Pre-Surgical Endovascular Proximal Feeder Artery Devascularization Technique for the Treatment of Cranial Arteriovenous Malformations
Received 2 January 2020
Accepted for publication 6 May 2020
Published 19 May 2020 Volume 2020:16 Pages 181—191
Checked for plagiarism Yes
Review by Single anonymous peer review
Peer reviewer comments 2
Editor who approved publication: Dr Daniel Duprez
Khaled Alawneh,1 Bashar Abuzayed,2 Majdi Al Qawasmeh,3 Liqaa Raffee,4 Abdelwahab Aleshawi5
1Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan; 2Department of Neurosurgery, The Specialty Hospital, Amman, Jordan; 3Department of Neuroscience, Division of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan; 4Department of Accident and Emergency, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid 22110, Jordan; 5King Abdullah University Hospital, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
Correspondence: Khaled Alawneh
Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan
Email [email protected]
Objective: Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) aims to abolish any risk for intracranial hemorrhage with the preservation of the patient’s functional status. We present the technique of pre-surgical endovascular devascularization through proximal feeder artery occlusion for the treatment of cranial AVMs rather than nidus occlusion. Also, we highlight the advantages and the possible clinical indications.
Patients and Methods: Two patients with brain AVM and one patient with scalp AVM were treated by pre-surgical endovascular devascularization followed by surgical resection. Endovascular devascularization was performed by occlusion of the AVM feeders only with Liquid Embolic System Agent (Onyx®) 18 without entering and filling the nidus. During surgery, feeding arteries colored with the black color of the Liquid Embolic System Agent were clearly identified and cut. Dissection of the AVM was performed, and resection of the nidus was achieved.
Results: Total resection of the AVM was achieved in all cases confirmed with follow-up angiographies, with no neurologic or systemic complications. Also, no major bleeding was detected. In addition, the surgical clips were avoided during surgery. Brain AVMs were safely resected in piecemeal fashion.
Conclusion: Pre-surgical endovascular proximal feeder artery devascularization technique shows to be a safe, simple and effective technique for the management of cranial arteriovenous malformations. This technique simplifies both the endovascular and surgical approaches to complicated cranial AVM cases.
Keywords: angiography, arteriovenous malformation, devascularization, endovascular, surgical resection
Cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are uncommon intracranial lesions usually presenting as brain hemorrhage with an annual risk of bleeding of 2–4%.1 The main aim of the treatment of AVMs is to reduce or eliminate the risk of intracranial hemorrhage and to preserve or restore the patient’s functional status.1,2 Their management presents a technical challenge. AVMs are still challenging vascular lesions because they are a heterogeneous pathological entity, varying in their shape, location, size, and hemodynamics, with an unpredictable, despite developments in endovascular, surgical, and microsurgical management modalities.2 The treatment of choice is microsurgical resection because it can achieve a selective AVM resection because it excludes the AVM immediately and definitively.3 For patients with a high risk of morbidity, endovascular approach, radiosurgery, or multidisciplinary combined approaches are options to be considered.1,2
In this article, we present our technique of pre-surgical proximal artery endovascular devascularization for the treatment of cranial AVMs with discussion of the indications and the favorable features of this technique with practical application in demonstrative cases.
Patients and Methods
Two patients with bleeded brain AVM and one patient with scalp AVM were treated by pre-surgical endovascular devascularization followed by surgical resection. The main principle of pre-surgical endovascular AVM embolization is to occlude only the feeding arteries to decreases the intranidal blood flow and volume without the need to enter and embolize the nidus. In this way, we facilitate the intra-surgical planning and resection of the nidus by previous occlusion and marking (coloring) of the feeding arteries for the surgeon before resection, instead of the intra-surgical investigation, testing, and clipping of the patent feeders (Figure 1A–C).
After performing diagnostic 6-vessel cerebral angiography, a detailed study of the vascular architecture is done and main arterial feeders are identified to be targeted for endovascular occlusion. Very small feeders difficult to access and thought to be with minimal impact upon nidus feeding can be excluded. Planning of the occlusion also includes the site of the occlusion of the marked arteries in a way to be as proximal as possible to the nidus without being an arterial branch supplying normal brain tissue distal to the occlusion site. The patient then is operated under general anesthesia by endovascular technique to inject Liquid Embolic System Agent (LESA) (Onyx® 18, Micro-Therapeutics, Inc., Irvine, CA) slowly to occlude the marked feeding arteries and visualize significant reduction of blood flow inside the nidus. Onyx® or LESA is a non-adhesive liquid embolic agent comprising ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide and suspended micronized tantalum powder to provide contrast for visualization under fluoroscopy. Options about the timing to carry on surgical resection are variable. The patient can be operated surgically directly after the endovascular de-vascularization under the same anesthesia or surgery can be delayed but not more than few days.
