Back to Journals » Clinical Ophthalmology » Volume 14

Performance of Two Photoscreeners Enhanced by Protective Cases

Authors Martin SJ, Htoo HE, Hser N, Arnold RW

Received 26 February 2020

Accepted for publication 8 May 2020

Published 25 May 2020 Volume 2020:14 Pages 1427—1435

DOI https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S251451

Checked for plagiarism Yes

Review by Single-blind

Peer reviewer comments 2

Editor who approved publication: Dr Scott Fraser


Video abstract of "Performance of two photoscreeners enhanced by protective cases" [ID 251451].

Views: 136

Samuel Joseph Martin,1 Hser Eh Htoo,2 Nay Hser,2 Robert W Arnold1

1Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Anchorage, AK, USA; 2Jungle School of Medicine Kawthoolei, Karen State, Burma (Myanmar)

Correspondence: Robert W Arnold
Alaska Blind Child Discovery, Anchorage, AK, USA
Tel +1 907561-1917
Email eyedoc@alaska.net

Background: Photoscreeners provide valid, cost-effective early detection of amblyopia risk factors; however, they require proper illumination, flash intensity, pupil dilation and patient cooperation. The Kaleidos case for the 2WIN infrared photoscreener fixes focal distance, decreases luminance and provides electric power. GoCheck Kids (GCK) has developed a flash-concentrating case for the Apple iPhone 7 Plus smartphone to reduce exposure time.
Methods: In remote Burmese and urban Alaskan clinics, Kaleidos and GCK were used before a confirmatory eye examination using 2013 AAPOS uniform guidelines validation, including some older patients. 2WIN refraction was compared to a cycloplegic examination using J0 and J45 vector transformation.
Results: In total, 48 Burmese patients and 114 Alaskan patients aged 8± 6 years were evaluated utilizing 2013 amblyopia risk factor guidelines. Kaleidos, with 13 Burmese inconclusives, had a sensitivity of 84%, specificity of 65% and positive predictive value (PPV) of 63%. GCK, with only six inconclusives, had a sensitivity of 63%, specificity of 83% and PPV of 73%, with sensitivity improving to 74% with central expert interpretation. Kaleidos closely matched cycloplegic refraction, with intraclass correlations of 0.47 for J0 vector and 0.57 for J45 vector. The protective cases provided clearer images and better pupil dilation than similar devices without cases.
Conclusion: Both devices detected amblyopia risk factors well. GCK gave fewer inconclusive results even with the Asian eyelid configuration, while Kaleidos matched sphere and cylinder refraction. The specialized housing enhanced the performance of the 2WIN and GCK photoscreeners, improving the speed and reliability of amblyopia screening and refraction, even in populous and luminous locations.
Clinical Trials Registry: NCT04068129.

Keywords: pediatric vision screening, amblyopia, instrument-based screening, validation
 

Creative Commons License This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution - Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License. By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms.

Download Article [PDF]  View Full Text [HTML][Machine readable]