate immune response to human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Nat Immunol. 2010;11(11):1005–1013. doi:10.1038/ni.1941
149. Bahr GM. Non-specific immunotherapy of HIV-1 infection: potential use of the synthetic immunodulator murabutide. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;51(1):5–8. doi:10.1093/jac/dkg063
150. Aroh C, Wang Z, Dobbs N, et al. Innate immune activation by cGMP-AMP nanoparticles leads to potent and long-acting antiretroviral response against HIV-1. J Immunol. 2017;199(11):3840–3848. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1700972
151. Astorga-Gamaza A, Vitali M, Borrajo ML, et al. Antibody cooperative adsorption onto AuNPs and its exploitation to force natural killer cells to kill HIV-infected T cells. Nano Today. 2021;36:101056. doi:10.1016/j.nantod.2020.101056
152. Mikelez-Alonso I, Magadán S, González-Fernández Á, Borrego F. Natural killer (NK) cell-based immunotherapies and the many faces of NK cell memory: a look into how nanoparticles enhance NK cell activity. Adv Drug Delivery Rev. 2021;176:113860. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2021.113860
153. Sabzehali S. Nanomaterials in drug delivery systems: challenges and perspectives. Eurasian J Chem Med Pet Res. 2025;4(1):96–110.
154. Panyam J, Labhasetwar V. Sustained cytoplasmic delivery of drugs with intracellular receptors using biodegradable nanoparticles. Mol Pharmaceut. 2004;1(1):77–84.
155. Paul S, Mukherjee S, Banerjee P. Recent advancement in nanomaterial-encapsulated drug delivery vehicles for combating cancer, COVID-19, and HIV-like chronic diseases. Mater Adv. 2023;4(9):2042–2061. doi:10.1039/D2MA01075E
156. Deutsc G, Phillips NC, Tsoukas CM. Phase-I study of liposomal- azidothymidine (AZT) in advanced HIV disease.
157. Rossi JJ, June CH, Kohn DB. Genetic therapies against HIV. Nat Biotechnol. 2007;25(12):1444–1454. doi:10.1038/nbt1367
158. Li C, Guan X, Du T, et al. Inhibition of HIV-1 infection of primary CD4+ T-cells by gene editing of CCR5 using adenovirus-delivered CRISPR/Cas9. J Gen Virol. 2015;96(8):2381–2393. doi:10.1099/vir.0.000139
159. Xu L, Yang H, Gao Y, et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated CCR5 ablation in human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells confers HIV-1 resistance in vivo. Mol Ther. 2017;25(8):1782–1789. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.04.027
160. Shahbazi R, Sghia-Hughes G, Reid JL, et al. Targeted homology-directed repair in blood stem and progenitor cells with CRISPR nanoformulations. Nature Mater. 2019;18(10):1124–1132. doi:10.1038/s41563-019-0385-5
161. Dash PK, Kaminski R, Bella R, et al. Sequential LASER ART and CRISPR treatments eliminate HIV-1 in a subset of infected humanized mice. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2753. doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10366-y
162. Yin L, Hu S, Mei S, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 inhibits multiple steps of HIV-1 infection. Human Gene Ther. 2018;29(11):1264–1276. doi:10.1089/hum.2018.018
163. Hultquist JF, Hiatt J, Schumann K, et al. CRISPR–Cas9 genome engineering of primary CD4+ T cells for the interrogation of HIV–host factor interactions. Nat Protocol. 2019;14(1):1–27. doi:10.1038/s41596-018-0069-7
164. Bogerd HP, Kornepati AV, Marshall JB, Kennedy EM, Cullen BR. Specific induction of endogenous viral restriction factors using CRISPR/Cas-derived transcriptional activators. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2015;112(52):E7249–E7256. doi:10.1073/pnas.1516305112
165. Dufour C, Claudel A, Joubarne N, et al. Editing of the human TRIM5 gene to introduce mutations with the potential to inhibit HIV-1. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0191709. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0191709
166. Dzmitruk V, Apartsin E, Ihnatsyeu-Kachan A, Abashkin V, Shcharbin D, Bryszewska M. Dendrimers show promise for siRNA and microRNA therapeutics. Pharmaceutics. 2018;10(3):126. doi:10.3390/pharmaceutics10030126
167. Zhou J, Neff CP, Liu X, et al. Systemic administration of combinatorial dsiRNAs via nanoparticles efficiently suppresses HIV-1 infection in humanized mice. Mol ther. 2011;19(12):2228–2238. doi:10.1038/mt.2011.207
168. Perisé-Barrios AJ, Jiménez JL, Domínguez-Soto A, et al. Carbosilane dendrimers as gene delivery agents for the treatment of HIV infection. J Control Release. 2014;184:51–57. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.03.048
169. Weber N, Ortega P, Clemente MI, et al. Characterization of carbosilane dendrimers as effective carriers of siRNA to HIV-infected lymphocytes. J Control Release. 2008;132(1):55–64. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2008.07.035
170. Briz V, Serramía MJ, Madrid R, et al. Validation of a generation 4 phosphorus-containing polycationic dendrimer for gene delivery against HIV-1. Curr Med Chem. 2012;19(29):5044–5051. doi:10.2174/0929867311209025044
171. Liu X, Liu C, Zhou J, et al. Promoting siRNA delivery via enhanced cellular uptake using an arginine-decorated amphiphilic dendrimer. Nanoscale. 2015;7(9):3867–3875. doi:10.1039/C4NR04759A
172. Liu X, Zhou J, Yu T, et al. Adaptive amphiphilic dendrimer-based nanoassemblies as robust and versatile siRNA delivery systems. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2014;53(44):11822–11827.