Under general anesthesia and proper position of the patient according to the location of the AVM craniotomy is performed. No large craniotomies extending far beyond the limits of the AVM are needed for tracking the feeder arteries. Upon the previous knowledge of the angiographic anatomy of the AVM and the site of the occluded arteries, direct dissection toward these arteries can be performed safely. First, the risk of bleeding is significantly decreased and the AVM becomes shrinked. Also, and very importantly, no need for detailed dissection of the feeding arteries and test them with occlusion test or intraoperative indocyanine green angiography (ICG) because these arteries are already marked with the dark color of the LESA. These dark colored arteries are already occluded and known to be the main feeders; therefore, safe cutting and separation of these arteries can be done. Also, during the circumferential dissection of the nidus when these feeders are not exposed yet, safe coagulation of the nidus and even of the main venous drainage can be done as the AVM is already de-vascularized similar to any AVM after clipping the feeding arteries. Moreover, in cases of large, bulky and irregular shaped AVM’s, the resection in piecemeal fashion becomes feasible with this technique and the overall operation becomes similar to the resection of low vascularized tumors. Thus, offering more safe and short-time surgery for the patient.
A 17-year-old male patient was first referred to emergency service 8 years ago with a complaint of sudden onset loss of consciousness at the age of 9 years. Brain computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed intracerebral and intraventricular hemorrhage with acute hydrocephalus. Six-vessel cerebral angiography was performed and demonstrated large splenium AVM supplied from distal branches of A5 segment of left anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and the lateral posterior choroidal artery branch of the left posterior cerebral artery (PCA). The venous drainage was seen directly into the vein of Galen (Spetzler-Martin Grade IV) (Figure 2A–D). At that time, external ventricular drain was placed followed by ventriculoperitoneal shunt. No surgical intervention for the AVM was performed at that time . For 8 years, the patient suffered from recurrent bleeding with an average of 1 bleed a year and mean hospital stay of 3 months/year. At the end, the patient was referred to our outpatient clinic and we decided to operate the patient with pre-surgical endovascular devascularization technique followed by surgical resection.
Under general anesthesia, and through endovascular approach by right femoral artery access, AVM feeder from the left A5 segment and left lateral posterior choroidal artery were sealed with LESA. Post-embolization, brain angiography revealed regression of the nidus (Figure 2E–H). Three days after, the patient was operated with neuronavigation-guided posterior left interhemispheric approach. During the surgery, the feeder artery was identified with its dark color marked by LESA and cut. Circumferential dissection of the AVM was performed with minimal bleeding and the AVM was resected totally in piecemeal fashion with no vascular clips and with estimated blood loss of about 250 mL (Figure 3A–C). Postoperatively, the patient had uneventful recovery with no post-operative complications. After one-year postoperatively, cerebral angiography was done and showed total resection of the AVM (Figure 3D–H).
A 5-year-old boy was presented to our emergency department with sudden onset of seizure attacks for the first time. After controlling the seizure and stabilizing the patient, neurological examination revealed left arm paresis with motor power of 2/5.
Brain CT scan and MRI revealed right frontal hemorrhage (Figure 4A). Six-vessel cerebral angiography revealed right small cortical AVM fed from distal branches of the upper division of M5 segment of the middle cerebral artery and draining to superficial cortical vein emptying into the superficial sylvian vein (Spetzler-Martin Grade I) (Figure 4B and C).
Similar to Case 1, under general anesthesia and through endovascular technique by right femoral artery access, AVM suppliers from the M5 segment were occluded with LESA. Post-embolization, angiography of the brain showed resolution of the AVM nidus (Figure 4D and E). After 4 days, the patient was operated neuronavigation-guided right frontoparietal craniotomy. During the early stage of the surgery, the feeder artery was identified with its dark color marked by LESA and cut. Total resection of the AVM in piecemeal fashion with no vascular clips and with estimated total blood loss of 150 mL (Figure 5A–D). Postoperatively, the boy achieved uneventful recovery without postoperative complications. The left arm power improved to normal. In addition, cerebral angiography was performed after 1 year and demonstrated total resection of the AVM (Figure 5E and F).