173. Gonzalo T, Clemente MI, Chonco L, et al. Gene therapy in HIV-infected cells to decrease viral impact by using an alternative delivery method. ChemMedChem. 2010;5(6):921–929. doi:10.1002/cmdc.201000029
174. Jiménez JL, Clemente MI, Weber ND, et al. Carbosilane dendrimers to transfect human astrocytes with small interfering RNA targeting human immunodeficiency virus. BioDrugs. 2010;24(5):331–343. doi:10.2165/11538400-000000000-00000
175. Campbell GR, Zhuang J, Zhang G, et al. CD4+ T cell-mimicking nanoparticles encapsulating DIABLO/SMAC mimetics broadly neutralize HIV-1 and selectively kill HIV-1-infected cells. Theranostics. 2021;11(18):9009. doi:10.7150/thno.59728
176. Kovochich M, Marsden MD, Zack JA, Sommer P. Activation of latent HIV using drug-loaded nanoparticles. PLoS One. 2011;6(4):e18270. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0018270
177. Tombácz I, Laczkó D, Shahnawaz H, et al. Highly efficient CD4+ T cell targeting and genetic recombination using engineered CD4+ cell-homing mRNA-LNPs. Mol Ther. 2021;29(11):3293–3304. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2021.06.004
178. Cevaal PM, Kan S, Fisher BM, et al. Efficient mRNA delivery to resting T cells to reverse HIV latency. Nat Commun. 2025;16(1):4979. doi:10.1038/s41467-025-60001-2
179. Wallet C, De Rovere M, Van Assche J, et al. Microglial cells: the main HIV-1 reservoir in the brain. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:362. doi:10.3389/fcimb.2019.00362
180. Garrido C, Margolis DM. Translational challenges in targeting latent HIV infection and the CNS reservoir problem. J Neurovirol. 2015;21(3):222–226. doi:10.1007/s13365-014-0269-z
181. Wu D, Chen Q, Chen X, Han F, Chen Z, Wang Y. The blood–brain barrier: structure, regulation and drug delivery. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):217. doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01481-w
182. Zha S, Liu H, Li H, et al. Functionalized nanomaterials capable of crossing the blood–brain barrier. ACS Nano. 2024;18(3):1820–1845. doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c10674
183. Singh R, Lillard JW Jr. Nanoparticle-based targeted drug delivery. Exp Mol Pathol. 2009;86(3):215–223. doi:10.1016/j.yexmp.2008.12.004
184. Roy U, Drozd V, Durygin A, et al. Characterization of nanodiamond-based anti-HIV drug delivery to the brain. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):1603. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-16703-9
185. Kanazawa T, Akiyama F, Kakizaki S, Takashima Y, Seta Y. Delivery of siRNA to the brain using a combination of nose-to-brain delivery and cell-penetrating peptide-modified nano-micelles. Biomaterials. 2013;34(36):9220–9226. doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.08.036
186. Garrido C, Simpson CA, Dahl NP, et al. Gold nanoparticles to improve HIV drug delivery. Future Med Chem. 2015;7(9):1097–1107. doi:10.4155/fmc.15.57
187. Huang Y, Guo X, Wu Y, et al. Nanotechnology’s frontier in combatting infectious and inflammatory diseases: prevention and treatment. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2024;9(1):34. doi:10.1038/s41392-024-01745-z
188. NCT00711230 CD. ClinicalTrials database: NCT00711230: repeated DermaVir immunizations in HIV-1 infected treatment-naïve patients (GIEU006). 2020.
189. NCT00712530CD. ClinicalTrials database: NCT00712530: single DermaVir Immunization in HIV-1 infected patients on HAART (GIHU004). 2013.
190. Haynes BF. New approaches to HIV vaccine development. Curr Opin Immunol. 2015;35:39–47. doi:10.1016/j.coi.2015.05.007
191. NCT02178800 CD. ClinicalTrials database: NCT02178800: evaluating the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of an investigational, injectable HIV medicine (GSK1265744) in HIV-uninfected adults. 2021.