A 26-year-old lady patient presented to our emergency department complaining of exacerbated headache and swelling of the left upper eye lid. On examination, a pulsatile soft swelling near the eye led and the left frontal scalp was found without neurological deficits. MRI and CT scan revealed left frontal and periorbital soft swelling with soft tissue signal and subcutaneous flow void signs. Accordingly, six-vessel cerebral angiography was conducted and demonstrated left frontal scalp AVM fed from the external and internal carotid arteries. From the external carotid artery, it supplied from right and left superficial temporal. On the other hand, from the internal carotid artery, it is fed from the left supraorbital artery, a branch of the ophthalmic artery. The venous drainage reaches the superior sagittal sinus through a pore from the bony skull (Figure 6A–D).
Under sedative anesthesia and analgesia, through the endovascular procedure (starting from the right femoral artery), bilateral superficial temporal arteries were occluded with LESA. Post-embolization, angiography was conducted and revealed complete resolution of the nidus with remaining of the supraorbital artery as the single main feeder for the AVM (Figure 6E–G). Two days following, the dilated supraorbital artery was ligated and excised through left eye-brow incision. In addition, left fronto-temporal skin incision was created and the flap was dissected and retracted in sub-periosteal fashion, leaving the AVM attached to the flap. During the retraction, the main venous drainage and bone pore was coagulated and occluded with bone wax. Dissection and retraction of the flap was continued until the superior orbital rim. The AVM was sealed and dissected from the peri-galeal plane to be totally resected (Figure 6A–D). The wound was closed and a drain was left beneath the flap. No intraoperative vascular clips were utilized, nor blood transfusion was needed, with blood loss of about 200mL (Figure 7A–F).
Postoperatively, the patient was discharged without complications. After one-year, cerebral angiography revealed no recurrence of the AVM nidus with normal intact superior sagittal sinus flow (Figure 6E and F).
Total resection of the AVM was done in all cases, without any neurologic or systemic complications. No major bleeding occurred, nor surgical clips were used during surgery. Follow-up cerebral angiography for the patients after 1 year showed complete absence of the malformations. Brain AVMs were safely resected in piecemeal fashion.
AVM treatment is challenging and the approach for management of such cases should be multidisciplinary: a cure may be achieved by surgery, radiosurgery, neurointerventional surgery, or a combination of these methods. The endovascular approach for AVM can achieve a reduction of AVM nidus dimension prior to surgery or it can eliminate associated vascular lesion such as aneurysms and fistulas.3
The standard management for AVM is the surgical resection whenever possible.3 According to a study by Fleetwood and Steinberg, when surgery is performed by expert vascular neurosurgeons, 94–100% of the small nidus AVMs can achieve an angiographic cure with low morbidity rates (from 1% to 10%).4 These percentages significantly vary with the treatment of bigger lesions located in critical brain regions, namely Spetzler and Martin grade IV and V AVMs, and angiographic cure may be obtained only in 22% and 17%, respectively, of the cases.4 Hartmann et al reported in their study that 3% of patients sustained surgery-related disabling neurologic symptoms and 32% of patients suffered from surgery-related non-disabling neurological deficits.5 van Beijnum et al stated in their meta-analysis that complete AVM occlusion can be achieved in 96% of patients who underwent microsurgery with a permanent complication rate of 7.4%.6
The advantage of utilization of pre-surgical embolization is down-grade the high inoperable Spetzler-Martin grade lesions to lower-grade operable lesions.7 Through several mechanisms, embolization can improve surgical outcomes of AVMs. These include reduction of the dimensions of the active nidus, occlusion of deep feeding arteries, and elimination of the feeding pedicle or nidal aneurysms that have either bled or are at risk of bleeding.7 Furthermore, pre-surgical embolization can act as a surgical guidance as embolized vessels are easily identifiable. Mostly, neurointerventionalist can achieve a selective embolization of the deep feeders in the opposite site of the surgical operation field through the utilization of LESA rather than glue to improve surgical resectability. New studies showed the safety and efficacy of combined endovascular embolization and microsurgical removal of AVMs in the hybrid operating room.8 Killory et al described the advantage of using green indocyanine to allow visualizing residual portions of AVMs during surgery to maximize surgical benefits.9
Although the final goal of AVM therapy is the complete obliteration of its nidus, this is not always possible. An endovascular approach can be applied in various approaches, such as embolization prior to surgery/radiosurgery, to treat vascular anomalies with an AVM (aneurysms and fistulas), as a curative therapy or in a palliation setting (ie, alleviation of blood flow steal symptoms).10 Through the most distal part of the feeding artery, nidal embolization can be performed by the microcatheter to allow the embolisate to be deposited into the nidus rather than the feeding artery.11,12 This allows the reduction of nidal size dimensions with no risk of persistence of the AVM and the following development of additional feeders. Moreover, it facilitates the down-grading of high-grade AVMs. As the AVMSs become lower-grade, the surgical resection or radiosurgery can be easily performed. Unfortunately, this technique is difficult to perform and needs very skilled hands. The endovascular embolization of the nidus can be performed as an adjuvant treatment before surgery due to the benefits discussed earlier. Recently, a transvenous approach has been developed and it can be done only in selected cases. These selected cases include high-flow venous side aneurysm occlusion which is not possible to navigate the microcatheter through small and tortuous arteries to reach the AVM nidus or when surgery or radiosurgery cannot be performed.13
After endovascular only approach, successful AVM obliteration occurred in 13% cases; however, complications leading to permanent neurological deficits or death occurred in 6.6% after embolization, which is higher compared with those in studies in which adjunctive embolization was the goal.6,14 Given the high complication rate related to a primary embolization approach, the risks and benefits of such a treatment strategy should be discussed among a multidisciplinary team. According to a late literature review by Mosimann and Chapot, lack of homogenous control groups, and poor compliance to PRISMA reporting guidelines in most of the interventional literature, it was unable to obtain solid data and perform a statistical meta-analysis on the safety and effectiveness of curative embolization.15 Conger et al recommended avoidance of over-embolization of AVM feeding arteries as this technique may lead to hypertrophy of deep white matter feeders that may cause more risk of post-embolization bleeding when endovascular-alone treatment is decided or in technical complexity during surgical resection when post-embolization microsurgical intervention is planned.3
Endovascular management of an AVM should not be done to reduce seizure frequency because seizures attacks themselves in AVM were not a predictor of rupture. On the other hand, endovascular procedure can cause a higher rate morbidity and mortality.16 Also, growing evidence from the literature shows that AVM bleeding is not totally excluded after even total embolization of the AVM and case reports documented LESA resorption with AVM recanalization after complete AVM obliteration.17,18
Radiosurgery can be used successfully in selected cases of high-grade AVMs (mostly IV and V grade lesions) which is considered to be inoperable or prone to severe or fatal complications if treated with other types of procedures. An important limitation of radiosurgery is the latency for devascularization results which reaches usually 2 years’ time from treatment (can be up to 4 years), a period during which patients are exposed to hemorrhagic risks comparable to non-operated.19 The second limitation concerns the radiosurgical target volume effect upon adjacent structures, which may lead to an iatrogenic morbidity.19 Complete obliteration is demonstrated in 50–90% of the cases and its rate is inversely related to the AVM nidus size.20,21 Also, radiosurgery may be limited by complications leading to permanent neurological deficits or death in 5.1% of the cases.6
In our technique, pre-surgical AVM feeder embolization is an effective and more simple technique than nidus occlusion. This is obvious in cases of diffuse-type nidus in which the total embolization is challenging. Also, this obvious in cases of direct high flow venous output into a major and/or deep vein where there is more risk of glue emboli of these veins. The post-embolization angiography and intra-operative findings showed significant reduction of the blood flow and volume in the AVM which facilitated the surgical resection without any major bleeding and nor using clips. This also facilitated the surgical resection by giving the chance of piecemeal fashion resection. The angiographic views of the AVM’s in our cases are rarely seen in the general practice as the general concept is to enter and embolize the nidus -totally or partially - whenever it is possible to reach the nidus by the microcatheter. Another important advantage of this technique during surgery is previous marking (coloring) of the feeding arteries. With the previous knowledge of the surgeon about the embolized arteries and their anatomic relation to the nidus, intro-operative identification of these arteries is facilitated as these arteries look (colored) darker due to the LESA. Thus, efforts to identify the feeders by extended dissection to track these arteries, occlusion test and/or using intraoperative ICG are reduced. Even in cases where the feeders are located in deep planes, partial resection in piecemeal fashion is applicable safely until exposing these arteries, as shown in our cases. Also, it is considered cost-effective due to using less embolic agents compared to endovascular approaches aiming for partial or complete embolization of the nidus before surgery.
Pre-surgical endovascular proximal feeder artery devascularization technique shows to be simple, safe, and effective technique for the treatment of cranial arteriovenous malformations. This technique simplifies both the endovascular and surgical approaches to complicated cranial AVM cases. Also, it is considered cost-effective due to using less embolic agents compared to endovascular approaches aiming to embolize the nidus. We believe that this technique can gain popularity and can be applied to more cases that would be published in the future in the literature.