192. NCT00740584 CD. ClinicalTrials database: NCT00740584: retention and duration of activity of SPL7013 (VivaGel®) after vaginal dosing. 2018.
193. McCarthy TD, Karellas P, Henderson SA, et al. Dendrimers as drugs: discovery and preclinical and clinical development of dendrimer-based microbicides for HIV and STI prevention. Mol Pharmaceut. 2005;2(4):312–318. doi:10.1021/mp050023q
194. Tyssen D, Henderson SA, Johnson A, et al. Structure activity relationship of dendrimer microbicides with dual action antiviral activity. PLoS One. 2010;5(8):e12309. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0012309
195. McGowan I, Gomez K, Bruder K, et al. Phase 1 randomized trial of the vaginal safety and acceptability of SPL7013 gel (VivaGel) in sexually active young women (MTN-004). AIDS. 2011;25(8):1057–1064. doi:10.1097/QAD.0b013e328346bd3e
196. Moscicki A-B, Kaul R, Ma Y, et al. Measurement of mucosal biomarkers in a phase 1 trial of intravaginal 3% StarPharma LTD 7013 gel (VivaGel) to assess expanded safety. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2012;59(2):134–140. doi:10.1097/QAI.0b013e31823f2aeb
197. ClinicalTrials Database: NCT02165202: phase II Safety and Acceptability of an Investigational Injectable Product, TMC278LA, for Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis (TMC278LA). 2018. Available from: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02165202?term=NCT02165202&rank=1.
198. Fiandra L, Colombo M, Mazzucchelli S, et al. Nanoformulation of antiretroviral drugs enhances their penetration across the blood brain barrier in mice. Nanomedicine. 2015;11(6):1387–1397. doi:10.1016/j.nano.2015.03.009
199. Mielke D, Tuyishime M, Kelkar NS, et al. Computationally selected multivalent HIV-1 subtype C vaccine protects against heterologous SHIV challenge. Vaccines. 2025;13(3):231. doi:10.3390/vaccines13030231
200. Shen X, Korber B, Spreng RL, et al. A pentavalent HIV-1 subtype C vaccine containing computationally selected gp120 strains improves the breadth of V1V2 region responses. Vaccines. 2025;13(2):133. doi:10.3390/vaccines13020133
201. Zhang Y-N, Paynter J, Antanasijevic A, et al. Single-component multilayered self-assembling protein nanoparticles presenting glycan-trimmed uncleaved prefusion optimized envelope trimers as HIV-1 vaccine candidates. Nat Commun. 2023;14(1):1985. doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37742-z
202. Leggat DJ, Cohen KW, Willis JR, et al. Vaccination induces HIV broadly neutralizing antibody precursors in humans. Science. 2022;378(6623):eadd6502. doi:10.1126/science.add6502
203. Cohen KW, De Rosa SC, Fulp WJ, et al. A first-in-human germline-targeting HIV nanoparticle vaccine induced broad and publicly targeted helper T cell responses. Sci trans med. 2023;15(697):eadf3309. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.adf3309
204. Mitchell MJ, Billingsley MM, Haley RM, Wechsler ME, Peppas NA, Langer R. Engineering precision nanoparticles for drug delivery. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2021;20(2):101–124. doi:10.1038/s41573-020-0090-8
205. Belal R, Gad A. Zinc oxide nanoparticles induce oxidative stress, genotoxicity, and apoptosis in the hemocytes of Bombyx mori larvae. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3520. doi:10.1038/s41598-023-30444-y
206. Xuan L, Ju Z, Skonieczna M, Zhou PK, Huang R. Nanoparticles‐induced potential toxicity on human health: applications, toxicity mechanisms, and evaluation models. MedComm. 2023;4(4):e327. doi:10.1002/mco2.327
207. Chopra S, Venkatesan N, Betageri GV. Liposomes as nanocarriers for anti-HIV therapy. Drug Delivery Transl Res. 2013;3(5):471–478. doi:10.1007/s13346-013-0134-2
208. Cunha RF, Simões S, Carvalheiro M, Pereira JMA, Costa Q, Ascenso A. Novel antiretroviral therapeutic strategies for HIV. Molecules. 2021;26(17):5305. doi:10.3390/molecules26175305
209. Wang Z, Ma W, Fu X, et al. Development and applications of mRNA treatment based on lipid nanoparticles. Biotechnol Adv. 2023;65:108130. doi:10.1016/j.biotechadv.2023.108130
210. Ejazi SA, Louisthelmy R, Maisel K. Mechanisms of nanoparticle transport across intestinal tissue: an oral delivery perspective. ACS Nano. 2023;17(14):13044–13061. doi:10.1021/acsnano.3c02403
211. Islam S, Ahmed MMS, Islam MA, et al. Advances in nanoparticles in targeted drug delivery-a review. Results Surf Interf. 2025;100529.