Data Sharing Statement
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author.
Ethics and Patient Consent
Written informed consent was obtained from the patients for publication. Institutional approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at Jordan University of Science and Technology. This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.
1. Ajiboye N, Chalouhi N, Starke MR, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation and management. Sci World J. 2014;2014:649036.
2. Abecassis IJ, Xu DS, Batjer HH, Bendok BR. Natural history of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review. Neurosurg Focus. 2014;37:E7. doi:10.3171/2014.6.FOCUS14250
3. Conger A, Kulwin C, Lawton MT, et al. Diagnosis and evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations. Surg Neurol Int. 2015;6:76. doi:10.4103/2152-7806.156866
4. Fleetwood IG, Steinberg GK. Arteriovenous malformations. Lancet. 2002;359(9309):863–873. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)07946-1
5. Hartmann A, Mast H, Mohr JP, et al. Determinants of staged endovascular and surgical treatment outcome of brain arteriovenous malformations. Stroke. 2005;36(11):2431–2435. doi:10.1161/01.STR.0000185723.98111.75
6. van Beijnum J, van der Worp HB, Buis DR, et al. Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;306(18):2011–2019. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1632
7. Bruno CA
8. Grüter BE, Mendelowitsch I, Diepers M, et al. Combined endovascular and microsurgical treatment of arteriovenous malformations in the hybrid operating room. World Neurosurg. 2018;117:e204–e214. doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.05.241
9. Killory D, Nakaji P, Gonzales LF, et al. Prospective evaluation of surgical microscope-integrated intraoperative near-infrared indocyanine green angiography during cerebral arteriovenous malformation surgery. Neurosurgery. 2009;65(3):456–462. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000346649.48114.3A
10. Fiorella D, Albuquerque FC, Woo HH, et al. The role of neuroendovascular therapy for the treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2006;59(5Suppl 3):S163–S177. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000237544.20452.47
11. Krings T, Hans FJ, Geibprasert S, et al. Partial “targeted” embolisation of brain arteriovenous malformations. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:2723–2731. doi:10.1007/s00330-010-1834-3
12. van Rooij WJ, Jacobs S, Sluzewski M, et al. Curative embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations with onyx: patient selection, embolization technique, and results. Am J Neuroradiol. 2012;33:1299–1304. doi:10.3174/ajnr.A2947
13. Kessler I, Riva R, Ruggiero M, et al. Successful transvenous embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations using onyx in five consecutive patients. Neurosurgery. 2011;69:184–193. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e318212bb34
14. Wu EM, El Ahmadieh TY, McDougall CM, et al. Embolization of brain arteriovenous malformations with intent to cure: a systematic review. J Neurosurg. 2019;1:1–12.
15. Mosimann PJ, Chapot R. Contemporary endovascular techniques for the curative treatment of cerebral arteriovenous malformations and review of neurointerventional outcomes. J Neurosurg Sci. 2018;62(4):505–513. doi:10.23736/S0390-5616.18.04421-1
16. Lv X, Li Y, Jiang C, et al. Brain arteriovenous malformation and endovascular treatment: effect on seizures. Interv Neuroradiol. 2010;16(1):39–45. doi:10.1177/159101991001600105
17. Bauer AM, Bain MD, Rasmussen PA. Onyx resorbtion with AVM recanalization after complete AVM obliteration. Interv Neuroradiol. 2015;21(3):351–356. doi:10.1177/1591019915581985
18. Sy ECN, Melot A, Troude L, et al. Delayed hemorrhagic complication after complete embolization of a brain arteriovenous malformation. Neurochirurgie. 2018;64(4):316–320. doi:10.1016/j.neuchi.2018.04.005
19. Rubin A, Brunswick A, Riina H, et al. Advances in radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations of the brain. Neurosurgery. 2014;74(suppl 1):S50–S59. doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000219
20. Kano H, Lunsford LD, Flickinger JC, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations. Part 1. management of Spetzler-Martin grade I and II arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2012;116:11–20. doi:10.3171/2011.9.JNS101740
21. Peschillo S, Caporlingua A, Colonnese C, et al. Brain AVMs: an endovascular, surgical, and radiosurgical update. Sci World J. 2014;834931:1–6. doi:10.1155/2014/834931
This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.Download Article [PDF]