212. Zhu Y-S, Wu J, Zhi F. Advances in conjugate drug delivery system: opportunities and challenges. Int J Pharm. 2024;667:124867. doi:10.1016/j.ijpharm.2024.124867
213. Ruan S, Tang J, Qin Y, et al. Mechanical force-induced dispersion of starch nanoparticles and nanoemulsion: size control, dispersion behaviour, and emulsified stability. Carbohydr. Polym. 2022;275:118711. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2021.118711
214. Chen X, Chen Y, Zou L, et al. Plant-based nanoparticles prepared from proteins and phospholipids consisting of a core–multilayer-shell structure: fabrication, stability, and foamability. J Agric Food Chem. 2019;67(23):6574–6584. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.9b02028
215. Caparco AA, González-Gamboa I, Hays SS, Pokorski JK, Steinmetz NF. Delivery of nematicides using TMGMV-derived spherical nanoparticles. Nano Lett. 2023;23(12):5785–5793. doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01684
216. Zhao F, Wang J, Zhang Y, et al. In vivo fate of targeted drug delivery carriers. Int J Nanomed. 2024:6895–6929. doi:10.2147/IJN.S465959
217. Suk JS, Xu Q, Kim N, Hanes J, Ensign LM. PEGylation as a strategy for improving nanoparticle-based drug and gene delivery. Adv Drug Deliv Rev. 2016;99(Pt A):28–51. doi:10.1016/j.addr.2015.09.012
218. Sharma G, Sharma AR, Bhattacharya M, Lee SS, Chakraborty C. CRISPR-Cas9: a preclinical and clinical perspective for the treatment of human diseases. Mol ther. 2021;29(2):571–586. doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.09.028
219. Rose BI, Brown S. Genetically modified babies and a first application of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR-Cas9). Obstetrics Gynecol. 2019;134(1):157–162. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000003327
220. Zhao T, Cai Y, Jiang Y, et al. Vaccine adjuvants: mechanisms and platforms. Signal Transduct Target Ther. 2023;8(1):283.
221. Sliepen K, Schermer E, Bontjer I, et al. Interplay of diverse adjuvants and nanoparticle presentation of native-like HIV-1 envelope trimers. NPJ Vaccines. 2021;6(1):103. doi:10.1038/s41541-021-00364-x
222. Kasturi SP, Rasheed MAU, Havenar-Daughton C, et al. 3M-052, a synthetic TLR-7/8 agonist, induces durable HIV-1 envelope–specific plasma cells and humoral immunity in nonhuman primates. Sci Immunol. 2020;5(48):eabb1025. doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.abb1025
223. Villarreal R, Casale TB. Commonly used adjuvant human vaccines: advantages and side effects. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(9):2953–2957. doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.045
224. Batista-Duharte A, Martínez DT, Carlos IZ. Efficacy and safety of immunological adjuvants. Where is the cut-off? Biomed Pharmacother. 2018;105:616–624.
© 2025 The Author(s). This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The
full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms
and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution
- Non Commercial (unported, 4.0) License.
By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted
without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly
attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.
Recommended articles
pH/Redox Dual-Responsive Drug Delivery System with on-Demand RGD Exposure for Photochemotherapy of Tumors
Li Y, Nie J, Dai J, Yin J, Huang B, Liu J, Chen G, Ren L
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2022, 17:5621-5639
Published Date: 23 November 2022
Multifunctional Nanoparticles Codelivering Doxorubicin and Amorphous Calcium Carbonate Preloaded with Indocyanine Green for Enhanced Chemo-Photothermal Cancer Therapy
Yu J, Wang L, Xie X, Zhu W, Lei Z, Lv L, Yu H, Xu J, Ren J
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2023, 18:323-337
Published Date: 18 January 2023
From Pioneering Discoveries to Innovative Therapies: A Journey Through the History and Advancements of Nanoparticles in Breast Cancer Treatment
Basingab FS, Alshahrani OA, Alansari IH, Almarghalani NA, Alshelali NH, Alsaiary AH, Alharbi N, Zaher KA
Breast Cancer: Targets and Therapy 2025, 17:27-51
Published Date: 21 January 2025
Mucoadhesive-to-Mucopenetrating Nanoparticles for Mucosal Drug Delivery: A Mini Review
Zheng B, Liu D, Qin X, Zhang D, Zhang P
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2025, 20:2241-2252
Published Date: 20 February 2025
Progress in the Application of Novel Nanomaterials in Targeted Therapy for Liver Cancer
Wei X, Cao W, Wang S, Zhang Y, Gao Z, Wang S, Yao L, Zhang Z, Li X, Deng W, Xie Y, Li M
International Journal of Nanomedicine 2025, 20:2623-2643
Published Date: 3 March 2025
